Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Document SpockM, SpockCtxM, WebStateM, WebStateT, ActionT, ActionCtxT #109

Open
Profpatsch opened this issue Feb 7, 2017 · 2 comments
Open

Comments

@Profpatsch
Copy link

Profpatsch commented Feb 7, 2017

All of these types have no docstrings, and it’s not obvious what part of the stack they represent. Thus as a user one has to infer it by clicking through type aliases (practically every time, since the naming scheme is not at all obvious and hard to remember).

@agrafix
Copy link
Owner

agrafix commented Feb 7, 2017

Would you like to help with this via PR?

@Profpatsch
Copy link
Author

I can try, of course you’d have to annotate.

# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants