Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

#

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Jump to bottom

Spock-core should have a reroute >= 0.7 constraint #180

Open
sternenseemann opened this issue Jul 26, 2022 · 2 comments
Open

Spock-core should have a reroute >= 0.7 constraint #180

sternenseemann opened this issue Jul 26, 2022 · 2 comments

Comments

@sternenseemann
Copy link

Otherwise compilation will fail with:

[8 of 8] Compiling Web.Spock.Core   ( src/Web/Spock/Core.hs, dist/build/Web/Spock/Core.o, dist/build/Web/Spock/Core.dyn_o )

src/Web/Spock/Core.hs:26:5: error:
    Not in scope: type constructor or class ‘AltVar’
   |
26 |     AltVar (..),
   |     ^^^^^^^^^^^

Adjusting the bound via a Hackage revision probably prevents people from running into this by accident, which seems kind of likely since stackage LTS 19 pins reroute to 0.6.
@sternenseemann
Copy link
Author

Additionally, it seems to me that 0.14.0.1 is an PVP violation, it should have been 0.14.1.0 since it newly exported AltVar?!

sternenseemann added a commit to NixOS/nixpkgs that referenced this issue Jul 26, 2022
@sternenseemann
haskellPackages.Spock-core: build with correct reroute version
57055b6 
Spock-core 0.14.0.1 now only supports reroute >= 0.7 because it exports
the new AltVar type (in an [PVP violation]).

We can luckily accomodate Spock-core, since all other [reverse deps] of
reroute are marked broken in nixpkgs at the moment.

[PVP violation]: agrafix/Spock#180 (comment)
[reverse deps]: https://packdeps.haskellers.com/reverse/reroute
@Zialus Zialus mentioned this issue Aug 2, 2022
Open
@Bodigrim
Copy link

Bodigrim commented Nov 1, 2022

As a Hackage trustee I made the necessary revision:
https://hackage.haskell.org/package/Spock-core-0.14.0.1/revisions/

# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@Bodigrim @sternenseemann