Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

After loading (cemerick.austin.repls/exec), austin fails with "No value supplied for key:" #75

Open
rterbush opened this issue Apr 1, 2015 · 4 comments

Comments

@rterbush
Copy link

rterbush commented Apr 1, 2015

Found the magic to get austin, piggieback and cljs to compile, but when running (cemeric.austin.repls/exec) it fails with the following error in the repl.

Please let me know what I can do to help track this down.

IllegalArgumentException No value supplied for key: cemerick.austin.DelegatingExecEnv@4fd7d1f4  clojure.lang.PersistentHashMap.create (PersistentHashMap.java:77)
@cemerick
Copy link
Owner

cemerick commented Apr 1, 2015

The problem is that Austin has not yet been updated to work with the latest piggieback. Coming soon.

jumarko added a commit to jumarko/austin that referenced this issue May 11, 2017
There was an issue when trying to start browser-connected repl:
 [{:type java.lang.IllegalArgumentException
   :message "No value supplied for key: cemerick.austin.DelegatingExecEnv@1d1e650e"
   :at [clojure.lang.PersistentHashMap create "PersistentHashMap.java" 77]}]
 :trace
 [[clojure.lang.PersistentHashMap create "PersistentHashMap.java" 77]
  [cemerick.piggieback$cljs_repl invokeStatic "piggieback.clj" 212]
  [cemerick.piggieback$cljs_repl doInvoke "piggieback.clj" 212]
  [clojure.lang.RestFn applyTo "RestFn.java" 139]
  [clojure.core$apply invokeStatic "core.clj" 650]
  [clojure.core$apply invoke "core.clj" 641]
  [cemerick.austin.repls$cljs_repl invokeStatic "repls.clj" 49]
  [cemerick.austin.repls$cljs_repl doInvoke "repls.clj" 43]

See cemerick#75.
@jumarko
Copy link

jumarko commented May 11, 2017

Not sure if this is the whole story, but that particular point can be solved by simple fix: jumarko@2302a3e#diff-7f3a30706a736e2d43f5b9174d97c73eL49

@cemerick
Copy link
Owner

I'll apply a PR if you send it.

FWIW, I use figwheel exclusively at this point, which is why I've not addressed this myself already.

@jumarko
Copy link

jumarko commented May 12, 2017

I've created the pull request: #77
Yes, it definitely makes sense to use figwheel nowadays for most of the work.
I was just playing with different alternatives :).

# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants