Skip to content

PatchWork AutoFix #49

New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

PatchWork AutoFix #49

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

codelion
Copy link
Owner

@codelion codelion commented Jun 29, 2024

This pull request from patched fixes 1 issues.


  • File changed: main.py
    Fix unencrypted HTTP requests and command injection vulnerability Replaced 'http://' with 'https://' in the proxies and URL, and changed 'subprocess.call' to use 'shell=False' to mitigate command injection risks.

@codelion codelion force-pushed the autofix-master branch 29 times, most recently from 6fdac03 to 6768c74 Compare July 6, 2024 14:02
@patched-codes patched-codes bot deleted a comment from github-actions bot Jul 8, 2024
@codelion codelion force-pushed the autofix-master branch 9 times, most recently from 21fdc13 to fdae94b Compare August 2, 2024 12:30
@codelion codelion force-pushed the autofix-master branch 16 times, most recently from ce3e591 to 38f100b Compare August 13, 2024 17:03
Copy link

The pull request aims to enhance security by transitioning from unencrypted HTTP to HTTPS, addressing some vulnerabilities, but raises concerns about a potential bug related to user input handling for command execution. Although the shift to a list format for subprocess.call reduces certain command injection risks, it fails to adequately validate or sanitize user input, leaving the system open to unintended behavior. Furthermore, the changes do not comply with established coding standards for input validation and error handling, highlighting the need for these practices to ensure both the security and reliability of the code.


  • File changed: main.py
    The pull request addresses some security vulnerabilities by switching from unencrypted HTTP to HTTPS. However, a potential bug arises from the way the user input for the command execution is handled. While switching to a list format for subprocess.call does mitigate some command injection risks, it does not validate or sanitize the user input properly. A user could still provide unexpected input, leading to unintended behavior. Additionally, the current change does not adhere to any established coding standards or practices for input validation and error handling, which should be considered to ensure the security and reliability of the code.

# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant