From 763d361434c8cce5d9549bfd5947799788d78a75 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "A. Jiang" <de34@live.cn>
Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2025 15:40:00 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] [fs.op.copy] Replace non-`codeblock`s with `outputblock`s

These blocks are used for showing of directory hierarchy but not code,
so we should use `outputblock`.

Co-authored-by: Eelis van der Weegen <eelis@eelis.net>
---
 source/iostreams.tex | 12 ++++++------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/source/iostreams.tex b/source/iostreams.tex
index 1a5a1cc663..67764460d4 100644
--- a/source/iostreams.tex
+++ b/source/iostreams.tex
@@ -17372,16 +17372,16 @@
 \pnum
 \begin{example}
 Given this directory structure:
-\begin{codeblock}
+\begin{outputblock}
 /dir1
   file1
   file2
   dir2
     file3
-\end{codeblock}
+\end{outputblock}
 
 Calling \tcode{copy("/dir1", "/dir3")} would result in:
-\begin{codeblock}
+\begin{outputblock}
 /dir1
   file1
   file2
@@ -17390,10 +17390,10 @@
 /dir3
   file1
   file2
-\end{codeblock}
+\end{outputblock}
 
 Alternatively, calling \tcode{copy("/dir1", "/dir3", copy_options::recursive)} would result in:
-\begin{codeblock}
+\begin{outputblock}
 /dir1
   file1
   file2
@@ -17404,7 +17404,7 @@
   file2
   dir2
     file3
-\end{codeblock}
+\end{outputblock}
 \end{example}
 \end{itemdescr}