Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

display fault proof status for chains #857

Open
tessr opened this issue Jan 20, 2025 · 5 comments
Open

display fault proof status for chains #857

tessr opened this issue Jan 20, 2025 · 5 comments
Assignees

Comments

@tessr
Copy link
Contributor

tessr commented Jan 20, 2025

When we planned the Superchain Registry initially, we didn't expect chains to spend an extended period of time on permissioned FPs: We thought everyone would get quickly to permissionless FPs (and Stage 1). But as more chains spend a longer time with permissioned FPs, we need a way to call out the distinction (and the Superchain Index wants this info as well).

We should detect and display whether chains are on:

  • Permissionless FPs
  • Permissioned FPs
  • No FPs (still using the L2OO)

And display this in the chainList.json/toml files.

@bitwiseguy
Copy link
Collaborator

How to Tell If a Chain Runs Fault proofs: link

@alfonso-op
Copy link

Reassigned to @yashvardhan-kukreja based on our discussion earlier this week.

@yashvardhan-kukreja
Copy link
Contributor

@bitwiseguy are you on the same page? Not exactly sure about the fact that the discussion being mentioned above included you as well explicitly.

I am happy to take over this but just mentioning this as a heads up so as to not step over any toes and do any duplicated work.

Thanks folks!

@alfonso-op
Copy link

@yashvardhan-kukreja just synced with Sam and he clarified he'll take this. Sorry for the noise!

@yashvardhan-kukreja
Copy link
Contributor

No problemo, cheers! Thanks for the clarification :)

# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: In Progress
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants