Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Have you considered table editing use case? #63

Closed
anaran opened this issue Sep 15, 2013 · 4 comments
Closed

Have you considered table editing use case? #63

anaran opened this issue Sep 15, 2013 · 4 comments
Labels

Comments

@anaran
Copy link

anaran commented Sep 15, 2013

Hi!

Perhaps I just missed this feature trying to find it in your docs/examples.

Editing of spreadsheet-like JSON data could be a great use of jsoneditor!

Is this already possible today?

Would you consider it for the future?

Some (read-only display) ideas may be had at following resources.

(I also opened marianoguerra/json.human.js#15, then I found your issue entry there, so I came here because I like your integration with jsonlint very much)

See
https://developers.google.com/chrome-developer-tools/docs/tips-and-tricks#console-table

and the original
http://getfirebug.com/wiki/index.php/Console_API#console.table.28data.5B.2C_columns.5D.29
(see also http://www.softwareishard.com/blog/firebug/tabular-logs-in-firebug/)

@josdejong
Copy link
Owner

nice idea!

Can be very powerful when implemented right, but it is a bit tricky. A lot of edge cases, and making everything editable can be an interesting challenge. One question is how to specify whether some array can be displayed as a table or not. Few options that come to mind:

@josdejong
Copy link
Owner

Maybe we could implement this as another mode for the JSONEditor, which only supports A JSON document containing an array with flat objects, to keep things simple.

@josdejong josdejong changed the title Have you considered table editing use case? (console.table(object[, columns]); might provide more ideas) Have you considered table editing use case? Jul 28, 2014
@josdejong
Copy link
Owner

Rethinking this, I think it's a bit out of scope. I will close this issue now.

@josdejong
Copy link
Owner

This feature request is opened again and continued in #402.

@josdejong josdejong reopened this Jun 28, 2017
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants