You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi everyone. I'm sorry for the slow response and thanks for checking.
I had the RNN working back in 2023 and did use it, but I don't remember anymore why we didn't conclude and merged that. I think that main received some changes and diverged from my fork and I didn't have the chance to conform. I would be excited to see RNN implemented in main, even better with LSTM and all the other variations. If what I did is helpful, please take it and move it forward, otherwise, fell free to close that branch and do it on your way. Whatever @milancurcic thinks is the most efficient and better way to move forward, works for me.
Tomorrow evening I'll look in my archives to remind myself what I did and update #162 with what I find.
Thanks @castelao, no worries. The main reason why I didn't push it to conclusion yet was because it remained marked as draft so I thought the design was still changing. Getting that PR up to speed should be easy (and I can do it too, if needed). Just mark it as ready for review if you think it is.
Particularly, RNN, SimpleRNN, LSTM, and GRU.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: