-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14
New issue
Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? # to your account
Pip-installability #19
Comments
Hi @arogozhnikov, I also made some effort to migrate to Based on my tests it works, but it would definitely require more testing from their side. About using version 2020.04.23 - at the time it was due to this bug, not sure if it has been fixed yet: oxpig/ANARCI#17 |
thanks, that's looks like a gross issue for a numbering tool |
Hey David, I've checked current ANARCI (main branch) and it does not have this exact issue that you posted (oxpig/ANARCI#17). I've updated my version with what is in the main branch right now, installable with
However it still fails the same test in AbNumber, and now additionally fails germline assignment
I'm a bit lost here, because ANARCI is widely used, but it is neither actively developed, nor produces coherent results across the versions, and doesn't have any tests that would confirm the absence of regressions - so I don't expect any future version to pass your tests either. |
Hi David,
I've challenged myself to move ANARCI from conda to pip, I've seen you previously have been working on same task in your fork.
you can find result here, currently mimics 2021.02.04, still requires
hmmer
binary installedhttps://github.com/arogozhnikov/microANARCI
It fails AbNumber tests (just as conda version).
Question: why do you think that older version is more correct? Everyone seems to use the latest from conda.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: