Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

feat: Uniswap designated caller #876

Closed
1 task done
Tracked by #843
LHerskind opened this issue Jun 19, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #901
Closed
1 task done
Tracked by #843

feat: Uniswap designated caller #876

LHerskind opened this issue Jun 19, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #901
Assignees
Labels
T-feature-request Type: Adding a brand new feature (not to be confused with improving an existing feature).

Comments

@LHerskind
Copy link
Contributor

LHerskind commented Jun 19, 2023

Add designated caller as mentioned in #843 to the Uniswap flow, ensuring that only Uniswap portal can spend initiate the consumption of the input asset withdraw on asset portal.

A successful implementation will ensure that:

  • Test abusing that designated is not used right now:
    • Consume the message first, making it impossible to execute the swap
    • Fix the below and see that same test will reject initial consumption by other party
  • Include uniswap address in message sent to asset portal as "designated caller"

Depends on

Preview Give feedback
  1. feature
    rahul-kothari
@LHerskind LHerskind added this to A3 Jun 19, 2023
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this to Todo in A3 Jun 19, 2023
@LHerskind LHerskind added the T-feature-request Type: Adding a brand new feature (not to be confused with improving an existing feature). label Jun 19, 2023
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from Todo to Done in A3 Jun 23, 2023
@iAmMichaelConnor iAmMichaelConnor removed this from A3 Jul 26, 2023
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
T-feature-request Type: Adding a brand new feature (not to be confused with improving an existing feature).
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants