Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

#

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Jump to bottom

Task: Yaml naming convensions for Storage/Blob #950

Closed
melonrush13 opened this issue Apr 15, 2020 · 0 comments · Fixed by #951
Closed

Task: Yaml naming convensions for Storage/Blob #950

melonrush13 opened this issue Apr 15, 2020 · 0 comments · Fixed by #951
Assignees
@melonrush13

Comments

@melonrush13
Copy link
Contributor

melonrush13 commented Apr 15, 2020 •
edited
Loading

What this task is about

  • All YAML files should use the same naming convention inside the spec for resourcegroup as: resourceGroup: resourcegroup-azure-operators
  • If a resource is the child of a parent, we should make sure the naming conventions match each other to avoid confusion
  • Currently, BlobContainer.Yaml does not follow this pattern

Done criteria

  • Fix resourcegroupname inside of the blobcontainer.yaml to be consistent
  • Make accountname the same name for all childs/parents who use it.

User story reference

#
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Assignees

@melonrush13 melonrush13

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

Fixes BlobContainer's naming convension inside yaml to match parent
1 participant
@melonrush13