Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Misplaced ASTs?... #745

Open
christinawlindberg opened this issue Nov 19, 2021 · 1 comment
Open

Misplaced ASTs?... #745

christinawlindberg opened this issue Nov 19, 2021 · 1 comment

Comments

@christinawlindberg
Copy link
Contributor

christinawlindberg commented Nov 19, 2021

This is a reminder for me to investigate the potential placement of input ASTs, specifically in the edge cases where the fractional coverage area is less the 50%. I originally assumed that setting the fraction higher would just remove the tiles from the viable area for placing ASTs, but I have a suspicion (based on the image below) that all it's doing is setting the source density to 0.0 which shouldn't be happening.

16235_SMC-879ne-11082_inputAST_positions.pdf

@karllark
Copy link
Member

Yeah, that looks bad. So many ASTs near the edges.

# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants