-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 34
New issue
Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? # to your account
pwalign #3361
Comments
Hi @hpages Thanks for submitting your package. We are taking a quick The DESCRIPTION file for this package is:
|
pwalign contains the The motivations for this split are:
H. |
I can pass this into building the reports however it will fail until the latest version of Biostrings is available. |
Biostrings 2.71.5 (latest version) is already on nebbiolo1 so we should be good to go. |
It has not propagated yet https://bioconductor.org/checkResults/devel/bioc-LATEST/Biostrings/ |
It doesn't need to. It's on the machine. |
Your package has been added to git.bioconductor.org to continue the IMPORTANT: Please read this documentation for setting Bioconductor utilized your github ssh-keys for git.bioconductor.org |
Dear Package contributor, This is the automated single package builder at bioconductor.org. Your package has been built on the Bioconductor Single Package Builder. On one or more platforms, the build results were: "WARNINGS". Please see the build report for more details. The following are build products from R CMD build on the Single Package Builder: Links above active for 21 days. Remember: if you submitted your package after July 7th, 2020, |
The 2 WARNINGs were expected. One is about using RMarkdown instead of Sweave for the vignette. Note that the vignette was just taken from Biostrings and put in pwalign. You can see it here. It was written a long time ago by Patrick Aboyoun, the original author of the The other WARNING is about "Empty or missing \value sections found in man pages.". This is a false positive that I reported here yesterday. Let me know if you have questions. H. |
A reviewer has been assigned to your package for an indepth review. |
Hi Hervé, @hpages Thank you for your submission. Best regards, pwalign
DESCRIPTION
NAMESPACE
vignettes
R
weight <- as.integer(weight)
## instead of
if (!is.integer(weight))
weight <- as.integer(weight)
setMethod("compareStrings",
signature = c(pattern = "ANY", subject = "ANY"),
function(pattern, subject) {
compareStrings(as.character(pattern), as.character(subject))
})
tests
> covr::package_coverage(type = "all")
pwalign Coverage: 76.46%
R/AlignedXStringSet-class.R: 0.00%
R/align-utils.R: 38.89%
R/PairwiseAlignmentsSingleSubject-class.R: 39.22%
R/pairwiseAlignment.R: 49.49%
R/zzz.R: 50.00%
R/00datacache.R: 66.67%
R/stringDist.R: 71.76%
R/PairwiseAlignments-class.R: 72.22%
R/PairwiseAlignments-io.R: 86.01%
R/substitution_matrices.R: 87.76%
src/align_pairwiseAlignment.c: 89.47%
src/align_utils.c: 99.48%
R/InDel-class.R: 100.00%
src/R_init_pairwiseAlignment.c: 100.00% |
Received a valid push on git.bioconductor.org; starting a build for commit id: be1b36bf4fe64419cbcc64b9316c823fd576bb51 |
Dear Package contributor, This is the automated single package builder at bioconductor.org. Your package has been built on the Bioconductor Single Package Builder. On one or more platforms, the build results were: "WARNINGS". Please see the build report for more details. The following are build products from R CMD build on the Single Package Builder: Links above active for 21 days. Remember: if you submitted your package after July 7th, 2020, |
Thanks Marcel for the feedback.
Removed.
See my previous comment from 2 weeks ago above.
Removed.
I prefer that idiom over an unconditional FWIW this has hit me a few times in the past so I got into the habit of systematically using the
I simplified the
I disabled this. Rmpi has been in I might re-enable it at some point in the not too distant future but some serious testing will be required first. Also, this predates BiocParallel so the Rmpi approach might be completely obsolete, I don't know. Will need to revisit, test, assess, and decide what to do with it. Disclaimer: I've never used Rmpi myself (Patrick Aboyoun implemented this) .
Usually yes. I think maybe the reason Patrick didn't do it in this case is that the list of all possible values for the
My understanding is that this is acceptable when the upstream and client packages have the same maintainer, which is why H. |
Hi Hervé, @hpages |
Your package has been accepted. It will be added to the Thank you for contributing to Bioconductor! Reviewers for Bioconductor packages are volunteers from the Bioconductor |
The default branch of your GitHub repository has been added to Bioconductor's To use the git.bioconductor.org repository, we need an 'ssh' key to associate with your github user name. If your GitHub account already has ssh public keys (https://github.com/hpages.keys is not empty), then no further steps are required. Otherwise, do the following: See further instructions at https://bioconductor.org/developers/how-to/git/ for working with this repository. See especially https://bioconductor.org/developers/how-to/git/new-package-workflow/ to keep your GitHub and Bioconductor repositories in sync. Your package will be included in the next nigthly 'devel' build (check-out from git at about 6 pm Eastern; build completion around 2pm Eastern the next day) at https://bioconductor.org/checkResults/ (Builds sometimes fail, so ensure that the date stamps on the main landing page are consistent with the addition of your package). Once the package builds successfully, you package will be available for download in the 'Devel' version of Bioconductor using https://bioconductor.org/packages/pwalign If you have any questions, please contact the bioc-devel mailing list (https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel); this issue will not be monitored further. |
Update the following URL to point to the GitHub repository of
the package you wish to submit to Bioconductor
Confirm the following by editing each check box to '[x]'
I understand that by submitting my package to Bioconductor,
the package source and all review commentary are visible to the
general public.
I have read the Bioconductor Package Submission
instructions. My package is consistent with the Bioconductor
Package Guidelines.
I understand Bioconductor Package Naming Policy and acknowledge
Bioconductor may retain use of package name.
I understand that a minimum requirement for package acceptance
is to pass R CMD check and R CMD BiocCheck with no ERROR or WARNINGS.
Passing these checks does not result in automatic acceptance. The
package will then undergo a formal review and recommendations for
acceptance regarding other Bioconductor standards will be addressed.
My package addresses statistical or bioinformatic issues related
to the analysis and comprehension of high throughput genomic data.
I am committed to the long-term maintenance of my package. This
includes monitoring the support site for issues that users may
have, subscribing to the bioc-devel mailing list to stay aware
of developments in the Bioconductor community, responding promptly
to requests for updates from the Core team in response to changes in
R or underlying software.
I am familiar with the Bioconductor code of conduct and
agree to abide by it.
I am familiar with the essential aspects of Bioconductor software
management, including:
months, for bug fixes.
(optionally via GitHub).
For questions/help about the submission process, including questions about
the output of the automatic reports generated by the SPB (Single Package
Builder), please use the #package-submission channel of our Community Slack.
Follow the link on the home page of the Bioconductor website to #.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: