Option for "guessed licenses"

[neverendingqs]

Request: add an option that toggles matching for guessed licenses.

As per https://github.com/Brightspace/license-checker-ci/blob/master/bin/license-checker-ci?at=b5c57a7#L90 and:

An asterisk next to a license name means that it was deduced from an other file than package.json (README, LICENSE, COPYING, ...) You could see something like this:
~ https://github.com/davglass/license-checker/blob/master/README.md

the tool attempts to guess which licenses are used based on a file other than package.json.

Depending on the context, guessed licenses might be sufficient to satisfy licensing needs.

[jkehres]

Should we really be "guessing" when it comes to license compliance?

[neverendingqs]

It depends on how much you trust https://github.com/davglass/license-checker/blob/master/lib/license.js?r=f58b20c.

The current tool looks at package.json for "exact" checks, which doesn't necessarily have to be correct either. (To be fair, incorrect declarations in package.json could maybe be pushed back to the owner not declaring their license properly / IANAL).

[zommerfelds]

I agree with Jeff, but newer contributors to this project seem to like less strict checking. If less maintenance work is desired than that is fine with me. It would be nice to have official D2L guidelines about what is OK to do for automated license checking.

[zommerfelds]

For example we already made the assumption that minor version changes won't change the license.

[neverendingqs]

Feel free to close this - I'm happy without this with #50 and #51 on the horizon.