Add clientConfig to WS test

[spacesailor24]

We experience the issue mentioned in #3816 with our e2e_windows test suite, this aims to fix it

[render]

Your Render PR Server URL is https://web3-js-pr-4299.onrender.com.

Follow its progress at https://dashboard.render.com/static/srv-c4s29os1nok4ouigmvi0.

[coveralls]

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 1211808017

• 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
• 422 unchanged lines in 7 files lost coverage.
• Overall coverage decreased (-2.6%) to 72.908%

---

Files with Coverage Reduction	New Missed Lines	%
packages/web3-core-requestmanager/src/jsonrpc.js	1	88.0%
packages/web3-core-helpers/src/formatters.js	24	80.65%
packages/web3-core-helpers/src/errors.js	31	4.41%
packages/web3-utils/src/soliditySha3.js	55	5.13%
packages/web3-utils/src/index.js	62	29.31%
packages/web3-utils/src/utils.js	85	13.04%
packages/web3-eth-accounts/src/index.js	164	25.31%

Totals
Change from base Build 1195730440:	-2.6%
Covered Lines:	3324
Relevant Lines:	4310

---

💛 - Coveralls

[jdevcs]

One message can fit into one or more(if message is fragmented) data frames as https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc6455#section-5.6 ,

The default values are maxReceivedFrameSize 1MiB and maxReceivedMessageSize 8MiB
https://github.com/theturtle32/WebSocket-Node/blob/a2cd3065167668a9685db0d5f9c4083e8a1839f0/docs/WebSocketClient.md#client-config-options

Both maxReceivedFrameSize and maxReceivedMessageSize are made here around 95.3 MiB, which will hinder fragmentation and multiplexing https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc6455#section-5.4 in case of huge message.

Plus It will not make ws connection fail safe.

[nazarhussain]

As these are just the tests so be fine. But I agree with @jdevcs we should be using realistic values here.

[nazarhussain]

Apart form the point raised by @jdevcs LGTM.

[spacesailor24]

I'm going to close this until we start to see the error pop up again, so that we can test with values other than 100000000 to obtain a more reasonable value. Additionally, I'm not entirely convinced this is the solution