Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

#

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Jump to bottom

COMMON and EQUIVALENCE Analysis #26

Open
ben-brewer-codethink opened this issue Sep 2, 2016 · 0 comments
Open

COMMON and EQUIVALENCE Analysis #26

ben-brewer-codethink opened this issue Sep 2, 2016 · 0 comments
Assignees
@ben-brewer-codethink
Labels
enhancement

Comments

@ben-brewer-codethink
Copy link
Member

Currently we don't check that EQUIVALENCE statements are valid, and compatible with COMMON block rules.
To do this we'll need to generate a memory map, and error on any unresolvable conflicts.
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Assignees

@ben-brewer-codethink ben-brewer-codethink

Labels
enhancement
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@ben-brewer-codethink