Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

[Decoder Feedback]: #927

Open
winston-yallow opened this issue Jul 24, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

[Decoder Feedback]: #927

winston-yallow opened this issue Jul 24, 2024 · 2 comments
Labels
Documentation Item relates to documentation Needs Documentation Item requires supporting documentation

Comments

@winston-yallow
Copy link

Brand

ML-Train

Model

DRIVE-M with SUSI 4A [84004501]

Type

Multi-function with sound

Type (other)

No response

Firmware

No idea, I didn't change the default. If you can tell me how to check the exact firmware used then I'm happy to provide the version number.

Connector type

N/A (bare wires)

Connector type (other)

No response

ACK Settings

Default

Rating (out of 3)

3

Comments

NMRA compliant, so works perfectly fine. Tested most functions except sounds since I don't have a module for that currently.

@winston-yallow winston-yallow added the Needs Documentation Item requires supporting documentation label Jul 24, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot added the Documentation Item relates to documentation label Jul 24, 2024
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this to Backlog in DCC-EX Jul 24, 2024
@Asbelos
Copy link
Contributor

Asbelos commented Jul 25, 2024

Is this a dccex issue? we don't catalog supported decoders because there are 1000s of them. If however a decoder doesn't work with dccex, we endeavour to discover why in case we can accommodate its quirks with adjusted tuning parameters.
Jmri decoderpro does have this kind of information and if it does not recognise this decoder then the issue shoukd be raised with jmri.

@winston-yallow
Copy link
Author

winston-yallow commented Jul 25, 2024

I'm a bit confused then, because the existing list has 8 out of 13 entries rated at "3" for working perfectly without any adjustments.

Maybe the list should be cleaned up then if it's supposed to only list decoders with known quirks?

# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
Documentation Item relates to documentation Needs Documentation Item requires supporting documentation
Projects
Status: Backlog
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants