Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Distinguish identical items with a little marker (A, B, C, D, ...) #7662

Closed
ahydronous opened this issue Jan 4, 2022 · 3 comments
Closed

Comments

@ahydronous
Copy link

Proposed change

I think it would be neat if items of the same name would get a little marker in the bottom right so they are visually distinguishable from each other.

I am not versed in the Destiny API, but I assume there is some sort of ID attached to each item.
To me, A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, etc. would make the most sense as most of the other values that you see with an item are numerical.
There is the problem of how to assign the markers. If you do it based on acquired date, you run into the problem that you either A) have the markers constantly swapping as some of the identical items are dismantled or B) markers have to keep incrementing upwards.

How does this fit into your workflow?

This help when building loadouts, transferring stuff etc. since you don't have to check which item is which, and in some places in DIM (loadouts and one or two others that I can't remember) where you literally cannot watch item info.

@nev-r
Copy link
Member

nev-r commented Jan 5, 2022

i agree with the use case, but consider this to be a failure of some interfaces, like loadout editor, to let you click the polaroid to find out details.
actually, know what would be super cool in places we don't allow item popup?
image

@ahydronous
Copy link
Author

This problem has not been fixed at all @bhollis, can you reopen?

@bhollis
Copy link
Contributor

bhollis commented Mar 31, 2022

Not fixed, but closed. We won't be adding these indicators.

# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants