ontology issues

[VladimirAlexiev]

Comments based on the diagram in #94 (comment):

• Why do you need new classes Dataset, Distribution, DataService? You can apply your props to existing classes. IMHO only DataProduct is needed.
  • If it's not the intent to create subclasses, then show the namespace for each class, and do something about the pink "subclass" arrows (maybe make them dashed and without arrowheads)
• why add rdfs:label? dcat:Resource uses dct:title

More comments:

• Maybe informationSensitivityClassification should be raised to Resource because Distributions might have different sensitivity?
• https://ekgf.github.io/dprod/#securityschematype shows Range: dcat:SecuritySchemaType. But there is no such class in dcat, change it to dprod
• Similar for https://ekgf.github.io/dprod/#protocol: there is no dcat:Protocol
• dprod:Protocol claims to be "A detailed specification, possibly including a specific version, for how to communicate with a service." but has no properties. Either elaborate or delete this class

[rivettp]

Need to include info about classes (identifier etc) as we do for properties

[jgeluk]

@rivettp just to clarify/verify, we mean here that we want to show the prefix dcat: in front of class names like @VladimirAlexiev mentioned in his first bullet point right? Because we do not redefine those classes in OWL, they're just referred to from some shapes...