Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

consider standard protocol specification like AsyncAPI #6

Open
crotwell opened this issue Oct 12, 2022 · 2 comments
Open

consider standard protocol specification like AsyncAPI #6

crotwell opened this issue Oct 12, 2022 · 2 comments
Labels
later keep issue for possible future version of protocol

Comments

@crotwell
Copy link
Collaborator

Perhaps worth considering something like
https://www.asyncapi.com/docs
for standard way to specify the protocol.

I'm not sure if this is actually worth it, but probably should at least look into it as following a standard may be useful in generating api documentation, automated testing and interaction with tools, etc.

@andres-h
Copy link
Collaborator

Feedback from proposal team

This may be a good idea, but we wouldn’t want to hold up the specification. It can be added later.

@crotwell crotwell added the later keep issue for possible future version of protocol label Oct 23, 2023
@crotwell
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Agree, propose we leave this issue open for future consideration, but not be part of v4 spec.

# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
later keep issue for possible future version of protocol
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants