Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

security-command-center: no code sample to receive notifications for v2 API #9534

Open
hegemonic opened this issue Sep 24, 2024 · 0 comments
Assignees
Labels
priority: p2 Moderately-important priority. Fix may not be included in next release. samples Issues that are directly related to samples. triage me I really want to be triaged. type: bug Error or flaw in code with unintended results or allowing sub-optimal usage patterns.

Comments

@hegemonic
Copy link
Contributor

In which file did you encounter the issue?

Did you change the file? If so, how?

No

Describe the issue

In #9276, we added code samples that show how to manage notifications with the Security Command Center v2 API. However, we didn't add a v2 version of NotificationReceiver.java.

We need to create a v2 version of this sample, with the region tag securitycenter_receive_notifications_v2.

cc: @owenhuyn

@hegemonic hegemonic added type: bug Error or flaw in code with unintended results or allowing sub-optimal usage patterns. priority: p2 Moderately-important priority. Fix may not be included in next release. triage me I really want to be triaged. labels Sep 24, 2024
@product-auto-label product-auto-label bot added the samples Issues that are directly related to samples. label Sep 24, 2024
@iennae iennae assigned owenhuyn and unassigned kweinmeister Oct 4, 2024
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
priority: p2 Moderately-important priority. Fix may not be included in next release. samples Issues that are directly related to samples. triage me I really want to be triaged. type: bug Error or flaw in code with unintended results or allowing sub-optimal usage patterns.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants