Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Extend test cases with passing a named function #56

Open
timagixe opened this issue Jan 22, 2023 · 0 comments · May be fixed by #57
Open

Extend test cases with passing a named function #56

timagixe opened this issue Jan 22, 2023 · 0 comments · May be fixed by #57

Comments

@timagixe
Copy link

timagixe commented Jan 22, 2023

According to MDN (source):

If function name is omitted, it will be the variable name (implicit name).
If function name is present, it will be the function name (explicit name).

Code exmaple:

const foo = function () {};
foo.name // "foo"

const foo2 = foo;
foo2.name // "foo"

const bar = function baz() {};
bar.name // "baz"

I suggest extending test cases with the following case:

diff --git a/Exercises/4-methods.test b/Exercises/4-methods.test
index a408b22..78eb07d 100644
--- a/Exercises/4-methods.test
+++ b/Exercises/4-methods.test
@@ -10,11 +10,15 @@
         },
         m3(x, y, z) {
           return [x, y, z];
-        }
+        },
+        m4: function sum(x, y) {
+          return x + y;
+        },
       }, [
         ['m1', 1],
         ['m2', 2],
-        ['m3', 3]
+        ['m3', 3],
+        ['sum', 2],
       ]
     ],
   ]
@timagixe timagixe linked a pull request Jan 22, 2023 that will close this issue
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant