-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 156
New issue
Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? # to your account
Publish ledger specifications as CIPs and explicitly endorse the process #3178
Comments
Plus, this would lead the repository to display a nice badge 😂 |
cardano-foundation/CIPs#372 (comment) ☝️ relevant |
@abailly-iohk are you thinking one CIP per historical ledger era? With links in each CIP to the up-to-date CI build of the PDF? And links to the CDDL specs in this repo? I don't think we would want to get rid of the table in this readme. |
Yes.
For example. And/Or the source code, does not matter much.
Yes.
Your call, we could add a column with the proper link. Essentially, the CIPs could contain a summary with link to stable URLs. My idea is that by putting those specifications (more) in the limelight, we make it possible for them to be replicated, challenged, tested, extended, inspected, furthering the goal of turning Cardano into a proper Common |
I've put this up to endorse the CIP process: cardano-foundation/CIPs#456 I'm still on the fence about how best to handle "ledger eras" in the CIP process. I feel like they are closer to releases than CIP-able 🍵 things... |
The ledger is obviously a critical part of the Cardano as it embodies most of the rules governing how various parties interact with each other through the network. While there is a
Ledger
category, it seems the ledger project does not explicitly endorse the CIP process, along the lines of what Plutus project did in CIP-35. Following revised CIP-0001, there's now explicitly a section on project's endorsement: https://github.com/cardano-foundation/CIPs/tree/master/CIP-0001#project-enlistingAlso, it seems to me it could be worthwhile to publish all ledger specifications, past, present and future as CIPs, effectively replacing this list of PDFs/CDDLs
by a list of CIPs.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: