We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? # to your account
Currently, the OML concrete syntax involves a lot of repetition.
For example:
open terminology <http://example.org/foo> { ... concept A A extendsConcept B A extendsConcept C A extendsConcept D }
A Turtle-like syntax could help avoid repeating the concept like this:
open terminology <http://example.org/foo> { ... concept A [ extendsConcept B extendsConcept C extendsConcept D ] }
Note that it is important to retain the possibility of both syntaxes since OML statements can be asserted individually; for example:
open terminology <http://example.org/foo> { ... concept A [ extendsConcept B extendsConcept C ] }
open terminology <http://example.org/bar> { extends <http://example.org/foo> A extendsConcept D }
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
Currently, the OML concrete syntax involves a lot of repetition.
For example:
A Turtle-like syntax could help avoid repeating the concept like this:
Note that it is important to retain the possibility of both syntaxes since OML statements can be asserted individually; for example:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: