We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? # to your account
I just realized that we don't have a hasproperty(x, s) function, analogous to haskey. We could define one with the default definition:
hasproperty(x, s)
haskey
hasproperty(x, s::Symbol) = s in propertynames(x)
This came up in https://github.com/JuliaPy/PyCall.jl/pull/517/files#r212317623
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Relatedly, a hasfield function to accompany getfield/setfield! may be nice. This definition actually works for that:
hasfield
getfield
setfield!
hasfield(T::DataType, name::Symbol) = fieldindex(T, name, false) > 0
Sorry, something went wrong.
Agreed. I think the fallback may be isdefined though.
isdefined
hasproperty
No branches or pull requests
I just realized that we don't have a
hasproperty(x, s)
function, analogous tohaskey
. We could define one with the default definition:This came up in https://github.com/JuliaPy/PyCall.jl/pull/517/files#r212317623
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: