Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Followup regarding parallel_stable_sort from boost #219

Open
hendrikmuhs opened this issue May 2, 2021 · 0 comments
Open

Followup regarding parallel_stable_sort from boost #219

hendrikmuhs opened this issue May 2, 2021 · 0 comments

Comments

@hendrikmuhs
Copy link
Contributor

see #215, boostorg/sort#54, #218

Due to a segfault in the indexer, we switched the parallel sorting algorithm in #218 at least until the root cause has been found. parallel_stable_sort uses less memory according to the documentation. However we haven't run the 2 in a benchmark. Revisit when the root cause got fixed.

# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant