Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Newer .NET versions require PackageReadmeFile to be explicitly set #173

Closed
justalemon opened this issue May 24, 2024 · 0 comments
Closed
Labels
priority: p3 low A cosmetic bug or a new feature request status: completed The feature has been completed of the bug has been patched type: documentation This is a documentation improvement

Comments

@justalemon
Copy link
Member

I noticed this when building with .NET 7:

The package LemonUI.SHVDN3.2.1.0 is missing a readme. Go to https://aka.ms/nuget/authoring-best-practices/readme to learn why package readmes are important.
The package LemonUI.RagePluginHook.2.1.0 is missing a readme. Go to https://aka.ms/nuget/authoring-best-practices/readme to learn why package readmes are important.
The package LemonUI.AltV.2.1.0 is missing a readme. Go to https://aka.ms/nuget/authoring-best-practices/readme to learn why package readmes are important.
The package LemonUI.AltV.Async.2.1.0 is missing a readme. Go to https://aka.ms/nuget/authoring-best-practices/readme to learn why package readmes are important.
The package LemonUI.SHVDNC.2.1.0 is missing a readme. Go to https://aka.ms/nuget/authoring-best-practices/readme to learn why package readmes are important.
The package LemonUI.FiveM.2.1.0 is missing a readme. Go to https://aka.ms/nuget/authoring-best-practices/readme to learn why package readmes are important.
The package LemonUI.RageMP.2.1.0 is missing a readme. Go to https://aka.ms/nuget/authoring-best-practices/readme to learn why package readmes are important.
@justalemon justalemon added priority: p3 low A cosmetic bug or a new feature request status: acknowledged We are aware of the bug or feature request type: documentation This is a documentation improvement labels May 24, 2024
@justalemon justalemon added this to the 2.1 milestone May 24, 2024
@justalemon justalemon added status: completed The feature has been completed of the bug has been patched and removed status: acknowledged We are aware of the bug or feature request labels May 24, 2024
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
priority: p3 low A cosmetic bug or a new feature request status: completed The feature has been completed of the bug has been patched type: documentation This is a documentation improvement
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant