You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Accompanied by the change Emiss/emissivity -> SurfEmiss/emissivity for yamls in sith, source code in opsinputs should reflect the new naming convention.
@mikecooke77 I had forgotten about this issue. As of now, it doesn't seem too important to me. We could allow the old-style name to persist in yamls for VarObs Writer. What do you think?
We could do. I think at some point it would be nice to deal with but if its get forgotten in the sands of time then so be it. I think worth leaving the issue open.
The IODA naming conventions define the group
SurfEmiss
for surface emissivity:https://github.com/JCSDA-internal/ioda/blob/develop/share/ioda/yaml/validation/ObsSpace.yaml#L112.
However, in opsinputs
VarField_mwemiss
is mapped toEmiss/emissivity
.https://github.com/MetOffice/opsinputs/blob/develop/src/opsinputs/opsinputs_varobswriter_mod.F90#L861
Accompanied by the change
Emiss/emissivity
->SurfEmiss/emissivity
for yamls in sith, source code in opsinputs should reflect the new naming convention.See https://github.com/MetOffice/sith/issues/163.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: