Replies: 3 comments
-
Thanks for the feedback Calimore. I've always meant to fix the timestamps and then it somehow slips off the radar. I'll have a solution for this in the next release. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
I've decided to go with the filename safe version of ISO8601. But I'm not going to express the time in UTC or include the zone offset as I don't think that's necessary here. For Example:
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
I think that solves the decribed problem perfectly. Much appreciated! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
# for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
# to comment
-
Hey there,
as of now timestamps for archive filenames are kinda weirdly formatted without padding zero on single digit occurences like this:
m-d-yyyy-h-M-S
This is on one side hard to parse for external scripts or programs and also shows files listed by filename "out of order" (e.g. for incremental backups).
Would it be possible to add the option to change timestamps to a fixed width timestamp and something that sorts properly when listing files by name (like this maybe: YYYYmmdd-hhMMSS) OR maybe even supporting ISO8601 timestamps?
Thanks for taking the time to read this. Cheers and thanks for that awesome program!
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions