Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Evaluate using Profile-Guided Optimization (PGO) and LLVM BOLT #1185

Open
zamazan4ik opened this issue Oct 29, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

Evaluate using Profile-Guided Optimization (PGO) and LLVM BOLT #1185

zamazan4ik opened this issue Oct 29, 2023 · 0 comments

Comments

@zamazan4ik
Copy link

Hi!

Recently I checked Profile-Guided Optimization (PGO) improvements on multiple projects. The results are here. E.g. PGO results for LLVM-related tooling are here. According to the tests, PGO usually helps with the compiler and compiler-like workloads (like static analysis) - e.g. Clang gets +20% compilation speed with PGO. I think trying to optimize the Fuser compiler with PGO can be a good way to reduce Fuser's CPU usage.

I can suggest the following action points:

  • Perform PGO benchmarks on Fuser. If it shows improvements - add a note to the documentation about improvements in Fuser's compiler performance with PGO.
  • Providing an easier way (e.g. a build option) to build scripts with PGO can be helpful for the end-users and maintainers since they will be able to optimize the Fuser compiler according to their own workloads.
  • Optimize pre-built Fuser binaries.

Testing Post-Link Optimization techniques (like LLVM BOLT) would be interesting too (Clang and Rustc already use BOLT as an addition to PGO) but I recommend starting from the usual PGO.

Here are some examples of how PGO optimization is integrated in other projects:

# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant