Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

a question for the initializations about Beta in _mapnet.ini_ #42

Closed
yuzewang1998 opened this issue Jul 26, 2021 · 4 comments
Closed

a question for the initializations about Beta in _mapnet.ini_ #42

yuzewang1998 opened this issue Jul 26, 2021 · 4 comments

Comments

@yuzewang1998
Copy link

Hi Samarth,
I am implement your paper and I have a question for the initializations about Beta in mapnet.ini .I found that you set Beta = -3.0 in mapnet.ini ,and in your paper (Section 3.5. Implementation Details) you choose Beta = 0.0 instead.

image

Can I learn from you that which is the better initialization for Beta, and whether it has some reason to choose that initialization?
Thanks, waiting for your reply.

@samarth-robo
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @novasky0709! I think others have asked similar questions before. I have tried to compile hyper parameter information in this README based on those questions. Does it answer your question?

@yuzewang1998
Copy link
Author

Hi @samarth-robo ! Thanks for your reply .In that README ,beta was only explained the meaning (absolute pose) but wasn't given a value . So I think the initialization for Beta is the same as the paper . In paper , beta was initialized by 0.0 . In mapnet.ini, beta was initialized by -3.0. So I wonder if there's some reasons for that initialization.

@samarth-robo
Copy link
Contributor

@novasky0709 that README I linked has this line: "beta is the initial value of Gamma (Eq. 3 of the paper) for absolute pose".

@yuzewang1998
Copy link
Author

Thanks for your reply.

# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants