You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Which physics engines are there recommended, compatible with bitECS? Matter.js seems to be slow when using their API to get physical objects by ID. The alternative is to built ECS on top of matter.js instead of using matter.js on top of bitECS.
What could also be done is to creating a physics engine in Nate's bitECS style with components like Pos, Vec, Rectangle and the rest of the physics, but that'd mean to not use any of the existing physics libraries at all.
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
Which physics engines are there recommended, compatible with bitECS? Matter.js seems to be slow when using their API to get physical objects by ID. The alternative is to built ECS on top of matter.js instead of using matter.js on top of bitECS.
What could also be done is to creating a physics engine in Nate's bitECS style with components like
Pos,Vec,Rectangleand the rest of the physics, but that'd mean to not use any of the existing physics libraries at all.Any advices/ recommendations to go with?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions