You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Mar 31, 2023. It is now read-only.
You can use constraints to do what I want - effectively further filtering of machines to offers
Since there are fairly small set of resources on mesos (cpu, mem, gpu, bandwidth)... it's not really too bad to have 4 or even 10 (in the future) that are hard coded since for most workloads you'll need CPU + mem so the permutations are not that many ... w/ or w/out network, w/ or w/out gpu.. etc.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hello @senior7515 thank you, hope you find it useful.
Could you elaborate on what you mean by the OR operation here?
Fitness functions are expected to return a double value between 0.0 to 1.0. So, does your expression translate to, for example,
.withFitnessCalculator ( 0.1 | 0.4 | 0.67 )
Sounds like I may have misinterpreted your suggestion?
hi @spodila just testing out fenzo
Seeing the binpackingfitnescalculators.* it's effectively
Wondering if it'd be worth it to make it OR objects... so that one can do
Interested in a patch?
I guess two things:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: