You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This is the kind of provider or specialty as it appears in the source data. This includes physician specialties such as internal medicine, emergency medicine, etc. and allied health professionals such as nurses, midwives, and pharmacists.
Put the kind of provider as it appears in the source data. This field is up to the discretion of the ETL-er as to whether this should be the coded value from the source or the text description of the lookup value.
SUGGETION
This refers to the specific type of healthcare provider or field of expertise listed in the source data, encompassing physician specialties like internal medicine, emergency medicine, etc., as well as allied health professionals such as nurses, midwives, and pharmacists. It covers medical specialties like surgery, internal medicine, and radiology, while other services like prosthetics, acupuncture, and physical therapy fall under the domain of "Service."
The type of provider and their specialty should be entered as they appear in the source data. The decision to use either the coded value or the text description is left to the discretion of the ETL-er.
Descriptive Text for PROVIDER.SPECIALTY_SOURCE_VALUE
CDM or THEMIS convention?
CDM
Table or Field level?
Field
Is this a general convention?
One Field
Summary of issues
Summary of answer
Improve the text here:
https://ohdsi.github.io/CommonDataModel/cdm53.html#provider
Related links
Other comments/notes
Duplicate Providers? #161
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: