Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Question About "advect_iceberg_no_acc" in openberg.py #1465

Open
dayexingyang opened this issue Dec 20, 2024 · 3 comments
Open

Question About "advect_iceberg_no_acc" in openberg.py #1465

dayexingyang opened this issue Dec 20, 2024 · 3 comments

Comments

@dayexingyang
Copy link

Hi,

I have a question regarding the function "advect_iceberg_no_acc" in openberg.py at Line 462. Why does the implementation not use the iceberg velocity calculated in the previous time step as the initial velocity for the current time step? Instead, it relies on advect_iceberg_no_acc for computation. Could you please clarify the basis behind the formula used in advect_iceberg_no_acc?

Thanks. Looking forward to your response.

@knutfrode
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi, perhaps you can answer this question @AchrefAO ?

@AchrefAO
Copy link
Contributor

AchrefAO commented Jan 9, 2025

The no_acc function assumes that the iceberg has no inertia, so it reacts instantaneously to the forcings, regardless of the velocity in the previous time step. This seems like a very unrealistic assumption but in practise it does not change much the results. Hope that clarifies it.

@dayexingyang
Copy link
Author

The no_acc function assumes that the iceberg has no inertia, so it reacts instantaneously to the forcings, regardless of the velocity in the previous time step. This seems like a very unrealistic assumption but in practise it does not change much the results. Hope that clarifies it.

Thanks for your reply. It's an interesting setting.

# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants