Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
171 lines (86 loc) · 9.95 KB

key_elements.md

File metadata and controls

171 lines (86 loc) · 9.95 KB

Learning Objectives:

LO10a: To understand the needs of different stakeholder groups in scholarly communication, and the impact that Open Science can have on them.

LO10b: To be able to translate your knowledge into an effective program or tool for external engagement.

Key components:

  • What does it mean to be an 'advocate' for Open Science.

  • Advocating for your own rights as an author.

  • The basic steps for achieving local culture change (e.g., Kotter's 8-step change model of management).

  • Advocating to your peers, including writing letters and articles advocating for Open Science.

  • Talking to journal editors - catalysing the Open Access conversation within your field.

  • Talking to policymakers about Open Science.

  • Building or joining an Open Science community.

  • Effective leadership and training in Open Science, and empowering others to make change.

Who to involve:

  • Individuals: Josh Bolick (and colleagues, see the rebuttal article below), Johan Rooryck, April Clyburne-Sherin, Nick Shockey, Joseph McArthur, Heather Joseph, Nicole Allen, Erin McKiernan.

  • Organisations: R2RC, SPARC, Creative Commons, IGDORE.

  • Other: Country specific advocacy groups (e.g., AOASG, Open Access Nigeria), OpenCon.

Key resources:

Tools

Research Articles and Reports

Key posts

Other

Tasks:

  • Write a letter to your local political representative about why you think research is important.

    • What do politicians care about? Use this context to empathise with them and deliver your message effectively.
  • Send an email to an editor (or editorial board) of a 'closed access' journal in your field to start the OA conversation.

    • Is the journal OA already (or 'hybrid')? How much are APCs for it? Are there any cheaper alternatives they might not be aware of?
  • Does your research institute have a magazine, forum, or newsletter? Write a letter/post for it in support of Open Science.

  • Draft your own email template reply for requests to peer review about how you only review for OA journals.

    • Re-use/base it on ones out there already. What has worked or not worked so well in the past?
  • Outline opportunity costs for your university administrators on role of Open Science in hiring, tenure and promotion guidelines.

    • Outline concrete solutions and benefits Open Science can deliver for current headaches university administrators may struggle with.
  • Find your local Open Science advocacy group and volunteer for them!

    • Does one not exist yet? Why not start one! Local groups are a great way to meet like-minded individuals and work together.

    • Having a webpage like Meetup can help keep people engaged and aware of meetings.