You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It would be nice to be able to choose which operator to use for the indicators growing_season_start/growing_season_end. This is possible for the growing_season_length indicator. However, I find it a bit confusing if the default operator ">=" corresponds to the definition under Notes with Tmean > 5 degC and Tmean < 5 degC or if the default behaviour is Tmean >= 5 degC and Tmean <= 5 degC.
Potential Solution
No response
Additional context
No response
Contribution
I would be willing/able to open a Pull Request to contribute this feature.
Code of Conduct
I agree to follow this project's Code of Conduct
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Indeed, the same addition of the op argument of growing_season_length could be done to the other growing season indicators. FYI, >= is what is currently coded in the start and end functions,
And sorry for the confusing documentation, the default behaviour for growing_season_lenght is "T >= thresh" for a start and "T < thresh" (the boolean opposite) for an end.
Addressing a Problem?
It would be nice to be able to choose which operator to use for the indicators
growing_season_start/growing_season_end
. This is possible for thegrowing_season_length
indicator. However, I find it a bit confusing if the default operator ">=" corresponds to the definition under Notes withTmean > 5 degC and Tmean < 5 degC
or if the default behaviour isTmean >= 5 degC and Tmean <= 5 degC
.Potential Solution
No response
Additional context
No response
Contribution
Code of Conduct
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: