Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Support for Dreame S10+ (dreame.vacuum.r2211o) #571

Open
2 of 7 tasks
foudepc83 opened this issue Dec 10, 2024 · 2 comments
Open
2 of 7 tasks

Support for Dreame S10+ (dreame.vacuum.r2211o) #571

foudepc83 opened this issue Dec 10, 2024 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request new platform

Comments

@foudepc83
Copy link

Checklist

  • I have updated the integration to the latest version available
  • I have checked if the vacuum/platform is already requested
  • I have sent raw map file to piotr.machowski.dev [at] gmail.com (Retrieving map; please provide your GitHub username in the email)

What vacuum model do you want to be supported?

dreame.vacuum.r2211o

What is its name?

Xiaomi S10+ vacuum

Available APIs

  • xiaomi
  • viomi
  • roidmi
  • dreame

Errors shown in the HA logs (if applicable)

Found an unsupported model 'dreame.vacuum.r2211o' for class 'RoborockVacuum'.
If this is working for you, please open an issue at https://github.com/rytilahti/python-miio/


Got error when receiving: {'code': -9999, 'message': 'user ack timeout'}

And blue camera " failed to retrieve map from vacuum "

Other info

I am using a Dreame S10+ (dreame.vacuum.r2211o) with the Xiaomi Cloud Map Extractor integration in Home Assistant. However, the integration fails to recognize the model and returns the following log

@Tasshack
Copy link

https://github.com/Tasshack/dreame-vacuum/releases/tag/v2.0.0b16

@suskozaver
Copy link

this ticket should be closed as i have the same model and it works with @Tasshack integration

# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request new platform
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants