-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 803
New issue
Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? # to your account
mangle exported functions for PyPy #3040
Conversation
I think the existing news fragment is sufficient. Thanks! bors r+ |
3040: mangle exported functions for PyPy r=adamreichold a=mattip Continuation of #3031. This [turned up](https://github.com/pypy/binary-testing/actions/runs/4390086363/jobs/7688256133#step:6:179) in the run of PyPy 3.10 HEAD against PyO3 HEAD. Should I add a new news fragment or is the one from #3031 sufficient? Co-authored-by: Matti Picus <matti.picus@gmail.com>
Build failed: |
@mattip Could you have a look at the build failure in https://github.com/PyO3/pyo3/actions/runs/4396220835/jobs/7698525481 ? Does this need a version limit? |
Yes, there should be a version guard. Only PyPy3.10 mangles the name of |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sorry I had a pending review comment, just posted - we can do #[cfg_attr(all(PyPy, Py_3_10), ...)]
Co-authored-by: David Hewitt <1939362+davidhewitt@users.noreply.github.com>
bors retry |
Build succeeded: |
Continuation of #3031. This turned up in the run of PyPy 3.10 HEAD against PyO3 HEAD. Should I add a new news fragment or is the one from #3031 sufficient?