change_org_milestones_petition_slug_dc-entertainment-remove-amber-heard-from-aquaman-2_at_20211102-105321.json

{"results": [{"data": {"petition": {"id": "14451136", "slug": "dc-entertainment-remove-amber-heard-from-aquaman-2", "user": {"id": "24448735", "displayName": "Jeanne Larson", "photo": {"id": "221862322", "userSmall": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/7/xs/ly/cXXSLydpSVDqIVB-48x48-noPad.jpg?1553098061", "processing": false}}}, "organization": null, "updatesConnection": {"nodes": [{"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "29715353", "createdAt": "2021-10-13T04:00:09.000Z", "title": "Appeal denied!", "description": "<p>Amber Heard has tried at least three times to have Johnny Depp\u2019s defamation suit against her dismissed. Her dismissal attempts have seemed endless, but those attempts might have come to an end.</p>\n<p>Judge Penney Azcarate has handed down a ruling that refused to allow Amber Heard\u2019s lawyers to petition the Virginia Supreme Court to become involved in the case. Basically, Heard wanted the Supreme Court to throw out Depp\u2019s defamation case because he lost the UK libel suit against the Sun tabloid, which labeled him a Wife Beater.</p>\n<p>Judge Azcarate had previously ruled against Heard\u2019s dismissal attempt, so Heard tried to go over the judge\u2019s head and have the Supreme Court do it instead. It didn\u2019t work.</p>\n<p>If Heard\u2019s appeal had been approved, it would have meant the end of Depp\u2019s defamation suit against her.</p>\n<p>Filed in March 2019, Depp\u2019s defamation suit contends that Heard defamed him when she wrote an op-ed describing herself as a domestic abuse survivor. The op-ed didn\u2019t name Depp, but followed months of Heard\u2019s allegations that he had abused her.</p>\n<p>Depp lost his role in Disney\u2019s Pirates of the Caribbean franchise four days after the op-ed came out. Depp is asking for $50 million in damages.</p>\n<p>Not to be outdone, Heard has filed a counterclaim against Depp asking for $100 million, alleging that Depp orchestrated a smear campaign against her \u2013 including allegations that Depp is/was responsible for this petition's creation. I remain ready and able to prove that he had nothing to do with it.</p>\n<p>The trial is set for spring/summer 2022. I\u2019m keeping my schedule flexible in case they call me.</p>", "photo": null, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "29694389", "createdAt": "2021-10-07T13:28:29.000Z", "title": "Amber Heard hits Jason Momoa?", "description": "<p>Filming is suspended on Aquaman 2, according to this tip, after an incident in which Amber Heard hit Jason Momoa, injuring his eye.\u00a0</p>\n<p>The Health and Safety board in the UK are investigating after a stunt incident damaged Jason Momoa's eye. Safety tips were removed from a prop that Amber Heard was using and she hit him [Momoa] with it.</p>\n<p>Was she unaware of the missing safety tip? Did she not care? Did Momoa say or do something that angered her? Or was she just too inept to be able to use the prop correctly?</p>\n<p>Whatever the case, it seems nobody is safe from being hurt by Amber Heard.</p>\n<p>Talk about an insurance nightmare.\u00a0</p>\n<p>I have to wonder if the safety of having her continue on the project is the subject of conversation right now. That's just one more reason she should be removed from the film.</p>", "photo": {"id": "225992326", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/6/bv/xa/XDBVXaMenGYPtYc-800x450-noPad.jpg?1633613312", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "29671480", "createdAt": "2021-10-01T04:03:38.000Z", "title": "Petition to charge Amber Heard", "description": "<p>There's a new petition making the rounds, to charge Amber Heard with assault for cutting off Johnny Depp's finger.\u00a0</p>\n<p>You can check it out and sign <a href=\"https://chng.it/BncC79mc\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\">HERE</a>.</p>", "photo": {"id": "225977590", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/2/jw/uk/bhJwUklcfPBHXRX-800x450-noPad.jpg?1633061020", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "29650692", "createdAt": "2021-09-26T00:38:23.000Z", "title": "Why Amber Heard lied and accused Johnny", "description": "<p>Throughout the time that this petition has existed, I\u2019ve provided links to all sorts of evidence supporting the notion that Amber Heard abused Johnny Depp and then accused him of abuse.</p>\n<p>First, there was the <a href=\"https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fK2kADXcbeY&amp;ab_channel=SecondPoster\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\">audiotape where Heard admits to punching Johnny Depp repeatedly</a>.<br>\u201cI was hitting you.\u201d</p>\n<p>And there\u2019s the audiotape where she admits to cutting off his finger \u2013<br>\u201cI never meant to hurt him! I didn\u2019t mean to do it!\u201d <a href=\"https://twitter.com/LyttleWyng/status/1441915367039844353\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\">HERE</a>\u2019s a quick snap of that.</p>\n<p>But if hearing that she abused Johnny Depp in her own words isn\u2019t enough to convince you that her victim act is just that, an act, there\u2019s <a href=\"https://twitter.com/Marussia15/status/1426161911117324288\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\">this audio of Amber Heard telling Johnny Depp why she lied and accused him of abusing her</a>. It\u2019s not new, but it\u2019s circulating lately so I thought I\u2019d share it with you again. You may not have heard it before, or there might have been new evidence that\u2019s got you ready for another listen. It\u2019s the truth, and it\u2019s out there. In print, in audio, online, just about everywhere.</p>\n<p>But, hey. Don\u2019t believe the mass media. They\u2019re just in it for the money.</p>\n<p>Don\u2019t believe me. I\u2019m obviously biased. I think Amber Heard should be sitting in an Australian jail for cutting Johnny\u2019s finger off.</p>\n<p>Believe your own ears. Heard says it herself. Admits it, tries to weasel her way out of blame by pointing the finger at somebody else, as per usual. But she says it. All you have to do is listen.</p>\n<p>Or, if you can\u2019t be arsed to listen to the whole thing, here\u2019s the transcription:</p>\n<p>\u201cLaura Wasser had proposed that I need to\u2026 not proposed, I\u2019m sorry, said that I would have to leave. That I\u2019d be kicked out. I\u2019d be evicted. So Rock and Josh and everybody, evicted in 21 days.</p>\n<p>\u201cNo,\u201d Johnny answered that fear, telling Amber that she\u2019d have however long she needed to get her feet back up underneath her. \u201cBut I told you the last time we talked, told you that you were fine, that you stay there two, three, fucking four months, whatever. Just fucking figure it out. We\u2019ll figure it out. You stay there, you\u2019ll be comf-\u201c</p>\n<p>\u201cI got that too,\u201d She interrupted him.</p>\n<p>\u201cBe in your home,\u201d he tried to assure her.</p>\n<p>\u201cNo,\u201d She insists. \u201cI thought that too. They told me 21 days. THAT IS PART OF WHY I ACCUSED YOU OF DOING THAT.\u201d</p>\n<p>There you have it. In her own words, from her own mouth. Amber Heard accused Johnny Depp of abusing her so that she and her friends could stay in the penthouses at the Eastern Columbia Building. Not because he actually abused her. Not because she was afraid of him. Because she didn\u2019t want to lose the apartment. Never mind that she had her own place, her dad\u2019s place, friends\u2019 places and countless other places she could have landed, she insists that she would have been homeless if she had to leave the ECB, so she had no choice but to lie about Johnny Depp and accuse him of domestic abuse.</p>\n<p>Oh, please.</p>\n<p>If this doesn\u2019t convince you that she\u2019s full of it, I don\u2019t know what else to tell you. Either you\u2019re stunned by her beauty (snark mode off), you\u2019re too stubborn to believe the truth when it\u2019s placed in front of you on a silver platter, or you\u2019re a troll hell bent on mischief.</p>\n<p>Next up: those cringe new mom photos.</p>", "photo": {"id": "225964688", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/1/fo/tf/odfotfFUIVCKhZN-800x450-noPad.jpg?1632616706", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "29579670", "createdAt": "2021-09-09T14:53:24.000Z", "title": "Mental Health Evaluation for Amber Heard?", "description": "<p>Team Depp is seeking to compel Ms. Heard to undergo an independent mental examination. This is a Rule 4:10 Motion for an Independent Mental Examination.</p>\n<p>The reason for the request is that Heard is claiming that Depp\u2019s alleged abuse left her with damages to her reputation and embarrassment and humiliation, as well as emotional damage. That opens the door for Team Depp to question exactly what Heard\u2019s emotional state was at the time, and what it still is, ongoing. It is absolutely relevant and timely, so an independent mental health evaluation is most definitely called for.</p>\n<p>Team Heard will undoubtedly fight against the evaluation, pulling out all stops to keep it from happening. There are, however, many in the public that think that Heard should be evaluated. They think that if she\u2019s properly diagnosed, perhaps she can begin to get some help.</p>\n<p>Barring that, there are those that think that if nothing else, perhaps it\u2019s possible that baby Oonagh can be removed from the care of a potentially dangerous parent and placed in a safer environment. There has been a great deal of concern expressed for the safety of the child, especially lately, with pictures surfacing that seemingly show Heard getting behind the wheel to drive while intoxicated.</p>\n<p>The hearing before Judge Azcarate is set for 9/24/21.</p>", "photo": {"id": "225920921", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/2/qm/ro/aAqmrovxnMZXaGJ-800x450-noPad.jpg?1631199205", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "29485087", "createdAt": "2021-08-19T15:47:32.000Z", "title": "Depp gets legal victory", "description": "<p>Johnny Depp was handed a legal win on Tuesday when a Virginia judge refused to dismiss his $50 million defamation lawsuit against ex-wife Amber Heard.</p>\n<p>Depp is suing Heard for defamation following an op-ed the actress published in the Washington Post claiming to have been the victim of domestic abuse. She didn\u2019t directly name Depp, but it\u2019s pretty obvious who she\u2019s talking about, especially after communications arose between Heard and the ACLU discussing that very matter.</p>\n<p>Heard sought to dismiss Depp\u2019s defamation suit on the grounds that a similar libel lawsuit Depp filed against the U.K. paper\u00a0The Sun\u00a0had been tossed in that country. Basically, Heard wanted the American defamation suit thrown out because Johnny lost the UK libel suit against the Sun.</p>\n<p>Judge Penney Azcarate, however, remained unconvinced. \u201cDefendant argues she was in privity with\u00a0The Sun\u00a0because they both had the same interest in the case,\u201d Azcarate wrote. \u201cThe Sun\u2019s interests were based on whether the statements the newspaper published were false. Defendant\u2019s interests relate to whether the statements she published were false.\u201d</p>\n<p>In other words, no. The UK libel suit wasn\u2019t about Amber Heard. It was about whether or not the Sun believed what Heard told them.</p>\n<p>The American defamation suit is about whether or not Amber is lying when she says that she was abused at the hands of Johnny Depp, an assertion she\u2019s repeated doggedly since the couple split. Entirely different animal.</p>\n<p>So, as of right now, Johnny Depp\u2019s defamation suit can continue as scheduled.</p>\n<p>Meanwhile, Johnny Depp is receiving awards in different countries for his body of work, recent work, and ongoing projects. Anybody who said that Johnny Depp was over is seriously mistaken.</p>\n<p>Heard, on the other hand, has no scheduled projects on her <a href=\"https://www.imdb.com/name/nm1720028/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\">IMDB</a> page. Perhaps she plans to spend time being a mother to her recently acquired baby daughter. Nothing wrong with that at all. A precious new life is a gift that deserves to be taken care of with the very best of intentions.</p>\n<p>Or Heard has fried all her bridges in Hollywood.</p>\n<p>Whatever the reason, Heard\u2019s film dance card is decidedly bare except for her dubious involvement with Aquaman 2 and a project called \u201cRun away with me\u201d that\u2019s been languishing in limbo for years.</p>\n<p>What do you think? Have we seen the last of Amber Heard on the silver screen? Or is she plotting some way to get new roles? Stop by Twitter and let us know what you think. \u00a0</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://www.thedailybeast.com/johnny-depp-scores-legal-win-as-judge-declines-to-toss-dollar50-million-defamation-suit-against-amber-heard\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\">SOURCE</a></p>", "photo": {"id": "225861743", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/9/yy/lm/mxyYLmUuylCCQpk-800x450-noPad.jpg?1629388055", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "29462132", "createdAt": "2021-08-14T16:31:42.000Z", "title": "Art of Elysium charity stream", "description": "<p>There's going to be an <a href=\"https://t.co/JC2c0rusDa?amp=1\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\">auction to benefit the Art of Elysium</a>. Artworks by creators far and will will be available for purchase and auction throughout the live 2-hour stream.\u00a0</p>\n<p>The auction starts today at 3est, in about 2 hours\u00a0<a href=\"https://t.co/JC2c0rusDa?amp=1\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\">HERE</a></p>\n<p>See you there!</p>", "photo": {"id": "225845930", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/0/lp/qi/TVLPqidkdtWuhTH-800x450-noPad.jpg?1628958705", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "29399423", "createdAt": "2021-07-30T19:26:34.000Z", "title": "Efforts to have Heard removed from AM2 carried no water", "description": "<p>So says producer\u00a0Peter Safran when asked whether or not the social media campaign by\u00a0Johnny Depp\u00a0fans for Amber Heard\u2019s removal from the DC sequel ever had any influence on the production and their casting decisions.</p>\n<p>\u201cI don\u2019t think we\u2019re ever going to react to, honestly, pure fan pressure,\u201d said Safran. \u201cYou gotta do what\u2019s best for the movie.\u201d</p>\n<p>If Safran and the AM2 franchise had any idea what was best for the movie, they would dump a known domestic abuser the instant audio came out with Heard admitting in her own words to abusing Johnny Depp. Any man would have been canned on the spot. Anybody else would have been fired. Period. Yet here\u2019s Amber Heard, acting like she\u2019s bulletproof, with support from inside the industry.</p>\n<p>What a travesty.</p>\n<p>But what\u2019s funny is that Safran neglects to mention the petition to remove Amber Heard from AM2 petition, which carries almost 2 million signatures from consumers who promise to boycott the movie if she\u2019s in it. And, despite efforts to silence the petition, more and more people sign it every day.</p>\n<p>Likewise, the apparent inclusion of Heard in AM2 has re-ignited\u00a0the #JusticeForJohnnyDepp crew on Twitter again. There\u2019s a whole world of people out here that don\u2019t want to see Amber Heard in AM2, and it\u2019s not just rabid Johnny Depp fans, as the slanted media would have you believe. A great many people opposing Amber Heard are survivors of domestic abuse who are outraged that Johnny Depp, the victim of domestic abuse, is still being treated like a pariah while his abuser continues to work in films.</p>\n<p>In fact, a great many of them really didn\u2019t care for Johnny Depp one way or another, but were outraged that there\u2019s such a biased double standard when it comes to male victims of domestic abuse, and that Depp continues to face false allegations of domestic abuse when he is, in fact, the victim.</p>\n<p>Like the front page of this petition says, men are victims of domestic abuse, just like women. This must be recognized, and action must be taken to prevent a known abuser from being celebrated within the entertainment industry.</p>\n<p>At this time, it appears that Amber Heard is, indeed, involved with AM2. But we don\u2019t know in what capacity, or to what extent. She could be the costar from start to finish, or she could be cast in just a few scenes that could easily be reshot after some judicial decisions are made about her. After all, Johnny Depp was removed from FB3 after filming already started. The same thing could happen to Heard after court happens.</p>\n<p>Let\u2019s not forget, after all, that she\u2019s not just facing Johnny Depp in court for Defamation. She\u2019s also being investigated by the FBI, and it Australia for perjury.</p>\n<p>Her legal woes aren\u2019t \u201cjust\u201d civil. They\u2019re also criminal.</p>\n<p>So she and her cohorts can pooh-pooh the internet and the millions of people out here in the real world that are rallying against her, but her world might not be all roses and sunshine like she makes it out to be. There could be serious legal and financial ramifications that she\u2019ll have to face, not the least of which is a massive flop when those millions of people boycott AM2.</p>\n<p>We\u2019ll have to wait and see what becomes of AM2, Heard\u2019s legal issues, and her career. But I, for one, don\u2019t see a thriving future for her in Hollywood moving forward. She got the AM franchise when she was married to Johnny Depp, sure. But her dance card isn\u2019t looking too good otherwise. There are no new projects listed for her on her IMDB page, and the rumor mill isn\u2019t churning out anything of merit.</p>\n<p>Heard might be mugging for selfies now, but I\u2019m pretty sure she\u2019ll be laughing out the other side of her face when the dust settles.</p>\n<p>Time will tell.</p>\n<p>What do you think? Is she getting away with it footloose and fancy-free? Or is the end about to catch up with her? Drop by Twitter and let us know what you think.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://deadline.com/2021/07/amber-heard-aquaman-2-johnny-depp-fans-1234802845/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\">SOURCE</a></p>", "photo": {"id": "225803336", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/0/bj/qd/GmbjQdXysmWaJaB-800x450-noPad.jpg?1627673196", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "29391109", "createdAt": "2021-07-28T19:59:04.000Z", "title": "Aquaman fans still want Emilia Clarke", "description": "<p>A new fan art proves that many fans would rather see Emilia Clarke as Mera in Aquaman 2 than Amber Heard.</p>\n<p>I'm one of them.</p>\n<p>However, we'll have to wait and see what the future holds for AM2.</p>", "photo": {"id": "225797738", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/5/rs/zu/ctrszUylJqzilaO-800x450-noPad.jpg?1627502346", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "29319766", "createdAt": "2021-07-11T12:57:04.000Z", "title": "Depp fans call for boycott", "description": "<p>Fans of Johnny Depp are furious that the actor has been fired from two major movie franchises while his abusive ex continues to work.\u00a0</p>\n<p>Depp has lost roles in the Pirates of the Caribbean and Fantastic Beasts movie franchises because of allegations by his ex-wife Amber Heard that he was violent during their tumultuous marriage. Meanwhile, Heard is apparently still involved with the Aquaman movie franchise opposite Jason Momoa.\u00a0</p>\n<p>Now, Depp fans have taken to social media in a last-ditch bid to get the actress fired from\u00a0Aquaman 2, Aquaman and the Lost Kingdom and get Depp rehired to both Pirates and Fantastic Beasts.\u00a0</p>\n<p>If that doesn't happen, scores of fans have promised to boycott Aquaman 2, as well as anything else put out by Warner Bros due to the injustice.\u00a0</p>\n<p>I don't think fans need to worry, however. Amber Heard is still in AM2 because she had a preexisting contract, not because of any new negotiations. And, judging by Heard's IMDB, she's got nothing new coming up. And it's highly unlikely that she will get many new film projects, if any. Not only are there the ongoing legal woes with Depp, Heard was heard on tape admitting to abusing Depp without remorse.</p>\n<p>Heard also has a history of domestic violence, including an arrest for violence against her ex-wife Tasya Van Ree.\u00a0</p>\n<p>There is an outcry among the public saying that if a man had committed these acts, with a history of domestic violence, he would have received much harsher penalties in Hollywood. Just look at what's happened to Johnny Depp based on unsubstantiated accusations.</p>\n<p>I think things are going to turn around. I think Heard will face repercussions for her actions, despite her recently acquired motherhood. The public doesn't want to see her in movies, as her recent flop, Gully might testify to. And, sooner or later, the studios are going to have to pay attention. It's the public that pays for tickets. Or, in this case, it's the public who don't.\u00a0</p>\n<p>Heard has a history of domestic abuse.\u00a0</p>\n<p>Johnny Depp is one of the most beloved figures in Hollywood, with a loyal fan base and a history of being a genuinely nice guy. He'll continue to work, and, once he's cleared his name, this nasty business with his ex will be put firmly in his rear view mirror.\u00a0</p>\n<p>Heard may very well never work in Hollywood again.</p>\n<p>We'll have to wait and see.</p>\n<p>What do you think? Will Depp rebound while Heard fades into oblivion, or will she continue to beg, borrow and connive her way into more movies? Drop by Twitter and let us know.</p>", "photo": {"id": "225747787", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/8/nk/qy/ThNKqyQRrEyoxOq-800x450-noPad.jpg?1626008227", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "29310494", "createdAt": "2021-07-08T21:48:03.000Z", "title": "More calls to fire Amber Heard from AM2", "description": "<p>After it was revealed that work on the next Aquaman sequel had officially commenced, supporters of Johnny Depp relaunched a new Twitter campaign against Amber Heard.</p>\n<p>Director James Wan revealed on Monday that production for Aquaman: The Lost Kingdom has begun, 18 months ahead of its December 2022 release date. Wan, who also helmed 2018\u2019s Aquaman, uploaded a photograph of a clapperboard in an ice cave on Instagram with the phrase \u201cday one.\u201d</p>\n<p>Instantly, the hashtag #JusticeforJohnnyDepp began trending on Twitter, as Johnny Depp fans voiced their displeasure that Heard is still potentially involved with the project.</p>\n<p>There remains doubt among the Twitterverse about the extent of Heard's involvement, however, since she hasn't posted anything on social media about filming. For Aquaman, she posted behind the scenes stuff practically every other day. This time around, nothing.\u00a0</p>\n<p>She's posted plenty from London, with her walking around, visiting restaurants and practicing her abysmal British wannabe accent, but nothing about filming. So some detractors wonder if she's really even involved at all.\u00a0</p>\n<p>But let's assume for the sake of conversation that she is. there are a LOT of people that aren't happy about it. Almost 2 million that I could point at right here on this petition, and there are thousands more out there. Maybe millions. We'll have to wait until December 2022 to find out the extent of Heard's involvement</p>\n<p>In the meantime, there's still the matter of Johnny Depp's defamation suit. It remains to be seen what effect the outcome will have on AM2, and on Heard's career, such as it is.</p>\n<p>The lawsuit will be heard in April 2022.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://www.animatedtimes.com/as-aquaman-2-officially-begins-filming-amber-heard-faces-renewed-calls-to-be-fired/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\">SOURCE</a></p>", "photo": {"id": "225740989", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/6/io/tb/KQIoTBlCaxsbLxw-800x450-noPad.jpg?1625780886", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "29300187", "createdAt": "2021-07-06T16:47:01.000Z", "title": "Johnny Depp's popularity continues to rise", "description": "<p>Despite losing\u00a0 major movie roles\u00a0 due to allegations of domestic abuse by his former wife Amber Heard, Johnny Depp\u2019s popularity continues to rise. One indication of that is that he\u2019s got more than 10 million followers on Instagram, and that number continues to rise. And that\u2019s after sharing only 18 posts.</p>\n<p>Another indication of Depp\u2019 popularity is a veritable army of supporters on twitter who continue to share in the actor\u2019s fight to clear his name.</p>\n<p>Amber Heard, meanwhile, barely has 4 million followers on Instagram, where she is recently posting pictures and videos of herself with her newly acquired baby.</p>\n<p>Depp\u2019s character prior to Heard\u2019s accusations is that of a kind, gentle, loving and generous fellow, and that\u2019s the impression that continues to shine through.</p>\n<p>Heard\u2019s character prior to her relationship with Depp is that of someone who\u2019s been arrested for domestic violence with a history of shady motives, and that\u2019s the impression that\u2019s hanging around her, despite new motherhood.</p>\n<p>Heard supporters say that Heard\u2019s a mommy now, so the whole thing with Depp should be dropped, and that his supporters should move on. Depp\u2019s supporters, however, insist that he deserves to have his name cleared, and that she should face justice for her misdeeds whether she\u2019s a new mom or not.</p>\n<p>Regardless of public opinion either way, the two actors will square off early next year in a defamation case that Depp leveled against Heard after she labeled him as her abuser repeatedly after a divorce settlement that included an NDA.</p>\n<p>We\u2019ll just have to wait and see how that goes. And we\u2019ll have to wait and see which of the two really is ready to put the issue to bed and move on, whichever way it comes out.</p>\n<p>In the meantime, Heard insists that she\u2019s involved in Aquaman 2, while Depp and his production company, Infinitum Nihil, have dozens of projects in the works.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://www.thenews.com.pk/latest/859501-johnny-depps-popularity-continues-to-rise\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\">SOURCE</a></p>", "photo": {"id": "225732991", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/3/eo/wi/kBeOWIPPlzTsKbE-800x450-noPad.jpg?1625590022", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}], "pageInfo": {"endCursor": "YXJyYXljb25uZWN0aW9uOjEx", "hasNextPage": true}}}}}, {"data": {"petition": {"id": "14451136", "slug": "dc-entertainment-remove-amber-heard-from-aquaman-2", "user": {"id": "24448735", "displayName": "Jeanne Larson", "photo": {"id": "221862322", "userSmall": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/7/xs/ly/cXXSLydpSVDqIVB-48x48-noPad.jpg?1553098061", "processing": false}}}, "organization": null, "updatesConnection": {"nodes": [{"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "29288233", "createdAt": "2021-07-03T15:22:51.000Z", "title": "Baby Backlash", "description": "<p>Two days ago, Amber Heard announced that she has become the mother of a daughter named Oonagh Paige Heard via surrogate. In her announcement, months after the baby\u2019s birth, Heard said: that baby Oonagh is \u2018the beginning of the rest of my life\u2019. And the backlash was immediate.</p>\n<p>Now, there\u2019s an article titled: Becoming a mother isn\u2019t all about you, Amber Heard. In it, author Amanda Platell calls Heard to task, saying:</p>\n<p>\u201cSorry, what? How about the beginning of someone else\u2019s life? Having a child, Amber, is not about you. It\u2019s about the tiny, helpless person you have chosen to bring into the world. Becoming a mother is the most selfless thing a woman can do. Forgive me if I have my lingering doubts that Amber understands that.\u201d</p>\n<p>And many Twitter denizens tend to agree. \u201cHer post was compete all about her,\u201d writes one sceptic. \u201cShe can\u2019t hide her narcissism.\u201d</p>\n<p>\u201cMe, me, me Heard,\u201d says another.</p>\n<p>One Twitter denizen is quick to point out that although the baby was born in April, Heard still hasn\u2019t updated her twitter bio. As of this writing, Heard\u2019s bio says that she\u2019s a(n) \u201cActor and activist, semi-professional disruptor, ice cream advocate and shameless teacup Yorkie-lover.\u201d Not a word about being a devoted mommy to a sweet little angel.</p>\n<p>They get that Heard might have wanted some private time with baby Oonagh before making an announcement to the world, but she\u2019s let the cat out of the bag now, and still not a word in her Twitter bio about her overwhelming joy at welcoming her new bouncing bundle of joy.</p>\n<p>Likewise, there\u2019s no category for Heard being a mother on her Instagram account. Just the same tired old categories that have been up forever.</p>\n<p>One might argue that she\u2019s too busy to bother with such trivialities, but she hasn\u2019t been too busy to post pictures of herself, or to post the announcement itself.</p>\n<p>One might, then, wonder where Heard\u2019s priorities lie.</p>\n<p>The day Oonagh was born, Heard posted a video of herself crawling around on the beach in a flimsy sundress, babbling about death threats. One Twitter user was quick to say: \u201cSo much concern for her new baby and the woman who actually birthed it.\u201d</p>\n<p>Another posted the video from that day with the caption: \u201cThe day her baby was born. On the beach Not with her child or surrogate.\u201d</p>\n<p>Overwhelmingly, the majority of the comments on Twitter show concern for a baby being raised by someone with a history of and arrest for domestic violence, posting the hashtag: #SaveBabyHeard.</p>\n<p>While this concern is touching, Heard\u2019s history of violence is against adults. She has no public record of a history of violence against children. And, while having a newborn can be a stressful and trying time, it\u2019s almost certain that Heard has a network of nannies and family upon whom she can lean to do most of the heavy lifting. After all, Heard is in London, reportedly filming right now, and there\u2019s no evidence that the baby is with her. There have been lots of photos and videos of Heard out and about in London, but none of them show evidence that she\u2019s got the baby along for the ride. So somebody\u2019s looking after little Oonagh.</p>\n<p>So, not to worry. There are probably enough people in baby Oonagh\u2019s life to ensure that she\u2019ll grow up safe and happy. Let's all wish little Oonagh the very best that life has to offer.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-9751153/PLATELLS-PEOPLE-mother-isnt-Amber-Heard.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\">SOURCE</a></p>", "photo": {"id": "225724444", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/7/lh/os/eBlhOsNCFKvYpba-800x450-noPad.jpg?1625325774", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "29275299", "createdAt": "2021-06-30T15:22:47.000Z", "title": "Depp fans and abuse survivors livid", "description": "<p>Aquaman director James Wan recently released the title of Aquaman 2 and confirmed that filming has begun, and the backlash from #JusticeForJohnnyDepp fans was immediate.</p>\n<p>Depp fans and abuse survivors flooded both of <a href=\"https://www.instagram.com/creepypuppet/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\">Wan's Instagram</a> messages with so many calls for Amber Heard to be removed from Aquaman 2 that he had to restrict his comments.\u00a0</p>\n<p>Also, one brave fan placed a \"Justice for Johnny Depp\" poster outside the Warner Bros studio outside London as a reminder that millions of people have sworn to boycott the film vehemently if and when it comes out.\u00a0</p>\n<p>People aren't soon to forget that Johnny Depp was removed from the Pirates franchise and fired from Fantastic Beasts while his abuser continues to work. It's a double standard that should and must be rectified.</p>\n<p>Aquaman 2 is set to be released in December, 2022.\u00a0</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://www.newsweek.com/johnny-depp-supporters-demand-amber-heard-fired-aquaman-2-1605074\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\">SOURCE</a></p>", "photo": {"id": "225715603", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/1/ez/ny/VAEznYxWWcmMABx-800x450-noPad.jpg?1625066570", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "29159471", "createdAt": "2021-06-04T15:39:25.000Z", "title": "Heard's Australian Visa may be suspended", "description": "<p>Is Amber Heard still in Aquaman 2? Nobody knows for sure, including possibly Heard herself. She hasn't shared any pre-production tidbits like she did when gearing up for the first one. No costume previews, no workout videos with studio professionals, hada. Her timelines are instead filled with old pictures of herself in precarious positions with questionable attire.\u00a0</p>\n<p>Even IF Warner Bros are still considering Heard for the film, there might be a huge monkey wrench set to be thrown into the works. Heard might lose her Visa to enter Australia, where the first one was filmed (and the second likely will be, too).</p>\n<p>Heard, you see, is currently under investigation by the Australian department of agriculture for circumstances surrounding the time when Heard smuggled two teacup Yorkies into the country.</p>\n<p>\u201cThe department is investigating if any criminal offences under Commonwealth legislation have been committed relating to the testimony provided to the High Court in London. Because of the nature of those enquiries we are unable to provide a timeline,\u201d a departmental spokesperson told\u00a0news.com.au\u00a0late last year.</p>\n<p>\u201cThe Department of Home Affairs has the right to reject any application if the individual is under an investigation by our government,\u201d a representative told us. \u201cAlthough we cannot go into the specifics of Ms Heard\u2019s case, it is very much a possibility that VISA application may be put on hold until the investigation is over. It just depends of the severity of the offence.\u201d</p>\n<p>Providing a false document on entry\u00a0to Australia\u00a0under the Migration Act is a serious offence that attracts a maximum\u00a0penalty\u00a0of 12 months jail and a\u00a0fine\u00a0of $10,200. Furthermore, Heard didn\u2019t just lie on her documents, she also lied to the judge and perjury\u00a0is a far more serious offence and the maximum\u00a0penalty\u00a0is 14 years in jail.</p>\n<p>She squeaked out of charges at the time, but those events are being investigated. So it's very possible that her application to travel to Australia will be denied, leaving Heard out in the cold for any filming that takes place there.</p>\n<p>Is Heard important enough to the film for them to arrange for alternate locations this late in the game? That's questionable, but we'll have to wait and see.\u00a0</p>\n<p>Aquaman 2 is slated to start filming either this month or next (June or July 2021).\u00a0</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://poptopic.com.au/news/amber-heards-australian-visa-may-be-suspended-during-investigation/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\">SOURCE</a></p>", "photo": {"id": "225634548", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/8/or/rr/FloRrrONZqHlYfO-800x450-noPad.jpg?1622821167", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "29138587", "createdAt": "2021-05-31T17:31:22.000Z", "title": "Heard's lawyer denies perjury investigation", "description": "<p>Not long ago, it was revealed that the <a href=\"https://insidethemagic.net/2021/05/amber-heard-lapd-probe-perjury-rwb1/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\">LAPD</a> has become involved with investigating Amber Heard for <a href=\"https://insidethemagic.net/2021/05/amber-heard-lapd-probe-perjury-rwb1/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\">perjury</a>. Well, her lawyer says no.</p>\n<p>The \u201cAquaman\u201d star\u2019s lawyer said the Los Angeles Police Department is not looking into if she faked injuries during an alleged altercation between herself and ex-husband Johnny Depp during a hearing in his case against her. The statute of limitations has run out for that incident to be investigated, she insists.\u00a0</p>\n<p>I'm no law expert, I'll admit, but I've heard it said that it's not 3 years from the date of the incident that constitutes the statute. They say that the clock starts ticking when the authorities become aware of the perjury.\u00a0</p>\n<p>I don't know which scenario is true, but we'll see.</p>\n<p>It seems to me, though, that if the statute of limitations were up, the LAPD wouldn't bother starting an investigation, and they know a lot more about it than me.\u00a0</p>\n<p>We can add this investigation, if there is one, to the pile of Heard's legal woes. She's reportedly still under investigation for <a href=\"https://www.nzherald.co.nz/entertainment/amber-heard-facing-perjury-charges-in-australia-over-dog-smuggling/WTF4PC42UJM5PUWNMDPWFWLMKE/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\">perjury in Australia</a> regarding an incident where she smuggled the couple's dogs into the country in violation of Australia's bio-laws.\u00a0</p>\n<p>And let's not forget Johnny Depp's case against her for defamation, as if we could forget. There are hearings for motions scheduled along the way, but the main event is due to start in April of 2022. That's when it's really going to hit the fan.</p>\n<p>If the public thought that the libel case against the Sun was a circus, they haven't seen anything yet. The only evidence that was relevant in the Sun case was admitted as it related to the libel case.\u00a0</p>\n<p>In the Defamation case, EVERYTHING comes into play. And make no mistake, there's evidence we haven't even heard of yet. The Eastern Columbia building, where the couple lived, has CCtv security cameras that capture everything. There are stories about Heard chasing Depp out into the hall. If that happened, there's footage of it. Not to mention whatever men might have visited Heard in the penthouse when Depp was away working. Including what times they arrived and left.\u00a0</p>\n<p>Plus, there's the incident where Heard accused Depp of spilling wine all up and down the hallway in a fit of rage. If that happened, it'll be on camera, too. If not, the unblinking eye of the camera will show the truth of what happened that night. Including who was where, and when. Did the other penthouse denizens pass Depp's security to get into PH3? If not, they had to have come in through the adjoining penthouse, which screams setup, and blatantly contradicts their testimony.</p>\n<p>Let's see those Toronto tapes.\u00a0</p>\n<p>Let's hear more of those recorded conversations.\u00a0</p>\n<p>Let's see it ALL.\u00a0</p>\n<p>Oh, yes. There's so much more to come.\u00a0</p>\n<p>Point being, Heard's legal woes might not be over with Johnny's defamation case, win or lose. She still stands to face investigations in two countries for statements her mouth made that reality might not be able to back up</p>\n<p>What do you think? Will Heard walk away Scott free after the defamation case? Or are her legal troubles just getting started? Drop by Twitter and let us know.</p>", "photo": {"id": "225619717", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/1/mf/kz/VUMfkzBCSRiNlaR-800x450-noPad.jpg?1622482283", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "29133704", "createdAt": "2021-05-30T13:16:56.000Z", "title": "Judge scolds Heard", "description": "<p>Judge\u00a0Penney S. Azcarate\u00a0of Fairfax County granted a request from the 35-year-old Amber Heard to allow her to amend her motion to dismiss Johnny Depp's defamation case against her (Heard), but said during Friday Mornin's hearing that the request will likely prove \"futile.\"\u00a0 This is at least the third motion by Heard to dismiss, as her others attempts have been shut down.\u00a0</p>\n<p>Further, Azcarate warned that if Heard is found to have wasted the court's time, there will be legal repercussions for her in the form of sanctions.\u00a0</p>\n<p>Judge Penney is having none of Heard's antics.\u00a0</p>\n<p>Neither Heard nor Depp were present for the hearing on Friday, but the day is considered a huge win for Johnny Depp.</p>\n<p>Heard is required to file a hefty briefing with the court by June 14.</p>\n<p>Their next hearing will take place on July 22.</p>\n<p>You can watch an entertaining and informative video by That Umbrella Guy about this turn of events <a href=\"https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UjVEaOxJqhg\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\">HERE</a>.</p>\n<p>What do you think? Will Heard get her dismissal? Or will Judge Penney shut this one down, too? Drop by Twitter and let us know what you think.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://radaronline.com/p/judge-scolds-amber-heard-johnny-depp-defamation-case-lawsuit-virginia-exclusive/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\">SOURCE</a></p>", "photo": {"id": "225616235", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/7/kl/hb/unKLHBngnIQZOgI-800x450-noPad.jpg?1622380619", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "29103657", "createdAt": "2021-05-24T13:36:34.000Z", "title": "Heard's Gully", "description": "<p>It seems Amber Heard has a new film, Gully, coming out on June 4th.. There's no real description of what Heard's role in it is. The trailer only shows snippets of her screaming at the police and apparently pole dancing. It's hard to tell from that.</p>\n<p>In the meantime, the public are making their opinions known about a film with Heard in it, as there are far more dislikes clicked for the trailer than likes Don't take my word for it. See for yourself, <a href=\"https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=twT_gV7H_1Q&amp;t=6s\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\">HERE</a>.</p>\n<p>As for Heard's upcoming roles, according to IMDB, there are only the doomed \"Run away with me\" and Aquaman 2, which seems dubious at best. We'll have to wait and see if more roles come her way.\u00a0</p>\n<p>Heard's future in film might rely heavily on the outcome of ex-husband Johnny Depp's defamation suit against her, and investigations in two countries against her for perjury. Depending on how those go, it might be quite some time before we see Amber Heard on film again.</p>\n<p>What do you think? Will Amber Heard grace the screen again anytime soon, or have her legal woes put a halt to it? Drop by Twitter and let us know.</p>", "photo": {"id": "225596319", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/9/ov/dr/GNOvDrhsvzKudTW-800x450-noPad.jpg?1621863399", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "29080440", "createdAt": "2021-05-19T19:48:08.000Z", "title": "Amber Heard joining Harry Potter's world?", "description": "<p>According to <a href=\"https://www.giantfreakinrobot.com/ent/exclusive-amber-heard-harry-potter.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\">Giant Freakin Robot\u2019</a>s\u00a0insider sources, Amber Heard is eyeballing role in a Harry Potter project. According to those sources, Heard has wanted to become involved with the Harry Potter franchise for some time, but wouldn\u2019t broach the idea as long as ex-husband Johnny Depp was involved. Now that he\u2019s been booted, she has the freedom to angle for a role.</p>\n<p>They didn\u2019t say what role Heard might be after, or even what part of the franchise she\u2019s interested in. It could be a future film, or a highly anticipated Harry Potter series rumored to be coming our way via HBO. Who knows?</p>\n<p>A series would give her potential longevity instead of a single movie appearance, and it would maintain some distance from the elements of the franchise that Johnny Depp was associated with.</p>\n<p>The question is whether or not Warmer Bros wants to continue working with Heard, as her relationship with the upcoming Aquaman sequel is dubious at best. According to <a href=\"https://poptopic.com.au/rumour/amber-heard-allegedly-has-not-been-contacted-about-aquaman-2/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\">Poptopik</a>, she allegedly hasn\u2019t even been called for AM2, and it\u2019s supposed to start filming in just over a month. That just doesn\u2019t bode well.</p>\n<p>Just because she\u2019s eyeballing the Harry Potter franchise, that doesn\u2019t mean they\u2019re eyeballing her back.</p>\n<p>What do you think? Would Amber Heard fit into the innocent, child-like world of Harry Potter? Or is it all a pipe dream? Drop by Twitter and let us know.</p>", "photo": {"id": "225580197", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/8/qj/bn/eMqjBnyPwmDtvey-800x450-noPad.jpg?1621453690", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "29061119", "createdAt": "2021-05-16T16:21:59.000Z", "title": "New island photos show no injuries", "description": "<p>A new series of photos by Greg Williams from Johnny Depp\u2019s island show Amber Heard in a skimpy bikini days after she claims to have been beaten, with no injuries visible whatsoever.</p>\n<p>Amber Heard said: \"I had bruised ribs, bruises all over my body (...), two blue eyes, a broken nose, a cracked lip\" But these photos show Heard with no marks on her and a pristine skin. No bruises where those broken ribs would have been, no busted lip, and no contusions on her face that would be evident after such a savage beating.</p>\n<p>BILD asked\u00a0emergency phisician\u00a0Prof. Peter Sefrin, member of the DKR Presidium: \"Both a broken nose and bruised ribs\u00a0cause very severe pain. You don't necessarily see it on the outside, but\u00a0the nose has to be operated if it's broken, a bruised rib only\u00a0starts to heal after 14 days.\"</p>\n<p>NOTABLE:\u00a0There is no medical certificate or X-rays of the broken nose\u00a0from the incident of the alleged abuse on Dec 15th, 2015.<br>Amber's private nurse\u00a0, who she called in two days after the incident, testified at the time that she\u00a0could not see any visible injuries.</p>\n<p>BILD asked Amber's\u00a0Attorney Elaine Bredehoft\u00a0to comment. She said Bild should look into the London Court ruling that supports AMber's account of the mistreatment and her explanation for contradiction of going onto private trip shortly afterwards:\u00a0\"All the evidence has already been fully considered\".</p>\n<p>Trouble is, these photos weren\u2019t available at the London trial, or the outcome might have been very different. They will be available for the VA defamation trial, though.</p>\n<p>In related news, there might be some collusion between the ACLU and Amber Heard over making that WaMo OpEd look like it wasn\u2019t supposed to be about Johnny Depp, though it clearly was.</p>\n<p>I\u2019ll take a look at that next.</p>\n<p>What do you think? Drop by Twitter and let us know.<br><br>Here\u2019s the article in <a href=\"https://www.bild.de/bild-plus/unterhaltung/leute/leute/johnny-depp-enttarnen-diese-fotos-amber-heard-als-luegnerin-76396498,view=conversionToLogin.bild.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\">Bild</a><br>With a translation by <a href=\"https://twitter.com/TheNamesQ/status/1393571064764981249?s=20\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\">Qwerty</a><br>And photos from Laura B, <a href=\"https://twitter.com/LauraBockov/status/1393314805931548677?s=20\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\">HERE</a></p>\n<p>\u00a0</p>", "photo": {"id": "225566791", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/8/wy/ck/nNWYcKMJgzNdlMk-800x450-noPad.jpg?1621182121", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "29027734", "createdAt": "2021-05-10T19:22:23.000Z", "title": "In the News", "description": "<p>The recent news that Amber Heard is reportedly being investigated by the LAPD is gaining traction.\u00a0</p>\n<p>Originally reported in the German news outlet BILD, the story is being picked up and spread around by American sources as well. This is good news in and of itself.\u00a0</p>\n<p>The press so far has been decidedly pro-Heard, posting every little thing she says and does, painting her in a favorable light, while largely refusing to print anything remotely favorable to Heard's ex husband, Johnny Depp.</p>\n<p>The two are embroiled in litigation that's already gone on as many as 3 years, and promises to continue into years to come. The two will face off in court in Fairfax, VA starting in April of 2022 in Johnny Depp's defamation suit against Heard. There's no telling how long that will take to play out.\u00a0</p>\n<p>One thing's for sure, though, it's going to be informative. CCTV footage of everything that happens in the hallways of the Eastern Columbia building in LA is recorded by security cameras. That, of course, is where the couple lived at the time of their explosive falling out. So, Heard's claims of Depp's behavior could very bell be confirmed or debunked by the building's own security cameras.\u00a0</p>\n<p>One claim has already been given a new light. Bodycam footage from two of the officers responding to 911 calls was recently released, showing no damage to the apartment, including the door, that Heard had previously claimed.\u00a0</p>\n<p>It remains to be seen what evidence will be forthcoming for the defamation trial, but I'm willing to bet it'll be newsworthy.</p>\n<p>And with the media showing a willingness to report stories that may favor Depp, we'll be able to follow it in the media. Hopefully by then, it'll be completely acceptable to cover pro-Depp stories as well.\u00a0</p>\n<p>What do you think? Is Johnny Depp winning the press over again? Will we see an upward trend toward supporting Johnny Depp? Drop by Twitter and let us know what you think.\u00a0</p>", "photo": {"id": "225543692", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/9/ya/zq/OdyAzQhUibaAGPC-800x450-noPad.jpg?1620674547", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "29008755", "createdAt": "2021-05-06T21:56:18.000Z", "title": "Investigations everywhere!", "description": "<p>A German news article is reporting that LAPD has opened an investigation into Amber Heard for Perjury. You can view it <a href=\"https://www.bild.de/bild-plus/unterhaltung/leute/leute/johnny-depp-hat-amber-heard-beweise-gefaelscht-polizei-ermittelt-gegen-seine-ex-76309364,view=conversionToLogin.bild.html#fromWall\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\">HERE</a>.\u00a0</p>\n<p>Add that to whispers that the FBI have been brought on board to investigate Amber Heard for perjury in Australia regarding the incident where Heard smuggled two dogs into Oz in violation of their bio laws...</p>\n<p>And it looks like Amber Heard is running out of places to hide.</p>\n<p>I'm not sure what the penalty for perjury is in California, but it'll be interesting to find out</p>\n<p>Okay.. a quick Google says that \"Perjury\u00a0is punishable by imprisonment in the state prison for two, three or four years.\"</p>\n<p>Interesting. The penalty is punishable by up to 14 years in Australia. Those potential jail terms are stacking up all over the place, aren't they?</p>\n<p>What do you think? Will Amber Heard serve time for perjury in California? In Australia? Great Britain? Anywhere? Drop by Twitter and let us know.</p>\n<p>Hat tip to <a href=\"https://twitter.com/LauraBockov\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\">Laura B.\u00a0</a></p>", "photo": {"id": "225530089", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/5/ut/qm/PiUtqMZOPgdxvrJ-800x450-noPad.jpg?1620338209", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "28983302", "createdAt": "2021-05-02T19:01:50.000Z", "title": "It Ain't Over Til It's Over", "description": "<p>As of a few days ago, rumor from a trusted source has it that Amber Heard will, indeed, be appearing in Aquaman 2. This information has struck a lot of Johnny Depp supporters hard, because it seems like she can get away with whatever she wants and keep getting roles in blockbuster films.\u00a0</p>\n<p>But there's more to the story.</p>\n<p>For one thing, there are millions of people bombarding @WBPictures on Twitter with their disdain for this decision. Amber Heard seems to get away with being this massive abuser and doesn't get fired, while Johnny Depp, who is overwhelmingly innnocent, gets canned from two major franchises. The Travesty! These millions promise to #BoycottAquaman2 and there are whispers of demonstrations at both the filming locations and the movie's premiers in assorted countries.\u00a0</p>\n<p>So things don't look so hot for WB for hiring Amber Heard back after reportedly buying out her contract so that she wouldn't be in it.</p>\n<p>Plus, there are still legal woes plaguing Amber Heard. And, no. I don't just mean the defamation case brought against her buy Johnny Depp, which is set to begin in April of 2022.</p>\n<p>Nope. I'm talking about Amber Heard reportedly being investigated by the Australian government for perjury in association with smuggling two dogs into Australia contrary to Oz's biosecurity laws.\u00a0</p>\n<p>That's nothing new, I know. It's been going around for years that they're looking at her for that, seemingly with no end in sight.</p>\n<p>What's new is a claim by a Youbuter named <a href=\"https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=That+umbrella+guy\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\">That Umbrella Guy</a> that the FBI has been contacted to assist with the investigation. If that's true, it puts things in a whole different light. The penalty for perjury in Australia could land Heard as many as 14 years in jail, hefty fines, and possibly being banned from Australia for a number of years.\u00a0</p>\n<p>While it's disturbingly unlikely that Heard will do any jail time (though many of her detractors hope she will), being banned from the country could affect filming schedules from any movie being produced there.</p>\n<p>Including Aquaman 2.</p>\n<p>It's been said by cast and crew that AM2 will begin filming in London in June, 2021, but that's likely for the indoor scenes. It's very possible that the outside scenes will be filmed in Australia, like they were for AM1.</p>\n<p>If that's the case, Heard would not be able to film in Australia. Granted, there may be legal loopholes they can jump through to make it possible, since the film is a preexisting project, or some such, but it presents an ever-growing headache for any studio that considers working with her in the future. Time will have to tell that tale.</p>\n<p>Regardless, whatever happens in court, and in Australia, Johnny Depp's popularity and productivity continue to soar, while Heard's public opinion seems to be waning.\u00a0</p>\n<p>Will Heard be able to repair her public image? A LOT of people, myself included, doubt it sincerely, but we'll have to wait and see what happens.</p>\n<p>What do you think? Is Heard washed up? Or will she rally? Drop by Twitter and let us know.</p>", "photo": {"id": "225511834", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/8/og/hs/FXogHsQtANYGOPK-800x450-noPad.jpg?1619982112", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "28935417", "createdAt": "2021-04-23T18:28:29.000Z", "title": "New Bid to Dismiss", "description": "<p>Amber Heard says that Johnny Depp's US defamation lawsuit should be thrown out after 'wife-beater' ruling in the UK. She says that the UK trial established that: \"Mr Depp committed domestic violence against Ms Heard on many occasions, causing her to fear for her life\".<br>Depp famously lost his slander case against NGN newsgroup and the Sun tabloid, who labeled him as a \u201cwife beater.\u201d He was also denied the chance to file an appeal to overturn the ruling. That, Heard insists, is grounds to dismiss his $50 million defamation suit against her.<br>It continued: \"Depp cannot relitigate these factual issues, and as a result of their preclusion, he cannot claim that the statements are false and 'actionable' under Virginia defamation law, so his claims are barred as a matter of law.\"</p>\n<p>The filing from the Aquaman actress's team of lawyers adds: \"Therefore, as a matter of law, Depp cannot prevail on any of his claims, and Depp's complaint against Ms Heard should be dismissed in its entirety.\"</p>\n<p>Heard has requested a hearing next month in front of a judge in an effort to put a stop to the lawsuit. Again. This marks perhaps half a dozen attempts on Heard\u2019s part to have Depp\u2019s slander case against her dismissed. All previous attempts have been denied, and this one likely will be, too.</p>\n<p>The Sun case wasn\u2019t between Depp and Heard, remember. It was against Depp and the Sun. Heard was just a witness. And \u201cJust because the Sun says so\u201d isn\u2019t a good enough reason to throw out a lawsuit.</p>\n<p>Depp\u2019s legal team haven\u2019t yet responded to Heard\u2019s latest filing, but it\u2019s unlikely that her request to have his suit thrown out will succeed.</p>\n<p>The case is due to be heard in Fairfax, VA in April of 2022.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://news.sky.com/story/johnny-depps-us-defamation-lawsuit-should-be-thrown-out-after-wife-beater-ruling-in-the-uk-amber-heard-says-12284508\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\">SOURCE</a></p>", "photo": {"id": "225478007", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/1/ov/ql/QnovqLhGsohQOMz-800x450-noPad.jpg?1619202517", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}], "pageInfo": {"endCursor": "YXJyYXljb25uZWN0aW9uOjIz", "hasNextPage": true}}}}}, {"data": {"petition": {"id": "14451136", "slug": "dc-entertainment-remove-amber-heard-from-aquaman-2", "user": {"id": "24448735", "displayName": "Jeanne Larson", "photo": {"id": "221862322", "userSmall": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/7/xs/ly/cXXSLydpSVDqIVB-48x48-noPad.jpg?1553098061", "processing": false}}}, "organization": null, "updatesConnection": {"nodes": [{"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "28935415", "createdAt": "2021-04-23T18:28:14.000Z", "title": "New Bid to Dismiss", "description": "<p>Amber Heard says that Johnny Depp's US defamation lawsuit should be thrown out after 'wife-beater' ruling in the UK. She says that the UK trial established that: \"Mr Depp committed domestic violence against Ms Heard on many occasions, causing her to fear for her life\".<br>Depp famously lost his slander case against NGN newsgroup and the Sun tabloid, who labeled him as a \u201cwife beater.\u201d He was also denied the chance to file an appeal to overturn the ruling. That, Heard insists, is grounds to dismiss his $50 million defamation suit against her.<br>It continued: \"Depp cannot relitigate these factual issues, and as a result of their preclusion, he cannot claim that the statements are false and 'actionable' under Virginia defamation law, so his claims are barred as a matter of law.\"</p>\n<p>The filing from the Aquaman actress's team of lawyers adds: \"Therefore, as a matter of law, Depp cannot prevail on any of his claims, and Depp's complaint against Ms Heard should be dismissed in its entirety.\"</p>\n<p>Heard has requested a hearing next month in front of a judge in an effort to put a stop to the lawsuit. Again. This marks perhaps half a dozen attempts on Heard\u2019s part to have Depp\u2019s slander case against her dismissed. All previous attempts have been denied, and this one likely will be, too.</p>\n<p>The Sun case wasn\u2019t between Depp and Heard, remember. It was against Depp and the Sun. Heard was just a witness. And \u201cJust because the Sun says so\u201d isn\u2019t a good enough reason to throw out a lawsuit.</p>\n<p>Depp\u2019s legal team haven\u2019t yet responded to Heard\u2019s latest filing, but it\u2019s unlikely that her request to have his suit thrown out will succeed.</p>\n<p>The case is due to be heard in Fairfax, VA in April of 2022.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://news.sky.com/story/johnny-depps-us-defamation-lawsuit-should-be-thrown-out-after-wife-beater-ruling-in-the-uk-amber-heard-says-12284508\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\">SOURCE</a></p>", "photo": {"id": "225478006", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/3/nf/fi/uVnFfIXRTGpAkrq-800x450-noPad.jpg?1619202502", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "28892582", "createdAt": "2021-04-16T19:57:16.000Z", "title": "Bodycam Footage Drops", "description": "<p>In a shocking turn of events, bodycam footage has dropped from the night Aber Heard claims that Johnny Depp hurled a phone at her face and trashed the condo.</p>\n<p>On the night of the blowout fight, a friend of Heard, who asked to remain anonymous had dialed 911, claiming that the actress was being \u2018assaulted\u2019 by her boyfriend.</p>\n<p>\u201cHi, I need to report an assault right now happening at 849 Broadway at the Eastern building, it\u2019s penthouse three,\u201d the female caller says in the recording, referring to the luxurious home the former couple previously shared in downtown LA.</p>\n<p>\u201cI happen to know that it\u2019s happening and I just need to remain anonymous,\u201d she added.</p>\n<p>\u201cSo what did she say that this guy assaulted her or hit her?\u201d the LAPD operator replies, explaining she needs more detail.</p>\n<p>\u201cPhysically assaulting her, yeah,\u201d replies the caller \u201dSend somebody up there please,\u201d the caller pleads, reiterating the location of the couple\u2019s penthouse before the call abruptly ends.</p>\n<p>Another 911 call was made by Heard\u2019s friend iO Tillet Wright.</p>\n<p>That means that two sets of officers responded to the scene. And both sets of officers have insisted from day one that they saw no evidence of violence, not on Heard\u2019s face, and not in the condo.</p>\n<p>Up until now, it\u2019s been a matter of he say/she say, leaving judges, journalists, and the public to decide who to believe.</p>\n<p>But now, the debate is over. In bodycam footage from the second set of officers, the condo is clearly seen as being tidy and undamaged. You can read the article from the Daily Mail <a href=\"https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9474979/Johnny-Depp-says-police-bodycam-footage-PROVES-Amber-Heard-lying.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\">HERE</a>.</p>\n<p>And you can see a clear version of the bodycam footage <a href=\"https://twitter.com/DigitalDDaniels/status/1383126221458915332\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\">HERE</a>.</p>\n<p>Depp\u2019s attorney Adam Wadman says the footage proves that there was never any wrecking spree and that Heard\u2019s account of the evening cannot be believed.</p>\n<p>\u201cAmber Heard and her friends described a chaotic, messy crime scene but the newly released LAPD bodycam videos unambiguously show that the penthouse was utterly undamaged and that their testimony was one more grandiose lie,\u201d Waldman told DailyMail.com in a statement.</p>\n<p>Depp and Heard will square off in April, 2022 in a defamation suit that Depp filed against his ex-wife. It remains to be seen how this new footage will affect the proceedings, but it doesn\u2019t look good for Heard.</p>\n<p>It also remains to be seen if this new evidence will inspire perjury charges in previously offered court testimony in Depp\u2019s recent libel suit against NGN and the Sun tabloid in the UK. That\u2019s where Heard described the chaotic scene.</p>\n<p>Heard is currently being investigated for perjury charges in Australia for testimony surrounding an incident in which Heard smuggled the couple\u2019s dogs into Australia in violation of quarantine laws.</p>\n<p>It\u2019s possible that these mounting legal woes will affect Heard\u2019s appearance in any upcoming projects, and could potentially land her jail time. Time will tell the extent to which this new evidence, and Depp\u2019s impending slander suit will affect Amber Heard.</p>\n<p>What do you think? Will Heard shrug this evidence off? Or is this the mic drop moment for Depp in his quest to vindicate himself?</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9474979/Johnny-Depp-says-police-bodycam-footage-PROVES-Amber-Heard-lying.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\">SOURCE</a><br><a href=\"https://twitter.com/DigitalDDaniels/status/1383126221458915332\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\">SOURCE</a></p>", "photo": {"id": "225445598", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/6/nm/fm/vNnMfmZHboPfvDp-800x450-noPad.jpg?1618603038", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "28836434", "createdAt": "2021-04-07T15:16:28.000Z", "title": "Aquaman 2 filming and release dates", "description": "<p>Aquaman 2 is expected to start production this coming June (2021) in the UK under the working title \u2018Necrus.\u2019 In Aquaman lore,\u00a0Necrus\u00a0is another underwater city like Atlantis, ruled by the militaristic King Mongo. Unlike Atlantis, its placement is unstable, meaning the location of the city constantly changes, never to be found in the same place twice. Apparently. So, while the working title could just be a fun nod to lore, it could also mean Arthur may interact, or even fight, Mongo. It\u2019s safe to say that Black Manta will return as Aquaman\u2019s nemesis.</p>\n<p>Jason Momoa will return as the titular character, and despite fans\u2019 protestations, Amber Heard is still clutching the notion that she will once again be the queen of the deep. However, there\u2019s also been constant speculation that a\u00a0new major female character is being written into the script, as a means to both increase diversity among the ensemble and reduce Heard\u2019s screen time in the event of a worst case scenario. WB has yet to confirm that, but insider Daniel Richtman is now claiming that\u00a0Aquaman 2\u00a0will have four female leads, though the tipster doesn\u2019t offer any further details to elaborate on his intel.</p>\n<p>Heard\u2019s Mera, the aforementioned mystery character and Nicole Kidman\u2019s returning Queen Atlanna will presumably make up 75% of the quartet, leaving one position unfilled. But with filming set to start a mere two months away, we should start to get some answers soon, both about the new mystery character and Heard\u2019s dubious chances of returning as the film\u2019s primary female lead.</p>\n<p>Aquaman 2\u00a0is currently set for a December 16, 2022 release.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://www.awn.com/news/aquaman-2-production-begin-summer\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\">SOURCE</a><br><a href=\"https://wegotthiscovered.com/movies/aquaman-2-reportedly-4-female-leads/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\">SOURCE</a></p>", "photo": {"id": "225407387", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/1/dd/qt/BAdDQTtNmJJOnQn-800x450-noPad.jpg?1617808591", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "28819119", "createdAt": "2021-04-03T19:19:06.000Z", "title": "Amber Heard on a Twitter rampage", "description": "<p>Amber Heard is targeting fans as well as Johnny Depp\u2019s own lawyer on Twitter in a variety of ways \u2013 namely outright mocking them. It\u2019s an interesting reaction, considering she already won the UK lawsuit, but apparently Amber Heard has simply had enough of the Internet backlash.</p>\n<p>Adam Waldman called Amber out in a tweet pointing out that despite claims of being brutalized by Johnny Depp, Amber Heard appears days later in a photo shoot, without any sign of injury.\u00a0</p>\n<p>Heard's backlash was to call Waldman short. Such witty repartee.\u00a0</p>\n<p>It\u2019s worth mentioning that Adam Waldman is actually Johnny Depp\u2019s lawyer, and that he\u2019s been using social media as a way to call Amber Heard and her claims into question. This includes much of the majority of his Twitter feed, but it was the particular image posted above that caught Amber Heard\u2019s attention. It seemed she had enough of Adam Waldman, and decided to respond to him and a variety of Johnny Depp fans on Twitter as a result.</p>\n<p>Most recently, Depp supporters have been targeted, having their comments reported en masse in an attempt to have them banned from Twitter. The Depp supporters remain, however, and don't appear to be going anywhere anytime soon.\u00a0</p>\n<p>I wrote a <a href=\"https://lepplady.wordpress.com/2021/04/03/amber-turd-on-twitter-rampage/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\">blog article</a> about Heard's Twitter rampage, having been targeted myself. Feel free to read it <a href=\"https://lepplady.wordpress.com/2021/04/03/amber-turd-on-twitter-rampage/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\">HERE</a>.\u00a0</p>\n<p>Depp and Heard have to wait a full year before Depp's Defamation case against Heard gets to court. In that time, I'm sure we'll see a lot of action back and forth between Heard and her ex-husband. And, from the look of it, we can expect to see even more hostilities between Heard, her posse on Twitter, and Johnny Depp supporters.</p>\n<p>More as it happens.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://www.screengeek.net/2021/04/01/amber-heard-johnny-depp-fan-response/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\">SOURCE</a></p>", "photo": {"id": "225394516", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/6/sp/my/hHSPMyLQAlvcfuj-800x450-noPad.jpg?1617477548", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "28779859", "createdAt": "2021-03-26T20:46:08.000Z", "title": "Sign and share", "description": "<p>I know I'm preaching to the choir, here, but I wanted to send this out.</p>\n<p>Please sign and share this petition.<br><a href=\"https://www.change.org/p/dc-entertainment-remove-amber-heard-from-aquaman-2\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\">https://www.change.org/p/dc-entertainment-remove-amber-heard-from-aquaman-2</a></p>\n<p>Let them know that we're not done fighting!</p>\n<p>Hang in there, gang. It gets better.\u00a0</p>", "photo": {"id": "225368051", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/1/vi/qn/YzViQnfHJEiBEQs-800x450-noPad.jpg?1616791571", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "28770580", "createdAt": "2021-03-25T10:25:22.000Z", "title": "Appeal denied", "description": "<p>Johnny Depp has FAILED in his application to appeal the libel judgment which found The Sun newspaper\u2019s allegation he engaged in domestic violence against Amber Heard was \u201csubstantially true\u201d.</p>\n<p>Rubbish. I'd like to use a stronger word, but refrain.</p>\n<p>As much as this is a blow to Johnny Depp, it's more of a defeat for male victims of domestic violence, particularly in the UK. This kind of finding tells them that, no. they won't be believed, so just shut up and take it, and don't you dare speak up. It shouldn't be that way. I must change.</p>\n<p>The thing to remember at this point is that this verdict is not a win for Amber Heard. This case wasn't against her. It was against NGN and the Sun.</p>\n<p>What we can do now is look forward to the Defamation trial in VA. That one is directly between Johnny Depp and Amber Heard. I'm a little nervous about that one because Heard never named Depp in her WaPo OpEd, the reason he finally sued her. On that basis alone, it could very well go her way, even though it's obvious who she was talking about.\u00a0</p>\n<p>But no matter how it goes, the truth about Heard will come out. There's evidence we haven't even seen yet. No matter how court goes, she loses in the court of public opinion, which will directly impact upon her career. Let's remember that she doesn't have any active projects coming up while Johnny Depp and his production company is directly involved with no fewer than 20 projects coming up.\u00a0</p>\n<p>This decision today is beyond ridiculous but it's one battle, not the war. Let's try to stay positive and look forward to the Virginia trial. It's a different court, a different case, and is more than likely to come out a different way.\u00a0</p>\n<p>Hang in there, folks. It gets better.</p>\n<p>Hat tip to<a href=\"https://twitter.com/nickwallis\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\"> Nick Wallis</a>.</p>", "photo": {"id": "225361829", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/0/el/bq/OyELbQqHJIXUdqc-800x450-noPad.jpg?1616667923", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "28767922", "createdAt": "2021-03-24T21:57:14.000Z", "title": "The appeal decision", "description": "<p>Here we go again. This is going to look awfully familiar, but it's not a repeat. The decision about Johnny's permission to appeal will be handed down tomorrow.</p>\n<p>Johnny Depp\u2019s hearing for permission to continue with his appeal is going to air live tomorrow morning at 10am UK time. I think that\u2019s 6am Eastern, 5 my time. US central. Don\u2019t quote me though.\u00a0</p>\n<p>Here\u2019s the website that hosts the live content:<br><a href=\"https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCvLfIeTq5grIEkc7JvOpoxg\" rel=\"nofollow\">https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCvLfIeTq5grIEkc7JvOpoxg</a></p>\n<p>There are three YouTube channels that could potentially be airing the coverage. I suspect that due to the large volume of people that will be tuning in, all three might be covering it. They are:<br><a href=\"https://t.co/Ad6qdt8riI?amp=1\" rel=\"nofollow\">https://t.co/Ad6qdt8riI?amp=1</a><br><a href=\"https://t.co/O77lNVAxpi?amp=1\" rel=\"nofollow\">https://t.co/O77lNVAxpi?amp=1</a><br><a href=\"https://t.co/nvvdTIRpSg?amp=1\" rel=\"nofollow\">https://t.co/nvvdTIRpSg?amp=1</a></p>\n<p>Me, I'm going to tune in with Doctor Soup, Stevie J Raw, Spiritually empowered, and Come Geek some, <a href=\"https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N_CkjvusXbs\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\">HERE</a> for the verdict. Feel free to join me. We'd love to have you.</p>\n<p>Just remember that no part of the proceedings can be capped, recorded or shared in any form. To do so could amount to contempt of court. Just don't do it. It's not worth it.</p>\n<p>If Johnny wins tomorrow, that doesn\u2019t mean that he has won his appeal. It means only that he can continue with the appeal process.</p>\n<p>If Johnny loses tomorrow, his appeal in London is done and over with. So let's all keep our fingers crossed.</p>", "photo": {"id": "225360121", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/6/tx/cw/DNTXCwmblHUGSit-800x450-noPad.jpg?1616623036", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "28731414", "createdAt": "2021-03-18T13:37:43.000Z", "title": "No Decision Today", "description": "<p>Counsel for both sides had a turn arguing their points, about why an appeal should be granted and why it shouldn\u2019t. It seemed to go really well for Johnny\u2019s side, while the opposition seemed to flounder. We won\u2019t be getting a decision today. Rather, the judge\u2019s on the bench promised that their decision will be handed down \u201cshortly\u201d in writing. We\u2019re guessing that might mean a week or less.</p>\n<p>Let\u2019s keep our fingers and toes crossed, folks.</p>", "photo": {"id": "225336548", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/9/rv/vh/xwrvvHSLPoaYpHP-800x450-noPad.jpg?1616074666", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "28727140", "createdAt": "2021-03-17T19:37:24.000Z", "title": "Hearing streaming live", "description": "<p>Johnny Depp\u2019s hearing for permission to continue with his appeal is going to air live tomorrow morning at 1030am UK time. I think that\u2019s 630am Eastern, 530 my time. US central. Don\u2019t quote me though. I\u2019m still recovering from daylight savings time. But I think that\u2019s right.</p>\n<p>Here\u2019s the website that hosts the live content:<br><a href=\"https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCvLfIeTq5grIEkc7JvOpoxg\" rel=\"nofollow\">https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCvLfIeTq5grIEkc7JvOpoxg</a></p>\n<p>There are three YouTube channels that could potentially be airing the coverage. I suspect that due to the large volume of people that will be tuning in, all three might be covering it. They are:<br><a href=\"https://t.co/Ad6qdt8riI?amp=1\" rel=\"nofollow\">https://t.co/Ad6qdt8riI?amp=1</a><br><a href=\"https://t.co/O77lNVAxpi?amp=1\" rel=\"nofollow\">https://t.co/O77lNVAxpi?amp=1</a> <br><a href=\"https://t.co/nvvdTIRpSg?amp=1\" rel=\"nofollow\">https://t.co/nvvdTIRpSg?amp=1</a></p>\n<p>Just remember that no part of the proceedings can be capped, recorded or shared in any form. To do so could amount to contempt of court. Just don't do it. It's not worth it.</p>\n<p>If Johnny wins tomorrow, that doesn\u2019t mean that he has won his appeal. It means only that he can continue with the appeal process.</p>\n<p>If Johnny loses tomorrow, his appeal in London is done and over with. So let's all keep our fingers crossed.</p>", "photo": {"id": "225333845", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/3/ts/xd/lKtSXdfmRMCkEvy-800x450-noPad.jpg?1616009847", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "28641417", "createdAt": "2021-03-02T23:43:38.000Z", "title": "Who's doing what?", "description": "<p>According to <a href=\"https://wegotthiscovered.com/movies/amber-heard-reportedly-offers-hollywood-legal-battle-backlash/\" rel=\"nofollow\">We Got This Covered</a>, Amber Heard is still getting acting offers despite all the drama going on, while Johnny Depp's career hangs in tatters.</p>\n<p>Let's look at that, shall we?\u00a0</p>\n<p>Amber Heard's IMDB page lists 2 projects upcoming for her. \"Run away with me\" which was abandoned years ago and \"Aquaman 2\" that she's reportedly been dropped from. That's it.\u00a0</p>\n<p>Meanwhile, here's a list of what Johnny Depp's IMDB pro page has him working on:\u00a0</p>\n<p>Affected Provincial's Companion<br>Producer</p>\n<p>Attica<br>Producer</p>\n<p>Caliber<br>Producer</p>\n<p>Desperate Hours<br>Producer</p>\n<p>Fierce Invalids Home from Hot Climates<br>Producer</p>\n<p>Fortunately, the Milk<br>Producer</p>\n<p>Happy Days<br>Producer</p>\n<p>In the Hand of Dante<br>Producer</p>\n<p>Inamorata<br>Producer</p>\n<p>Mortimer Wintergreen<br>Producer</p>\n<p>Muscle Shoals<br>(TV Series)\u00a0-\u00a0Executive Producer</p>\n<p>Rex Mundi<br>Producer</p>\n<p>The Ginger Man<br>Producer</p>\n<p>The Night Stalker<br>Producer</p>\n<p>The Secret World<br>(TV Series)\u00a0\u2013\u00a0Producer</p>\n<p>The Thin Man<br>Producer</p>\n<p>The Vault<br>Producer</p>\n<p>Tom's Dad<br>Producer</p>\n<p>Torched<br>(TV Movie)\u00a0-\u00a0Executive Producer</p>\n<p>True Crime Addict<br>(TV Movie)\u00a0-\u00a0Executive Producer</p>\n<p>Untitled Don Quixote Project<br>Producer</p>\n<p>Untitled Dr. Seuss Project<br>Producer</p>\n<p>Untitled Paul Revere Project<br>Producer</p>\n<p>Untitled Keith Richards Documentary<br>Director</p>\n<p>Puffins<br>(TV Mini-series)\u00a0-\u00a0Johnny Puff</p>\n<p>Call me crazy, but combine this list with the fact that the Hollywood Vampires are currently writing new work as well, it looks to me like Johnny Depp's doing just fine when it comes to his career.</p>\n<p>Amber Heard on the other hand, not so much.</p>", "photo": {"id": "225276267", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/9/af/xf/ncAFxfKrYDgEvpJ-800x450-noPad.jpg?1614728619", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "28633362", "createdAt": "2021-03-01T18:23:47.000Z", "title": "Amber Heard facing jail time?", "description": "<p>According to <a href=\"https://www.distractify.com/p/is-amber-heard-going-to-jail\" rel=\"nofollow\">Distractify</a>, Amber Heard could be facing up to three years of jail time if the court rules in Johnny Depp\u2019s favor.</p>\n<p>Amber Heard could be going to jail if Johnny Depp wins his lawsuit.<br>Basically,\u00a0Amber Heard\u00a0claimed on the stand in Johnny\u2019s libel suit against the Sun tabloid that Johnny Depp had physically and emotionally abused her.</p>\n<p>Back in 2015, Heard showed up in court with a black eye seeking a restraining order.\u00a0Johnny claims that Amber had faked her black eye seen at the court, and\u00a0Amber Heard\u2019s stylist\u00a0corroborated this. She stated, \u201cThroughout the day of December 16, 2015, I could see clearly that Amber Heard did not have any visible marks, bruises, cuts, or injuries to her face or any other part of her body.\u201d</p>\n<p>Since then, Johnny Depp has fought back against every bad word against him with libel and defamation lawsuits, so far against\u00a0The Sun\u00a0(which he lost), and against Amber Heard, which has not yet been seen in court. According to\u00a0Deadline, the latest update is that their court date is once again pushed back to at least April 11, 2022.\u00a0If Amber Heard loses, she could face jail\u00a0time for tampering with evidence.</p>\n<p>Even though it\u2019s possible Johnny Depp could win his upcoming lawsuit in the coming years, there\u2019s no confirming whether or not Amber Heard will face jail time. Regardless, this puts Warner Bros. in a tough spot. Even though fans had petitioned for Warner Bros. to force\u00a0Amber Heard\u2019s resignation from\u00a0Aquaman 2, WB hasn\u2019t announced any plans for change.</p>\n<p>However, in December 2020, a lifestyle article in\u00a0Forbes\u00a0about Emilia Clarke\u2019s home let the cat out of the bag that Emilia Clarke had signed on to replace Amber Heard as Mera in\u00a0Aquaman 2.\u00a0Sadly, though, there\u2019s still no confirmation. It could just be wishful thinking on the fans\u2019 part.</p>\n<p>It\u2019s not clear according to that article why Amber Heard could be facing jail time if Johnny Depp wins his appeal. They mention tampering with evidence, but don\u2019t say clearly what evidence, or how it was tampered with.</p>\n<p>I\u2019m going to go out on a limb and suggest that if Johnny wins his appeal, Heard might be on the hook for some very serious perjury charges. She\u2019s already being investigated in Australia for Perjury charges for falsifying statements about smuggling their dogs Pistol and Boo into the country. So it wouldn\u2019t be a far stretch if she\u2019s investigated in a London court for the same crime. Not for lying about the dogs, this time, though, but for potentially lying on the stand during Johnny\u2019s libel case against NGN and the Sun tabloid.</p>\n<p>It could be for something else altogether.</p>\n<p>Let\u2019s not forget that there\u2019s no statute of limitations in Australia for grievous bodily injury requiring medical attention. And that\u2019s where Heard cut off the tip of Johnny\u2019s finger with a Vodka bottle. And, no. I\u2019m not making a wild accusation there. Heard herself was recorded on audiotape admitting that she did, saying \u201cI didn\u2019t mean to do it!\u201d and begging Johnny not to leave her.</p>\n<p>The point being, if Johnny wanted to, he could always file a report with Australian police and have her put behind bars for a long time. And if her were the vengeful monster she keeps trying to say he is, he would have done that already.</p>\n<p>All Johnny\u2019s interested in is clearing his name. He\u2019s said it time and time again, and the fact that Heard\u2019s not cooling her heels already in an Australian prison proves it.</p>\n<p>What do you think? Will Heard face jail time if Johnny wins his appeal? Or if he wins his defamation suit? Should Johnny press charges in Australia over his severed finger?</p>\n<p>Yeah. I do too.</p>", "photo": {"id": "225270885", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/1/yp/om/ahyPoMgOnXIvGwP-800x450-noPad.jpg?1614623031", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "28619185", "createdAt": "2021-02-26T19:57:00.000Z", "title": "Amber Heard Physically unfit?", "description": "<p>It\u2019s looking more and more like Amber Heard really won\u2019t be in Aquaman 2.</p>\n<p>This petition has reported long since that Heard\u2019s contract has been bought out by WB and that she won\u2019t appear in Aquaman 2. But the masses want proof, rightfully so. Well, the more time goes by, the more it looks like we might actually have been properly informed.</p>\n<p>It\u2019s being reported lately that Emilia Clarke might have signed on to replace Amber Heard in Aquaman 2. But, again, there\u2019s no confirmation, though an article in Forbes seems to be as legit a source as it gets. So we can\u2019t be sure about that part of the speculation about Amber Heard\u2019s dubious future in AM2.</p>\n<p>However\u2026</p>\n<p>Recently, <a href=\"https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nf2AgE2eE8M\" rel=\"nofollow\">Popcorned Planet</a>\u2019s Andy Signore went on record saying: \u201cThe part of this story that is true is that, yes, Amber Heard is fired from Aquaman 2. Now, from what I\u2019ve heard so far she\u2019s been fired from Aquaman 2. From what I\u2019ve heard through a source, though other people that are involved in the production is that it already happened.\u201d</p>\n<p>Previously, we\u2019ve heard that WB bought out Heard\u2019s contract because she might not be bondable (due to alcohol and drug use, perhaps?). If she can\u2019t be insured for the duration of filming, she can\u2019t film.</p>\n<p>But the reason might be something completely different than what we thought.</p>\n<p>According to <a href=\"https://www.sausageroll.com.au/entertainment/movies/amber-heard-aquaman-2-contract-terminated-for-health-fitness-reasons/\" rel=\"nofollow\">Sausage Roll</a>, Amber Heard might not appear in AM2 because she \u2018s not physically fit enough. They say: \u201cAmber Heard did not pass her physical examination. She\u2019s put on some pounds and is in terrible shape. There is a clause in her contract which says she is required to be in good form ahead of shooting and she violated that.\u201d</p>\n<p>True to form, Heard manages to blame Johnny Depp for it, throwing Covid in for good measure. \u201cHeard allegedly blamed Johnny Depp and COVID-19 for her deteriorating health, saying that she\u2019s been under tremendous amount of stress and has been suffering from depression but she insists that she will get back in shape.\u201d</p>\n<p>Filming for Aquaman 2 is set to start filming in June (2021), so it remains to be seen whether or not she\u2019ll get back in shape. We\u2019ll also have to wait and see if she is, or becomes, bondable for filming.</p>\n<p>That seems like a lot to happen in just a few months.</p>\n<p>Also, according to another industry insider, Heard may have failed to report an injury. If she were injured, failed to report it and got further injured during training, which is quite rigorous, the studio would have been on the hook for it. So, it's entirely possible that this is the nature of Heard being physically unfit.</p>\n<p>Whichever the reason it seems more likely than not that the rumors about Amber Heard not appearing in AM2 are true. I don\u2019t know whether it will Emelia Clarke or not that takes over, but I\u2019m totally on board with it if it is.</p>\n<p>What do you think? Will Amber Heard fit back into the fish suit again or will we see somebody else taking over screen time in AM2?</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://www.small-screen.co.uk/amber-heard-fired-aquaman-2-mera-dc-comics/\" rel=\"nofollow\">source</a></p>", "photo": {"id": "225260964", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/4/rk/tm/UwrKTMBCvDQOQLj-800x450-noPad.jpg?1614369423", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}], "pageInfo": {"endCursor": "YXJyYXljb25uZWN0aW9uOjM1", "hasNextPage": true}}}}}, {"data": {"petition": {"id": "14451136", "slug": "dc-entertainment-remove-amber-heard-from-aquaman-2", "user": {"id": "24448735", "displayName": "Jeanne Larson", "photo": {"id": "221862322", "userSmall": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/7/xs/ly/cXXSLydpSVDqIVB-48x48-noPad.jpg?1553098061", "processing": false}}}, "organization": null, "updatesConnection": {"nodes": [{"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "28613653", "createdAt": "2021-02-25T21:01:42.000Z", "title": "Johnny Depp pissed off?", "description": "<p>The latest story coming from leaker Daniel Richtman is saying that <a href=\"https://wegotthiscovered.com/movies/johnny-depp-reportedly-furious-amber-heard-job-offers/\" rel=\"nofollow\">Johnny Depp is furious</a> that his ex-wife Amber Heard\u2019s star appears to be rising as his falls. According to Richtman Depp is \u201cpissed\u201d that she keeps getting work.</p>\n<p>Heard recently appeared in CBS\u2019\u00a0The Stand\u00a0and is about to film\u00a0Aquaman 2\u00a0despite\u00a0multiple <a href=\"https://wegotthiscovered.com/movies/petition-amber-heard-fired-aquaman-2-closing-2m-signatures/\" rel=\"nofollow\">fan campaigns</a> trying to get her fired\u00a0(Mera will also play a minor role in\u00a0Zack Snyder\u2019s Justice League\u00a0next month, a movie that\u2019s already been filmed).</p>\n<p>But it\u2019s the latest rumor doing the rounds that must seriously enrage Depp, as reports say that Heard is\u00a0in contention to portray <a href=\"https://wegotthiscovered.com/movies/amber-heard-reportedly-play-liveaction-rapunzel-disney/\" rel=\"nofollow\">Rapunzel</a>\u00a0in Disney\u2019s live-action version of\u00a0Tangled.</p>\n<p>The actress potentially being hired by the House of Mouse for a big role just as they drop Depp from his most iconic part (Captain Jack Sparrow, of Disney\u2019s Pirates of the Caribbean franchise) must really stick in his craw.</p>\n<p>But this story isn\u2019t over yet, as Depp is mounting an appeal to the verdict in his failed libel suit against NGN media and the Sun tabloid, and there are lawsuits filed in Virginia that could go more favorably for him.</p>\n<p>Still, According to Richtman, right now, Heard is going from strength-to-strength and\u00a0Johnny Depp\u00a0is suffering major career damage. So even if he\u2019s eventually vindicated, he might never again be the A-lister he once was.</p>\n<p>Where to start.</p>\n<p>First, the sober truth is that Heard is a little long in the tooth to portray a Disney princess. Those girls are usually in their mid-teens, and Heard is twice that age now. It\u2019s highly unlikely that she\u2019s up for any such part.</p>\n<p>Second, after Heard has pestered Disney with subpoenas and legal shenanigans, it\u2019s not likely at all that they would line up to sign her for anything, let alone a role half her age.</p>\n<p>Third, Johnny is not hurting for work. If you look at Depp\u2019s <a href=\"https://pro.imdb.com/name/nm0000136?rf=cons_nm_meter&amp;ref_=cons_nm_meter\" rel=\"nofollow\">IMDB pro</a> page, he\u2019s lined up to be involved with more than twenty projects.</p>\n<p>Heard has <a href=\"https://www.imdb.com/name/nm1720028/\" rel=\"nofollow\">2 projects</a> on her books. Aquaman 2, which she probably won\u2019t appear in. Strong rumor has it that Emilia Clark will replace Heard in Aquaman 2.</p>\n<p>The other project is \u201cRun away with me\u201d a project which was abandoned years ago. Two movies she will most likely not even appear in. That\u2019s it. That\u2019s all she\u2019s got scheduled for future projects.</p>\n<p>Finally, but not least, it\u2019s looking more and more like Johnny Depp is going to be vindicated in both court proceedings, leaving him in a much more favorable position than Heard.</p>\n<p>So it\u2019s not quite as bleak for Depp as Richtman would have you believe. Either his information is faulty or he\u2019s just plain wrong.</p>\n<p>What do you think? Is Heard\u2019s star rising? Or is Depp coming out on top?</p>", "photo": {"id": "225257223", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/8/pj/sq/bdpJsQhkPxDtqNI-800x450-noPad.jpg?1614286904", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "28602060", "createdAt": "2021-02-24T00:26:36.000Z", "title": "Trial date pushed back", "description": "<p>The defamation suit Johnny Depp took out against his ex wife Amber Heard was scheduled to on May 7th, 2021. But, probably due to Covid, the trial date has been pushed back to April 11th, 2022.</p>\n<p>Now, it's possible that Johnny will get word back about his appeal to overturn the verdict in his libel suit against NGN and The Sun tabloid before he even sets foot in the courtroom for his defamation suit against Heard. He might be vindicated on the British front first.</p>\n<p>Heard has been worried in the past about how the defamation suit will affect her filming schedule. But if she's found to have lied in a British court, and if Australia has their way about her lying in one of their courts, her filming schedule might be the last thing she'll have to worry about.\u00a0</p>\n<p>Instead, the courts might have to figure out how to het her from jail to the courtroom. That could make for some interesting travel plans.</p>\n<p>Somehow, I doubt that the flight they'd put her on would have Champaign and caviar.\u00a0\u00a0</p>\n<p>What do you think? Will Heard go to jail for lying to a British High Court? Or will she get out of it somehow?</p>\n<p>Hat tip to <a href=\"https://twitter.com/LauraBockov/status/1364322724794007555/photo/1\" rel=\"nofollow\">Laura B</a>.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/circuit/sites/circuit/files/assets/documents/pdf/high-profile/depp%20v%20heard/cl-2019-2911-calendar-control-order-2-23-2021.pdf\" rel=\"nofollow\">SOURCE</a></p>", "photo": {"id": "225249390", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/6/kd/wq/tdkdwqwvNrjybrL-800x450-noPad.jpg?1614126397", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "28560793", "createdAt": "2021-02-16T19:45:28.000Z", "title": "Amber Heard a Disney Princess?", "description": "<p>According to \"Insider\" Daniel Richtman, Amber heard is in talks with the House of Mouse about playing a live-action Disney princess.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://insidethemagic.net/2021/02/amber-heard-tangled-ad1/\" rel=\"nofollow\">One article</a> says that she's negotiating to play princess Rapunzel in Tangled. <a href=\"https://www.giantfreakinrobot.com/ent/amber-heard-disney-princess.html\" rel=\"nofollow\">Another one</a> backs it up.</p>\n<p>I'm not quite sure how seriously to take these revelations.\u00a0</p>\n<p>First, there's the messy legal battle that's warring between Amber Heard and her ex-husband Johnny Depp. It's a sordid affair, and Heard has dragged Disney into it by demanding a plethora of documents from them, pretty much any dealing they ever had with Johnny Depp, his schedule, his contracts, his alleged drug use or bad behavior on the set, anything she can get her hands on.</p>\n<p>Maybe it's just me, but I don't think that Disney would be too quick to negotiate with somebody who's causing them so many legal woes.</p>\n<p>And second, there's the demographic of Disney princesses. Traditionally, Disney princesses are in their mid-teens, just coming into their own. Amber Heard is 34 years old, and not getting any younger. That's just about twice the age of the average Disney princess.\u00a0</p>\n<p>I suppose it's not impossible that Heard could be in talks with Disney to portray a princess, but I think it's highly unlikely.</p>\n<p>A lot of frivolous press has been floating around about Heard lately, but I personally think that this is among the more amusing.\u00a0</p>\n<p>What do you think? Would Amber Heard personify a Disney princess? Or has the time for kind of role come and long gone for her?</p>", "photo": {"id": "225220517", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/8/lw/xn/KIlwxNJYTqhbTMN-800x450-noPad.jpg?1613504731", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "28555166", "createdAt": "2021-02-15T20:49:24.000Z", "title": "Amber Heard wants Aquaman 3", "description": "<p>Often when putting together a franchise, the powers that be offer the principal players a three picture deal. That cuts down on scheduling conflicts and keeps actors from negotiating for a better deal in-between each picture. But that\u2019s not always the case. Just as often, they take it one film at a time.</p>\n<p>In the case of the Aquaman franchise, it looks like they opted to do one film at a time. If that is indeed the case, no actor is guaranteed a part in the second or third installment.</p>\n<p>According to insider Daniel Richtman, Amber Heard is already scrambling to try to secure her place in Aquaman 3, even though AM2 hasn\u2019t even begun to film yet.</p>\n<p>There are doubts about whether or not Heard will even appear in AM2. Almost 2 million people have made it clear that they don\u2019t want to see Amber Heard in any further AM films, and it\u2019s possible that WB is paying attention. One rumor has it that Heard\u2019s screen time in AM2 is being severely curtailed, with another female lead taking on more screen time.</p>\n<p>Other rumors whisper that Heard\u2019s contract has been bought out, meaning that while Heard got paid, she will not appear in the film at all.</p>\n<p>There are several factors that will likely determine whether Heard comes back in any subsequent Aquaman films. First, there are the court cases going back and forth between Heard and her ex-husband, Johnny Depp. Depp is suing Heard for Defamation for portraying him as a domestic abuser who physically abused and terrorized her throughout their marriage. Depp is having none of that is on a legal crusade to clear his good name and prove that it was Heard who was the abuser the entire time. Heard has a lot of sob storied and the support of her friends to back up her abuse storied, while Depp has video and audio recordings of her admitting to abusing him. Unlike Heard, Depp also has medical evidence, including a fingertip that got severed and a burn on his cheek from a cigarette being put out on his face.</p>\n<p>The two are also embroiled in litigation in England from a libel case that Depp leveled against NGN media and the Sun tabloid, for calling Depp a wife-beater. Initially, the judgement favored the Sun, who repeated that wife-beater claim again. But Depp is appealing the verdict, and will likely prevail.</p>\n<p>If these two cases go Depp\u2019s way, it doesn\u2019t bode well for Heard\u2019s continued presence in the AM franchise. Most films have a morals clause in their contracts, and if Heard is proven to be a domestic abuser again, that clause might very well be invoked.</p>\n<p>I say \u201cagain\u201d because Heard was arrested in 2009 for domestic abuse against her then wife Tasya Van Ree.</p>\n<p>There\u2019s also the issue of whether or not Heard is bondable. That is to say, whether or not she can be insured for the duration of filming. If she can\u2019t be insured for any reason, like a preexisting medical condition, excessive drug or alcohol abuse, she can\u2019t and won\u2019t be hired for any future AM project.</p>\n<p>Heard supporters insist that she\u2019ll be in AM2 and 3 because there hasn\u2019t been any official announcement from WB about her being dropped. But that\u2019s not the way it works. If Heard has been dropped, there likely won\u2019t be any announcement. The movie will simply come out without her in it. So fans who want her dropped who are waiting for an announcement won\u2019t get one. We\u2019ll just have to wait for the film to come out to see whether she\u2019s in it or not.</p>\n<p>Time will have to tell whether or not Amber Heard is in Aquaman 2, let alone Aquaman 3. We\u2019ll have to wait and see how those court cases come out, and whether or not Heard is bondable. As ever, I\u2019ll bring you the latest as I find it.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://wegotthiscovered.com/movies/amber-heard-reportedly-secure-aquaman-3-role/\" rel=\"nofollow\">SOURCE</a></p>", "photo": {"id": "225216787", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/2/vs/aa/UavsAaslEgIsluk-800x450-noPad.jpg?1613422168", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "28550493", "createdAt": "2021-02-14T20:58:00.000Z", "title": "Amber Heard is a nobody", "description": "<p>Amber Heard is a nobody, at least according to Amber Heard. In one of her latest court filings, Amber has a fit about people calling her that.</p>\n<p>If you recall, Heard filed in her original $100 million dollar counterclaim to Johnny Depp\u2019s $50 million dollar defamation suit against her, that there was an army of bots under Depp\u2019s command torturing her. Even creating and/or signing this very petition. An investigation found less than a dozen questionable Twitter accounts that might be bots, blowing that claim out of the water.</p>\n<p>Undaunted, Heard has shoved forward, trying to obtain personal data about 200 Twitter users, to prove that they\u2019re bots and not real people, I guess.</p>\n<p>Now, she\u2019s down to two. TWO people that she\u2019s upset at for: 1) saying they\u2019re proud of Johnny Depp for fighting to clear his name, and 2) refer to the defendant (Heard), a movie star, as \u201ca nobody.\u201d And she had to put that in there, that she\u2019s \u201ca movie star.\u201d She needed to point that out, I suppose, in case anybody forgets that she got lucky off the back of being married to Johnny Depp and scored Aquaman. Would she have gotten that movie on her own? Anybody? Bueller?</p>\n<p>She\u2019s throwing everything she can at the wall with regards to Twitter users, hoping that something will stick.</p>\n<p>Unfortunately, all of the statements she\u2019s throwing around by Twitter fans are protected opinions of celebrities. People just don\u2019t like her, and there\u2019s not one single thing she can do about it.</p>\n<p>What I suspect, however, is that she doesn\u2019t really expect any of this Twitter bluster to stick to the wall. I think it\u2019s a diversionary tactic, intended to direct attention away from the avalanche of evidence Johnny Depp has that\u2019s bearing down on her.</p>\n<p>And it works. For a minute. But she\u2019s deluding only herself if she thinks that the people who support Johnny Depp are about to lose sight of the big picture. They might point fingers and laugh at her folly when she tries some new antic, but they\u2019re steadfast to the case at the heart of the matter.</p>\n<p>What will she pull next? What new filing will she throw at the court to try to filibuster her way out of the inevitable? We\u2019ll have to wait and see. One thing that\u2019s sure is that it\u2019ll bring out more finger pointing and giggles, at least until the final verdicts come down. Then it will be Johnny Depp that gets the last laugh.</p>\n<p>Hat tip to <a href=\"https://twitter.com/poopah73/status/1360310642968850437\" rel=\"nofollow\">Lizzie Borden</a></p>", "photo": {"id": "225213452", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/2/ba/uv/AubAUvMnVkryAij-800x450-noPad.jpg?1613336282", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "28532880", "createdAt": "2021-02-11T14:36:03.000Z", "title": "iO tries to quash subpoena", "description": "<p>iO Tillet-Wright, fast friend of Amber Heard, is the guy that called 911 the fateful night of Amber Heard and Johnny Depp\u2019s last fight. You know, the one where Heard claimed that Depp struck her in the face with a phone.</p>\n<p>iO has been very vocal in his support of Heard, claiming to bear witness to the after-effects of many violent episodes where Heard said that Depp brutalized her. Blood on a pillow, hair on the floor, that sort of thing. Mind you, iO never witnessed any violence, just saw that (staged?) scene afterwards.</p>\n<p>Now, iO is trying to quash the subpoena calling for him to appear for a deposition.</p>\n<p>In his motion to quash, iO says: \u201cI am not a party to the above-referenced actions. I have personal knowledge of the matters set forth herein, and if called upon to testify thereto, I could and would completely do so.\u201d</p>\n<p>But\u2026</p>\n<p>\u201cI have never been served with any subpoena in this action (Case No. 19stcp04763) or in the Virginia Fairfax County Court Action (Case no. CL-2019-0002911). Rather, I understand that Mr. Depp\u2019s lawyers emailed copies of the subpoena to my lawyer, Lee Brenner, on January 20, 2021.\u201d</p>\n<p>\u201cI do not reside at the address of 6144 Panorama Street, Joshua Tree, CA 92252, and I have never resided at that address. I have no ownership interest in that address.\u201d</p>\n<p>I understand that a man named Anthony was at the address that day, and I have spoken to him. He said that he spoke to a process server that day (Jan 19, 2021) who left a pile of papers on the front step.\u201d</p>\n<p>\u201cI declare under penalty of perjury and under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct.\u201d</p>\n<p>\u201cExecuted this 8th day of February 2021, and Joshua Tree, California.\u201d</p>\n<p>And he signed it.</p>\n<p>Further: \u201cHere, Mr. Wright was not served with the subpoena at issue. See Wright Cecl. At \u00b6 3-5. First, he does not reside at the address listed on the Subpoena nor does he have any ownership interest in that address. Id., at \u00b63, Mr. Wright has spoken with a man named Anthony who was at the address listed on the \u201cproof of service\u201d on January 19 2021 and was told that a process server left a pile of papers on the front step. Id., at \u00b65. Mr. Wright does not know why anyone would say that they served him because they simply did not. Id., at \u00b6 4. In the light of the foregoing, the subpoenas are procedurally defective and should be quashed.</p>\n<p>Okay, then.</p>\n<p>First, if iO has no ownership or interest in that address, how does he know who was there on that day or any other? He clearly knows more than he's letting on, to have spoken with a man he says was there that day.</p>\n<p>Look, I don\u2019t care one way or another where iO lives, but this just doesn\u2019t add up.</p>\n<p>What\u2019s iO so scared of that he\u2019s trying to dodge his subpoena? Is he afraid that the hoax is finally going to catch up with him and that he could face charges of perjury if he lies to an American court? Fines can be hefty, and jail isn\u2019t exactly kind to trans persons.</p>\n<p>Maybe the time has come for iO to reconsider his position in the Amber Heard fiasco. Because, dodge as he might, that subpoena is going to catch up to him, like it or not.</p>\n<p>See images of the iO\u2019s quash paperwork <a href=\"https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Et6TSVGWQAIaift?format=png&amp;name=900x900\" rel=\"nofollow\">HERE</a>, <a href=\"https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Et6TThoWQAA5eDf?format=jpg&amp;name=large\" rel=\"nofollow\">HERE</a>, <a href=\"https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Et6TUDnXYAEVJ20?format=jpg&amp;name=medium\" rel=\"nofollow\">HERE</a>, <a href=\"https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Et6TUmxXIAMnAtC?format=jpg&amp;name=medium\" rel=\"nofollow\">HERE</a> and <a href=\"https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Et6TurSXcAUMgLl?format=png&amp;name=large\" rel=\"nofollow\">HERE</a>.</p>\n<p>Lofty hat tip to <a href=\"https://twitter.com/LauraBockov/status/1359686506093420545\" rel=\"nofollow\">Laura B</a>.</p>", "photo": {"id": "225201811", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/2/gr/kl/eGgrkLkniLLSsyF-800x450-noPad.jpg?1613054164", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "28521093", "createdAt": "2021-02-09T19:41:45.000Z", "title": "Minamata bombs? Not exactly.", "description": "<p>According to <a href=\"https://wegotthiscovered.com/movies/johnny-depps-movie-earns-15000-box-office/\" rel=\"nofollow\">We Got This Covered</a>, \"Minamata\u00a0didn\u2019t even chart among the fifteen highest-grossing titles of the weekend, meaning that it made less than $15,000.\"</p>\n<p>\"The dire performance of\u00a0Minamata\u00a0is yet another blow for\u00a0Johnny Depp\u2018s career,\" The article says.</p>\n<p>There's a problem with that report. The film hasn't been released yet.</p>\n<p>\"Over the past couple of days, varying outlets began reporting that Johnny Depp\u2019s new film absolutely bombed at the box office on its opening weekend. The news spread like wildfire despite there being no information to be easily gleaned about the movie\u2019s box office online. In fact, now the studios says the movie didn\u2019t open at all.\" Says <a href=\"https://www.cinemablend.com/news/2562629/no-johnny-depps-new-movie-did-not-bomb-horribly-minamata-opening-weekend\" rel=\"nofollow\">Cinemablend</a>.</p>\n<p>\"Minamata was not released this past weekend. MGM had postponed the release due to the pandemic and no new date has been set yet.\"</p>\n<p>That's the problem with the mainstream media, especially lately. They take a scrap of a story and run with it, or make one up all together, with no real basis in fact. We've seen that a lot with Johnny Depp since his split from ex-wife Amber Heard, their divorce, her accusations of domestic abuse and his legal efforts to clear his good name.</p>\n<p>If these articles show anything, it's not the demise of Johnny Depp's career. It's that you can't believe everything you read, especially when it comes to Johnny Depp and his ex.\u00a0</p>\n<p>Don't just believe headlines at face value, folks. Do a little homework to find out the facts.\u00a0</p>\n<p>Carry on.</p>", "photo": {"id": "225193850", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/8/wq/lu/SiWQLULWTwjeTkI-800x450-noPad.jpg?1612899707", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "28508017", "createdAt": "2021-02-07T17:17:38.000Z", "title": "Russian Bots sign the Petition", "description": "<p>In an interesting turn of events, a <a href=\"https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lbz-aaNo56U\" rel=\"nofollow\">new video</a> has surfaced of somebody using Russian bots to sign the petition to remove Amber Heard from Aquaman 2.</p>\n<p>In <a href=\"https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lbz-aaNo56U\" rel=\"nofollow\">the video</a>, a nameless, faceless person uses a Russian website to create over 2,000 signatures.</p>\n<p>According to the video\u2019s creator, for over 16 hours his bot signed the petition over 2,000 times. It can do 3,000 a day from ONE bot channel and infinitely more from multiple channels.</p>\n<p>The fact that the bots in this case are being made to look Russian in origin plays right into Amber Heard's narrative that all or most of the signatures on the petition are fake. And it's important that they're of Russian origin, since great measures were taken to try to tie them to Adam Waldman, Johnny Depp's lawyer and friend.</p>\n<p>According to this article: \"The bot\u2019s Russian origin is a crucial aspect of this story.\u00a0Adam Waldman,\u00a0Johnny Depp\u2019s\u00a0attorney who was\u00a0barred from his upcoming libel case\u00a0in the United States, is a former lobbyist for Russian oligarch\u00a0Oleg Deripaska,\u00a0a Russian billionaire, and Kremlin insider. It\u2019s believed by some\u00a0he was involved with or has insider knowledge, of the 2016 hacking of the US election.\"</p>\n<p>Laying it on really thick in the anti-Waldman crusade.</p>\n<p>In recent history, two things have apparently bothered Amber Heard: Adam Waldman and this petition. She took care of Waldman by successfully lobbying to get him removed from Johnny Depp's upcoming Fairfax defamation case against Amber Heard. That backfired, though, since removing Waldman from the case left him free to discuss the case freely. And he has been. Check out <a href=\"https://twitter.com/adam_waldman\" rel=\"nofollow\">Waldman's Twitter</a> feed to read some delightful insights into the case.</p>\n<p>And it's obvious that the petition bothers Heard, who mentions it prominently in her $100 million dollar countersuit.</p>\n<p>It's not the first time action has been taken to try and get the petition removed. Not long ago, negative comments were posted on the petition, and then reported as violations to try to get the petition taken down.</p>\n<p>That didn't work, and this isn't going to, either. I've already been in contact with Change.org, and rest assured. The petition is quite safe.</p>\n<p>Johnny Depp has a hearing on 18 March regarding his appeal in the UK libel case against the Sun, and the defamation suit in Fairfax is due to start in May - if it's not pushed back due to Covid.</p>\n<p>With these cases looming so large, it's possible that more shenanigans will pop up trying to further discredit Adam Waldman and attack the petition. Hopefully, both of these cases will reach fruition soon, and the matter can be decided, once and for all.\u00a0</p>\n<p>How do you think these cases will play out? Will Johnny Depp get justice? Or will Amber Heard prevail?</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://www.thegeekbuzz.com/the-basement/video-reveals-bots-signing-anti-amber-heard-petition/\" rel=\"nofollow\">SOURCE</a></p>", "photo": {"id": "225184786", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/3/mu/go/MVmUgOZpenuitse-800x450-noPad.jpg?1612718260", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "28504793", "createdAt": "2021-02-06T23:29:11.000Z", "title": "Amber Heard angry at WB", "description": "<p>Unless you\u2019re the title hero, then anyone in any major blockbuster franchise can theoretically be deemed expendable. For instance,\u00a0Aquaman 2\u00a0could recast the entire ensemble from top to bottom and people would still be willing to check it out, as long as Jason Momoa remained on board as Arthur Curry.</p>\n<p>Of course, there\u2019ve been a lot of fans\u00a0threatening to boycott the DCEU sequel\u00a0entirely based on Amber Heard\u2019s continued involvement in the underwater adventures,\u00a0although she doesn\u2019t care in the slightest and can\u2019t wait to suit up as Mera again. However, there are reports making the rounds that a new female lead is being introduced as well,\u00a0one that could potentially reduce Heard\u2019s screen time\u00a0in the finished product depending on how her next court case opposite ex-husband Johnny Depp plays out.</p>\n<p>On that note, insider Daniel Richtman is now claiming that the actress is furious after catching wind of the decision, and isn\u2019t happy with Warner Bros. trying to essentially force her out of the spotlight as the female lead of the highest-grossing DC Comics adaptation in history.\u00a0</p>\n<p>We might take this report with a grain of salt, though, considering insiders in the industry have been saying for months that Heard won't be in Aquaman 2 at all.\u00a0</p>\n<p>Sources say that WB has bought out Heard's contract completely. That means that she'll be compensated for her contract without actually appearing in the film.\u00a0</p>\n<p>This flies in the face of some media claims that she's going to get a raise or that <a href=\"https://wegotthiscovered.com/movies/amber-heard-join-team-zack-snyders-justice-league/\" rel=\"nofollow\">Mera will take over</a> for the titular Arthur Curry in the Justice League movies. I guess we'll just have to wait and see who's right.</p>\n<p>Who do you believe? Industry insiders or the mainstream media?</p>\n<p>Yeah. Me too.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://wegotthiscovered.com/movies/amber-heard-reportedly-angry-wb-steal-spotlight-aquaman-2/\" rel=\"nofollow\">SOURCE</a></p>", "photo": {"id": "225182581", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/2/ta/ym/yQtAymEgTLzrgFE-800x450-noPad.jpg?1612654152", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "28496270", "createdAt": "2021-02-05T14:56:45.000Z", "title": "Johnny Depp's appeal hearing has a date", "description": "<p>Last year, the high court of London found against Johnny Depp in a libel case he leveled against NGN newsgroup and The Sun tabloid in particular.\u00a0</p>\n<p>Johnny Depp and his legal team immediately appealed the decision.</p>\n<p>The appeals process has been rather involved, first going to the original judge to approve or deny that the appeal should move forward, which the judge denied. It was his judgement, after all. That was to be expected.</p>\n<p>That left team Depp open to take the appeal to the next level, further requesting that the judge's denial should be overlooked and that the appeal should move forward.</p>\n<p>That process could have left Depp and his crew in legal limbo for a year or more. But now, Depp's lawyers have asked for permission to introduce new evidence. That's ramped up the process, and there's going to be a hearing on the evidence, and the appeal at large.</p>\n<p>The hearing is set for March 18th.\u00a0</p>\n<p>If granted, this matter could be decided much sooner than we thought.</p>\n<p>What do you think? Will Johnny's appeal be granted? Or will he be out on his ear?</p>\n<p>Hat tip to <a href=\"https://twitter.com/LauraBockov/status/1357671294918090753\" rel=\"nofollow\">Laura B</a>.\u00a0</p>", "photo": {"id": "225177083", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/7/fu/ne/QjfuNEoFYtzjcQp-800x450-noPad.jpg?1612537006", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "28491118", "createdAt": "2021-02-04T20:05:59.000Z", "title": "Amber Heard's late night Twitter rant", "description": "<p>Following Evan Rachel Wood revealed Marilyn Manson as her alleged abuser, Amber Heard just can\u2019t seem to keep her face out of it. She\u2019s tying herself to Wood, including them together in her claims railing against men she seems to allege are getting away with abusing women, calling out the media, saying: \u201c...and yet, no one sees the trend here? Everyone wants to tag a bathroom wall, no one wants to understand the writing. Evan &amp; I aren\u2019t the 1st to raise our hands. Are you done ignoring it?\u201d</p>\n<p>It seems that Heard went on a bender last night, posting about how the media seems to be ignoring Marilyn Manson after Wood\u2019s allegations.</p>\n<p>What it\u2019s got to do with her, one has to wonder. There are some Johnny Depp fans that really don\u2019t want to see Johnny dragged through the mud in the Manson case, but it seems that Heard is desperate to make sure that he is, by association.</p>\n<p>In her meltdown, at one point, Heard goes off on somebody that calls her a fraud, telling them to shut up if they haven\u2019t been in a situation where they were being strangled and fighting for their life. And, true to fashion, she did it using the tweenspeak trend of using numbers to abbreviate words, making it that much harder to take her accusations and vitriol seriously.</p>\n<p>Is she now saying that she herself has been strangled? Are these new allegations she\u2019s coming up with against Johnny Depp, or did she at one point say that he was strangling her while he was brutalizing her. Is that part of the testimony she gave behind closed doors? Or was that \u201cjust\u201d about being brutally raped? Is there anything she won\u2019t come up with to throw at Johnny Depp to try and make her case stick?</p>\n<p>In another post, she continues her rage against rich white men, which some might say is rather ironic since those have been the type of men she\u2019s spent her intimate time with. Or, perhaps she\u2019s just talking about the ones that have rejected her.</p>\n<p>If you recall, Heard\u2019s former assistant Kate James revealed that Heard stole her story of being raped. Is she now appropriating Wood\u2019s story about being strangled?</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EtZ1utgXAAcrXET?format=jpg&amp;name=small\" rel=\"nofollow\">HERE</a>, <a href=\"https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EtYbXxtUYAECKld?format=png&amp;name=small\" rel=\"nofollow\">HERE</a>, <a href=\"https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EtaAQw7WYAEIKGB?format=jpg&amp;name=large\" rel=\"nofollow\">HERE</a> and <a href=\"https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EtZ7kD2XYAAZPhO?format=jpg&amp;name=360x360\" rel=\"nofollow\">HERE</a> are some screen shots of Heard\u2019s rant. They're taken out of order, from different posts and different conversations, but they are her own words, so enjoy.\u00a0</p>\n<p>Heard amusingly refer to Johnny Depp fans as Wald-Mignons - referring to Depp's lawyer and friend Adam Waldman. I'm pretty sure she meant minions, but fell flat with the intended slight. One fan responded that Mignon actually means cute or pretty, \"...so, thanks.\"</p>\n<p>It seems that Heard is desperate at this point, especially with Depp\u2019s appeal in the UK case looming so near in the future. We all thought we\u2019d have to wait up to two years to hear anything else about that, but here it is, with a huge milestone in the case happening just next month.</p>\n<p>Yes, she seems desperate. And with what could be a huge victory for Depp looming large on the very near horizon, it stands to reason that we'll likely see more from Heard, whether it's in the context of her own case or not.\u00a0</p>\n<p>Hat tips to everybody that provided screen shots.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/films/news/amber-heard-marilyn-manson-allegations-b1797749.html\" rel=\"nofollow\">SOURCE</a></p>", "photo": {"id": "225173740", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/6/hx/tz/HrhXTZEdDZSGhpe-800x450-noPad.jpg?1612469162", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "28483513", "createdAt": "2021-02-03T20:04:31.000Z", "title": "Aquaman 2 filming in London?", "description": "<p>Dolph Lundgren, who plays King Nereus in the\u00a0James Wan movie Aquaman, revealed all in a recent appearance at\u00a0Wizard World Virtual Experiences 2021, telling fans that he'll be diving back into the CGI ocean \"this summer\".</p>\n<p>Keeping things relatively coy, Lundgren said: \"I may be doing\u00a0Aquaman 2\u00a0this summer, shooting in London. And that's coming out the following year in the theatres, they hope.\"</p>\n<p>Aquaman, the first, was filmed in Australia. So why the move for part 2?</p>\n<p>Probably because of how seriously Australia takes their bio-laws. Everybody coming into the country has to endure a quarantine period. And that just might not be feasible for such a large production, with people coming and going.\u00a0</p>\n<p>We'll have to wait and see when and where Aquaman 2 starts filming. And who will be in it.\u00a0</p>\n<p>More as it happens.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://www.digitalspy.com/movies/a35393732/aquaman-2-filming-start-date-revealed-dolph-lundgren/\" rel=\"nofollow\">SOURCE</a></p>", "photo": {"id": "225168408", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/5/xg/xp/qpXGxPGAcakircb-800x450-noPad.jpg?1612382673", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}], "pageInfo": {"endCursor": "YXJyYXljb25uZWN0aW9uOjQ3", "hasNextPage": true}}}}}, {"data": {"petition": {"id": "14451136", "slug": "dc-entertainment-remove-amber-heard-from-aquaman-2", "user": {"id": "24448735", "displayName": "Jeanne Larson", "photo": {"id": "221862322", "userSmall": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/7/xs/ly/cXXSLydpSVDqIVB-48x48-noPad.jpg?1553098061", "processing": false}}}, "organization": null, "updatesConnection": {"nodes": [{"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "28476056", "createdAt": "2021-02-02T20:21:56.000Z", "title": "New evidence", "description": "<p>Last year, Johnny Depp sued NGN and the Sun tabloid over a headline that labeled him a \u201cwife beater.\u201d During testimony, Amber Heard testified that she had been brutalized by Johnnhy Depp on a number of occasions.</p>\n<p>Following a three-week trial in July last year, Mr. Justice Nicol ruled that Mr Depp, 57, assaulted Ms. Heard, 34, on a dozen occasions and put her in \u201cfear for her life\u201d at least three times.</p>\n<p>Depp is challenging that ruling.</p>\n<p>As of yesterday, Johnny Depp\u2019s legal team is asking to submit new evidence that was previously unheard during the trial but has direct bearing upon Depp\u2019s appeal request.</p>\n<p>There\u2019s some speculation among netizens as to what that evidence could be. Some hope for those salacious Toronto tapes, but more think that the new evidence has to do with proving that Heard lied about donating $7 million dollars to charity as a condition of their divorce. It was those charitable donations that caused Justice Nicol to decide that Heard was not a \u201cgold digger.\u201d If it can be proven that she didn\u2019t donate the money, Nicol\u2019s finding in that regard can definitely be challenged, and could affect whether or not Depp can continue with his appeal process.</p>\n<p>There will be a two-hour hearing sometime between March 15th and 30th regarding that matter.</p>\n<p>You can see some of the paperwork <a href=\"https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EtO-oFwXYAEVlYe?format=jpg&amp;name=large\" rel=\"nofollow\">HERE</a> and <a href=\"https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EtO-oFuXMAAh9Hr?format=jpg&amp;name=large\" rel=\"nofollow\">HERE</a>,</p>\n<p>Huge Hat tip to <a href=\"https://twitter.com/LauraBockov/status/1356637514438762497\" rel=\"nofollow\">Laura B</a>.</p>", "photo": {"id": "225163090", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/6/ht/yw/oiHTyWGOsWgywVE-800x450-noPad.jpg?1612297319", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "28469977", "createdAt": "2021-02-02T00:02:36.000Z", "title": "Evan Rachel Wood accuses Marilyn Manson", "description": "<p>Evan Rachel wood has been talking for a couple of years about having been allegedly horribly abused by an ex. She spoke before panels and worked hard to try to reform domestic abuse laws.</p>\n<p>Today, she came forward with the name of her <a href=\"https://www.usatoday.com/story/entertainment/celebrities/2021/02/01/marilyn-manson-accused-horrifically-abusing-evan-rachel-wood/4335539001/#:~:text=Manson%2C%20in%20a%202009%20Q%26A,told%20the%20outlet%20of%20Wood.\" rel=\"nofollow\">alleged abuser: Marilyn Manson</a>. The two got together when Wood was in her teens and MM was in his thirties.</p>\n<p>There are a lot of people who immediately believe Wood because of her history of talking about this alleged abuse, and because Manson is just so weird. Also because he wrote in his autobiography that he used to be an abusive piece of shit and that he used to imagine crushing her skull with a sledgehammer. And for saying that the song \u201cI Want to Kill You Like They Do in The Movies\u201d was inspired by one of their breakups.</p>\n<p>On top of that, four other women have stepped forward with similar accusations of their own against MM.</p>\n<p>All of that, along with Wood\u2019s disturbing allegations have a lot of people willing to crucify MM on the nearest telephone pole.</p>\n<p>What does that have to do with Amber Heard or Aquaman 2? At first glance, nothing. But if we take a closer look, the associations abound.</p>\n<p>First, ERW is \u201cclose\u201d friends with Heard. Wood has come out in <a href=\"https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/entertainment/english/hollywood/news/Evan-Rachel-Wood-defends-Amber-Heard-amid-her-feud-with-Johnny-Depp/articleshow/53280392.cms\" rel=\"nofollow\">support of Heard</a>\u2019s allegations against Johnny Depp since Heard first started to allege them \u2013 which is just about the time that Wood started talking about being a victim of domestic abuse. Coincidence number one.</p>\n<p>Also, it\u2019s a pretty well-known fact that MM is (or was) best of buddies with Johnny Depp. The two of them haven\u2019t been seen together in about a year, but they have a long history of being besties. Whether or not that\u2019s still the case isn\u2019t really known.</p>\n<p>It\u2019s also a fact that as far as I know, none of the women accusing MM ever called the police or filed any reports. The only word we have is in the media and on social media. I\u2019m not saying that makes them liars, far from it. A lot of victims never report their abuse. Johnny Depp didn\u2019t call the police. He relied upon his own private security to protect him.</p>\n<p>All I\u2019m saying is that the allegations against MM are pretty severe, with women saying they\u2019ve been violently raped, had their lives threatened, were locked in closets, were beaten, even whipped, and more. With allegations so severe, it\u2019s easy to wonder why the police weren\u2019t called, at least by one of them. It would certainly make the allegations easier to swallow.</p>\n<p>I\u2019m also not saying MM didn\u2019t do it. His own words in his autobiography don\u2019t bode well for him, certainly.</p>\n<p>What I\u2019m saying is that we need to wait and see some proof, one way or the other. Until that happens, all we have is a she-say/he-say situation.</p>\n<p>It could come down in a number of ways. MM could be the heartless, sadistic monster his self-proclaimed victims say he is, and he should be locked up for life.</p>\n<p>Or it could come down that the girls are in cahoots. Wood and Heard, I mean. The two of them, friends, have been alleging abuse against MM and Johnny Depp for roughly the same amount of time, and now would be a great time to come forward with MM\u2019s name, what with the legalities between Heard and Johnny Depp shaping up the way they are. It\u2019s not looking too good for Heard in the Fairfax, VA defamation case Johnny has leveled against her. So what better time to cut the legs out from under Johnny\u2019s bff with allegations of even more monstrous abuse?</p>\n<p>Or the two cases could have nothing whatsoever to do with each other but coincidence.</p>\n<p>Right now, it\u2019s too soon to call.</p>\n<p>One thing that is a fact is that Amber Heard has made it more difficult for victims of either gender to come forward with their stories of abuse thanks to her lies about being abused. Her sh*tstorm of mainstream media stories and crusade through the #MeToo movement have made it nigh impossible for anybody to come forward without enduring intense scrutiny. Gone are the days when we could #BelieveAllWomen. Heard\u2019s completely ruined that.</p>\n<p>So yeah. While there is a faction ready to believe her outright, ERW is being looked at with some skepticism by a large contingency.</p>\n<p>The only real truth here is that time will have to tell the truth of what\u2019s going on. My suggestion is to neither believe nor deny these allegations against MM until there\u2019s some shred of proof to back them up, or to prove that they\u2019re false.</p>\n<p>That\u2019s what happened with Johnny Depp. He was accused of domestic abuse and a lot of people believed it. Then proof came out that those allegations were false.</p>\n<p>That\u2019s what I\u2019m saying we should do here. Wait for some proof. Reserve judgement until we know definitively, one way or the other. The truth always outs, and it will in this case, too.</p>\n<p>What do you think? Hang the dude\u2019s reputation on her word? Or wait and see?</p>", "photo": {"id": "225158142", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/9/rl/ds/fMrlDSKhJQkHUzj-800x450-noPad.jpg?1612224157", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "28461870", "createdAt": "2021-01-31T20:03:22.000Z", "title": "What is Amber Heard worth?", "description": "<p>There's <a href=\"https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Es_GRo6XIAAOXJ_?format=jpg&amp;name=large\" rel=\"nofollow\">THIS</a> snippet from some magazine suggesting that Heard was paid $7 million dollars for her part as Mera in Aquaman 2.\u00a0</p>\n<p>Let's take a look at that, shall we?</p>\n<p>Jason Momoa's total net worth is reported to be $14 million, and that's combined with his wife, former Cosby kid Lisa Bonet's net worth. It's not impossible that Momoa was paid a figure in the millions, but it's not likely.\u00a0</p>\n<p>Let's take a look at some examples for comparison.</p>\n<p>Robert Downey Jr, a talented and well-respected actor was reportedly paid $500 thousand for Iron Man.\u00a0</p>\n<p>Gal Gadot was reportedly paid $300 thousand for Wonder Woman.</p>\n<p>These two were the stars of their movies. And we're supposed to believe that Amber Heard was paid $7 million for a supporting role? It's not impossible, I suppose. But I suspect that pigs would sooner fly.</p>\n<p>The same magazine clip claims that Heard will probably make closer to $10 million for her part in Aquaman 2.</p>\n<p>Let's take a look at that, too.</p>\n<p>Sources have confirmed that Amber Heard will not be in Aquaman 2. She hasn't been fired, exactly. Word has it that she was never re-hired. Being bondable is one concern. Morals clause infringements might very well be another.</p>\n<p>Rather, her contract has reportedly been bought out by WB. So, while she might have been paid for the project, she will likely not appear in it.</p>\n<p>Like other stories about Amber Heard, I suspect that this one is greatly exaggerated.\u00a0</p>\n<p>What do you think? Is Heard dipped in gold and worth millions? Or is she on her way out the door from Hollywood?</p>", "photo": {"id": "225152561", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/3/bq/tt/uLbQtToFGCFlEYl-800x450-noPad.jpg?1612123406", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "28451726", "createdAt": "2021-01-29T20:31:22.000Z", "title": "Fairfax and Oz", "description": "<p>It's entirely possible that Johnny Depp's defamation trial against his ex-wife Amber Heard might get pushed back into the timing of when Heard claims she's supposed to be filming Aquaman 2.\u00a0</p>\n<p>Remember when Johnny Depp wanted to make arrangements for the trial to allow for his filming of FB? Heard successfully argued against it, refusing to let the court make any such allowances for him. That might, in part, have been why Johnny Depp was asked to step down from the franchise. His filming schedule would have been interrupted - partly by that three-day deposition she made him sit for that conflicted with filming.</p>\n<p>Well, now the shoe is on the other foot.</p>\n<p>Because of court's Covid-related scheduling conflicts, the case may very well be pushed back into what she claims will be HER filming schedule. And, since she already argued against scheduling court around filming for him, the same applies to her.\u00a0</p>\n<p>If .court couldn't be rescheduled for him, it can't be rescheduled for her.</p>\n<p>Sauce for the gander is just as good for the goose.</p>\n<p>There's also the small matter of fact that filming for Aquaman 2 will take place in Australia, where Heard is being investigated for perjury in relation to smuggling her dogs into Australia.\u00a0</p>\n<p>Given both of these circumstances, and the fact that reliable sources report that her contract has been bought out, chances are very slim (see what I did there?) that Heard will appear in Aquaman 2.</p>\n<p>What do you think? Will Heard be AM2? Or is she all washed up?</p>\n<p>Hat tip to <a href=\"https://twitter.com/CultStitch/status/1355178206849019904\" rel=\"nofollow\">Stitch_Cult</a></p>", "photo": {"id": "225145801", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/4/gc/ss/sEGcSSAdrMswSfG-800x450-noPad.jpg?1611952288", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "28424879", "createdAt": "2021-01-25T18:44:59.000Z", "title": "Pulled or cut?", "description": "<p>Amber Heard insisted in her testimony that Johnny Depp pulled her hair no fewer than 12 times over the course of 5 years, leaving open wounds on her scalp at least once. Toward that end, Heard has circulated <a href=\"https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EsfwmnoW8AE6RJZ?format=jpg&amp;name=small\" rel=\"nofollow\">this picture</a> showing her pointing at the incriminating hair laying in the floor in one perfect clump.</p>\n<p>Let's take a look at that, shall we?</p>\n<p>There isn't a root on a single one of those hairs, no bits of skin or flesh.</p>\n<p>Let us now consider a few questions that Lawyer laws asked her in response to those claims:\u00a0</p>\n<p>Laws: why do we see no roots with the pulled out hair? <br>AH: Because it broke, where he grabbed it. <br>Laws: Then how do we see a picture of an injured scalp, when the hair just broke? <br>AH: .-------------</p>\n<p>Right. There's no real answer to that. Because if hair on somebody's head is being violently yanked, whole clumps of it don't just break off, no matter how damaged it is.</p>\n<p>No. There's no evidence to show that this clump of hair \"broke\" off during a violent tussle. And that begs the question: Where did it come from? Is it possible that this photo is staged to try to frame Depp?</p>\n<p>You tell me.</p>", "photo": {"id": "225127501", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/4/ti/oe/HfTioENyropnEzG-800x450-noPad.jpg?1611600303", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "28408750", "createdAt": "2021-01-22T17:08:35.000Z", "title": "Both Toxic?", "description": "<p>I still see people using the argument that both Johnny Depp and Amber Heard were toxic and violent. So, the theory goes, it's a wash.</p>\n<p>Let's take a look at that, shall we?\u00a0</p>\n<p>Amber Heard recorded conversations with herself and ex Johnny Depp, in which she calls him a baby for ducking out of fights. She criticizes him harshly for leaving every single fight, admonishing him for not staying and fighting.</p>\n<p>She also admits to being the one that starts physical fights. Johnny answers that when things get physical, they have to separate, and she berates him again, daring him to tell the world that he's a victim because nobody will believe him.</p>\n<p>If you can tolerate listening to Johnny being verbally abused and gaslit, you can hear the conversation <a href=\"https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7947733/Amber-Heard-admits-hitting-ex-husband-Johnny-Depp-pelting-pots-pans-tape.html\" rel=\"nofollow\">HERE</a>.\u00a0</p>\n<p>Now, you tell me. Does it sound like the action of a violent man to leave whenever fights get physical, started by Heard, by her own admission?</p>\n<p>Of course not. But there are people out there that want to believe Heard because she's a woman, or who haven't bothered to educate themselves to the facts of the case.</p>\n<p>That's why Johnny's case is so important. Not just to clear his own name, but to clear a path for abused men to be able to come forward as victims and be believed.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EsMX0PyWMAABQ90?format=jpg&amp;name=medium\" rel=\"nofollow\">HERE</a> is a schedule of upcoming events related to the Depp/Heard legal battle. Hat Tip to Laura B.\u00a0</p>", "photo": {"id": "225116128", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/8/zg/ap/gUzgaPzaTEWNoHH-800x450-noPad.jpg?1611335317", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "28396893", "createdAt": "2021-01-20T17:56:13.000Z", "title": "Amber Heard's nonexistent injuries", "description": "<p><a href=\"https://twitter.com/virgovi65655518/status/1351947450903384074\" rel=\"nofollow\">Qwerty</a>, Twitterverse denizen extraordinaire, posted a thread about Amber Heard\u2019s claims of injury, with proof of how each never happened.</p>\n<p>It\u2019s a gorgeous <a href=\"https://twitter.com/virgovi65655518/status/1351947450903384074\" rel=\"nofollow\">thread</a>, complete with pictures and irrefutable proof. I highly suggest that you check it out. Especially if you\u2019re one of those people that still, unexplainably, believe Heard\u2019s version of events. There\u2019s no denying the pictures, or Heard\u2019s own words.</p>\n<p>For example, this picture was taken 2 days after Amber claims Johnny Depp knelt on her back and was hitting her, slapping her, and pulling her hair. Do you see any injuries? Nope. Me neither.</p>\n<p>This picture also flies in the face of Heard's testimony that Johnny didn't let her wear anything too revealing when they were together.</p>\n<p>Funny how those lies add up, innit?</p>\n<p>Massive hat tip to dearest <a href=\"https://twitter.com/virgovi65655518/status/1351947450903384074\" rel=\"nofollow\">Qwerty</a>.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://twitter.com/virgovi65655518/status/1351947450903384074\" rel=\"nofollow\">SOURCE</a></p>", "photo": {"id": "225107508", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/4/dd/jl/TnddJlymmaHCYcO-800x450-noPad.jpg?1611165375", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "28393118", "createdAt": "2021-01-20T00:50:15.000Z", "title": "Johnny Depp's lawyer speaks", "description": "<p>Adam W, Johnny Depp's friend and lawyer has been gloriously dishing the Tea about Amber Heard on <a href=\"https://twitter.com/adam_waldman\" rel=\"nofollow\">Twitter.</a> It's a thing of beauty.\u00a0</p>\n<p>If you want to keep up with the latest on what's wrong with Amber Heard's case, be sure to look him up.</p>", "photo": {"id": "225104760", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/7/nm/vf/WxnMvfUGfzUIaut-800x450-noPad.jpg?1611103835", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "28380622", "createdAt": "2021-01-17T18:15:20.000Z", "title": "Poop-phobic?", "description": "<p>iO Tillet-Wright famously insisted on the stand that Amber Heard couldn't have left the pile of poop in Johnny Depp's bed because she's \"<a href=\"https://www.irishexaminer.com/lifestyle/celebrity/arid-40021751.html\" rel=\"nofollow\">Faecal-Phobic</a>.\"\u00a0</p>\n<p>Yet <a href=\"https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Er9AHA_XIAASLWi?format=jpg&amp;name=900x900\" rel=\"nofollow\">HERE'S</a> Amber Heard toting a sack o' poop after cleaning up after her dogs. <a href=\"https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Er9AtRCXYAU7Wjq?format=jpg&amp;name=large\" rel=\"nofollow\">HERE'S</a> another one. And <a href=\"https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Er9AaJDXYAQn_Kf?format=jpg&amp;name=900x900\" rel=\"nofollow\">another</a> from a different day. So...</p>\n<p>Poop-phobic? Or full of it? You tell me.\u00a0</p>", "photo": {"id": "225095496", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/0/fy/hi/QwfyHIfCIuXIljr-800x450-noPad.jpg?1610907322", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "28371071", "createdAt": "2021-01-15T18:52:24.000Z", "title": "Heard wants to depose Disney and the LAPD", "description": "<p>Amber Heard continues her legal posturing ahead of Johnny Depp's defamation suit against her, which is set to begin in May, 2021.</p>\n<p>There's a subpoena issued for \"an executive\" from Disney, seeking: \u201call information relating to documents and communications of any nature\u201d on Depp and \u201cincidents of drug or alcohol use (including suspected drug or alcohol use).\u201d Similarly, they are looking for any information about \u201cany delays or tardiness caused by Mr. Depp,\u201d \u201cany incidents of violence or abuse by Mr. Depp,\u201d any info on impute the actor had or \u201chiring, casting,\u201d and \u201cdisagreements with the writers, directors or producers with the filming, editing and/or release of Pirates 5.\u201d</p>\n<p>There's a subpoena out for the LAPD as well, wanting: everything that the police have on file regarding a May altercation between Heard and Depp that led to Heard receiving a restraining order against Depp. And they mean everything. Any correspondence, body cam footage, everything.\u00a0</p>\n<p>Heard insists that the final altercation between herself and Johnny Depp was Depp's fault because he was physically and verbally abusing her. Johnny insists that the altercation never happened, that it's a hoax perpetrated by Heard and her close circle of friends.</p>\n<p>If body cam footage of the police's response exists, it could go a long way toward proving one position or the other.\u00a0</p>\n<p>The court date is looming ever nearer. We'll have to wait and see how this one goes. If you remember Johnny lost a libel suit against the Sun because the judge said he believed Heard.\u00a0</p>\n<p>That case is under appeal, so we'll have to see how that one turns out, too. It's not over for Johnny in either case. Not by a long shot. He is determined to clear his name, and there is an army of fans worldwide that support him wholeheartedly.\u00a0</p>\n<p>I'm one of them.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://www.cbr.com/amber-heard-johnny-depp-lapd-disney-discovery-lawsuit/\" rel=\"nofollow\">SOURCE</a></p>", "photo": {"id": "225088841", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/3/on/hz/epoNHZszclnXiCj-800x450-noPad.jpg?1610736746", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "28365721", "createdAt": "2021-01-14T20:58:40.000Z", "title": "Updates", "description": "<p>I'm having a little trouble posting updates lately. I'll keep trying, so keep your fingers crossed that it's just a glitch I can get fixed.</p>", "photo": {"id": "225085286", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/4/ye/rl/sYyERlFLmHBmlqM-800x450-noPad.jpg?1610657924", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "28328823", "createdAt": "2021-01-08T16:13:57.000Z", "title": "Heard's missing Donations", "description": "<p>As part of her divorce settlement, Amber Heard pledged to donate her entire 7 million dollar settlement to charity. Namely, to the American Civil Liberties Union and the Children\u2019s Hospital of Los Angeles.</p>\n<p>Heard has said in numerous interviews in the last several years that the money was donated, split between those two charities. She also testified to it under oath, under penalty of Perjury.</p>\n<p>Well, lately, things have gotten really interesting. Turns out the only contribution that\u2019s been made to the Children\u2019s hospital was the original $100,000 Johnny Depp made on her behalf. And there\u2019s no proof of what, if anything, Amber Heard donated to the ACLU herself. Apparently there have been donations made on her behalf, but no proof that she, herself, donated a single red cent.</p>\n<p>For one thing, it was part of a legally binding contract (her divorce), that she would donate that money. For another thing, she testified under penalty of perjury that she donated it.</p>\n<p>As I understand it, the penalty for Perjury in the UK is up to 7 years in prison. Pile that on top of perjury charges she\u2019s being investigated for in Australia, and those years are really starting to pile up on her.</p>\n<p>In a truly amusing turn of events, Amber Heard, through her lawyer, is now claiming that she can\u2019t make those donations because of Johnny\u2019s ongoing litigation.</p>\n<p>\"However, Amber has been delayed in that goal because Mr. Depp filed a lawsuit against her, and consequently, she has been forced to spend millions of dollars defending Mr. Depp's false accusations against her.\"</p>\n<p>And never mind that Heard was supposed to have made those donations 3 years before he ever filed suit against her.</p>\n<p>Heard plans to fulfill those donations \u201ceventually,\u201d her lawyer says.</p>\n<p>So, basically, Heard\u2019s defense against being accused of not paying 7 million dollars to charity is to admit that she didn\u2019t pay 7 million dollars to charity, and blame it on Johnny.</p>\n<p>Keep on digging, Amber. Keep on digging.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://www.eonline.com/news/1225154/amber-heard-responds-to-claim-she-failed-to-donate-s7-million-johnny-depp-divorce-settlement\" rel=\"nofollow\">SOURCE</a></p>", "photo": {"id": "225058903", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/8/zd/yq/hJzdYQXZnEAyztb-800x450-noPad.jpg?1610122439", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}], "pageInfo": {"endCursor": "YXJyYXljb25uZWN0aW9uOjU5", "hasNextPage": true}}}}}, {"data": {"petition": {"id": "14451136", "slug": "dc-entertainment-remove-amber-heard-from-aquaman-2", "user": {"id": "24448735", "displayName": "Jeanne Larson", "photo": {"id": "221862322", "userSmall": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/7/xs/ly/cXXSLydpSVDqIVB-48x48-noPad.jpg?1553098061", "processing": false}}}, "organization": null, "updatesConnection": {"nodes": [{"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "28324876", "createdAt": "2021-01-07T23:04:39.000Z", "title": "Amber Heard contradicts herself. Again.", "description": "<p>Amber Heard has claimed in her testimony that ex-husband Johnny Depp tried to control her for up to three years or more by making sure she didn\u2019t have access to any cars. Depp\u2019s driver(s) took her everywhere, apparently, making sure she couldn\u2019t go anywhere on her own.</p>\n<p>But yet, Heard got into an accident driving Johnny\u2019s Range Rover. <a href=\"https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ErIVpgOXAAczgep?format=jpg&amp;name=900x900\" rel=\"nofollow\">HERE'S</a> statement trying her hardest to shirk responsibility for it. Whether she caused the accident is neither here nor there. What matters is that she was driving.</p>\n<p>How does that work, when she claims that she wasn\u2019t allowed to drive?</p>\n<p>Those inconsistencies keep piling up, don\u2019t they?</p>\n<p>Up next: How much did Heard actually donate to the Children\u2019s Hospital? Let\u2019s look at those receipts, shall we?</p>", "photo": {"id": "225055917", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/8/dw/dr/YmdwDrZoOEfwbFz-800x450-noPad.jpg?1610060680", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "28309556", "createdAt": "2021-01-05T17:05:32.000Z", "title": "We're Human!", "description": "<p>Hey, folks, guess what! We\u2019re human!</p>\n<p>The court in Fairfax, VA has issued an <a href=\"https://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/circuit/sites/circuit/files/assets/documents/pdf/opinions/cl-2019-2911-depp-v-heard-01-24-21.pdf\" rel=\"nofollow\">Opinion Letter</a> dismissing most of Amber Heard\u2019s counterclaim, and upholding only a few bits of it. But the parts where she mentions this petition say that:</p>\n<p>\u201cThe allegations that \u201cMr. Depp has initiated, coordinated, overseen and/or supported and amplified two change.org petitions: one to remove Ms. Heard as an actress in the Aquaman movie franchise, and one to remove her as a\u00a0 spokeswoman for L\u2019Oreal\u201d fails under the second prong of the VCCA. See Countercl. Paragraph 6. Nothing in that allegation implies facts showing that the change.org petitions included obscene language, threatened illegal or immoral acts, or suggest or propose obscene acts. See Va. Code 18.2-152.7:1. Likewise, the allegation that Mr. Depp \u201ccreated, coordinated, controlled, and/or manipulated social media accounts created specifically for the purpose of targeting Ms. Heard,\u201d also fails under the second prong of the VCCA. See VA code 18.2-152.7:1. The pleading fails to demonstrate that the social media accounts communicated obscene language, suggested obscene acts, or threatened illegal or immoral acts. Because neither of those allegations meet the second element of the VCCA, they cannot move forward in this litigation.\u201d</p>\n<p>So the court didn\u2019t buy all that nonsense about Johnny Depp\u00a0 being responsible for these petition and all us \u201cRussian bots.\u201d So even the court recognizes how ridiculous that claim was.</p>\n<p>The only bummer about it is that now, I probably won\u2019t be called to testify that Johnny Depp had nothing to do with the creation or maintenance of this petition. I was kind of looking forward to that.</p>\n<p>There's a lot more to the letter, addressing more about Heard's counterclaim, but that's the part that deals with this petition.</p>\n<p>You can read the Opinion Letter in full <a href=\"https://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/circuit/sites/circuit/files/assets/documents/pdf/opinions/cl-2019-2911-depp-v-heard-01-24-21.pdf\" rel=\"nofollow\">HERE</a></p>", "photo": {"id": "225044661", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/8/jv/da/WojVDarRKyryBRo-800x450-noPad.jpg?1609866334", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "28288452", "createdAt": "2020-12-31T17:35:44.000Z", "title": "The Calm Before the Storm", "description": "<p>There isn\u2019t much going on between Johnny Depp and Amber Heard these days. There isn\u2019t any new news about Johnny Depp\u2019s appeal in the high court of London regarding his libel suit against the Sun tabloid for calling him a Wife-Beater.</p>\n<p>And there isn\u2019t much new that\u2019s going on in Fairfax county. A few new subpoenas or motions get posted now and again, laying all the groundwork. But nothing too earth-shattering.</p>\n<p>Johnny seems to be upbeat, carrying on with the task of being fabulous Johnny Depp. There are whispers of upcoming projects that might include the Addams Family and maybe even Beetlejuice.</p>\n<p>Amber Heard has been keeping up the appearance of being an active actress and relevant activist, putting her speaking services on the market. For a mere 30 grand a pop, you can hire Heard to give a motivational speech about surviving hardship, civil liberties, or some such.</p>\n<p>Neither one of them seems to be addressing the upcoming defamation court case. Maybe there\u2019s nothing new to talk about, or maybe they\u2019re both playing the long game.</p>\n<p>Me, I think it\u2019s the calm before the storm. We still haven\u2019t seen the majority of the footage from the Eastern Columbia building\u2019s surveillance system, and we\u2019re waiting with bated breath for the Toronto tapes. When those hit the public purview, nothing\u2019s going to be the same.</p>\n<p>Why didn\u2019t we see this evidence in the Sun trial? Because the Sun had nothing to do with the Eastern Columbia building. The Sun had nothing to do with Toronto.</p>\n<p>Too many people lost sight of the fact that the Sun trial wasn\u2019t between Johnny Depp and Amber Heard. It was against Johnny Depp and The Sun. Amber Heard was only a witness.</p>\n<p>The Fairfax, VA trial is between Johnny Depp and Amber Heard. As such, ALL the evidence comes into play. And I sincerely doubt that we\u2019ve even scratched the surface with all the evidence we\u2019ve seen so far. If I were on Johnny Depp\u2019s legal team, I\u2019d save the best for last, pulling out the aces when the time\u2019s right. When it\u2019s so damning that Amber Heard will have absolutely no defense. When it will well and truly screw her, finally revealing her for who and what she is, what she did, and holding her accountable for it.</p>\n<p>We want to see the worst of it so that we can commiserate with Johnny and support him. But we also want him to prevail. We want him to win so that he can clear his good name, once and for all.</p>\n<p>Wait for it, folks. Things might be quiet now, but I\u2019m betting that the very best is yet to come.</p>", "photo": {"id": "225027246", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/2/cj/hy/cqCJhyftbHttrMb-800x450-noPad.jpg?1609436145", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "28277591", "createdAt": "2020-12-28T19:52:40.000Z", "title": "Messages from Depp and Heard", "description": "<p>Johnny Depp posted a hopeful <a href=\"https://www.instagram.com/p/CJRBzrpsRtw/?utm_source=ig_embed\" rel=\"nofollow\">message</a> to his 9 million Instagram followers:</p>\n<p>\u201cThis year has been so hard for so many. Here\u2019s to a better time ahead. Happy Holidays, everyone! My love and respect to you all. Eternally, JD. X\u201d He posted it with a picture of himself looking happy and well with Shane MacGowan on the set of the documentary\u00a0Crock of Gold,\u00a0which Depp produced.</p>\n<p>That post has received over \u00a01,965,562 likes.</p>\n<p>On the flip side of the same token, Amber Heard was interviewed by <a href=\"https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uretrfMA-Io\" rel=\"nofollow\">Access Hollywood</a> in a new video on YouTube talking about how she\u2019s adapted and survived 2,000, including her legal troubles with Johnny Depp.</p>\n<p>That video has received over 283,000 DISlikes.</p>\n<p>Likewise, the comments on that video are heavily laden with sentiments supporting Johnny Depp, identifying with him as the victim of Amber Heard\u2019s abuse. \u201cThey won\u2019t believe you, because you are a man\u201d many commenters post, due to an audio in which Amber Heard taunted Johnny saying that people wouldn\u2019t believe that he was in fact an abuse victim. They call Amber out for portraying herself as the victim when the opposite is in fact true, by her own admission. \u201cI was hitting you,\u201d She confessed to Johnny on tape. And the public won\u2019t let her forget it.</p>\n<p>Considering the number of likes Johnny Gets compared to the number of dislikes and negative comments Heard gets, I think it\u2019s pretty clear how the public feels about the two of them.\u00a0</p>", "photo": {"id": "225018363", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/5/wo/hd/UnwOHdPdbybJVaq-800x450-noPad.jpg?1609185161", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "28266946", "createdAt": "2020-12-24T19:56:57.000Z", "title": "Johnny Depp requests retrial", "description": "<p>Johnny Depp has asked the Court of Appeal to order a retrial of his libel claim against The Sun over an article calling him a \u201cwife beater\u201d, which a High Court judge found was \u201csubstantially true\u201d. Justice Nicol, the judge in the case, basically believed Amber Heard\u2019s claims that she was abused, and found that the Sun, therefore, had every right to call Depp a \u201cwife beater\u201d on their front page.</p>\n<p>Since this ruling, many tabloids, which I will not link to here, have run rampant, calling Depp a wife-beater and just about everything else in the book.</p>\n<p>Johnny\u2019s request for a retrial claims that he \u201cdid not receive a fair trial\u201d and the judge\u2019s ruling is \u201cplainly wrong\u201d and \u201cmanifestly unsafe\u201d, according to documents filed by Mr. Depp\u2019s legal team with the Court of Appeal.</p>\n<p>Says David Sherborne, counsel for Johnny Depp: \u201cThe judge failed to properly assess [Heard\u2019s] credibility by reference to documentary evidence, photographs, recordings or otherwise.\u201d He further claimed that audio recordings of Mr Depp and Ms Heard while they were in a relationship demonstrated that \u201cMs Heard had not only been the violent one \u2026 but that she had also been untruthful in her oral evidence about the appellant\u2019s violence\u201d.</p>\n<p>You can view the documents Johnny\u2019s legal team filed on <a href=\"https://www.nickwallis.com/courtofappeal\" rel=\"nofollow\">Nickwallis.com</a>.</p>\n<p>NGN will have to file a response and then a decision will be taken by a Court of Appeal judge on whether or not to allow the application (this can be done with or without a hearing). A decision could come down as early as January. If Depp\u2019s request for a retrial is dismissed, it\u2019s all over and Nicol\u2019s judgment stands.</p>\n<p>At that point, Johnny\u2019s only recourse against his ex-wife (Heard) will be his upcoming defamation suit against her resulting from her op-ed in the Washington Post, in which she describes herself as a survivor of his domestic abuse. She doesn\u2019t name him specifically in that piece, but she\u2019s been naming him ever since their split in every other outlet, so her message was clear and obvious.</p>\n<p>Here\u2019s hoping the new year brings Johnny the vindication he deserves.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://www.eveningexpress.co.uk/lifestyle/entertainment/johnny-depp-to-ask-court-of-appeal-to-order-retrial-of-wife-beater-libel-case/#:~:text=Johnny%20Depp%20has%20asked%20the,found%20was%20%E2%80%9Csubstantially%20true%E2%80%9D.\" rel=\"nofollow\">SOURCE</a><br>Hat tip to <a href=\"https://twitter.com/nickwallis/status/1342088042148995072\" rel=\"nofollow\">Nick Wallis</a></p>", "photo": {"id": "225009638", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/8/ud/fq/hJuDFQaLckQcyJT-800x450-noPad.jpg?1608839819", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "28262754", "createdAt": "2020-12-23T16:14:24.000Z", "title": "Amber Heard AM2 role shrinking", "description": "<p>Up until now, most of the fallout from Johnny Depp\u2019s legal woes with ex-wife Amber Heard has been at Johnny Depp\u2019s expense. Now, a lot of folks on the internet are campaigning to see Heard suffer the same treatment. In fact, the petition to remove her from Aquaman 2 is nearing a staggering 2 million signatures. And while WB has yet to announce any plans to hire another actress for the role, it seems that they\u2019re trying to come up with a compromise.</p>\n<p>With all of this going on, it looks like WB is gearing up to either reduce Amber Heard\u2019s role in Aquaman 2 or write her out altogether.</p>\n<p>According to Grace Randolph, the host of the \u201cBeyond The Trailer\u201d YouTube channel, the studio is bringing on another female lead to \u2018balance things out.\u2019</p>\n<p>\u201cSome of you are asking re Amber Heard \u2013 as I told you before, they are bringing on this new female lead to balance things out, and writing the script so that Heard\u2019s role can be cut down if needed. But as of right now she\u2019s still in Aquaman 2,\u201d the journalist wrote on her Twitter feed.\u00a0</p>\n<p>As we learned last month, Warner Bros. may not be able to fire the\u00a0London Fields\u00a0star if it comes to it due to her contract. What they can do, however, is find a way to sideline her character in favor of a newcomer in Aquaman 2. To what extent they\u2019ll do so, though, is anyone\u2019s guess at this point.</p>\n<p>Another source has maintained that al of this speculation is pointless, as Amber Heard has already been removed from Aquaman 2. If those sources are to be believed, it\u2019s true that Amber Heard can\u2019t be officially fired, but that she\u2019s been bought out of her contract. Pretty much the same situation as Johnny Depp and Fantastic Beasts. They fired Johnny, but paid his contract. That\u2019s what it\u2019s rumored happened to heard. They basically paid her not to be in Aquaman 2.</p>\n<p>Aquaman 2\u00a0is due to start shooting in Australia after the new year ahead of its scheduled release in December 2022. Time will tell if Heard will be involved. It\u2019s entirely possible that the new female lead isn\u2019t just being brought on board to \u201cbalance things out.\u201d She might be Heard\u2019s replacement.</p>\n<p>Good.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://wegotthiscovered.com/movies/aquaman-2-reportedly-introducing-female-lead-balance-amber-heard/\" rel=\"nofollow\">SOURCE</a><br><a href=\"https://wegotthiscovered.com/movies/aquaman-2-reportedly-written-amber-heards-role-reduced/\" rel=\"nofollow\">SOURCE</a></p>", "photo": {"id": "225006281", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/8/yf/xa/okyFxAVdtJBCRas-800x450-noPad.jpg?1608740066", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "28247422", "createdAt": "2020-12-19T17:12:14.000Z", "title": "The latest", "description": "<p>Two years to the day after Amber Heard published an editorial describing the backlash she faced as a domestic abuse survivor, a Virginia judge ordered the actress to produce her arrest record\u00a0in the defamation case filed against her by ex-husband Johnny Depp.</p>\n<p>Her arrest record, which involves an altercation with a different romantic partner more than a decade ago, is \u201ccrucial to key allegations in Mr. Depp\u2019s complaint,\u201d said the actor\u2019s lawyer, Benjamin Chew of Brown Rudnick, during a hearing Friday in Fairfax County.\u00a0</p>\n<p>Thing is, though, that I\u2019m pretty sure there have been more arrests than Heard\u2019s 2009 arrest for domestic violence against her wife Tasya Van Ree. As I understand it, there have been a couple of DUI\u2019s and rumor has it that there was at least one other arrest for domestic violence. I don\u2019t know against whom, but it looks like we\u2019re going to find out.</p>\n<p>If this is true and Amber Has multiple arrests against her for domestic violence, it could be crucial in helping Johnny Depp establish that it was Heard who was violent in their relationship.</p>\n<p>On the same day, a subpoena was issued to the ACLU, one of the organizations to which Heard swears she donated part of her 7 million dollar divorce settlement. It \u00a0has long been rumored that Heard didn\u2019t donate to these organizations as she swore in her divorce documents, legal court documents, that she would.</p>\n<p>I don\u2019t know exactly what could happen to Heard if she kept the money and didn\u2019t donate it, or didn\u2019t donate all of it, like she said she would. Contempt of court, maybe? Or would this even be grounds for the divorce to be revisited? Could she owe that money back to Johnny? We\u2019ll have to wait and see what the fallout is, but the fact is that she will now have to prove in a court of law what she did with that money.</p>\n<p>If nothing else, it goes to her credibility if she swore to donate that money and didn\u2019t. Not that her credibility holds much weight anymore.</p>\n<p>Three days later, the court issued a subpoena for iO Tillet Wright, longtime friend and flying monkey of Heard\u2019s. <a href=\"https://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/circuit/sites/circuit/files/assets/documents/pdf/high-profile/depp%20v%20heard/cl-2019-2911-foreign-subp-prep-io-tillet-wright-12-18-2020.pdf\" rel=\"nofollow\">The service notice</a> doesn\u2019t say whether it was Heard\u2019s side or Johnny\u2019s that requested the subpoena. It would be interesting to see who called iO. It\u2019ll be even more interesting to see how far iO is willing to go to perjure himself for Heard. It\u2019s one thing to lie to a court abroad where they can\u2019t touch you. It\u2019s another thing to perjure oneself in America where they can easily find you and level perjury charges. It\u2019ll be interesting to see how far any of her friends are willing to perjure themselves.</p>\n<p>It bears note that some of those previously pro-Heard folks are deleting their social media en masse. I don\u2019t know if it\u2019s related to the defamation case that\u2019s looming ever larger, but it\u2019s certainly possible.</p>\n<p>By all accounts, it looks like Amber Heard\u2019s legal world is crashing down on her. I wonder what her response will be when Johnny wins his defamation case, and then wins his appeal in the libel case he leveled against the Sun tabloid and subsequently lost. I wonder what the whole world\u2019s reaction will be. So many have been so quick to vilify him. I wonder how quick they\u2019ll be to vindicate him.</p>\n<p>Time alone will tell.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://www.courthousenews.com/heard-ordered-to-hand-over-arrest-record-in-depp-defamation-case/\" rel=\"nofollow\">SOURCE</a></p>", "photo": {"id": "224992988", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/8/yl/cd/oCYLCdbJGQYxGAZ-800x450-noPad.jpg?1608397936", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "28238185", "createdAt": "2020-12-17T17:45:23.000Z", "title": "You can now hire Amber Heard to speak", "description": "<p>Amber gets on board with Prince Harry &amp; Megan Markle\u2019s public speaking agency. The public speaking agency is based out of New York, called The Harry Walker agency.</p>\n<p>The agency has even made a statement regarding Amber\u2019s entry into the agency. On their official website, Amber Heard is described her as \u201cAn outspoken advocate for women\u2019s rights and for the civil rights of survivors of all gender-based violence around the world, Amber works with organizations that encourage survivors both personally and politically to come forward and reclaim their power. Amber makes frequent trips to DC to lobby and fight on behalf of the civil rights of women and the innumerable silent survivors of gender-based violence.\u201d<br><br>If you\u2019d like to hire her to speak at your event, she can be booked for the princely sum of $33,000. The agency describes her talks as \u201cdeeply moving\u201d and says that hiring her is an excellent choice for a group or organization that\u2019s looking for \u201csome much-needed inspiration from a woman who walks day-to-day looking to be a contribution.\u201d</p>\n<p>There are, of course, those who would vehemently disagree. A large contingency of the public view Heard as a woman who abused her ex-husband Johnny Depp, as she admitted as much on audiotape. Those people find it ludicrous that Heard should dare to claim to be a spokesperson for survivors when she herself is an admitted abuser with a history of being arrested for domestic abuse against wife Tasya Van Ree in 2009.</p>\n<p>Heard has already spoken at the Global Citizen Festival, the Social Good Summit and the L\u2019Oreal Women of Worth awards, leading the reader to believe that Heard was paid to speak at those events. So, with a payday of up to $33,000 per appearance, her outpouring of heartfelt civic duty doesn\u2019t exactly come across as altogether altruistic, does it? Rather, she seems motivated by the payday, which some would argue has always been her only impetus.</p>\n<p>I for one will be interested to see how many people or organizations will hire Heard to speak for such a hefty payday. As more and more evidence comes out about the sort of person she really is, I can only imagine that this prospect will fail for her, just like all the rest of them do.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://www.republicworld.com/entertainment-news/hollywood-news/amber-heard-now-a-part-of-prince-harry-and-megan-markles-public-speaking-agency.html\" rel=\"nofollow\">SOURCE</a></p>", "photo": {"id": "224985003", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/0/ng/xm/JtnGxMYFoTxkaCO-800x450-noPad.jpg?1608227125", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "28227492", "createdAt": "2020-12-15T21:51:26.000Z", "title": "December 17th", "description": "<p>Many people have sworn to boycott Stephen King\u2019s \u2018The Stand\u2019 which starts on Thursday, December 17th because Amber Heard is in it. I\u2019m one of them. Anything that has Amber Heard in it gets a hard pass from me, and I can think of about 1.7 million people who feel the same way.</p>\n<p>Instead, I suggest showing our support for Johnny Depp by watching something by Johnny Depp instead, whether it\u2019s a DVD you already own, or picking a Johnny Depp movie on the streaming platform of your choice. There are lots of excellent movies to choose from, so it shouldn't be too hard finding a good one. Me, I'll probably be watching Pirates.</p>\n<p>I like Stephen King\u2019s work as much as the next guy, and I know that he didn\u2019t personally hire Amber Heard, but I simply cannot support a project that she\u2019s in. Nothing personal Steve. I just can't.</p>\n<p>So if you feel the same way, let\u2019s let the industry know that we\u2019re having none of her by boycotting \u2018The Stand\u2019 and stream something by Johnny Depp instead. Let 'em know what we want: Johnny Depp. And what we don't want: Amber Heard.\u00a0</p>\n<p>The media might be working hard to silence Johnny Depp, but they'll never silence us.\u00a0</p>", "photo": {"id": "224977360", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/7/fr/up/clfrUphMRveLrYB-800x450-noPad.jpg?1608069088", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "28195245", "createdAt": "2020-12-09T23:53:53.000Z", "title": "Johnny dropped the N bomb to Ex Lori Anne Allison?", "description": "<p>\u201cSources say he paid his first wife, Lori Anne Allison, $1.25 million to keep quiet after he allegedly left a long ranting message in which he repeatedly used the N-word. The previously unreported settlement was accomplished using fictitious names to avoid scrutiny.\u201d</p>\n<p>That\u2019s just one of the many allegations put forth in an article published by The Hollywood Reporter. There are a ton of others, but I won\u2019t dignify them by repeating them here. I\u2019ll post the link because I have to cite my sources, but I\u2019m hoping that you won\u2019t give them any hits by clicking through to read it. It\u2019s just all the same lies Amber Heard\u2019s been spouting over the last few years.</p>\n<p>I selected this statement to write about because this is the first time I\u2019ve ever seen it. And because it\u2019s so full of outrageous and flawed elements that I just had to pick it apart.</p>\n<p>First, \u201cSources\u201d? Really? Until or unless these \u201csources\u201d are identified, it\u2019s pretty hard to take anything that follows seriously.</p>\n<p>Second, it doesn\u2019t say WHEN this alleged payment took place. Johnny married Lori Anne more than 30 years ago. That\u2019s a long stretch of road during which this alleged transaction could have taken place. They\u2019re going to have to narrow it down a little more before it can be taken seriously.</p>\n<p>Third, they also don\u2019t say WHEN this long, ranting message took place. Was it back when they were together? Sometime since? Did he recently call Lori Anne out of the blue just to leave audio evidence of racial epithets nobody else on the planet has ever accused him of using? Just like I said a minute ago, they need to narrow down the timeline.</p>\n<p>Fourth, when else has Johnny ever been accused of using language like that? Every? So we\u2019re supposed to believe that he did it on tape just because some unnamed \u201csources\u201d say so? Are we really supposed to be that gullible?</p>\n<p>Fifth, where\u2019s this message? If \u201csources\u201d have heard it, why haven\u2019t we? Are we supposed to believe that a tape like this exists and it hasn\u2019t been leaked to the public?</p>\n<p>Sixth, why in the world would Johnny Depp need to use a fake name to give his ex-wife some money? If Johnny wanted to give his ex some money, for whatever reason, there\u2019s no reason whatsoever that he couldn\u2019t just do so. He gave Vanessa money, too, and there\u2019s nothing shady about it. By all accounts, he\u2019s a generous guy. Why shouldn\u2019t he be able to give his ex some money if he wants to?</p>\n<p>I\u2019m sorry, folks, but it doesn\u2019t quite wash. They talk about scrutiny, but the fact is that there are far too few details for a claim like this to stand up to even the most casual scrutiny.</p>\n<p>The point here, is that headlines like this are juicy and look damning on the surface, but you need to look a little deeper to determine if there\u2019s any substance to back them up. This is just one among many allegations being tossed about in the press since the court in the UK ruled against him in his libel case against the Sun. The media\u2019s been having a field day at Johnny\u2019s expense, and there\u2019s no more substance to those headlines than there are to this one. It\u2019s just a bunch of fluffed-up rubbish set forth with no more justification than that someone said so.</p>\n<p>Don\u2019t take the headlines seriously, boys and girls, no matter how good \u2013 or bad \u2013 they look. There\u2019s a good chance that it\u2019s just a bunch of unfounded allegations being printed to sell papers. Or to get clicks online. That\u2019s all. They, the papers, don\u2019t care about the truth. If they did, they\u2019d be exposing Johnny Depp\u2019s abuser, proven by her own words, rather than serving the victim up on a platter the way they are. So don\u2019t give them the satisfaction of giving their trash a second glance. Stick to the world of facts which have been proven, tried and true, by the abuser herself.</p>\n<p>The truth will out in the end. It\u2019s no coincidence that this article came out at the same time as Johnny applied to the higher court to move forward with his appeal to overturn the verdict in the Sun case. Like I said before, it\u2019s all an agenda that\u2019s being spoon fed to you. Don\u2019t swallow it.</p>\n<p>Keep your wits about you, folks, and keep fighting the good fight. We'll end up on the right side of the roaring rapids in the end.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/features/hes-radioactive-inside-johnny-depps-self-made-implosion?utm_source=twitter&amp;utm_medium=social\" rel=\"nofollow\">SOURCE</a> - which I hope you don't click on.</p>", "photo": {"id": "224954427", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/0/ax/gn/vfaxgnDqaEbcrOH-800x450-noPad.jpg?1607558034", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "28173276", "createdAt": "2020-12-05T17:52:18.000Z", "title": "Steven Crowley and Amber Heard", "description": "<p>Steven Crowley is an actor that knew and worked with Amber Heard on a movie called \u201cNever Back Down.\u201d He recently posted on <a href=\"https://www.tiktok.com/@stevencrowley/video/6899955612692516101?_d=secCgsIARCbDRgBIAMoARI%2BCjwJwKV1Z7iPseiCnqcCqgorvxQKfKudCC6U7odEm%2BcVhDyZL7DW5DPEBlgxJ6RT3XEjlQvarTehNaYz1yEaAA%3D%3D&amp;language=en&amp;preview_pb=0&amp;sec_user_id=MS4wLjABAAAASEfHqDmQjy3OT_mgTD_dVC8Q2fpeea5FYcGo9DQOmhwG6MdY7e95hhOPSQMv1VQ8&amp;share_item_id=6899955612692516101&amp;share_link_id=702327CC-07B7-4399-BF29-AEB9E9D6537B&amp;timestamp=1606655972&amp;tt_from=copy&amp;u_code=d26ea8e5m5j667&amp;user_id=6602617470308057093&amp;utm_campaign=client_share&amp;utm_medium=ios&amp;utm_source=copy&amp;source=h5_m\" rel=\"nofollow\">Tik Tok</a> that he has his own stories about Amber Heard and promised to do a YouTube about them. He posted a picture of himself and Amber Heard with the caption \u201cMe trying not to get beat up every day on set for 3 months.\u201d</p>\n<p>Well, on December 2nd, <a href=\"https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L1x07aqi1-0&amp;feature=emb_title\" rel=\"nofollow\">that video</a> went up on YouTube. Steven and his buddy Jason were chatting away, and then, about 12 minutes in, Steven starts talking about Amber Heard. He described first meeting her as sex personified, and so charming and overpowering that if she\u2019d told him to go out and kill somebody, he would have done it. Not really, of course, but he was illustrating how much influence she can have on people, even at first sight. At least back then.</p>\n<p>He went on to talk about Amber and the fights that she used to get into with her wife Tasya Van Ree, saying that they were real blow up fights. He also hinted at Amber\u2019s drug and alcohol consumption as activities that he saw with his own two eyes.</p>\n<p>Steven also talked about how Amber Heard was when she worked with Johnny Depp on the Rum Diary. Heard wasn\u2019t even remotely interested in Depp. She was married to Tasya, but was well aware of Johnny\u2019s interest in her, he said. It wasn\u2019t until after another couple of movies failed, a tv show failed, then all of a sudden you hear about Amber Heard being with Johnny Depp, and wouldn\u2019t you know it, she started getting parts.</p>\n<p>Amber Heard was with Johnny Depp to further her career. That\u2019s what Steven said without saying it.</p>\n<p>Steven beat around the bush about a LOT of stories he said he could tell, but he was scared to death of getting sued if he told them. Jason assured Steven that the truth is the ultimate defense against a law suit, and that maybe these stories need to be told so that the world has both sides of the situation, not just the one that Heard is telling the world. Still, Steven hesitated and ultimately refused to say any more. The two agreed to talk about this more off-screen and then come back and revisit the issue in a future video.</p>\n<p>What strikes me the most about the whole thing is how scared Steven was to talk about events he saw with his own two eyes. And, he said, there are a lot more people with stories to tell that are afraid to talk, too.</p>\n<p>Why? Why are these people afraid of her? Because she\u2019ll sue them? Like Jason said, the truth is the best defense against that. And it\u2019s not just a matter of he say/She say if multiple people are stepping forward to corroborate each other\u2019s stories. And I\u2019m sure there are some people with photos or videos to back their stories up. They just have to work up the nerve to step forward and speak up.</p>\n<p>All it takes is for one person to say \u201cenough\u201d and stand up. Once that first brave soul makes a stand and speaks out against Amber Heard, I think the floodgates will open up and everybody else who\u2019s been holding back stories will come forward too. And it\u2019ll be high time. This no-talent would-be actress has held her reign of terror long enough.</p>\n<p>And I think that with the VA trial coming up, her web is going to start falling apart. She\u2019s having to subpoena people who were previously willing to talk about her freely. I think they\u2019re starting to realize what they\u2019ve got to lose, and that her ship is sinking. And it is. The USS Amber Heard is taking on water, more every day. It\u2019s only a matter of time until those rats start hopping off. I think we\u2019re seeing it already.</p>\n<p>By all means, go have a look at Steven Crowley\u2019s <a href=\"https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L1x07aqi1-0&amp;feature=emb_title\" rel=\"nofollow\">video</a>. See for yourself all of the stories he hints at being able to tell about her, and witness how afraid he is to talk.</p>\n<p>Let\u2019s hope he\u2019s the one that starts the ball rolling about Heard. It\u2019ll make him a hero of epic proportions. He might just by a lynchpin if they get him involved with the VA case.</p>\n<p>Come on, Steven. You can do it!</p>", "photo": {"id": "224939220", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/6/jo/ak/VPJOaKaUxbgUdKR-800x450-noPad.jpg?1607190740", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "28142187", "createdAt": "2020-11-30T00:05:45.000Z", "title": "Unsubstantiated?", "description": "<p><a href=\"https://www.change.org/p/dc-entertainment-remove-amber-heard-from-aquaman-2?recruited_by_id=fb12f490-244c-11eb-9f12-4d18c74b7bc0&amp;utm_source=share_petition&amp;utm_medium=copylink&amp;utm_campaign=psf_combo_share_initial\" rel=\"nofollow\">The petition to remove Amber Heard from Aquaman 2</a> is getting a lot of press lately, including a piece in the <a href=\"https://nypost.com/2020/11/27/petition-to-kick-amber-heard-off-aquaman-2-gets-1-5m-signatures/\" rel=\"nofollow\">New York Post</a>. But a common theme is saying that the claims on the petition are unsubstantiated. So let\u2019s take a look at one piece of evidence. Or have a listen. <a href=\"https://www.courttv.com/news/amber-heard-witness-statements-depp-blamed-the-monster-for-physical-verbal-abuse/\" rel=\"nofollow\">These</a> are the <a href=\"https://www.courttv.com/news/amber-heard-witness-statements-depp-blamed-the-monster-for-physical-verbal-abuse/\" rel=\"nofollow\">audio recordings</a> that were admitted into court, and were officially accepted into evidence.</p>\n<p>Amber Heard admits in her own recordings that she repeatedly instigated physical fights with Johnny Depp and became enraged when he would often \u201csplit\u201d to avoid the confrontation. She accused him of being a monster because he refused to stay and fight.</p>\n<p>\u201cThe monster is back, this is him. Ran away at the first sign of trouble.\u201d So the monster is not someone who hits her. The monster is someone who runs away at the first sign of trouble.</p>\n<p>Hardly what Heard wanted the world to think, given her testimony. But it goes to show that not only is Johnny not the monster Heard apparently wanted everyone to believe, but also that the claims on this petition are also based in reality. \u00a0</p>\n<p>By all means, go ahead and <a href=\"https://www.courttv.com/news/amber-heard-witness-statements-depp-blamed-the-monster-for-physical-verbal-abuse/\" rel=\"nofollow\">have a listen</a>. Not to rumor, not to innuendo, and not to gossip. But listen to Amber Heard's own words. They tell you everything you need to know.</p>\n<p>Hat tip to TheRealLauraB.</p>", "photo": {"id": "224917825", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/7/kr/ww/jekrwWjZDJGiEYU-800x450-noPad.jpg?1606694748", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}], "pageInfo": {"endCursor": "YXJyYXljb25uZWN0aW9uOjcx", "hasNextPage": true}}}}}, {"data": {"petition": {"id": "14451136", "slug": "dc-entertainment-remove-amber-heard-from-aquaman-2", "user": {"id": "24448735", "displayName": "Jeanne Larson", "photo": {"id": "221862322", "userSmall": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/7/xs/ly/cXXSLydpSVDqIVB-48x48-noPad.jpg?1553098061", "processing": false}}}, "organization": null, "updatesConnection": {"nodes": [{"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "28137552", "createdAt": "2020-11-28T20:40:54.000Z", "title": "Dior sticks with Johnny Depp", "description": "<p>Evidence suggests defiant Johnny Depp fans have been buying Dior\u2019s Sauvage fragrance in support of the actor, who continues to be the face of the cologne despite a high court judge\u00a0finding\u00a0that he violently abused his ex-wife during their relationship.</p>\n<p>Depp has been the face of the aftershave since it launched in 2015 with an advertising campaign that was criticized for its\u00a0racist portrayal\u00a0of Native Americans. But many were surprised to see an advert for the fragrance, featuring Depp playing a guitar, being shown on TV during The Great British Bake Off this week.</p>\n<p>\u201cWe have received a total of 11 complaints about this ad,\u201d a spokesperson for the\u00a0Advertising\u00a0Standards Authority said, \u201cwith the complainants believing that Johnny Depp shouldn\u2019t be in the ad due to details concerning his recent court case.\u201d</p>\n<p>Depp was rumored to have been paid between $3m and $5m for the Sauvage advert.</p>\n<p>Since the advert was broadcast, fans of Depp, using the hashtag #Justiceforjohnnydepp, have been posting messages of support on social media for the actor and Dior\u2019s continued association with him. \u201cJohnny Depp is still the face of Sauvage, because Dior aren\u2019t idiots,\u201d said one post. \u201cShout out to Dior for practically being the one sponsor left for\u00a0Johnny Depp\u00a0that hasn\u2019t turned their back on him,\u201d said another. \u201cHe\u2019s still the face of their cologne Sauvage, definitely gonna get me a bottle to show my support.\u201d</p>\n<p>Asked if there was a chance Dior could use Depp again, Lauren Sherman, the chief correspondent for the Business of Fashion, said: \u201cIn the past, pre-social media, I would have bet on it. Now there is more to lose. It\u2019s possible, but it\u2019s riskier.\u201d</p>\n<p>Despite the shadow of \u201ccancel culture\u201d, Sherman said she thought Dior was taking the position of \u201call publicity is good publicity\u201d.</p>\n<p>\u201cMost businesses like that take a long view, which is that growing awareness is good overall,\u201d she said. \u201cPeople will forget about the Depp association with time, but they may not forget the Sauvage name so easily.\u201d</p>\n<p>Dior has yet to comment, but ads continue to grace the airwaves. So I think we have our answer.</p>\n<p>I, personally, am here to tell you that an overwhelming number of people have posted about their Sauvage purchases. Others have tried to purchase the brand, but have found it to be sold out. I think it\u2019s safe to say that Dior made the right choice to keep Johnny Depp.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://www.theguardian.com/film/2020/nov/27/dior-sticks-by-johnny-depp-in-defiance-of-wife-beater-ruling\" rel=\"nofollow\">SOURCE</a></p>", "photo": {"id": "224914556", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/9/ye/my/fMyEMYdiOoYclmJ-800x450-noPad.jpg?1606596058", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "28130001", "createdAt": "2020-11-27T03:52:17.000Z", "title": "Amber Heard in Pirates?", "description": "<p>It\u2019s not bad enough that Johnny Depp has lost the lead in the Pirates of the Caribbean franchise, has been asked to step down from Fantastic Beasts, lost his libel case against NGN and The Sun tabloid, and was denied his appeal. Now there are rumors that his ex-wife, Amber Heard, is in talks with Margot Robbie to appear in a remake of Pirates heavily laden with what Robbie calls \u201cGirl Power.\u201d</p>\n<p>With this rumor about Pirates, what Heard insists will be her return to Aquaman 2 despite this petition that has more than 1.5 million signatures, and possibly a spinoff featuring Mera, her Aquaman role, it might look like Heard is riding high on a wave of professional success.</p>\n<p>But let\u2019s take a look at that, shall we?</p>\n<p>First, there\u2019s absolutely no substance to the rumor that Heard is getting anywhere near Pirates. Daniel Richtman said so on his Patreon account, and internet news sources have picked it up and run with it, but there\u2019s no proof whatsoever. I could say that I\u2019M going to be in Pirates, but that doesn\u2019t make it true. Unfortunately, though, we live in a society where any tabloid rumor is considered news. But not everything you read is true, so don't take it on gospel just because it's on the internet.</p>\n<p>Next, Aquaman 2. While Heard insists that she\u2019ll be returning as Mera, there are a couple factors that make me doubt it. For one thing, the word through the grapevine is that WB bought out her contract. If that\u2019s true, they paid her NOT to be in the movie. For another thing, the movie will shoot in Australia, where Heard is being investigated for perjury in relation to when she smuggled her dogs into the country in violation of Australia\u2019s bio-laws. She could get arrested if she shows up there. And the main cast usually knows exactly when production is going to start, and all she can say is \u201cNext year.\u201d Nah, I sincerely doubt that Heard\u2019s going to appear in AM2.</p>\n<p>A Mera spinoff? There\u2019s even less of a reason to believe that this is happening, and that\u2019s saying something. There might have been a time when this idea was bantered about, which is understandable considering the popularity of the original film, and WB might be looking to ramp up their own girl power front. But now, with Heard\u2019s troubles, I sincerely doubt that a spinoff is going to happen. You can see all of the reasons I gave above regarding her return to Aquaman. And you can add the whispers that Heard is unbondable, which would mean that she can\u2019t be insured for filming. No insurance, no filming. Not for Pirates, AM2, and definitely not for her own film franchise.</p>\n<p>No, folks. These rumors of all these great projects are just that. Rumors. Spoon fed to the media by someone with an agenda. It sounds like Heard is trying to not only obliterate her ex, Johnny Depp, in courts and in the press. It looks like she\u2019s trying to replace him. What\u2019s next? Heard being prominently featured in a Harry Potter film? It wouldn\u2019t surprise me if that rumor started floating around, too.</p>\n<p>Be careful what you believe in the press, folks. Until those rumors can be corroborated, take \u2018em with a pinch of salt. The proof is in the pudding, and I\u2019ve got a feeling that Heard is going to leave us all starving.</p>", "photo": {"id": "224909480", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/0/cy/xp/ndCYXprYUnoLzox-800x450-noPad.jpg?1606449372", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "28123888", "createdAt": "2020-11-25T21:23:15.000Z", "title": "Appeal denied, but there's still hope", "description": "<p>Johnny Depp was recently dealt a blow when he lost his libel case against NgN and The Sun tabloid. The Pirates of the Caribbean actor, 57, has also been ordered to pay \u00a3628,000 in legal costs to\u00a0The Sun\u00a0for his failed libel action against the newspaper.</p>\n<p>But determined to see justice done, Johnny Depp wrote a note on his <a href=\"https://www.instagram.com/p/CHQXHimJvAC/\" rel=\"nofollow\">Instagram</a> saying that he intended to appeal.\u00a0</p>\n<p>The first step in the appeal process is to get permission to move forward with the appeal. As promised, Johnny did indeed file for an appeal. But I'm sorry to say that permission to move forward with the appeal was denied. By the same judge that found against him in the first place, (in)Justice Nicol.</p>\n<p>Got that? The SAME JUDGE that found against Johnny in the first place turned down his bid for an appeal, saying that he did not believe that Johnny's appeal had a \"reasonable prospect of success. In any event, I do not consider that the proposed grounds of appeal have a reasonable prospect of success (and that is also the case so far as the grounds of appeal suggest that I erred in principle or in law) and there is not some other compelling reason why permission to appeal should be granted.\"</p>\n<p>In his ruling Mr. (in)Justice Nicol wrote: \"The findings of fact by a first instance tribunal (particularly one, such as myself, who has heard oral evidence) are rarely open to challenge on appeal.\"</p>\n<p>But that's not the end of Johnny's appeal. Apparently, going through (in)justice Nicol for the first part of the appeal was just a step that had to be taken as a matter of routine. Now, Johnny can take the case directly to the Court of Appeal.</p>\n<p>That's the good news. Most likely, Johnny's appeal has every chance of being victorious, meaning that the original court finding will be overturned.</p>\n<p>The bad news is that the appeal process could take as long as 2 years. Anything can happen in that time, and that's a long time for an actor to wait between roles, if the verdict is held against him in Hollywood.</p>\n<p>Rumor has it though, that Robert Downey Jr is talking about including Johnny in an upcoming project. And Johnny is reportedly in talks about upcoming projects with Netflix. So Johnny's acting future might not be as dismal as it might seem with him booted from both Pirates and Fantastic Beasts 3. It looks like he'll rise above this nonsense.</p>\n<p>Still, up to 2 years is a long time to wait.</p>\n<p>Thanks for singing and sharing the petition. And if you want to keep up to date with the conversation, jump on over to Twitter.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://www.mirror.co.uk/3am/celebrity-news/johnny-depp-refused-permission-appeal-23069201\" rel=\"nofollow\">SOURCE</a></p>", "photo": {"id": "224905075", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/3/th/mf/OhThmfZcPUMYSAV-800x450-noPad.jpg?1606339397", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "MilestonePetitionUpdate", "id": "28118203", "createdAt": "2020-11-24T21:06:52.000Z", "signatureCount": 1500000}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "28117649", "createdAt": "2020-11-24T19:22:08.000Z", "title": "Keeping in touch", "description": "<p>I miss seeing comments from you guys when you sign. So let me invite you guys to join us on Twitter. There are a LOT of people who feel the same way you do, and we're always happy to hear from supporters of the petition and what it stands for.</p>\n<p>And that way, you can continue to raise your voices and be heard with your comments as well as your signatures.</p>\n<p>So feel free to look me up on Twitter, @Lepplady ...</p>\n<p>I hope to see you guys there.</p>", "photo": {"id": "224901049", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/3/aq/fr/WVaQfrMNxEpsFzG-800x450-noPad.jpg?1606245729", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "28107361", "createdAt": "2020-11-22T18:42:11.000Z", "title": "Comments shenanigans", "description": "<p>Amber Heard has accused this petition of being a paid campaign orchestrated by Johnny Depp and has accused all of us of being paid Russian bots. I don\u2019t know why they have to be RUSSIAN bots. Why can't they be Mexican bots. Or Japanese bots. There are a lot of countries in the world. She can take her pick.</p>\n<p>She\u2019s also tried dismissing this petition as having no basis in reality. Yet she keeps bringing it up in court documents, both in the UK and VA cases. Which is it, I wonder? Seems like the poor thing can\u2019t make up her mind.</p>\n<p>One thing\u2019s pretty clear, though. This petition bugs the everlovin\u2019 sh*t right out of her.</p>\n<p>Our little petition is under attack. Somebody (wonder who?) started spamming my comments with nasty comments last week, then reporting them as violations, trying to get the petition taken down for violating Change .org\u2019s terms of service. And it might have come pretty close to working. For a few days, features of the petition were removed and altered. Some people couldn\u2019t find the petition at all, and others weren\u2019t able to sign it if they could.</p>\n<p>Well, it didn\u2019t work.</p>\n<p>I got in touch with Change .org and took control of the petition back. I asked them to hide my comments for a while so that they can\u2019t be spammed and then reported as violations. I don\u2019t like that the comments are off, I like for people to be able to speak their minds. It bugs me that freedom of expression is being curtailed. 99% of the comments were from decent people who felt the need to speak out against injustice, abuse, and bad acting.</p>\n<p>But people haven\u2019t been put off by these recent actions, and the petition is still standing strong. No matter how hard somebody\u2019s trying to make it, people are still finding the petition in droves.</p>\n<p>By signing the petition, millions of people are speaking in one voice, saying that they do not want to see Amber Heard in Aquaman 2. And if she doesn\u2019t like that, it\u2019s kind of too bad. she can only blame herself. All I did was turn on a spotlight.</p>\n<p>People might not be able to leave comments, for now, but we will not be silenced. The number of signatures keeps climbing, and more living, breathing people are signing all the time.</p>\n<p>That speaks louder than words.</p>\n<p>Also, this petition isn\u2019t searchable on change .org anymore \u2013 not my doing - so it\u2019s more important than ever to sign and share so that people can keep finding it. Thanks a bunch for hanging in there.</p>\n<p>If nothing else, it\u2019s worth it to know how very much we\u2019re bugging her.</p>", "photo": {"id": "224893509", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/2/bo/yg/rvboYGMNWdwzjms-800x450-noPad.jpg?1606070533", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "28102343", "createdAt": "2020-11-21T15:05:10.000Z", "title": "Amber Heard can't be fired, claims.", "description": "<p>According to ScreenRant, WB can\u2019t fire Amber Heard or even ask her to break her contract due to the legal issues involved in her dispute with Depp. In the United States, the plaintiff has to prove malicious intent by the reporter, as well as avoidance of the truth, in order to succeed in a defamation of character suit. However, in the UK system, the journalist in question has to prove to a court that they weren\u2019t acting in bad faith and to justify the accuracy of their reporting.</p>\n<p>So The Sun got away with it because all they had to do was say that they believed Amber Heard\u2019s claims in good faith, not that she was telling the truth. And they\u2019ve only gotten away with it until Johnny\u2019s appeal goes through. When that happens, it\u2019s going to be a whole different story.</p>\n<p>When Johnny prevails in his upcoming defamation suit against ex-wife Amber Heard, it\u2019ll be much harder for her to secure work, though word through the grapevine has it that she\u2019s already unemployable already because she\u2019s unbondable. So claims of her being case as the invisible girl, or appearing in a movie with Nicolas Cage (a LONG time Johnny Depp friend) are more than likely just that: claims. Unfounded in reality, to coin her phrase.</p>\n<p>But then there\u2019s her contract with WB regarding Aquaman 2. Perhaps it is true that she can\u2019t be fired due to these legal proceedings. But that doesn\u2019t mean she can\u2019t be fired for other reasons. For example, most contracts these days have some sort of morals clause.</p>\n<p>And that doesn\u2019t mean that her contract can\u2019t be bought out by WB. That\u2019s a whole different circumstance. And reliable rumor has it that\u2019s exactly what happened. So when you hear claims in the press that Heard\u2019s position with WB is unshakable, or that she\u2019s got ALL these roles coming up, take it with a pinch of salt. Just remember those claims that she was going to be in a live-action Hercules movie? Right. She and her PR team can cook up whatever claims they want. Doesn\u2019t make them true.</p>\n<p>And remember, when it comes to how things are worded in the press, just remember there\u2019s more than one way to get things done. Take a look at the wording, then take a look around it. Just because she can\u2019t be fired for one reason, it doesn\u2019t mean she can\u2019t be fired for another. And it certainly doesn\u2019t mean that she\u2019s going to be hired for anything new.</p>\n<p>Time will tell.</p>\n<p>What do you think? Would Amber Heard make a good invisible girl?</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://wegotthiscovered.com/movies/wb-fire-amber-heard-aquaman-2-due-contract/\" rel=\"nofollow\">SOURCE</a></p>", "photo": {"id": "224890130", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/6/eq/yj/DvEqyjyplsKOltG-800x450-noPad.jpg?1605971112", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "28091945", "createdAt": "2020-11-19T18:54:31.000Z", "title": "Heard and Howell", "description": "<p>If you don\u2019t know who Jennifer Howell is, she\u2019s Whitney Heard\u2019s former boss and friend. She was dragged into the Johnny Depp v Amber Heard case when Whitney testified that she fled the situation and slept on Jennifer Howell\u2019s floor. Jennifer spoke up and corrected Whit by saying that she never made Whit sleep on the floor. Since then, it\u2019s come out that Whitney regularly confided in Jennifer about everything that was going on, including Amber being the bully in the staircase episode, and that Amber Heard took Johnny Depp\u2019s finger off. These are crucial points, since Amber Heard painted Johnny Depp as the aggressor in both cases.</p>\n<p>Originally, Amber Heard subpoenaed Jennifer Howell, likely expecting her to support her version of events, but was faced with the fact that Jennifer vows to tell the truth. That\u2019s not a good thing for Amber.</p>\n<p>So now, Johnny Depp\u2019s team has subpoenaed Jennifer Howell.</p>\n<p>Amber Heard\u2019s team jumped all over that, petitioning the court to deny Jennifer Howell\u2019s testimony, calling it irrelevant. But the court has denied that petition, saying that Jennifer Howell can definitely testify. This is the petition that the court called disingenuous, and sanctioned Amber Heard $4,732.50 for wasting the court\u2019s time.</p>\n<p>Court said that if Amber Heard thought Jennifer Howell was relevant enough to subpoena in the first place, she can\u2019t turn around and say that Jennifer Howell is irrelevant just because Johnny\u2019s team wants to subpoena her.</p>\n<p>On Jennifer Howell\u2019s Instagram, she says:</p>\n<p>I was recently subpoenaed into a court case to tell the truth, and I did so. Verdict came down on Monday and the actual truth was destroyed by an unjust system.<br>I share this now because I want to have faith in truth, dignity, love and integrity ultimately winning. My heart has been broken during this process as I have lost faith in so many people who have claimed to be moral and good yet lack the integrity to tell the truth when it might be \u201can inconvenience\u201d for them.<br>Those same people have contacted old employees of the charity and told them not to speak to attorneys and to dodge subpoenas. Have questioned my integrity for actually telling the truth when I was called to do so and much more. Heartbreaking to lose faith in people. I write this as I am trying not to lose faith in humanity, in justice and in the greater good... Truth and goodness have to win in the end.</p>\n<p>The VA case is going to be a jury trial, and I have a feeling that they\u2019re going to give Jennifer\u2019s testimony a great deal of weight, considering she\u2019s friends with the Heards, but is willing to tell the TRUTH regardless of the personal consequences to herself.</p>\n<p>I for one can\u2019t wait to see what Jennifer Howell says on the stand. It seems to me that her testimony will be a lynchpin in blowing Amber Heard\u2019s lies wide open, as well as everybody else who lied for her. That puts them ALL in the hot seat for perjury charges not just for the VA case, but also the UK case as well.</p>\n<p>Heard keeps digging her own hole deeper and deeper, and she\u2019s dragging people down with her.</p>\n<p>I personally think that it\u2019s only a matter of time before those rats start jumping off her sinking ship. I should take bets for who jumps first.</p>\n<p>Heard\u2019s little world is crumbling down around her and she\u2019s the only one that doesn\u2019t see it.</p>\n<p>You can check out Jennifer Howell's instagram <a href=\"https://www.instagram.com/p/CHLHoP-J-EQ/\" rel=\"nofollow\">HERE</a></p>", "photo": {"id": "224882908", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/5/pw/sh/mtpwShoILJyeSIg-800x450-noPad.jpg?1605871323", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "28085673", "createdAt": "2020-11-18T16:21:42.000Z", "title": "Amber Heard loses court ruling", "description": "<p>Amber Heard's motion to exclude information about her alleged donation to the Children's Hospital of LA is denied. That means that we WILL find out if Heard made any donatios, and in what amounts. Or if any donations were made to her benefit, how much and by whom.\u00a0</p>\n<p>Heard was also sanctioned fines that total more than $8,000 dollars, basically for wasting the court's time.</p>\n<p>Heard's motions were characterized as disingenuous and nonsensical by the courts.\u00a0</p>\n<p>So it looks like the VA court is having none of Heard's antics, not only refusing her \"nonsensical\" motions, but also fining her for filing them frivolously.</p>\n<p>These are good signs, people. Not only does it look like the court is not in Heard's pocket, but early signs are favorable towards Depp, which an unbiased court must be, considering his mountain of evidence, videos, witnesses, audio tapes, and so much more.\u00a0</p>\n<p>Youtuber Stevie J Raw does a great job of breaking down these latest revelations. Feel free to have a look at his video <a href=\"https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QMUAyEpATfs\" rel=\"nofollow\">HERE</a>.\u00a0 And he made that picture on the update. Let's all say thank yoou.</p>\n<p>You can read about the latest ruling in the VA case <a href=\"https://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/circuit/sites/circuit/files/Assets/Documents/PDF/High-Profile/Depp%20v%20Heard/CL-2019-2911-plaintiff-opp-to-mot-to-compel-8-requests-11-13-2020.pdf\" rel=\"nofollow\">HERE</a>.</p>\n<p>With these favorable findings, and rumors that hint at Johnny Depp's possible future film and/or television projects, it looks like things are looking up for Johnny. Here's hoping.</p>", "photo": {"id": "224877871", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/4/ng/xu/rdnGxUxzdeuMBDA-800x450-noPad.jpg?1605716504", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "28071457", "createdAt": "2020-11-15T18:47:06.000Z", "title": "Loyalty", "description": "<p>\"My intense loyalty is not just to J.K. (Rowling) and David Yates, but [also] to the people who go and see the films as well...I hope to give them something they haven\u2019t seen before.\" <br>~ #JohnnyDepp</p>\n<p>And that loyalty was repaid with being sacked from FB3 and abandoned by not only the cast and crew, but by Rowling herself. The man deserves better than radio silence.</p>\n<p>I understand that nobody wants to lose their jobs, but SOMEbody could grow a backbone and stand up and speak out.</p>\n<p>I only hope that folks in Hollywood see past what's going on right now and stand by a buy that's stood by them for decades. To do otherwise doesn't just shame Hollywood, but each and every person in it that doesn't have enough of a spine to stand up and do the right thing.\u00a0</p>\n<p>\u00a0</p>", "photo": {"id": "224865541", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/7/qy/ay/XEqyaYRJTgQzftx-800x450-noPad.jpg?1605466028", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "28068114", "createdAt": "2020-11-14T20:31:36.000Z", "title": "Subpoenas", "description": "<p>Tasya Van Ree, Raquel (Rocky) Pennington and iO Tillet-wright have all formally been served with Subpoenas. You can see proof of service\u00a0<a href=\"https://twitter.com/An_elf_pirate/status/1325894501303545856/photo/1\" rel=\"nofollow\">HERE</a>, <a href=\"https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EmaGBLrWMAA14LQ?format=jpg&amp;name=large\" rel=\"nofollow\">HERE</a>, and <a href=\"https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EmaGBLuW4AIJGf4?format=jpg&amp;name=large\" rel=\"nofollow\">HERE</a>. And it bears note that the plaintiff issued these subpoenas. Johnny Depp's lawyers, not Amber Heard's.</p>\n<p>If you don't remember, Tasya Van Ree was Amber Heard's domestic partner, who Amber was arrested for assaulting in 2009.</p>\n<p>We've all seen Rocky and iO lie for Amber, and even Tasya Van Ree once issued a statement downplaying the domestic violence incident.\u00a0</p>\n<p>What we haven't seen is Tasya Van Ree on the stand, under oath, willing to lie for Amber. And, really, she can't. She can try to downplay the incident, but she can't deny that it happened. And if the arresting officer is also called to testify, the severity of the attack will be on full display.</p>\n<p>So the question becomes whether or not Van Ree will be willing to outright lie for her former partner, under oath, risking a perjury charge.</p>\n<p>Were Rocky and iO called to the stand in the UK? Was Whitney? Was Josh Drew? How many of them will be willing to take the stand in America and commit perjury? The date for the VA trial is getting ever closer. It'll be interesting to see how many of them are willing to keep lying, or how many of those little rats start to jump ship as the date gets closer. Presumably, iO, Rocky and Van Ree have lives and livelihoods they don't want to risk losing by going to jail. And Whitney has a baby son she certainly doesn't want to leave so she can go and serve jail time for her abusive sister.</p>\n<p>Truth is, Amber's little make-believe world is closing in around her. Whatever power it is she thinks she's got over people is fragile at best. People have a self-preservation instinct that's stronger than whatever sword of Damocles she's got hanging over their heads.\u00a0</p>\n<p>And, when the first rat cracks, the rest of them will hit the water like Ethel Merman choreographed it. Make no mistake about that.</p>\n<p>Now, while Amber might be celebrating what she thinks is a win in the UK, that story isn't finished. Johnny is certain to win his appeal, even if it does take up to two years for the process to run its course.\u00a0</p>\n<p>And let's not forget that Amber's being investigated for perjury in Australia, and they're serious about putting her behind bars. Which begs the question, how is she going to travel to Australia to film Aquaman 2, as she claims, with that looming over her head?</p>\n<p>Nah. I've heard that Warner Bros bought out her contract, and that's the information I'm running with. I'd bet dollars to donuts that she won't be AM2.\u00a0</p>\n<p>And I'm waiting to see which rat will jump ship first.</p>\n<p>Who do you think it will be? iO? Rocky? Tasya Van Ree? Whitney? Josh Drew? Elon? Somebody else I haven't thought of? Who will turn on Amber first? Drop a comment and let us know who you think will crack first.</p>", "photo": {"id": "224862570", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/1/ae/po/XgAEpoOHheFHbID-800x450-noPad.jpg?1605385898", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "MilestonePetitionUpdate", "id": "28056064", "createdAt": "2020-11-12T12:39:35.000Z", "signatureCount": 1000000}], "pageInfo": {"endCursor": "YXJyYXljb25uZWN0aW9uOjgz", "hasNextPage": true}}}}}, {"data": {"petition": {"id": "14451136", "slug": "dc-entertainment-remove-amber-heard-from-aquaman-2", "user": {"id": "24448735", "displayName": "Jeanne Larson", "photo": {"id": "221862322", "userSmall": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/7/xs/ly/cXXSLydpSVDqIVB-48x48-noPad.jpg?1553098061", "processing": false}}}, "organization": null, "updatesConnection": {"nodes": [{"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "28051923", "createdAt": "2020-11-11T18:56:45.000Z", "title": "Live chat for charity", "description": "<p>Exceptional YouTuber <a href=\"https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCAk03rcNVtLK1_LlgRTOh2w\" rel=\"nofollow\">Stevie J. Raw</a> is hosting a <a href=\"https://www.justgiving.com/fundraising/stevie-j-raw1\" rel=\"nofollow\">live chat</a> on Saturday, November 14th to raise money and awareness for the Greater Ormond Street Children's Hospital. The chat starts at 1030am, est, 930am central.</p>\n<p>Johnny Depp's daughter, Lily-Rose Depp spent time at The Greater Ormond Street hospital in her childhood, so while Johnny will not be at the chat, this is a charity near and dear to his heart.</p>\n<p>The chat's <a href=\"https://www.justgiving.com/fundraising/stevie-j-raw1\" rel=\"nofollow\">donation page</a> says:</p>\n<p>\"The goal of this event is to raise money in support of ALL domestic violence victims who do not have a voice. One of those men is Johnny Depp therefore all moneys raised will go to Great Ormond Street Hospital where Johnny himself donates every year.\"</p>\n<p>I for one will be there with bells on. I hope to see you guys there as well.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://www.justgiving.com/fundraising/stevie-j-raw1\" rel=\"nofollow\">Watch the live chat HERE</a>.</p>", "photo": {"id": "224848327", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/9/xi/ck/NoxiCkDjIvaxQSy-800x450-noPad.jpg?1605121007", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "28038248", "createdAt": "2020-11-09T17:44:06.000Z", "title": "Connections", "description": "<p>Johnny Depp stood no chance in the UK defamation trial against the Sun from the beginning. Justice Nicol was a lawyer championing for freedom of press for The Times which is owned by Murdock Who employees his son. The Judge's son works with defendant DAN WOOTTON. This combined with other connections between the judge and Amber Heard set Johnny Depp up to fail from the beginning. That\u2019s why Heard was so smug throughout the proceedings. She knew the whole time that she had it in the bag.</p>\n<p>But Johnny is appealing the verdict, taking the decision out of Justice Nicol\u2019s hands. Heard might be laughing out the other side of her butt when the appeal comes down in Johnny\u2019s favor.</p>\n<p>And let\u2019s not forget the Defamation case coming up in Virginia. Unless that judge has ties to Heard, or has been paid off, that\u2019s a slam dunk for Johnny. There\u2019s a ton of evidence that wasn\u2019t brought forth in the UK trial because it was the Sun in the Hot Seat, not Heard. She was just a witness in that case. In Virginia, she\u2019s the defendant. A LOT of evidence and a myriad of witnesses will be brought that she\u2019ll have a very hard time trying to disprove. Johnny\u2019s got video, audio and witnesses. All Heard has is: \u201cBecause I say so.\u201d That doesn\u2019t fly in an unbiased court of law.</p>\n<p>There are so many connections between Heard and \u00a0Justice Nicol that it would take me all day to chase them down. Stevie J Raw did a great job of it today in his live chat. If you want to learn a lot more about these connections, by all means, go check out his chat <a href=\"https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d9SIxHWf4p8\" rel=\"nofollow\">HERE</a>.</p>\n<p>What do you think? Will Johnny win his appeal? Or is the system so corrupt that he\u2019s just sunk? Drop a comment and let us know.</p>", "photo": {"id": "224837803", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/6/eq/zi/IIeQZIeXhulygDJ-800x450-noPad.jpg?1604943850", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "MilestonePetitionUpdate", "id": "28037329", "createdAt": "2020-11-09T15:09:20.000Z", "signatureCount": 750000}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "28021521", "createdAt": "2020-11-06T18:07:10.000Z", "title": "Bring Johnny back.", "description": "<p>In light of Johnny Depp's recent loss in his defamation case against NGN media and The Sun, Warner Bros has asked for his resignation from the Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them franchise. Being the gentleman that he is, Johnny has graciously stepped aside. You can read his statement of resignation on his Instagram\u00a0<a href=\"https://www.instagram.com/p/CHQXHimJvAC/?utm_source=ig_embed&amp;utm_campaign=loading\" rel=\"nofollow\">HERE</a>.</p>\n<p>There's so much wrong with this that reaches far beyond one role - or two, now that he's lost Pirates as well. In the end, Johnny will prevail. He's currently appealing the verdict against him. It's very likely that he'll win the appeal, and his upcoming defamation case against ex wife Amber Heard, too. He's still got film roles coming in, his band the Hollywood Vampires is rock and rolling along. Besides which, he has the love and support of the entire world.\u00a0If anything, the verdict has brought the world closer together in their support of this wrongfully persecuted man.</p>\n<p>But the damage is done. Not just to Johnny, but every male survivor of domestic abuse. By finding against Johnny and his preponderance of evidence in the face of Heard's abysmal lack of evidence, by saying that he believed Amber Heard because she's a woman, the judge has made it impossible for abused men to come forward in search of support.</p>\n<p>And by dumping Johnny, WB sends the message that they support abusers, and have no support whatsoever for the true victim. That's not acceptable, and we must come together and raise our voices.</p>\n<p>Let's send WB the message that we DO support not just Johnny Depp but every survivor of domestic support, including Men. Demand that Warner Bros do the right thing brings back Johnny Depp back in his iconic role of Gellart Grindelwald in Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them.\u00a0</p>\n<p>Please sign the petition to bring Johnny Depp back to Fantastic Beasts <a href=\"http://chng.it/VbygFNf8\" rel=\"nofollow\">HERE</a>.</p>", "photo": {"id": "224823372", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/9/va/ay/JKvaAyHyTwyTblX-800x450-noPad.jpg?1604686032", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "28010429", "createdAt": "2020-11-04T23:34:20.000Z", "title": "We've reached our 500,000 Milestone!", "description": "<p>Thanks to all of you, we've reached half a million signatures!\u00a0</p>\n<p>The way Change.org works, when a milestone is met, it automatically sets a new milestone. So the new milestone of a million, I didn't do that.\u00a0</p>\n<p>I feel like we've already won. The word through the grapevine is that WB bought out Amber Heard's contract, so she won't be in Aquafish 2. But it hasn't been made official yet, so I'm still going to hang in there with the petition and continue to speak out for victims of domestic violence, including and especially Johnny Depp.</p>\n<p>I just want to say thank you to each and every one of you for bringing this petition as far as it has come. You rock.</p>", "photo": {"id": "224814974", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/4/jt/be/rZjtbeNPVjhXDmJ-800x450-noPad.jpg?1604532862", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "MilestonePetitionUpdate", "id": "28009466", "createdAt": "2020-11-04T20:20:56.000Z", "signatureCount": 500000}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "28004235", "createdAt": "2020-11-03T22:46:35.000Z", "title": "Petition owner told to \"Support women.\"", "description": "<p>This comment landed on the petition to remove Amber Heard from Aquaman 2 yesterday. I was told to:</p>\n<p>\u201cShut down this pathetic petition, Justice for Amber! Support women shame on you Jeanne.\u201d</p>\n<p>That right there is exactly what\u2019s wrong with what\u2019s going on right now. Amber Heard expecting people to believe her just because she\u2019s a woman.</p>\n<p>\u201cTell the world, Johnny. Tell them I Johnny Depp, a man, I'm a victim too of domestic violence... and see how many people believe or side with you.\"</p>\n<p>And at first, she was right. People did side with her just because she\u2019s a woman. Even in the recent verdict in Johnny Depp\u2019s libel case against the Sun, the judge ridiculously said that even though Johnny had the preponderance of evidence, he was choosing to believe Amber Heard. What woman would lie about being the victim of domestic abuse, right?</p>\n<p>Well, we know the answer to that one, don't we?</p>\n<p>Heard may be celebrating right now, but the libel case isn\u2019t over. Not by a long shot. Johnny and his team have 21 days from the verdict date to appeal the verdict. And, according to Johnny\u2019s legal team, the verdict is so absurd that it\u2019s unthinkable not to appeal.</p>\n<p>I can neither confirm nor deny that such an appeal will take place, so I\u2019ll just suppose that it will. And if it does, the verdict must certainly be overturned.</p>\n<p>Regarding Justice Nicol, it\u2019s rumored that his wife is BFFs with one of Amber\u2019s lawyers. If that\u2019s true, can we say \u201cconflict of interest\u201d much?</p>\n<p>As for me, no. I won\u2019t support women just because they\u2019re women. I will support VICTIMS no matter what gender they are. I support Johnny, a male victim of domestic abuse. I hope his verdict is overturned, so that men in the UK and around the world can feel safer coming forward seeking support. Nobody should feel so victimized by society that they can\u2019t get help.</p>\n<p>Shame on me for not supporting Amber because she's a woman? No, honey. Shame on you for supporting an abuser.</p>\n<p>And since you have to sign the petition to comment, thanks for your support!</p>", "photo": {"id": "224808525", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/6/bx/nk/HrbxNkYlmNSwrAs-800x450-noPad.jpg?1604443599", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "27994935", "createdAt": "2020-11-02T11:28:29.000Z", "title": "Outrage as Johnny Depp loses Libel suit", "description": "<p>The judge in Johnny Depp's libel suit against the Sun has found in favor of the tabloid. The ruling, which you can read <a href=\"https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/QB/2020/2911.html\" rel=\"nofollow\">HERE</a> contradicts itself repeatedly, saying that the judge believed Johnny, but found in favor of the Sun anyway.</p>\n<p>To celebrate, the Sun immediately posted a headline saying basically: \"See? Johnny Depp WAS a wife beater!\"</p>\n<p>What absolute rubbish.</p>\n<p>Netizens are in an outrage, calling for the removal of the judge (who I will not name here) to be removed from the bench and investigated for potential bribery. One Twitter user said: \"I smell a muskrat.\"</p>\n<p>We'll never know why the verdict came down the way it did. We just have to remember that\u00a0this is just one battle. The war isn't over. Johnny still has his case against Amber Heard herself, and there's a whole lot more evidence, and more witnesses, that were not presented at the UK trial. We'll just have to wait for Johnny to get justice against his ex wife one on one.</p>\n<p>No matter how all these legal tribulations play out, Johnny is the winner. He's got the support of the entire world behind him, while she's left with the reputation of being a bed-pooper. He's got film role offers left and right, while all she's got are pictures of her picking up dog crap.\u00a0</p>\n<p>Johnny Depp will prevail, no matter what the courts say. I just hope he knows how many people love and support him.</p>\n<p>What do you think of the verdict? Drop a comment and let us know.</p>", "photo": {"id": "224800540", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/3/yk/gh/NAyKghRaPSmIjjS-800x450-noPad.jpg?1604316511", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "27991081", "createdAt": "2020-11-01T15:23:17.000Z", "title": "UK Verdict Watch Party", "description": "<p>Just a quick not to let you know that a lot of us will be joining <a href=\"https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BegT76_0Spo\" rel=\"nofollow\">Stevie J Raw</a> for a UK verdict watch party tonight/tomorrow. We'll be watching live as the verdict is handed down, and will be discussing the implications.\u00a0</p>\n<p>How will the UK verdict affect the upcoming defamation trial in in Virginia? If Depp loses against the Sun in the UK, does he have any chance in Virginia? If Johnny wins, is Virginia going to be a slam dunk.</p>\n<p>And if Johnny wins, will Amber Heard et al be sought for perjury in the UK? That's something to consider, since she's being investigated for Perjury in Australia.</p>\n<p>How much time could Heard face if she's found guilty of Perjury in the UK? Anybody know?</p>\n<p>I hope to see you all at the watch party. It's early but it will be well worth it. Here's the link. See you at 4am central!\u00a0<br><a href=\"https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BegT76_0Spo\" rel=\"nofollow\">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BegT76_0Spo</a></p>", "photo": {"id": "224797563", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/0/ep/vn/XHepvNSfGLsaHNe-800x450-noPad.jpg?1604244199", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "27963320", "createdAt": "2020-10-27T14:14:36.000Z", "title": "UK trial verdict date", "description": "<p>Hang onto you hats, kids. We have a date for the verdict in the UK libel trial, thanks to Nick Wallis, who says:</p>\n<p>\"The judgment in Depp v News Group Newspapers Ltd will be handed down remotely at 10am on Monday 2 November 2020. The judgment will be available on the Judiciary website at 10am, along with a press summary. Nothing will be taking place physically at the Royal Courts of Justice.\"</p>\n<p>That means that nobody has to appear in London for the verdict. That's good, considering the interruptions Johnny's already got to face during filming. If you recall, Amber Heard successfully demanded that Johnny Appear in Virginia to sit for a three day deposition - which he could just as easily have done via video.</p>\n<p>You can keep up to date on the UK court website <a href=\"https://www.bailii.org/cgi-bin/lucy_search_1.cgi?query=Depp&amp;results=50&amp;submit=Search&amp;rank=on&amp;callback=on&amp;mask_path=ew%2Fcases%2FEWHC%2FQB\" rel=\"nofollow\">HERE</a>.</p>\n<p>Thanks to Nick Wallis for all his tireless efforts keeping us informed.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://twitter.com/nickwallis/status/1321029159158714369\" rel=\"nofollow\">SOURCE</a></p>", "photo": {"id": "224776850", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/3/yt/gz/qxYtgzswrxXpOEs-800x450-noPad.jpg?1603808078", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "27947091", "createdAt": "2020-10-24T13:20:39.000Z", "title": "Judge throws Depp's lawyer off the case", "description": "<p>Judge Bruce White threw Depp\u2019s attorney Adam Waldman off the case on Friday, after hearing that the attorney had leaked confidential information. Waldman was admitted pro hac vice \u2014 for this case only \u2014 to Fairfax County Circuit Court in September 2019.\u00a0That means the Waldman, who practices in Washington, was given permission to represent Johnny in Virginia.</p>\n<p>That same month, Judge White signed a\u00a0protective order\u00a0governing the treatment of Depp and Heard\u2019s personal information \u2014 passport numbers, phone numbers and the like, as well as\u00a0medical records, including psychological conditions, diagnoses or treatment.\u00a0</p>\n<p>Heard had\u00a0moved for sanctions\u00a0against the Washington attorney last month, contending that the press leaks happened \u201con at least two occasions.\u201d</p>\n<p>She said Waldman was responsible for disseminating audio recordings, surveillance pictures and declarations from third-party witnesses to websites and Twitter users.</p>\n<p>In court on Friday, Heard\u2019s lawyers accused Waldman of spreading false rumors about their client.\u00a0\u00a0</p>\n<p>White, who is chief judge of the 19th\u00a0Circuit, agreed Friday to revoke Waldman\u2019s pro hac vice status. Despite finding that ethical standards were violated, the judge declined to issue a gag order against Waldman.\u00a0\u00a0</p>\n<p>While it\u2019s easy to see this as a defeat, it\u2019s not. Not at all. Johnny has be represented by Virginia lawyer Benjamin Chew throughout these proceedings thus far, and he\u2019ll continue to do a fine job. After all, whoever presents them, the facts are still the facts, and Amber Heard is still sunk by them. She can\u2019t get everybody fired.</p>\n<p>Besides, now that Adam Waldman isn\u2019t constrained by the orders of the case anymore, he can say and do whatever he wants. The judge didn\u2019t issue a gag order remember, and Waldman knows EVERYTHING about the case. While I\u2019m sure he wouldn\u2019t do anything to hurt Johnny \u2013 he\u2019s still Johnny\u2019s lawyer \u2013 he\u2019s now free to talk about any little thing.</p>\n<p>Heard may see this as a victory, but the truth is that she may have shot herself in the food on this one. Waldman\u2019s free to talk, now, and I for one can\u2019t wait to see what he\u2019s got to say.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://www.courthousenews.com/lawyer-for-johnny-depp-kicked-off-case-after-press-leaks/\" rel=\"nofollow\">SOURCE</a></p>", "photo": {"id": "224764301", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/4/zk/zj/KcZkZjmXcyLlNBs-800x450-noPad.jpg?1603545641", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "27944722", "createdAt": "2020-10-23T23:21:03.000Z", "title": "Depp v Heard on YouTube", "description": "<p>Before the other day, the most videos I\u2019ve seen on YouTube are the incredibly informative videos done by <a href=\"https://t.co/4WkBaH8hVW?amp=1\" rel=\"nofollow\">Incredibly Average</a>, That Brian Fella. He\u2019s got a talent for dissecting the events and information and presenting us with an unbiassed view of the truth.</p>\n<p>Aside from Incredibly average, I had seen one or two videos by <a href=\"https://t.co/wakbRHTk82?amp=1\" rel=\"nofollow\">eHacker</a>, because they did one on the petition. Come to find out, they've got a lot to say on the subject of Heard V Depp.</p>\n<p>At that time, though, I wasn\u2019t aware that there were YouTubers that were doing live streams chatting about the events surrounding Johnny Depp versus Amber Heard.</p>\n<p>Then I was invited to be a guest on a live chat with Stevie J Raw. At first I declined, because I really didn\u2019t think I was important enough to have anything relevant to say. But then I was reminded that it would help raise awareness for the petition, which raises awareness for not only Johnny Depp, but also other male victims of domestic abuse. So I agreed and I went on Stevie\u2019s live stream.</p>\n<p>I think I was an idiot, but Stevie was an extremely gracious host, and everybody was so supportive. They made it painless. <a href=\"https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eoZRUgYEhu4\" rel=\"nofollow\">HERE</a>\u2019s the link to that video, if you want to see for yourself that I\u2019m not a bot, curls and all.</p>\n<p>In the days since, I\u2019ve become aware of more YouTubers who dedicate time to covering the Depp v Heard debacle. They\u2019re sharp, clever, and do a fantastic job of peeling back the layers of the truth. So please give them a look and listen.</p>\n<p>In no particular order:<br><a href=\"https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC4ltvXoxGZobqqduv9iXOWg\" rel=\"nofollow\">Come Geek Some</a><br><a href=\"https://t.co/bComSnSktj?amp=1\" rel=\"nofollow\">Shelby Soup</a><br><a href=\"https://t.co/kodm2p35c1?amp=1\" rel=\"nofollow\">Truthy McGoo</a><br><a href=\"https://t.co/XMOvMRHcmp?amp=1\" rel=\"nofollow\">Spiritually Empowered Coaching</a><br><a href=\"https://t.co/aspgYkWLxM?amp=1\" rel=\"nofollow\">Johnny Depp Project</a><br><a href=\"https://t.co/BKrIy3S4mE?amp=1\" rel=\"nofollow\">That Umbrella Guy</a><br><a href=\"https://t.co/qcZQVdtQoX?amp=1\" rel=\"nofollow\">Lost Beyond Pluto</a><br><a href=\"https://t.co/ry7IqBGBC3?amp=1\" rel=\"nofollow\">Live Abuse Free</a><br><a href=\"https://t.co/UOQ9MaEhPv?amp=1\" rel=\"nofollow\">Autumn on Venus</a><br><a href=\"https://t.co/1kJFko4tfT?amp=1\" rel=\"nofollow\">Yellow Flash</a><br><a href=\"https://t.co/F3TywWPi5a?amp=1\" rel=\"nofollow\">Believing Bruce</a><br><a href=\"https://t.co/DmOLVUCmXq?amp=1\" rel=\"nofollow\">Observe</a><br><a href=\"https://t.co/T9wQABH5q1?amp=1\" rel=\"nofollow\">Nerdette\u2019s Newsstand</a><br><a href=\"https://t.co/DnnDbc46LI?amp=1\" rel=\"nofollow\">Paralegal reacts/Debbi Dooms</a></p>\n<p>They're a talented, knowledgeable group of people, including lawyers. And, as you can see, there\u2019s a lot of discussion going on about the legal proceedings between Johnny Depp and Amber Heard. So join in, or just give a listen. There\u2019s so much more going on than meets the eye.</p>", "photo": {"id": "224762357", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/3/us/mf/BMuSMFOMPjBrTFQ-800x450-noPad.jpg?1603495264", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}], "pageInfo": {"endCursor": "YXJyYXljb25uZWN0aW9uOjk1", "hasNextPage": true}}}}}, {"data": {"petition": {"id": "14451136", "slug": "dc-entertainment-remove-amber-heard-from-aquaman-2", "user": {"id": "24448735", "displayName": "Jeanne Larson", "photo": {"id": "221862322", "userSmall": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/7/xs/ly/cXXSLydpSVDqIVB-48x48-noPad.jpg?1553098061", "processing": false}}}, "organization": null, "updatesConnection": {"nodes": [{"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "27923120", "createdAt": "2020-10-20T20:42:33.000Z", "title": "Amber Heard's fate has gone to the dogs", "description": "<p>The Department of Agriculture in Queensland, Australia is investigating\u00a0Amber Heard\u00a0for possible perjury over the Pistol &amp; Boo star-paws palaver. Hound lovers\u00a0may recall that\u00a0during the Pirates of the Caribbean star\u2019s libel case against The Sun newspaper, Depp\u2019s former employee told the court he was forced to lie under oath about the dogs\u2019 illegal entry into Queensland. Heard\u2019s former assistant also claimed the actor \u201cdeliberately smuggled the dogs into Australia.\u201d</p>\n<p>The 34-year-old Heard avoided conviction in April 2016 after she pleaded guilty to giving Customs a false document. But she and Depp were forced to film a hostage video, sorry, biosecurity apology.\u00a0</p>\n<p>The department is investigating if any criminal offences under commonwealth legislation have been committed relating to the testimony provided to the High Court in London. As the matter is the subject of a current investigation the department is unable to provide any further comment at this time.</p>\n<p>The maximum penalty for perjury in Queensland? Fourteen years in jail. \u201cIs the defense for perjury that you have got to be able to act?\u201d Joyce zinged. \u201cWhat is the point of having laws if they are not pursued?\u201d</p>\n<p>That\u2019s right, folks. Heard could face up to 14 years in jail for one count of perjury alone.</p>\n<p>That doesn\u2019t even begin to touch the time she could serve if Johnny filed a complaint about his finger and had her thrown in jail for assault resulting in grievous bodily injury. If he did that, we wouldn\u2019t have to be bothered with Miss Thang for quite a while.</p>\n<p>I don\u2019t know why Johnny hasn\u2019t filed a complaint yet for that finger incident, but I wish he would, and make her face justice for it, once and for all.</p>\n<p>What do you think? Should Johnny put Heard in jail for cutting off his finger? Or should he let sleeping dogs lie?</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://www.theaustralian.com.au/commentary/strewth/pup-fiction-amber-heard-investigated-for-perjury-over-pistol-and-boo/news-story/3b64ed3e0ff7db616d3fd85ab72cdb6b\" rel=\"nofollow\">SOURCE</a></p>", "photo": {"id": "224742621", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/3/rs/mc/pyRSmcXqWVIjlZy-800x450-noPad.jpg?1603226556", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "27908067", "createdAt": "2020-10-17T22:43:34.000Z", "title": "Celebs speak out for Johnny Depp", "description": "<p>It wasn't very long ago that Snoop Dogg showed Johnny some love on <a href=\"https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EZl5xkPXkAIeRjN.jpg\" rel=\"nofollow\">Instagram</a>.\u00a0</p>\n<p>And now, a couple others are stepping forward.</p>\n<p>Singer Sia took to <a href=\"https://twitter.com/Sia/status/1316909149230387202\" rel=\"nofollow\">Twitter</a> to say \"Just showing my support for Johnny Depp. I mean, I\u2019d love him to get clean and stop with the jewelry, but he is clearly the victim after hearing those tapes.\"</p>\n<p>The 44-year-old singer (born Sia Kate Isobelle Furle) took to Twitter on Thursday, showing her support for the 57-year-old Pirates of the Caribbean star.</p>\n<p>She also took a shot towards\u00a0his ex Amber Heard, and her former boyfriend\u00a0Elon Musk, throwing some serious shade\u00a0in another tweet.</p>\n<p>\"Also\u00a0@elonmusk didn't you give her the seven million she \"donated\"\u00a0from her settlement?\u00a0She still came out seven million richer.\u00a0Why are you protecting her? She will never\u00a0get the help she needs\u00a0if we all stay\u00a0silent!\"</p>\n<p>Anna Akana posted on <a href=\"https://twitter.com/AnnaAkana/status/1317228560566812678?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Etweet\" rel=\"nofollow\">twitter</a>: \"I just spent the entire day deep diving into the Amber Heard &amp; Johnny Depp situation and\u00a0WOW.\u00a0I'm ashamed that I believed this woman who cried wolf,\u00a0and\u00a0I'm deeply angry that her lies hurt real victims.\u00a0He's one of the victims\u00a0that is being discredited due to\u00a0her false accusations.\u00a0Though\u00a0men are a smaller percentage of abused victims, they are also ones that face\u00a0more stigma/dismissiveness.\u00a0She knew this and exploited it :(\u00a0\"</p>\n<p>\"I\u00a0listened to the hour conversation\u00a0that both knew was being recorded, the half hour conversation Amber secretly recorded &amp; a telephone conversation Depp recorded.\u00a0There was a\u00a0clear pattern in all of verbal and emotional abuse by Heard.\u00a0Not being able to promise that you won't hit someone again is\u00a0insane.\"</p>\n<p>It\u2019s really good to see celebrities standing up and speaking out in favor of Johnny Depp. I wish more people would follow suit. He\u2019s a super nice guy that\u2019s worked with a LOT of people in the industry, and I wish more of them would stand up and show their support.</p>\n<p>Who would you like to see step up and speak out? Drop a comment and let us know.</p>", "photo": {"id": "224731147", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/7/yi/rx/ifyIrXPGvJDmwPj-800x450-noPad.jpg?1602974618", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "27902300", "createdAt": "2020-10-16T18:48:02.000Z", "title": "Amber Heard bullies Johnny Depp", "description": "<p>Johnny Depp is ordered to appear for three successive days in counsel for the defendant\u2019s offices on November 10th, 11th, and 12th, beginning at 10am. And he has to pay her the cost of filing this motion, as well as whatever other reasonable costs apply.</p>\n<p>So, basically, Johnny has to pay Amber for bullying him into interrupting filming in London in order to appear in Virginia for a deposition that easily could have waited until after his filming was concluded.</p>\n<p>Let\u2019s keep in mind that it\u2019s not just three days at stake. There are quarantine periods as well. So it\u2019s not just a matter of days that filming is being disrupted by. It could be weeks.</p>\n<p>While I\u2019m sure it\u2019s Amber\u2019s intention to jerk Johnny around \u2013 maybe even get him fired from FB3 \u2013 she\u2019s also meddling with WB, forcing them to reschedule Johnny\u2019s filming and having to film around him. Is this something she\u2019d pull if she were still affiliated with Aquaman 2? I don\u2019t think so. She wouldn\u2019t risk her status with them if she still had the part.</p>\n<p>Heard might be feeling all victorious right about now, winning this little battle. But one battle doesn\u2019t win the war, and she will not win this one. The verdict will come down from London soon about Depp\u2019s libel case against the Sun for calling him a wife beater, and when it does, the whole world will be put on notice that the courts aren\u2019t buying her story about being a battered wife. The court in London won\u2019t buy it, and neither will the court in Virginia.</p>\n<p>She can enjoy what little bit of money she gets from Johnny right now, right up until she\u2019s forced to pay him $50 million for his defamation case. Since she\u2019s not worth that much to begin with, it\u2019ll be interesting to see where she gets the money.</p>\n<p>She can enjoy pushing him around for now, too. Because while she\u2019s getting her way this time, she does no control Johnny Depp any more. He caught wise to what kind of a monster she really is, and kicked her to the curb. Sure, he\u2019ll have to sit for the deposition, but she will not be the one asking questions. She shouldn\u2019t even be in the room, though I\u2019m sure she\u2019ll find a way to insert herself so that she can stare him down and witness his defeat. But that\u2019s the end of it. He\u2019s moved on with his life and regained his happiness. And no matter how much she thinks she can push him around, she can\u2019t take that away from him. Never again.</p>\n<p>And she can go ahead and enjoy breathing free air, while she can. She\u2019s got several chances to be thrown behind bars hanging over her head. First, there\u2019s no statute of limitations in Australia for violence that results in grievous bodily harm. Like cutting off somebody\u2019s finger. The only reason she hasn\u2019t been brought up on charges is because Johnny hasn\u2019t filed a claim against her. She owes the fact that she\u2019s not in jail right now to the man she\u2019s pushing around. She needs to think about that.</p>\n<p>Second, Australia\u2019s looking at her for Perjury in the case where she brought the yorkies, Pistol and Boo, into the country illegally. She lied in her statement to authorities, and now they know it.</p>\n<p>And, depending on how the verdict comes down in London, she could very well be facing perjury charges there, too. She lied her ass off in her testimony to the British courts, just like she\u2019s lied for the past four years about Johnny.</p>\n<p>Will they seek perjury charges in Virginia after she lies there, too? They certainly could. So let her do her little victory dance at this perceived victory. She won\u2019t be laughing when it\u2019s all over.</p>\n<p>What do you think? Will the London judge rule in favor of Depp or Heard? What do you think will happen in Virginia? Will Heard manage to pull another rabbit out of her hat? Or will Johnny prevail, clearing his name and forcing her to face justice? Drop a comment and let us know.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/circuit/sites/circuit/files/assets/documents/pdf/high-profile/depp%20v%20heard/cl-2019-2911-compel-depo-docs-sanctions-order-10-15-2020.pdf\" rel=\"nofollow\">SOURCE</a></p>", "photo": {"id": "224726857", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/9/du/xw/NQDuxwvzdmoamcv-800x450-noPad.jpg?1602874085", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "27882547", "createdAt": "2020-10-13T13:32:02.000Z", "title": "All Quiet", "description": "<p>All is pretty quiet while we wait for Justice Nicol to hand down his ruling in Johnny Depp's libel case against the Sun tabloid. Nobody's really up to anything newsworthy.\u00a0</p>\n<p>If I were so inclined, I could post pictures of the inane things Amber Heard's been up to, from riding her horse, and a lesson horse, badly with the wrong tack, to her hanging her nipples out for the world to see (again) in that same see-through top that she wore to meet Jason Momoa and a gaggle of kids for an Aquaman event.</p>\n<p>But I'm not so inclined. It's not news, even if these base, nonsensical tidbits get posted in the Daily Fail (mail) tabloid.</p>\n<p>I have to wonder who she's got on her payroll to get them to post her non-event, inappropriate photos. SOMEbody's got to be getting paid for that. It also makes me wonder who's footing the bill. She got paid not to appear in Aquaman 2, so she's got a little bit of money. But she lives outside her means, and somebody's got to be picking up the tab.\u00a0</p>\n<p>Hopefully, we'll hear a ruling soon. Then we can celebrate, since Johnny is certain to win. And then we can look forward to the Virginia case, which Johnny is also certain to win, hands down. Heard spend years portraying herself as the victim of Depp's abuse, when the truth is that she was the abusive one. He lost his job as Captain Jack Sparrow due to her allegations. It's only right that he should be compensated for it.\u00a0</p>\n<p>As much as I enjoy updating this petition and interacting with all of you, this petition was created to be temporary. When it's confirmed beyond any doubt that Heard isn't in Aquaman 2, I can claim this petition to be a victory and put it to bed.\u00a0</p>\n<p>Until then, I'll bring you the latest as I find it.\u00a0</p>", "photo": {"id": "224710800", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/7/qz/ho/SJQZhOrHlABiiPT-800x450-noPad.jpg?1602595927", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "27853406", "createdAt": "2020-10-07T20:51:11.000Z", "title": "Ms. Heard's counterclaim is subject to dismissal on multiple grounds", "description": "<p>A new reply by Johnny Depp's legal team addresses how Amber Heard's counterclaim should be dismissed for multiple reasons.\u00a0</p>\n<p>First, she fails to state a claim for declaratory judgement. In her opposition, Ms. Heard fails to state a single case recognizing the viability of a standalone claim for a declaratory judgement. Basically, she's outta gas because of anti-SLAPP statutes.</p>\n<p>Second, Ms. Heard fails to allege computer crimes under the VA code. She can't cite where the alleged \"smear campaign\" is immoral or unlawful. Further, she can't prove that anything said by Mr. Depp was obscene or illegal as it relates directly to her.</p>\n<p>And third, calling someone a liar isn't defamation. Especially if they've already been proven to be a liar.</p>\n<p>In short, Heard's counterclaim is a whole bunch of her being butthurt, without any legal substance.\u00a0</p>\n<p>What do you think? Should Heard's counterclaim be dismissed? Or will she get to keep beating Johnny over the head with it? Let us know.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/circuit/sites/circuit/files/assets/documents/pdf/high-profile/depp%20v%20heard/cl-2019-2911-plaintiff-memo-supp-demurrer-plea-in-bar-10-5-2020.pdf\" rel=\"nofollow\">SOURCE</a></p>", "photo": {"id": "224688136", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/0/yw/kc/PPywkCVRnxTYgaI-800x450-noPad.jpg?1602103873", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "27845686", "createdAt": "2020-10-06T15:34:50.000Z", "title": "WB: We don't need her", "description": "<p>I keep hearing Amber stans (die-hard fans) insisting that since there's no official word from WB about Aquaman 2, there's no proof that Amber Heard won't be in the movie.</p>\n<p>Well here's an email from WB saying that they don't need her.\u00a0</p>\n<p>I think that's about as official as it gets. Don't you?</p>\n<p>I know that this email is in a specific context for a specific date and time, but I think that it's indicative of the fact that there's truth to the assertion that WB has bought out Heard's contract, and that she will not appear in Aquaman 2.</p>\n<p>What do you think? Are you convinced that Amber Heard will not be in Aquaman 2, or are you still on the fence?</p>", "photo": {"id": "224682081", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/8/yl/ne/DxYLnEPLQaKRRDQ-800x450-noPad.jpg?1601998492", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "27839907", "createdAt": "2020-10-05T17:28:06.000Z", "title": "Depp asks court to tell Heard to cool her jets", "description": "<p>Johnny Depp's legal team has responded to Amber Heard's request that he interrupt filming to sit for a deposition in Virginia.\u00a0</p>\n<p>\"Ms Heard has again filed a gratuitous motion, wasting the court's resources.\" Depp's opposition begins. \"Requiring Depp to disrupt the shooting, which involves 750 people, and make what would be unnecessary flights between London and Virginia during the COVID pandemic, as Ms. Heard irresponsibly requests, would also endanger Mr. Depp's health, And that of everyone with whom he would come into contact.\"</p>\n<p>Johnny's team reminds the court that he's already agreed to sit for his deposition after filming is complete, and requests that Heard and her team be patient until then.\u00a0</p>\n<p>What do you think? Will Heard wait for Johnny to finish filming, or will she continue to demand that he interrupt filming to go sit for a 3 day deposition in Virginia? Is she trying to disrupt filming to strain the relationship between Johnny and WB so that they won't want to work with him again? Or is she just so petty that she wants to be a thorn in his side? Does she want him to catch COVID by demanding that he travel? What do you think her game is? Let us know.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/circuit/sites/circuit/files/assets/documents/pdf/high-profile/depp%20v%20heard/cl-2019-2911-plaintiff-opp-to-mot-to-compel-depo-docs-sanctions-10-2-2020.pdf\" rel=\"nofollow\">SOURCE</a></p>", "photo": {"id": "224675770", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/2/bs/hg/DJbsHghYcMRhQcB-800x450-noPad.jpg?1601918891", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "27833665", "createdAt": "2020-10-04T12:58:32.000Z", "title": "Heard accuses Depp of dodging deposition", "description": "<p>\u00a0Amber Heard\u00a0has asked a Virginia judge to force ex-husband\u00a0Johnny Depp\u00a0to finally sit down for an elongated examination with her attorneys.</p>\n<p>\"Defendant is forced to bring this motion after extensive efforts to obtain the deposition of Plaintiff, even after providing a two-month Notice of Deposition, asking for locations and dates for Mr. Depp prior to his filming, seeking discovery to ascertain Mr. Depp's exact filming schedule, and finally being told that the Plaintiff in this action, suing Defendant for $50 million, will not make himself available for deposition until the filming of Fantastic Beasts is complete, sometime late February 2021, or possibly later,\" lawyers for the star state, reported Deadline.</p>\n<p>Heard is once again trying to get the case dismissed or seeking an assurance that Depp shows up \"for three successive days in counsel for Defendant's offices in Virginia on or before October 30, 2020 on dates and times agreeable to counsel for Defendant.\"</p>\n<p>A hearing has been set for 9 October before Fairfax County, Virginia, Circuit Court Chief Judge Bruce White on the matter, with another hearing on sanctions against Depp's main lawyer Adam Waldman scheduled for 23 October.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://www.aceshowbiz.com/news/view/00160518.html\" rel=\"nofollow\">SOURCE</a></p>", "photo": {"id": "224670973", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/1/yx/fo/ALyXfoQVeXTbCFx-800x450-noPad.jpg?1601816349", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "27825598", "createdAt": "2020-10-02T17:03:25.000Z", "title": "Amber Heard getting political", "description": "<p>It seems that Amber Heard is starting to pursue some political ambitions. She's recently come out swinging in favor of Joe Biden for President, and is now inserting herself into social events with political overtones.</p>\n<p>Today at 5pm pt/8pm est, Heard will attend a political rally of sorts featuring foster kids. According to the website:\u00a0</p>\n<p>\"Join us for a town hall with Foster Youth for Biden featuring actress and United Nations Human Rights Champion Amber Heard and Congressmember Karen Bass. Learn what is at stake for foster care and child welfare reform, why the issue matters this election season, and how to foster action.\"</p>\n<p>What do you think? Does Heard really care about foster kids? Or Joe Biden, for that matter? Or is this just the latest \"cause\" she's hitching her wagon to in order to 1) get her name in the headlines, 2) try to make herself seem relevant and caring? Is she going to try to go into politics since her acting career is down the toilet?\u00a0</p>\n<p>Drop a line and let us know what you think.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://www.fosteractionforce.org/\" rel=\"nofollow\">SOURCE</a></p>", "photo": {"id": "224664801", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/9/nv/od/kHNVODZGtyNslkY-800x450-noPad.jpg?1601658206", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "27811599", "createdAt": "2020-09-30T13:16:38.000Z", "title": "Heard's Motion DENIED", "description": "<p>Amber Heard's motions for sanctions against Johnny Depp is DENIED.\u00a0</p>\n<p>In yet another win for Johnny Depp, the court denies Heard's motion for Johnny to be punished for her percieved crimes against him, which still includes saying that he started this petition.</p>\n<p>Many more wins for Johnny to come.</p>", "photo": {"id": "224655080", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/2/op/tr/zPOPtrVSHuizqyj-800x450-noPad.jpg?1601471801", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "27807910", "createdAt": "2020-09-29T21:04:29.000Z", "title": "An open letter to Amber Heard", "description": "<p>I'm going to keep this short and sweet.</p>\n<p>Twitter user @TheInfamousOne6 has penned an <a href=\"https://medium.com/@theinfamousone/an-open-letter-to-amber-heard-1a8ae2bf7a83\" rel=\"nofollow\">open letter</a> to Amber Heard. I strongly suggest that anybody interested in this case read it. It's an intelligent, thoughtful look at dealing with a toxic narcissist - in this case, Amber Heard.</p>\n<p>Not only does it provide insights into the thought processes and motivations of a toxic narcissist, it does so with a pretty comprehensive timeline. Well worth the read.</p>\n<p>Quick warning. It contains sensitive and emotional triggers, so be sure to look after your emotional well-being while reading it.</p>\n<p>When you've read it, come back and let us know what you think.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://medium.com/@theinfamousone/an-open-letter-to-amber-heard-1a8ae2bf7a83\" rel=\"nofollow\">SOURCE</a></p>", "photo": {"id": "224652364", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/8/ge/xf/tRgEXFmWyjMLDKG-800x450-noPad.jpg?1601413470", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "27796435", "createdAt": "2020-09-27T19:20:35.000Z", "title": "Amber Heard goes after Johnny Depps attorney", "description": "<p>In her latest motions, Amber Heard asks the court to sanction Adam Waldman, Johnny Depp\u2019s lawyer, preventing him from communicating with the press, social media, or any potential third party witnesses about this case. In short, she doesn\u2019t want Waldman to post on Twitter.</p>\n<p>She says that \u201cThroughout this litigation, Mr. Waldman has acted like anything but an attorney this Court has a right to expect.\u201d</p>\n<p>In her memorandum, Heard insists that Mr. Depp has defamed her through Mr. Waldman\u2019s statements as Mr. Depp\u2019s agent, and has orchestrated a robust social media campaign against her through the use of inauthentic social media accounts (i.e. not real accounts by real people) casting aspersions on Heard while often praising Mr. Depp and Mr. Waldman. The conduct for which Defendant now seeks sanctions is related but distinct from the conduct alleged in Heard\u2019s counterclaims.</p>\n<p>What that means is that this isn\u2019t the same assertion she made in her counterclaim, this is a completely new motion asking the court to make Mr. Waldman stop posting on social media.</p>\n<p>More than that, it looks like she\u2019s trying to get Adam Waldman thrown off the case all together, saying that \u201cthe court has the right to revoke the pro had admission of Depp\u2019s lawyer (Waldman), if his behavior on social media adversely impacts the administration of justice.\u201d</p>\n<p>Admission pro hac vice is when a lawyer from another jurisdiction is allowed to practice in another area. Virginia isn\u2019t Adam Waldman\u2019s normal stomping ground, so Heard wants him thrown off the case.</p>\n<p>The reasons she says he should be dismissed aren\u2019t just his actions on social media. She also blames Waldman for leaking Josh Dre\u2019s deposition transcript. She goes on and on about Waldman on Twitter, having puppies and kittens about other \u201cleaked\u201d materials and laundered information.</p>\n<p>What it really means is that Waldman\u2019s doing his job, Heard can\u2019t stand it, and she\u2019s doing everything she can to get rid of him.</p>\n<p>It also looks like she\u2019s so jealous of Johnny\u2019s popularity on social media that she can\u2019t see straight. He gets hundreds of thousands of \u201clikes\u201d on his Instagram posts, none of which have had a single thing to do with her.</p>\n<p>On top of asking for all these sanctions, Heard also asks the court to award her the cost of filing these motions in the first place. She wants to fling mud at Depp and his legal team, and she wants Depp to pay for her to do it. Talk about nerve.</p>\n<p>What do you think? Will she be successful in getting rid of Adam Waldman? Or will the court tell her to sit down and shut up? Yeah, me too.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/circuit/sites/circuit/files/assets/documents/pdf/high-profile/depp%20v%20heard/cl-2019-2911-def-memo-supp-mot-for-sanctions-vs-adam-waldman-9-24-2020.pdf\" rel=\"nofollow\">SOURCE</a></p>", "photo": {"id": "224643853", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/9/hd/xt/KJHDxTaDPKyUKju-800x450-noPad.jpg?1601234436", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}], "pageInfo": {"endCursor": "YXJyYXljb25uZWN0aW9uOjEwNw==", "hasNextPage": true}}}}}, {"data": {"petition": {"id": "14451136", "slug": "dc-entertainment-remove-amber-heard-from-aquaman-2", "user": {"id": "24448735", "displayName": "Jeanne Larson", "photo": {"id": "221862322", "userSmall": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/7/xs/ly/cXXSLydpSVDqIVB-48x48-noPad.jpg?1553098061", "processing": false}}}, "organization": null, "updatesConnection": {"nodes": [{"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "27786805", "createdAt": "2020-09-25T16:00:34.000Z", "title": "Heard moves to dismiss - AGAIN", "description": "<p>Amber Heard has filed yet again for dismissal. In this motion, she tries to bully Johnny Depp into appearing at her lawyer's offices in Virginia for three days, right in the middle of his filming schedule for Fantastic Beasts 3.</p>\n<p>\"Defendedt Amber Lura Heard, by counsel, hereby moves this court for an Order granting appropriate relief and sanctions, to include the dismissal of the Complaint, with prejudice, compelling production of the 9th RPTs, compelling Plaintiff Mr. Depp to appear for three successive days in counsel for the defendant's offices in Virginia on or before October 30, 2020 on dates and times agreeable to counsel for the Defendant, and to award fees and costs to Defendant for having to bring this motion.\"</p>\n<p>Again, it looks like she's trying to cost Johnny his gig in FB3 by being so troublesome that the franchise doesn't deem him worth keeping around. It's a despicable tactic, and I hope that the court slaps her down for it.</p>\n<p>What do you think? Will she get him fired from Beasts with her pesky behavior? Or will he continue to shine in his magnificent career while she fades away into oblivion?</p>", "photo": {"id": "224636874", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/1/ga/zn/tKGAznwvCsfmrny-800x450-noPad.jpg?1601049637", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "27776442", "createdAt": "2020-09-23T22:58:29.000Z", "title": "Judge rules that Heard has to prove where the money went", "description": "<p>A judge has ruled that Heard has to put her money where her mouth is. Specifically, she\u2019s going to have to prove how much of her divorce settlement was actually donated to charity, where it went and how much.</p>\n<p>From court documents: \u00a0</p>\n<p>\u201cSecond, discovery into whether Heard did, in fact, as she publicly claims, donate her $7 million divorce settlement to charity, is relevant to Ms. Heard\u2019s motive in making the domestic abuse allegations against Depp. Defendant proclaimed to the world that \u201cmoney played no role\u201d in her divorce with Mr. Depp, promising that all settlement proceeds would be donated to charity, particularly to vulnerable and abused populations. Mr. Depp should be able to show that Ms. Heard\u2019s false abuse claims were to leverage a larger settlement, that she did not donate the entirety of the proceeds. In connection with a third-party subpoena pending before the Hon. Stephanie M. Bowick of California, that court has already tentatively agreed with Depp that Heard put her donations at issue, and that the truth of Heard\u2019s claims to have donated the settlement proceeds is relevant and discoverable. This evidence is directly relevant to Heard\u2019s motives, and the motion is nothing more than a blatant attempt by Heard to end run a well warranted adverse ruling in California.\u201d</p>\n<p>Depp\u2019s legal team submitted a motion to discover whether or not Heard had actually donated all of the money, and Heard\u2019s team objected. But in yet another win for Johnny, a judge agreed with him. Details about the settlement are relevant to Heard\u2019s motives in making abuse allegations against Depp.</p>\n<p>So, in short, Heard is going to have to prove where the divorce money went. Did she donate it? Did she donate part of it and keep the rest for herself? Did she donate any of it?</p>\n<p>Her little world is getting smaller and smaller, and she\u2019s running out of places to hide.</p>", "photo": {"id": "224629804", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/2/gi/bz/FHgibZxNfXsmhDy-800x450-noPad.jpg?1600901910", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "27768858", "createdAt": "2020-09-22T19:23:15.000Z", "title": "Amber Heard NOT confirmed for Aquaman 2", "description": "<p>According to an interview with James Wan, the director of Aquaman and AM2:</p>\n<p>\"The official cast of Aquaman 2 hasn\u2019t been revealed however, nonetheless, we do know that Jason Momoa will reprise his place of Arthur Curry / Aquaman. Other than him, Patrick Wilson who carried out the place of Orm Marius / Ocean Grasp (Arthur\u2019s half-brother and former king of Atlantis) will even make his return, and in response to him, \u2018Wan\u2019s concepts for Aquaman 2 are pushing it even extra.\u2019 Yahya Abdul-Mateen II has moreover confirmed his return and whereas others are however to be revealed, we anticipate to see Willem Dafoe, Amber Heard, and Nicole Kidman once more in movement as properly.\"</p>\n<p>Anticipated. Not confirmed.</p>\n<p>While WB might never make an official statement that Heard has been bought out and dropped from the film, there are a LOT of clues that hint at it, from a statement on court that Heard was SUPPOSED to be in AM2 to this, a statement from the film's director that doesn't confirm that she's in it.\u00a0</p>\n<p>The biggest clue of all might come from her countersuit against Johnny Depp, wherein she claims to have lost a total of $100 million in salary and damages because of him. The only major payday she had on the line was Aquaman. So she's saying she lost Aquaman 2 because of Johnny Depp, right?</p>\n<p>Aquaman 2 is due to be released on 16th December 2022. We might have to wait until then for proof that she's not in the film.</p>\n<p>What do you think? Will it take the film coming out without her in it before you believe that she's out? Or are the clues enough? Me, I believe that she's out because I believe the sources that say so - and no, I won't name them, so don't ask. They're insiders in the industry, and haven't been wrong yet.</p>\n<p>If only they could CGI her out of the first one, I'd be able to enjoy it.</p>\n<p><a href=\"http://marketglobalreview.com/2020/09/21/aquaman-2-shall-be-extra-severe-and-related-reveals-the-director/\" rel=\"nofollow\">SOURCE</a></p>", "photo": {"id": "224624513", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/5/ko/rt/DWkORTbEDyDyNqz-800x450-noPad.jpg?1600802596", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "27761192", "createdAt": "2020-09-21T15:06:32.000Z", "title": "Meanwhile, in San Sebastian..", "description": "<p>Johnny Depp spent some time at the San Sebastian International Film Festival looking healthy and happy.</p>\n<p>He took a moment to thank his fan base as his very public legal war against ex-wife Amber Heard continued last week.</p>\n<p>And amid the ongoing drama with his ex, Johnny Depp was seen arriving\u00a0at the Maria Cristina Hotel during 68th San Sebastian International Film Festival on Saturday.</p>\n<p>The actor, 57, opted for a typically quirky look as he arrived wearing a Ramones T-shirt and a baker boy style cap with aviator shades.</p>\n<p>Depp was in San Sebastian to attend the premiere of \"Crock of Gold, directed by Julien Temple. The film\u00a0combines unseen footage from the Pogues and MacGowan's family and is described as a 'celebration' of the star.</p>\n<p>Depp is also scheduled to reprise his role of Gellart Grindelwald, with filming on Fantastic Beasts 3 to resume filming any day now. Filming should be finished just in time for Depp to gear up for his Defamation trial against ex-wife Amber Heard, now scheduled to commence on May 17th, 2021.</p>\n<p>By all accounts, Depp is staying busy, staying healthy and looking happy as he interacts with fans and gets on with his life. Congratulations to him for coming out the other side happy and whole.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://www.msn.com/en-us/movies/celebrity/johnny-depp-attends-premiere-of-crock-of-gold-at-san-sebastian-fest/ar-BB19eLab\" rel=\"nofollow\">SOURCE</a></p>", "photo": {"id": "224618981", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/9/ch/sk/mnCHsKSqmsIhuXm-800x450-noPad.jpg?1600700794", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "27753305", "createdAt": "2020-09-19T21:10:43.000Z", "title": "Remove Amber Heard as spokesperson for L'oreal", "description": "<p>Hillary Deanna\u00a0started <a href=\"https://www.change.org/p/l-or%C3%A9al-remove-amber-heard-as-l-oreal-spokesperson?recruiter=1041262243&amp;recruited_by_id=115ef2d0-4820-11ea-8c12-09cb5da92a95&amp;\" rel=\"nofollow\">THIS PETITION</a> to remove Amber Heard as a spokesperson for L'Or\u00e9al. She cites many of the same reasons for her petition that I had when I started the petition to remove Heard from Aquaman 2.</p>\n<p>\"Amber Heard, for years now has been claiming to be the victim of abuse from her husband Johnny Depp. In light of recently leaked recorded sessions between Ms. Heard and Mr. Depp, it has come to the attention of many that it was in fact the other way around.</p>\n<p>If roles were reversed, Mr. Depp would have (and has had) many of his, if not all of his roles, and sponsorships taken away. Why should this be any different in the case of Ms. Heard, as it now known who the true abuser is?</p>\n<p>L'Oreal, it is time to remove Amber Heard as a spokesperson for your products. She has misrepresented herself, the \"me too\" movement, and should in no way be in a leadership position, or viewed as a role model for girls and women.\"\u00a0</p>\n<p>I couldn't have said it better myself.</p>\n<p>If you haven't yet signed the petition to remove Amber Heard as a spokesperson for L'oreal, consider stopping by to sign it <a href=\"https://www.change.org/p/l-or%C3%A9al-remove-amber-heard-as-l-oreal-spokesperson?recruiter=1041262243&amp;recruited_by_id=115ef2d0-4820-11ea-8c12-09cb5da92a95&amp;\" rel=\"nofollow\">HERE</a>.</p>", "photo": {"id": "224613097", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/6/in/nu/hHinNUMWBAyNeTy-800x450-noPad.jpg?1600549846", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "27740897", "createdAt": "2020-09-17T20:46:15.000Z", "title": "The Fishing Trip", "description": "<p>The latest from the Depp/Heard fiasco is Amber Heard seeking even more documents from Depp, insisting that he should have produced them already. These documents include correspondence between Johnny and:<br>(his sister) Christi Dembrowski<br>Ben King<br>Kevin Murphy<br>Jerry Judge<br>Nathan Holmes<br>Malcolm Connelly<br>Steven Deuters<br>any other security for Mr. Depp<br>Mick Doohan (owner of the Australia house)<br>House personnel<br>Housekeeping<br>Personal assistant staff</p>\n<p>That relate to:<br>Mr. Depp\u2019s substance abuse<br>Mr. Depp\u2019s alcohol abuse<br>Mr. Depp\u2019s substance abuse treatment<br>Mr. Depp\u2019s acts of physical violence<br>Mr. Depp\u2019s destruction of property<br>Mr. Depp\u2019s finger injury<br>Ms. Heard\u2019s 2016 domestic violence restraining order<br>Evidence or testimony related thereto<br>Allegations of physical or nonphysical abuse by Ms. Heard or Mr. Depp<br>Allegations that these are false, part of a hoax or fraud and/or that otherwise refer or relate to the claims, counterclaims, defenses or allegations in this lawsuit from January 1st, 2013 through the present.</p>\n<p>She doesn\u2019t want much, does she? Basically, she\u2019s asking for any communication he ever had with anybody on the planet during that time that was about her.</p>\n<p>She probably thinks that she\u2019s going to find some incriminating morsel that she can wave around as proof that he\u2019s a monster. But more likely, I think this fishing expedition is only going to find correspondence that corroborates Depp\u2019s version of events.</p>\n<p>Even more likely, Heard is asking for this staggering amount of communication to create even more of a paper blizzard to try to bury the facts in this case, that she defamed Johnny Depp by calling him a domestic abuser. No amount of paperwork is going to eradicate the fact that she\u2019s doomed when it comes not only to the verdict in London, but in the VA defamation case as well.</p>\n<p>See, when it comes to light that she perjured herself in London, that fact comes straight to Virginia, and applies directly to Depp\u2019s defamation case against her.</p>\n<p>It\u2019s my guess that she\u2019s trying to get ahead of the London verdict, which looms near, and kick up such a paperwork dust storm that she can hide her apparent guilt.</p>\n<p>Not gonna work. But she\u2019ll have to find that out for herself.</p>\n<p>What do you think? Will all this paperwork bury Heard's guilt? Or is she just plain screwed?</p>", "photo": {"id": "224604335", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/6/bu/yp/uEbUYpJvrkZXUWc-800x450-noPad.jpg?1600375580", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "27724443", "createdAt": "2020-09-15T12:50:22.000Z", "title": "Trial by Jury", "description": "<p>Originally, the Defamation trial date was continued to May 3rd, but it now looks like the trial is set instead for May 17th at 10am. And, according to this report, the trial is set to take 4 weeks.\u00a0</p>\n<p>That's 4 weeks to wade through all of Heard's ridiculous accusations against Johnny Depp, and Johnny's mountain of evidence proving that she's a liar. And, more than that, that she was the abuser in the relationship. I know it and you know it, but Johnny's got to prove it to the judge and jury. Is 4 weeks long enough for all that?</p>\n<p>That's something else that's different from the London trial. This one's marked to be a trial by jury at the request of both parties. Looks like Heard thinks that she can convince them with her horrible acting and obviously fake testimony.</p>\n<p>They're already looking at Heard for Perjury in Australia. It's possible that the UK will be looking at her for Perjury once the London verdict comes down. I wonder what the sentence for perjury is in the United States, particularly Virginia. Anybody know?</p>\n<p>The statute of limitations is over in America for everything Amber Did to Johnny, Tasya, Kate James, Whitney, and all the other victims she's left in her wake, so she won't do any time for any of those crimes.\u00a0</p>\n<p>There is no statute of limitations in Australia, though, for any assault resulting in grievous bodily harm. She will have the possibility of serving time in Australia for cutting Johnny's finger off for the rest of her life.\u00a0</p>\n<p>And, more recently, she's racking up quite a list of places where she can and should be charged for perjury. Oh, how I hope they take turns locking her up for it.\u00a0</p>\n<p>What do you think? Will Australia, the UK, or Virginia go after her for perjury? Or will she get away with it and walk away fancy free?</p>\n<p>Hat tip to the Real Laura B.</p>", "photo": {"id": "224592830", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/2/qf/of/saQFoFHnykkCQKv-800x450-noPad.jpg?1600174226", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "27718508", "createdAt": "2020-09-14T15:16:56.000Z", "title": "A sign of things to come", "description": "<p>Amber Heard has been removed from packaging for Aquaman, as well as not being mentioned in the cast credits for Aquaman 2 in google searches. She's still listed on Aquaman 2's <a href=\"https://www.imdb.com/title/tt9663764/\" rel=\"nofollow\">IMDB</a> page, but her name's dropping on the list. Jason Momoa's name is firmly at the top now, where it has belonged the whole time.</p>\n<p>IMDB probably won't be updated until after the movie comes out with its confirmed cast. That's probably when Amber Heard will update her IMDB without Aquaman 2 on it, too, since she'll have no choice, then.\u00a0</p>\n<p>These few little snippets aren't conclusive. They aren't confirmation by any means, but I think they're a sign of things to come. It looks like WB is slowly but surely weaning her out of its existence.\u00a0</p>\n<p>What do you think? Am I reading too much into it? Or is Amber Heard OUT?<br><br>Photo source: @wwfrills on Twitter.</p>", "photo": {"id": "224588444", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/8/ib/vh/fBibVHpoJbtKaWk-800x450-noPad.jpg?1600096617", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "27709502", "createdAt": "2020-09-12T19:55:15.000Z", "title": "Defamation trial delay granted", "description": "<p>Fairfax County Circuit Court Chief Judge Bruce White has granted Johnny Depp\u2019s request for a delay in his defamation trial against ex wife Amber Heard. The trial was set for Jan. 11, which coincides with the filming schedule for another installment of the \u201cFantastic Beasts\u201d series in which Depp will star, prompting his lawyers to\u00a0request a continuance\u00a0last month. But Heard objected to the delay. \u00a0</p>\n<p>According to Heard, she was told that Aquaman 2 would start filming in February, 2021. See that claim <a href=\"https://depplady.files.wordpress.com/2020/09/delay1.jpg?w=740\" rel=\"nofollow\">HERE</a>.</p>\n<p>Problem is that she\u2019s all wrong.</p>\n<p>WB wrote a letter regarding both FB3 and AM2, which says that they \u201crequire Mr. Depp to be in the United Kingdom from September 17th 2020 through the anticipated end of production in mid-February 2021.\u201d</p>\n<p>\u201cAs to Aquaman 2, that film will not start production any earlier that May 31, 2021.\u201d</p>\n<p>Notice how they name Johnny Depp and specifically address his filming schedule. But they don\u2019t name Amber Heard or address her filming schedule. They refer to AM2 as \u201cthat film\u201d and make no reference to Heard at all.</p>\n<p>It also goes to show that Heard is completely out of the loop with regard to AM2 production. She thought filming was going to start in February, when in fact, production is going to start months later. Seems to me if she were going to be involved with the movie, she would have been informed by now. All the principals have to know these things early so they can schedule accordingly.</p>\n<p>From the look of it, Heard has no idea whatsoever what\u2019s going on with AM2. If she were returning as Mera, she\u2019d be in the loop.</p>\n<p>I\u2019m taking it as a good sign that Heard\u2019s out of AM2, straight from the horse\u2019s mouth.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://www.courthousenews.com/virginia-judge-agrees-to-delay-johnny-depp-defamation-trial/\" rel=\"nofollow\">SOURCE</a></p>", "photo": {"id": "224581116", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/1/yy/hq/rCYyHqhlzfpqsCy-800x450-noPad.jpg?1599940517", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "27703207", "createdAt": "2020-09-11T17:51:16.000Z", "title": "Amber Heard subpoenas Disney", "description": "<p>You heard that right. She's subpoenaed Disney.</p>\n<p>According to <a href=\"https://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/circuit/sites/circuit/files/assets/documents/pdf/high-profile/depp%20v%20heard/cl-2019-2911-foreign-subp-prep-walt-disney-motion-pictures-group-inc-2-5-2020.pdf\" rel=\"nofollow\">THIS</a> filing, Amber Heard\u2019s legal team has issued a subpoena to Disney asking for certain documents. These include:</p>\n<p>1. All documents or communications with Mr. Depp that refer or relate to Ms. Heard<br>2. All documents or communications concerning the relationship between Mr. Depp and Ms. Heard, including, but not necessarily limited to any violence or abuse between Mr. Depp and Ms. Heard.<br>3. All documents or communications concerning any actual, alleged, or attempted acts of violence involving Mr. Depp.<br>4. All documents or communications concerning any actual alleged, or attempted alcohol or drug use or abuse by Mr. Depp from 2013 to present.<br>5. All documents of communications concerning any actual or alleged act of Mr. Depp that resulted in damage to property.<br>6. All documents concerning any decision to cast or not cast Mr. Depp in any future Pirates of the Caribbean films.<br>7. All contracts with or relating to Mr. Depp relating to the Pirates of the Caribbean franchise.<br>8. All documents or communications relating to any interviews, communications, or correspondence with press or entertainment trade publications concerning Mr. Depp.<br>9. All non-privileged documents or communications concerning any insurance policy or claims relating to any performance by Mr. Depp.</p>\n<p>I hardly know where to start. So I\u2019ll just start at the top. Any communications with Depp that relate to Ms. Heard. Why the hell would there be any communication between Disney and Ms. Heard? Does Heard\u2019s team think that Johnny regularly chatted up Disney about his marriage? That\u2019s ridiculous. Disney isn\u2019t any one person, it\u2019s a legal entity that exists on many levels, none of which includes marriage counseling. If there\u2019s any communication, it\u2019s from Disney telling Johnny that his wife was banned from the set because she was such a troublemaker during filming.</p>\n<p>Number 2, same thing. There\u2019s no reason there would be communications between Johnny and Disney about Heard at all, let alone anything about violence. But this is a slippery slope for Heard. IF there were any communications about violence, they are most likely about her being violent, not him.</p>\n<p>Number 3, asked and answered by number 2.</p>\n<p>Number 4, any actual alleged, or attempted alcohol or drug use or abuse by Mr. Depp. First, it\u2019s ridiculous to think that Disney babysat Johnny while he filmed, to know what he did or didn\u2019t do or drink. It would only be addressed if any such substance abuse became a problem for filming. Johnny is a consummate professional. We\u2019ve never heard that he was drunk on set. Just that he\u2019s a delight to work with. And secondly, what the hell is ATTEMPTED alcohol or drug use? That\u2019s such an absurd phrase that I\u2019m surprised any lawyer dared to put such a silly thing in actual court papers. Well, I guess they\u2019ll do anything they\u2019re paid to do.</p>\n<p>Number 5, Damage. What do they think? That Johnny wantonly went around smashing sets? For one thing, we would have heard about it in tabloids at the time. For another, Disney wouldn\u2019t have kept employing him if he were prone to smashing things up. They didn\u2019t dump him until Heard branded him as a wife-beater.</p>\n<p>Number 6, Any decision to cast or recast him in future films. That\u2019s not a legal argument, it\u2019s a personal fishing expedition. Yes, Johnny\u2019s asking for 50m because that\u2019s what he\u2019s out for losing Pirates, but it reads more like she\u2019s just desperate to know what work he\u2019ll be getting.</p>\n<p>Number 7, Asked and answered by number 6.</p>\n<p>Number 8, This is far too broad a request to be feasible. Any interviews, EVER, relating to Disney? Besides, what has his interviews got to do with her defaming him? This comes across as Amber trying to create such a fuss with Disney that they won\u2019t want to work with Johnny because of her. I hope the studio, and the judge, see through this abusive tactic and sent her packing.</p>\n<p>Number 9, any insurance policy or claims relating to any performance by Mr. Depp. I find this one to be really interesting. The way filming works is that actors have to be bonded, insured, in order to film. Can\u2019t film without being insured. So we already know that Johnny was insured for all past jobs with Disney or they wouldn\u2019t have happened. So this is another fishing expedition to find out if Johnny is insured for future projects, Pirates or otherwise. She\u2019s desperate to know what work he might have lined up with Disney in the future. It reeks of her wanting to know so that she can muck it up for him. I also think this request for his insurance information is highly ironic, since Heard herself is uninsurable. It reads to me like she's saying, \u201cIf I can\u2019t work, neither can he!\u201d</p>\n<p>Remind me again, who was the abuser here? Her supporters would say that he\u2019s the abuser by insisting upon these two court cases: the libel case in London and the Defamation case against her in VA. But let\u2019s not forget that during negotiations for their divorce, he BEGGED her to finish it up quietly to avoid court. He didn\u2019t want to hurt her reputation, he wanted to let her walk away. But it was SHE who kept running her mouth to any outlet she could think of, or pay for, labeling him as an abusive spouse and painting herself as the poor, embattled victim. She tried to ruin him, and she\u2019s still trying to ruin him. Only now, it\u2019s not just the public that gets to decide. It\u2019s a judge and a court, and they\u2019re not as gullible as I\u2019m sure she hopes they are. A few flimsy lies aren\u2019t going to hold up. They\u2019re too easily debunked, and that\u2019s what\u2019s going on. Johnny is presenting evidence that he didn\u2019t do what she says he did. She\u2019s just hoping that if she throws enough paperwork into the air, it\u2019ll distract away from the evidence.</p>\n<p>Sorry, kid, but it doesn\u2019t work that way. Those judgments are coming, sooner than later. And there\u2019s not going to be anywhere to hide.</p>\n<p>All she\u2019s managing to do with this little stunt of hers is ensure that Disney will never want to work with her. Johnny will be just fine once she\u2019s legally forced to shut her yap. I, for one, can\u2019t wait for that day.</p>\n<p>Hat tip to Qwerty, the Real Laura B, and the Depp army on Twitter.</p>", "photo": {"id": "224576538", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/7/fj/uk/jyFJuKRQJBidbEm-800x450-noPad.jpg?1599846804", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "27696770", "createdAt": "2020-09-10T19:28:18.000Z", "title": "Depp-osition", "description": "<p>Amber Heard's been screaming that Johnny Depp refuses to sit for his deposition, saying that he's dragging things out to torture her.</p>\n<p>As things stand right now, Depp is scheduled to sit for his deposition on October 5th, most likely via video link, though that's almost certain to change.</p>\n<p>Depp has filed for a continuance to allow for his filming schedule for Fantastic Beasts 3. Heard, naturally, is having fits about it. She thinks that Depp should be able to schedule his filming around court obligations, saying that Depp \"has made no effort to schedule around his deposition and this trial. The case needs to end, and end soon.\"</p>\n<p>That's not the way things work, of course, but there's no telling Heard that. She claims that Johnny and his lawyer Adam Waldman are waging a \"campaign of terror\" against her by posting on social media, and she calls for this abuse to end as soon as possible. And never mind that it is she who's been slandering him by way of every public platform that she can think of (or pay for) since they divorced. For her, it seems, it's \"Do as I say, not as I do.\"</p>\n<p>The thing is, they want five days for Depp's deposition, which Depp's side has argued is too long. They are also refusing to allow him to depo in London via WebX because AH wants a lawyer there, which would require 14 day quarantine period.\u00a0</p>\n<p>So while Heard is screaming about postponements, SHE'S the one making it difficult for him to sit for his deposition.\u00a0</p>\n<p>What do you think? Is Johnny dragging his feet by asking for a continuance? Or is Heard continuing to try to control and manipulate him?\u00a0</p>\n<p>Hat tip to @LauraBockov<br><a href=\"https://deadline.com/2020/09/johnny-depp-trial-delay-amber-heard-response-fantastic-beasts-3-aquaman-warner-bros-1234572618/\" rel=\"nofollow\">SOURCE</a></p>", "photo": {"id": "224571731", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/6/ff/lz/IgFfLzNdDSpyvGs-800x450-noPad.jpg?1599766099", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "27681538", "createdAt": "2020-09-08T15:33:40.000Z", "title": "1,000 words", "description": "<p>They say that a picture is worth a thousand words. Well, I'd like to take a look at this one.</p>\n<p>Amber said that nobody would believe that she abused Johnny because he's so much bigger than her. I think she used the words 'twice her size.' Looking at this picture, you can see that it's not exactly true.</p>\n<p>I understand that she was probably wearing heels for this photo, but still. It's not like he towers over her. She's as tall as Johnny, or nearly as tall, and we know that weight has nothing to do with someone's ability to throw a haymaker. Her argument about him being twice her size just doesn't wash.</p>\n<p>Something else about this picture I can't help noticing is how smug she looks, while he looks miserable. Like many of the photos of them together from the time they were together, he looks like he's withdrawn, trapped, and begging for help with his eyes.</p>\n<p>Now that he's finally rid of Amber, let's just hope that Johnny finds someone who treats him with love, dignity, and respect, so that he never has to look this miserable again.</p>", "photo": {"id": "224561329", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/4/qv/di/CaqvdiLDoqQMpFZ-800x450-noPad.jpg?1599579222", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}], "pageInfo": {"endCursor": "YXJyYXljb25uZWN0aW9uOjExOQ==", "hasNextPage": true}}}}}, {"data": {"petition": {"id": "14451136", "slug": "dc-entertainment-remove-amber-heard-from-aquaman-2", "user": {"id": "24448735", "displayName": "Jeanne Larson", "photo": {"id": "221862322", "userSmall": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/7/xs/ly/cXXSLydpSVDqIVB-48x48-noPad.jpg?1553098061", "processing": false}}}, "organization": null, "updatesConnection": {"nodes": [{"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "27671016", "createdAt": "2020-09-06T17:04:38.000Z", "title": "Support for Johnny Depp grows", "description": "<p>Mark Rylance, Depp\u2019s costar in Waiting for the Barbarians, has stepped forward in support of Johnny depp.</p>\n<p>\u201cMy impression of him was a very loving and very sensitive and very trustworthy person,\u201d Rylance said of Depp. \u201cIntensely, intensely shy. You know? Like Daniel Day-Lewis and so many great actors are. The accusations that were around at the time we were making the film were of physical violence. And he obviously denied this and I found his denial completely believable. It didn\u2019t seem to be part of his character at all.\u201d</p>\n<p>Likewise, Snoop Dogg is feeling the Johnny love.</p>\n<p>It\u2019s nice to see more and more people stepping forward with support for Johnny Depp. I think it\u2019s finally sinking in that he was the innocent party, and that Amber Heard is the one who was abusive in the relationship.</p>\n<p>Hell, she still is being abusive, asking to be informed about just about every minute of every day of his life. She\u2019s even demanding his call sheets for filming, which are usually not even typed up until the day before filming. She\u2019s contacting WB about him, demanding information. It seems to me that she\u2019s trying to pester WB into firing Johnny because SHE\u2019S too much of a pain in the arse for them to keep dealing with.</p>\n<p>And that begs the question: IF Amber were still an Aquaman, how would this pestering bode for her. Nah, folks. This sounds like somebody who\u2019s got nothing to lose from WB, meaning she\u2019s already out of Aquaman.</p>\n<p>It also comes across as Amber being insanely jealous that Johnny still has his blockbuster franchise, while she\u2019s out of hers.</p>\n<p>Maybe she should have thought of that before she beat the shit out of Johnny and then caused herself to be unbondable. She might still have the job.</p>\n<p>She had the kindest, nicest guy on the planet, and she couldn\u2019t keep from ruining that buy abusing him. Then she had one of the biggest film franchises on the planet, and she wrecked that, too. Poor little psycho just can\u2019t keep hold of a good thing, can she?</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://etcanada.com/news/687520/mark-rylance-says-johnny-depps-denial-is-completely-believable/\" rel=\"nofollow\">SOURCE</a></p>", "photo": {"id": "224553593", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/0/od/wy/CSOdwyguxYcnkVC-800x450-noPad.jpg?1599411880", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "27662403", "createdAt": "2020-09-04T23:23:52.000Z", "title": "Amber Heard doesn't want a continuance", "description": "<p>Amber Heard has filed opposition to Johnny Depp\u2019s request for a continuance, for a whole bunch of reasons. She says that his need to work is not \u201cgood cause\u201d for a continuance, and that if the court grants one, it will set a \u201chighly problematic\u201d precedent. He could, and should have worked his filming schedule around his deposition instead. She thinks, apparently, that Depp has the power to make a multi-million dollar film, its cast, crew, and schedule revolve around him, at her whim.</p>\n<p>Doesn\u2019t work that way. It would cost millions for the movie to wait for him to go to court, if that were even possible. Court is flexible. Filming a movie is not.</p>\n<p>Heard also says that it is of the utmost importance that the trial proceed as scheduled so that she can put a stop to Depp\u2019s \u201cdaily\u201d smear campaign of her through social media.</p>\n<p>More than that, she bemoans the cost of maintaining her legal defense for an additional five months, the amount of time Depp is seeking.</p>\n<p>She says that requesting a continuance, in part, because of Covid protocols, shouldn\u2019t happen because even though it is good cause, it\u2019s already been done twice. Apparently, she thinks twice is enough, and never mind that the pandemic is far from being resolved.</p>\n<p>With regard to filming schedules, Heard says that she was told that Aquaman was going to start filming sometime in the spring \u2013 WB didn\u2019t tell her exactly when. So, if she\u2019s in the movie, a continuance would interfere with HER filming schedule.</p>\n<p>We already know that she\u2019s not in Aquaman 2, and she knows it, too. She\u2019s pulling this out of her arse just to try to deny his request for a continuance. I mean, I can be TOLD that Aquaman is filming in the spring. That doesn\u2019t mean I\u2019ll be in it. Doesn\u2019t mean she will, either. And for them not to tell her exactly when filming starts is a huge red flag. Johnny\u2019s known for months ahead of time when FB3 was going to start filming. Certainly, if she was going to be in a blockbuster, she\u2019d know when she was supposed to show up to film it so that she could arrange her schedule accordingly.</p>\n<p>Heard went on to slam Adam Waldman, Johnny Depp\u2019s lawyer, claiming that he\u2019s done all sorts of things that are improper, maybe even illegal, based on social media posts that she doesn\u2019t like.</p>\n<p>I think my favorite line is when she says that she \u201cintends to vindicate herself at trial.\u201d Just like she did in London? Because that was just one big Charlie Foxtrot for her.</p>\n<p>Every day that passes, she insists, provides further opportunity for Depp and Waldman to smear her good name, tarnish her reputation, and irreparably damage her career, which has long been Depp\u2019s stated goal.</p>\n<p>His STATED goal? When and where did he STATE that his goal is to irreparably damage her career? She needs to be careful with her wording. She\u2019s already being sued for defamation. I don\u2019t think it\u2019s the best idea for her to defame him in ongoing court documents.</p>\n<p>I have paraphrased a long document, so please feel free to read the whole thing <a href=\"https://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/circuit/sites/circuit/files/assets/documents/pdf/high-profile/depp%20v%20heard/cl-2019-2911-def-opp-to-plaintiff-mot-for-continuance-9-4-2020.pdf\" rel=\"nofollow\">HERE</a>. It\u2019s a whole lot of her saying she doesn\u2019t want to court to grant Depp a continuance, without much \u2013 if any \u2013 substantial reason why he shouldn\u2019t get it. All she\u2019s got is her nonexistent filming schedule and a nonexistent smear campaign by Depp and his lawyer. Basically, she\u2019s got nothing.</p>\n<p>Please have a read and tell me if you agree. Does she have any good reasons why Depp shouldn\u2019t get a continuance, or is she flat outta gas?</p>", "photo": {"id": "224547087", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/5/qj/gg/AnqJggNftrvHCzt-800x450-noPad.jpg?1599261834", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "27654461", "createdAt": "2020-09-03T19:53:54.000Z", "title": "The Clock is Ticking", "description": "<p>If\u00a0 I understand this correctly, Amber Heard and her legal team have until September 28th to explain what work she's lost that adds up to the 100 million she's asking for in her countersuit against Johnny Depp.\u00a0</p>\n<p>Will she name Aquaman 2 among the work she's lost, admitting that she's not coming back to the water world? Or will she hold fast to the flimsy rumor that she's still going to be in it?</p>\n<p>Don't forget, we've got it on good authority that WB bought out Heard's contract, sending her to the bench. Meaning that she got paid, but will not appear in Aquaman 2.</p>\n<p>No, there hasn't been any official confirmation that she's out, and there likely won't be. The movie will simply come out without her in it. I wish there would be official word, but that's just not always the way it works, I'm sorry to say.</p>\n<p>What other work will she be able to prove that Depp cost her through his false smear campaign to ruin her reputation on social media? Including the formation and manipulation of this very petition - according to her. What other movies did she have lined up that we bots have made her lose?</p>\n<p>Word has it that she's unbondable. That means that she can't be insured during the production of a film. Without insurance, there's no part. Period. So, if that's the case, how is Johnny responsible? How are we?</p>\n<p>We'll find out by the 28th whether or not she'll finally admit that she's out of the Aquaman franchise. As soon as I know, you will.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/circuit/sites/circuit/files/assets/documents/pdf/high-profile/depp%20v%20heard/cl-2019-2911-memo-supp-plaintiff-mot-to-file-ext-brief-briefing-sched-8-31-2020.pdf\" rel=\"nofollow\">SOURCE</a><br>Fairfax County Gov website.<br>Hat tip to a certain Elf Pirate and the Netizens on Twitter. Without you guys, I would be nothing.</p>", "photo": {"id": "224541458", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/0/zj/aj/ZFZJAJFgzplwICO-800x450-noPad.jpg?1599162836", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "27638466", "createdAt": "2020-09-01T16:19:34.000Z", "title": "Johnny Depp asks for postponement", "description": "<p>Johnny Depp has asked for the defamation case against his ex wife Amber Heard, due to begin in January of 2021.\u00a0</p>\n<p>The reason for the postponement is that Fantastic Beasts 3 is going to be filming from October this year until February of next year. So Johnny has asked for a postponement until May or June of 2021.\u00a0</p>\n<p>A hearing on the filing will take place Sept. 11.</p>\n<p>Meanwhile, a verdict on Depp\u2019s libel\u00a0suit against Rupert Murdoch\u2019s U.K. tabloid The Sun\u00a0is expected this week.</p>\n<p>I have no doubt that Heard stans will be screaming that Johnny wants a postponement because he's running scared, or that he's putting other matters before legal matters, but neither could be further from the truth.\u00a0</p>\n<p>The truth is that Johnny isn't in charge of the filming schedule for FB3. He can't ask for dozens (hundreds?) of cast and crew to sit around and wait for him to appear in court. Filming really can't be delayed. The trial can.\u00a0</p>\n<p>More as it happens, folks.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://variety.com/2020/film/global/johnny-depp-defamation-fantastic-beasts-3-1234755267/\" rel=\"nofollow\">SOURCE</a></p>", "photo": {"id": "224529820", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/6/zs/jh/BPZsjHiXWNeeACk-800x450-noPad.jpg?1598977176", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "27615062", "createdAt": "2020-08-28T16:17:04.000Z", "title": "It's happening!", "description": "<p>Slowly but surely, Amber Heard is being weaned out of Aquaman 2. It's already happened in our hearts and minds, but now the internet is starting to catch up.\u00a0</p>\n<p>If you tell your phone to Google Aquaman 2 and then choose to look at the cast, you'll notice that Amber Heard is conspicuously missing from the photo lineup.</p>\n<p>Sadly, she's still listed on the movie's <a href=\"https://www.imdb.com/title/tt9663764/\" rel=\"nofollow\">IMDB</a>, and the movie is still listed on Heard's <a href=\"https://www.imdb.com/name/nm1720028/\" rel=\"nofollow\">IMDB</a>, but hey. It's happening. Baby steps.</p>\n<p>Like I've said before, we'll probably never get official confirmation from WB about her not being in AM2, but I think it'll be pretty definitive when the movie comes out and she's not in it.</p>\n<p>Besides, if she WERE in it, she'd be yapping her head off about it, just to shut up all us \"haters\" - I'm sure. But she hasn't said a single word. Instead, she's been too busy showing off her nipples in Turkish places of worship. So, doesn't that speak volumes?</p>\n<p>I may be making too much of this little development, but I am personally celebrating not seeing her face associated with Aquaman 2 on Google.\u00a0</p>\n<p>How about you? Is this good news? Or am I jumping the gun?</p>", "photo": {"id": "224512937", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/4/uo/ue/yIuOUexpuvEWgoD-800x450-noPad.jpg?1598631426", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "27595803", "createdAt": "2020-08-25T23:28:04.000Z", "title": "Fandome", "description": "<p>Aquaman 2' Release Discussion At DCFanDome Noticeably Excluded Mention Of Amber Heard.\u00a0</p>\n<p>During the\u00a0DCFanDome panel,\u00a0Aquaman 2\u00a0director James Wan discussed how the second film would expand upon the world of Jason Momoa's Aquaman. The director also stated that he was\u00a0excited to continue the journeys of their heroes and expand their world in the second chapter.</p>\n<p>Actor\u00a0Patrick Wilson, who played King Orm, also discussed what he wanted from\u00a0Aquaman 2\u00a0during the panel at DCFanDome. Patrick Wilson mentioned that he wanted the second movie to explore more of the ocean and explore\u00a0\u201csome new worlds\u201d.</p>\n<p>neither James Wan nor Patrick Wilson spoke about Heard's role in the sequel. The director and actor noticeably avoided talking about Amber Heard and the current controversy surrounding her.\u00a0For those unaware, many fans want Amber Heard removed from\u00a0Aquaman 2\u00a0due to her ongoing legal battle with Johnny Depp.\u00a0</p>\n<p>In fact, fans even started a petition online asking for Amber Heard's removal from the movie. As of now, WB and the makers of\u00a0Aquaman 2\u00a0have not yet commented on Amber Heard's role in the movie.\u00a0Aquaman 2\u00a0is set to release sometime in December of 2022.\u00a0</p>\n<p>Throughout the panel discussion, clips of the first Aquaman showed, including behind the scenes content about the making of the movie. But not once did they show a single image of Amber Heard.\u00a0</p>\n<p>That leaves conspicuously unanswered the question of whether Amber Heard will return as Mera in AM2. We have heard from reputable sources, however, that WB bought out Heard's contract, quietly giving her the boot from the franchise. By all accounts, Amber Heard will not be returning for AM2.\u00a0</p>\n<p>Will they write Mera out? A<a href=\"https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u77M-oANRtQ\" rel=\"nofollow\"> teaser</a> for the Snyder Cut of Justice League shows Aquaman bowing out on Mera, like \"See ya\" - hinting perhaps that her exit will be predicted there.\u00a0</p>\n<p>Will they recast Mera? The Twitterverse has some favorites in mind for the role.\u00a0</p>\n<p>I guess we'll just have to wait and see.\u00a0<br><a href=\"https://www.republicworld.com/entertainment-news/hollywood-news/aquaman-2-dcfandome-amber-heard-james-wan.html\" rel=\"nofollow\">SOURCE</a></p>", "photo": {"id": "224499240", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/6/sm/bc/xBSmBckUIXCIZnn-800x450-noPad.jpg?1598398087", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "27579544", "createdAt": "2020-08-23T19:00:03.000Z", "title": "Amber Heard subpoenas Twitter", "description": "<p>Yes, you read that right.</p>\n<p>Just when you think she\u2019s grasped at the last straw, she goes and throws a hail Mary like this.</p>\n<p>Me, I\u2019m still trying to wrap my head around how she\u2019s suing Johnny Depp for lost work that she already got paid for by the studio. She\u2019s not going to be in Aquaman 2, from all reports, but the studio still paid her for it.</p>\n<p>How bad to you have to suck for a studio to pay you NOT to be in their movie?</p>\n<p>But yes. Now Amber\u2019s throwing out more subpoenas, just about every day, trying to smoke up the mirrors, all while trying yet again to get the case dismissed.</p>\n<p>You know, for a woman who insists that she will not be silenced, she\u2019s trying awfully hard not to be heard.</p>\n<p>Speaking of subpoenas, I haven\u2019t been served with one yet, to go and testify that Johnny didn\u2019t have anything to do with creating this petition. Maybe the fact that I keep saying it over and over is good enough. Or maybe they just haven\u2019t gotten around to me yet. Or maybe I\u2019m just not important enough to subpoena. I suspect the latter. But it would be a GAS to look that flappy wench in the eye while I testify. Well, once or twice. The view on the other side of the courtroom will likely be immensely more pleasant.</p>\n<p>But there you have it.</p>\n<p>Amber Heard subpoenaed Twitter. I\u2019m pretty sure it\u2019s just to get information about Adam Waldman\u2019s communications, but still. Who DOES that?</p>", "photo": {"id": "224487831", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/2/va/ee/JNvAEeKVTsQyhlo-800x450-noPad.jpg?1598209207", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "27560956", "createdAt": "2020-08-20T20:04:47.000Z", "title": "The whole countersuit", "description": "<p>You can read Amber's entire counter claim <a href=\"https://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/circuit/sites/circuit/files/assets/documents/pdf/high-profile/depp%20v%20heard/cl-2019-2911-def-counterclaims-8-10-2020.pdf\" rel=\"nofollow\">HERE</a>.</p>\n<p>It's definitely worth a read, if you're in the mood for a good laugh. It's all about how Johnny is a big old meanie-weanie, stalking and harassing her online. She complains that he only created his Instagram account to harass her.\u00a0</p>\n<p>Me, I think it just bugs her that he's got more followers than her. And all of his are real people while I'm willing to bet that the bulk of hers are bots, bought and paid for.</p>\n<p>She's asking for a hundred million dollars, and whatever other relief that court deems appropriate, to repay her for what she calls his crusade to stalk and harass her online using \"inauthentic\" bots to bolster his popularity and pad the signatures on this petition, among others.</p>\n<p>Go and give it a read, all you bots. Then come back and tell us what you think of it.\u00a0</p>", "photo": {"id": "224473388", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/4/fd/vr/XtFdVRMtpLgJjsO-800x450-noPad.jpg?1597953889", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "27545431", "createdAt": "2020-08-18T17:00:21.000Z", "title": "Amber Heard's countersuit", "description": "<p>Amber Heard has filed a countersuit. In it, she makes some pretty outlandish claims, saying that this petition is fake, and that so are many of the people who signed it. She calls you conspicuously fake and highly suspicious.</p>\n<p>Remember when she called us all bots? Well, apparently she\u2019s holding that position, while saying that not only are we bots, but that we\u2019re bots on a Russian payroll.</p>\n<p>She says: \"These accounts exhibit behavior which includes but is not limited to tweet to retweet ratios in numbers implausible for authentic human users; they are created, attack Ms. Heard, then are set to inactive to avoid suspension; they utilize common language, patterns, and timing indicating broad coordination; they often offer little or no personal information, suggesting computer-control or a single individual controlling more than one account at a time (and often many more); and they republicize the content of one another at rates and consistencies that bely authentic human control.\"</p>\n<p>Well, no kidding. They exhibit common language, timing and patterns because they\u2019re all talking about the same topic, the TRUTH that Amber Heard abused Johnny Depp. There\u2019s no collusion behind that. It\u2019s the simple truth.</p>\n<p>And as far as offering little to no personal information, it must REALLY bug her that she can\u2019t find out who a few of you are. Good. Let her wonder who in the industry isn\u2019t a bot and knows the truth about her that they aren\u2019t shy to share.</p>\n<p>She goes on to say: \"These accounts are designed to damage Ms. Heard and her livelihood without being directly traceable to Mr. Depp. For example, it appears that a significant number of the accounts signing the petition to remove Ms. Heard from the Aquaman franchise are conspicuously fake or highly suspicious. The use of fake signatures on these petitions is well outside the skill set of the average internet troll or disgruntled fan. They reflect a concerted effort to damage Ms. Heard. In addition, the change.org petitions were modified to make it appear that far more people signed the petitions than actually did.\"</p>\n<p>She says: \"There are a number of newly created foreign language accounts specifically or predominantly designed to damage Ms. Heard. Many of these accounts have Cyrillic signatures, reflecting Russian origin. Mr. Waldman, Mr. Depp\u2019s agent and attorney, is publicly associated with Russian individuals with the capability to organize such attacks.\"</p>\n<p>She\u2019s also attacking netizens on Twitter, calling out accounts for being fake. These include, ReemDepp, MyGrindelwald, Mderndarkwizard, pomta5426, depp_oldiar, PerspectiveDepp, depphead_, RayRayDepp, Depplyyours, ILoveGellert, Jackiedepp1963, JDeppS_girl.</p>\n<p>Congratulations, kids, you\u2019re famous!</p>\n<p>And she says that investigation has revealed hundreds of others.</p>\n<p>She doesn\u2019t bother putting me on that list of fake accounts, which is good. It means that she knows I\u2019m real. And, if I\u2019m called to testify, she\u2019ll have to come face to face with me. I look forward to looking her straight in the eye when I testify that all of you are real, too. To my knowledge, bots can\u2019t sign the petition.</p>\n<p>This petition is apparently getting under her skin in a big way, for her to keep mentioning it in court documents. To that, I say GOOD! Not only is this petition \u2013 by way of all of you \u2013 getting awareness out there about not just Johnny Depp, but other victims as well. But it also serves the double purpose of bugging her. That\u2019s icing on the cake that I find to be delicious.</p>\n<p>She\u2019s desperate, folks, and it\u2019s showing more every day. Looks like she's paranoid AF, too.</p>", "photo": {"id": "224462136", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/5/xa/aw/SfxAAwlSrbQRJrZ-800x450-noPad.jpg?1597770022", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "27538106", "createdAt": "2020-08-17T14:46:24.000Z", "title": "Amber Heard goes tits up in Istanbul", "description": "<p>Amber Heard posted pictures and video of herself touring a mosque in Istanbul, where local custom requires a hijab to be worn covering the hair and neck. Likewise, modest clothing should be worn at holy places. Heard wore what she calls a head scarf, but has half her hair hanging out. She also shows her neck and cleavage. To top it off, she\u2019s braless in a sheer dress that clearly shows her nipples.</p>\n<p>She got called out on it from netizens, most of whom found it to be extremely disrespectful for her to appear this way in a place of worship. Muslim commenters found her actions to be unforgivable.</p>\n<p>Amber Heard has struck back. She writes: 'Nope. Apparently whoever paid 4 this to b \u201cwritten\u201d wasnt paid enough.\u00a0'Ill make it easy(ier): Mosques are real places. So are museums &amp; churches. So are head scarfs (where they are sometimes required n order 2 visit). Mystery solved.'</p>\n<p>First, she calls out the reporter for how the article is \u201cwritten\u201d then goes on to babble incoherently herself in gibberish that\u2019s barely legible. She has little room to talk.</p>\n<p>Second, the plural of scarf is scarves. Scarfs is loose slang for when one eats rapidly. And, more importantly, it\u2019s not a simple head scarf. It\u2019s a hijab, which when worn properly has social and religious meaning. She is obviously clueless not just about what it\u2019s called, but what it represents.</p>\n<p>Further, yes. Mosques are real places. They are places of worship which should be treated with respect. That respect does, indeed, require \u201chead scarfs\u201d to be worn, not just as fashion accessories for photo ops, but to be worn properly to show the place and the people the respect they deserve. By refusing to do that, she shows a staggering level of disrespect.</p>\n<p>Her dress is likewise abysmally disrespectful, with her nipples clearly showing through. She was wearing a jacket which she could easily have pulled closed around her chest for modesty. But it\u2019s clear that she has none. And there\u2019s nothing wrong with that bohemian attitude on the streets of Soho, perhaps. But in a place of worship where people were praying, a place where modesty is expected, it goes down like a lead balloon.</p>\n<p>It\u2019s clear that her trip to the mosque was nothing more than a photo op. And when she got called on it, she\u2019s completely without remorse. She lashes out like a child at the people that criticized her. She had a chance to learn something and be humble, even apologize, but instead chose to show her true colors. Vindictive and childish.</p>\n<p>I, for one, just can\u2019t wait for the judgement to come down in London, the first nail in her career coffin. Then for the judgement against her in Virginia, which will be the finish of her. Not that she really needs those judgments to finish her off. Word has it that not only is she removed from Aquaman 2, but that she\u2019s also blacklisted. Nobody wants to work with her. And I don\u2019t blame them. She comes across as a spoiled, selfish, abusive brat. Who wants to work with that?</p>\n<p>More as it happens, my dears.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-8634685/amp/Amber-Heard-hits-slammed-going-braless-visiting-Turkish-mosque.html?__twitter_impression=true\" rel=\"nofollow\">SOURCE</a></p>", "photo": {"id": "224456774", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/9/av/kv/upAVkvCMxOmFHtI-800x450-noPad.jpg?1597675586", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "27534033", "createdAt": "2020-08-16T21:20:04.000Z", "title": "Amber Heard gone from L'oreal?", "description": "<p>I honestly don't know if Amber Heard was ever listed as a spokesmodel on L'oreal's website. I want to say that she was, but I can't say for sure. But I can tell you that she's not there now.</p>\n<p>If she was removed, it wasn't done with any flourish or fanfare. It was done quietly days ago.</p>\n<p>What do you think? Is she canned from L'oreal or does it mean nothing that she's not on their website (anymore)?</p>", "photo": {"id": "224453679", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/4/eg/ud/XBEgudAXdaFzYwA-800x450-noPad.jpg?1597612805", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "27519918", "createdAt": "2020-08-14T13:00:30.000Z", "title": "The Whole TMZ Video", "description": "<p><a href=\"https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V7lg69VFSY8\" rel=\"nofollow\">The entire TMZ video</a> has been released, and it shows the whole story. The amazing @ThatBrianFella - Incredibly Average on YouTube, has posted it for us. Thanks, dude.</p>\n<p>In the TMZ version, it's a low-quality video that ends when Johnny snatches up the phone and the screen goes blank. Amber Heard supporters claim that that's when he started to smack her around.</p>\n<p>But this version extends beyond that, both at the beginning and the end. In the beginning, it shows Amber Heard turning on the phone to record, and setting it up where he couldn't see it.</p>\n<p>The interesting stuff happens at the end, though. After Johnny snatches up the phone and throws it in the trash, he says \"Bye.\" and leaves the room. No slapping her around, nothing of the sort. He leaves.</p>\n<p>From there, the video shows Amber fishing the phone out of the trash, gigging and smirking, like she knows she just got one over on him. She then follows Johnny before turning the phone off. Hardly the picture of the poor, embattled victim she wanted the world to think she was.</p>\n<p>What I love is that the defense showed the TMZ version of the video repeatedly in London, to try to prove what a monster he is. Then, on the closing day, BOOM! David Sherborne showed the whole video, blowing that pretext clean out of the water. Just like a rock and roll pirate. I only wish I could have seen the look on Heard's face.\u00a0</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V7lg69VFSY8\" rel=\"nofollow\">Have a look</a>, and enjoy.</p>", "photo": {"id": "224442459", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/3/sg/hv/ivSghVPuQClFoNx-800x450-noPad.jpg?1597410032", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}], "pageInfo": {"endCursor": "YXJyYXljb25uZWN0aW9uOjEzMQ==", "hasNextPage": true}}}}}, {"data": {"petition": {"id": "14451136", "slug": "dc-entertainment-remove-amber-heard-from-aquaman-2", "user": {"id": "24448735", "displayName": "Jeanne Larson", "photo": {"id": "221862322", "userSmall": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/7/xs/ly/cXXSLydpSVDqIVB-48x48-noPad.jpg?1553098061", "processing": false}}}, "organization": null, "updatesConnection": {"nodes": [{"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "27504042", "createdAt": "2020-08-12T13:16:06.000Z", "title": "Meanwhile in Virginia", "description": "<p>While we await the verdict in London, the wheels of justice are still turning in Virginia, where Johnny Depp has sued Amber Heard for defamation.</p>\n<p>Johnny Depp\u2019s request for a HIPPA waiver was <a href=\"https://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/circuit/sites/circuit/files/assets/documents/pdf/high-profile/depp%20v%20heard/cl-2019-2911-hipaa-order-8-10-2020.pdf\" rel=\"nofollow\">GRANTED</a>.</p>\n<p>Johnny\u2019s request for additional documents was <a href=\"https://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/circuit/sites/circuit/files/assets/documents/pdf/high-profile/depp%20v%20heard/cl-2019-2911-compel-order2-8-10-2020.pdf\" rel=\"nofollow\">GRANTED</a>.</p>\n<p>Amber Heard\u2019s request for additional documents from Johnny was <a href=\"https://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/circuit/sites/circuit/files/assets/documents/pdf/high-profile/depp%20v%20heard/cl-2019-2911-compel-order-8-10-2020.pdf\" rel=\"nofollow\">DENIED</a>, in part.\u00a0</p>\n<p>Hat tip to D @nosanityallowed on Twitter.</p>\n<p>I know it seems like January is a long way off, especially considering we haven't heard about London's verdict yet, but day by day, things are moving along in Johnny's case against Amber for defamation.</p>\n<p>If I were betting on the outcome, my money would be on Johnny, in both cases. He's long overdue for justice against all the horrors that were done to him, and for her calculated attacks on his reputation. She couldn't own him, couldn't take him for all he's worth, so she tried to destroy him. Didn't work. Not then and not now.\u00a0</p>\n<p>She's ruined herself, and I couldn't be happier to see it.\u00a0</p>", "photo": {"id": "224430424", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/6/pn/mn/DvPNmNgboYSWfut-800x450-noPad.jpg?1597238168", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "27497855", "createdAt": "2020-08-11T16:33:06.000Z", "title": "Zack Snyder's Justice League", "description": "<p>just a quick reminder:</p>\n<p>We may be getting rid of Amber Heard as Mera in Aquaman 2, but Zack Snyder's Justice League is already in post-production, with Amber Heard as Mera. That's what her <a href=\"https://www.imdb.com/name/nm1720028/\" rel=\"nofollow\">IMDB</a> page says, anyway.</p>\n<p>I don't know how large or small her role is in the new Justice League movie, but I know that I'm not going to watch it to find out.</p>\n<p>This might explain how she's got the money to travel around with world without a care right now. She probably got a chunk of change from Justice League.</p>\n<p>Just when you thought your gag reflex could relax...</p>", "photo": {"id": "224425708", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/8/co/vy/PlCOvyzUwNJdbUF-800x450-noPad.jpg?1597163588", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "27491498", "createdAt": "2020-08-10T19:07:24.000Z", "title": "Whitney Heard's as bad as Amber", "description": "<p>Whitney Heard has gotten a lot of attention lately with her former boss Jennifer Howell stepping forward with some delightful revelations. More about that soon.</p>\n<p>But I thought I\u2019d share this little tidbit with you. It shows that Whitney has the same garbage attitude as her sister, with a mouth to match.</p>\n<p>I\u2019m not sure when this is from, but on Twitter, Christina18angie @242sx had the guts to stand up and ask someone who followed Whitney the hard question, saying: \u201cMy god! How can you follow a person who helped try to destroy Johnny? This woman and Amber are bad!\u201d</p>\n<p>Whitheard answered @cris_angie6, saying: \u201cHa! You\u2019re suck a fucking idiot. Get a fucking life, you fucking troll! Go back to playing your video games or fucking your cousin or whatever it is you losers do, you ignorant fuck.</p>\n<p>Then followed it up with the sentiment: \u201cTroglodytes like @cris_angie6 should go back to the hole they came from.\u201d</p>\n<p>You can see the screen shot <a href=\"https://twitter.com/source411/status/1292504712625889284/photo/1\" rel=\"nofollow\">HERE</a>.</p>\n<p>First of all, I may be wrong, here, but is Whit even @-ing the right person? Maybe she knows something I don\u2019t, but that\u2019s not the name I see. Whatever.</p>\n<p>As you can see, Whitney Heard isn\u2019t the sweet, innocent little victim of her sister\u2019s abuse. I have no doubt that her sister treats her at least as badly as she did Johnny Depp, but she\u2019s certainly not the sweet little angel.</p>\n<p>Whitney\u2019s a grown woman with the world at her feet. She\u2019s got a husband and son at home, yet she chooses to traipse around the world with her sister, perjuring herself to try and clean up her sister\u2019s mess. Shows where her priorities lie.</p>\n<p>With an attitude like this, I say the two deserve each other.</p>", "photo": {"id": "224421263", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/4/mj/hk/GgmJhklSNZxlmOH-800x450-noPad.jpg?1597086446", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "27471763", "createdAt": "2020-08-07T14:43:14.000Z", "title": "Johnny orchestrated this petition?", "description": "<p>I was surprised and laughed hysterically when Amber Heard's team accused Johnny Depp of orchestrating this petition in recent court testimony in London. Johnny Depp is suing the Sun tabloid for calling him a wife-beater, remember. And Amber's team brought it up. Johnny was forced to answer about it.\u00a0</p>\n<p>I didn't realize that Johnny or Amber were even aware of our little petition until then.\u00a0</p>\n<p>I keep seeing articles repeating the same notion, that Johnny Depp colluded with me to start this thing. <a href=\"https://blindgossip.com/throw-another-log-on-this-legal-fire/\" rel=\"nofollow\">Another one</a> came out just the other day. I still think it's hysterical, but the ore I see it, the more I wonder. Am I going to have to testify that I alone started this thing? The more she pushes, the more I think I might actually have to.</p>\n<p>Not that I mind at all. I started this thing for a specific reason, and I still have a clear conscience about it. I do not believe that a serial abuser should be celebrated in the entertainment industry. I said it on the front page and I still believe it. If I'm called to the stand, that's exactly what I'll say.\u00a0</p>\n<p>And if they ask me why I write under the name Jeannie Depp, I'll tell them. It has more to do with me than him. (I simply didn't want my ex to see his name on my work anymore, so I chose another name to use, one that I hoped would best serve my work.)</p>\n<p>If they want to twist that into something ugly, I can't stop them. All I can do is tell the truth. Unlike the defendant, I haven't done anything that I should be ashamed of.</p>\n<p>It would be cool to see Johnny in person, though. So I hope they DO call me for Virginia.\u00a0</p>", "photo": {"id": "224406530", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/6/ik/vj/YWiKvJSkTqwjqDV-800x450-noPad.jpg?1596811395", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "27451403", "createdAt": "2020-08-04T22:04:07.000Z", "title": "Aquaman 2 release date", "description": "<p>With a release date of Dec 16th 2022, I think it's safe to assume that filming should start sometime soon. Especially considering the amount of time the movie will need in post to make it look like all those people are underwater.\u00a0</p>\n<p>So, will Amber be among the cast? Some sources say that WB bought out Amber's contract so that she got paid but won't be in it. (which I believe.) Others say that she's set to reprise her role as Mera.\u00a0</p>\n<p>There's another thing to consider. Filming will take place in Australia. And if Barnaby Joyce has his way, there might be perjury charges over Pistol and Boo waiting for her there if she returns.\u00a0</p>\n<p>And there's no statute of limitations in Australia for crimes that involve grievous bodily injury, so she can still face charges over what happened to Johnny's finger.\u00a0</p>\n<p>Which means that even if Amber's still in Aquaman 2, she runs some serious risks if she shows up to film it.\u00a0</p>\n<p>What's a girl to do?</p>", "photo": {"id": "224392051", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/1/hd/dg/wRHDDggpqmTiQvt-800x450-noPad.jpg?1596578649", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "27443101", "createdAt": "2020-08-03T19:48:35.000Z", "title": "Perjury over Pistol and Boo", "description": "<p>Barnaby Joyce, Johnny Depp\u2019s biggest fan (not) is demanding that Amber Heard be probed over statements she made when she was charged with smuggling the toy Yorkies Pistol and Boo into Australia. There are strict laws about bringing animals into Australia without a quarantine period, and Heard volated them when she brought the dogs into the country on the couple\u2019s private jet. She got out of jail time by agreeing to make a public service announcement about how important the country\u2019s bio-laws are. You can see the cringe-worthy video HERE.</p>\n<p>Now, Barnaby Joyce is demanding that Amber Heard be probed for perjury after allegedly telling an assistant to lie about bringing her two dogs illegally into Australia at the time. <br>Depp's former assistant of eight years,\u00a0Kevin Murphy, said Heard made him lie under oath when they were accused of bringing in the dogs illegally. Mr Murphy claimed Heard told him: 'I want your help on this. I wouldn't want you to have a problem with your job'. The assistant said he had told the actress several times over the phone, email and in person she was unable to bring the dogs. <br>Paperwork and the required ten day quarantine period had not been arranged for Pistol and Boo.</p>\n<p>Barnaby Joyce is calling the whole thing Dodgy ', saying that Depp and Heard were \u201cjust treating the whole thing as a joke. They had no regard for the law as they had no regard for biosecurity laws,' Mr Joyce said. And now he wants Amber Heard to pay for it. He\u2019s got no love lost for Johnny Depp, but it was Amber Heard that smuggled the dogs.</p>\n<p>\u201cThe Department of Agriculture, Water and the Environment is aware of recent media reports concerning the prosecution of Ms Amber Heard in Australia in 2016 and is consulting with the CDPP (Commonwealth Department of Public Prosecution) on this issue,\u201d a spokesperson told Strewth. After a bit of sniffing around, senior sources informed us an investigation was potentially on the cards. The maximum penalty for perjury in Queensland? Fourteen years in jail.</p>\n<p>14 years. That\u2019s nothing to play with.</p>\n<p>What do you think? Will Amber Heard be tried and convicted in Australia on top of her legal woes with Johnny Depp? Me, I hope so. I hope so a lot.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8546727/Barnaby-Joyce-slams-Amber-Heard-allegedly-warned-not-bring-Pistol-Boo-Aus.html\" rel=\"nofollow\">SOURCE</a><br><a href=\"https://www.theaustralian.com.au/commentary/strewth/amber-heard-could-face-charges-over-pistol-and-boo-fiasco/news-story/33ee83053ba7faf141820c4ef8a71ccb\" rel=\"nofollow\">SOURCE</a></p>\n<p>\u00a0</p>", "photo": {"id": "224386491", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/7/zc/rz/ipzCRzCtlThyVcU-800x450-noPad.jpg?1596484117", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "27436369", "createdAt": "2020-08-02T18:31:33.000Z", "title": "60 Minutes Australia", "description": "<p>60 minutes</p>\n<p>\u00a0</p>\n<p>Barnaby Joyce was Agricultural Minister of Australia when Amber Heard was charged with smuggling Pistol and Boo into the country in October, 2015. He told the dogs to buggar off back to America and threatened to euthanize them.</p>\n<p>Well, Barny obviously hasn\u2019t forgotten about Johnny Depp or Amber Heard. He told 60 minutes Australia: \u201cHey, Johnny, look where your life ended up, old trout! They might be royalty in Hollywood, but we don\u2019t give a toss about that.\u201d</p>\n<p>From the beginning, the Aussie documentary seemed heavily slanted toward Amber Heard\u2019s version of events, showing pictures of Johnny sleeping on the floor and sleeping on the couc\u201dh covered in her ice cream, her incessant blathering about how he beat her up and pulled out clumps of her hair.</p>\n<p>I watched, waiting for the show to give Johnny equal time, but it didn\u2019t really happen. While the show didn\u2019t try to predict the outcome of Johnny\u2019s libel trial against the Sun, they did say with certainty that everybody involved walks away \u201cstained.\u201d</p>\n<p>Me, I disagree. Throughout the course of the trial, with all the evidence being made public every day, there has been an increasing outpouring of support for Johnny Depp, while Amber Heard\u2019s public opinion took a heavy nose dive. People waited outside to give Johnny flowers, while all Amber got was boos. I think Johnny will walk away vindicated, win or lose. The world knows what she did to him, now, and there\u2019s no going back from that.</p>\n<p>I\u2019ll give the show some credit, though. While they played Amber\u2019s whining about being abused, they did show pictures of Johnny\u2019s actual injuries, albeit fleetingly, and playing the tape where Amber admits to hitting Johnny repeatedly.</p>\n<p>They made repeated use out of that TMZ video, where Johnny was kicking cabinets, as that\u2019s just about the only \u201cevidence\u201d Amber\u2019s team could present that he was ever violent. And I was less than thrilled when it was thrown out there that Johnny might have shat in his own bed and said that he was self-immolating by bringing the libel proceedings.</p>\n<p>Ultimately, the show insinuated that both Johnny and Amber are guilty, and that they\u2019re both damaged, no matter who wins.</p>\n<p>What the show seems to forget is that this case isn\u2019t between Johnny and Amber. THIS case is between Johnny Depp and the Sun tabloid. Amber was just a witness. So there\u2019s no way that Amber Heard can win, here. I\u2019m sure she\u2019d claim victory for herself if the Sun prevails, but such really is not the case. Despite her narcissistic need for attention, not everything is about her.</p>\n<p>I\u2019ll be honest, I didn\u2019t finish watching the show. With about 10 minutes left, I decided that I\u2019d seen enough of the both-blaming game they were playing.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n6j5rYBUAeM\" rel=\"nofollow\">HERE</a> is the show, if you\u2019d care to give it a look yourself.</p>", "photo": {"id": "224381770", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/6/tz/us/lNTzUSTjHXuLDXF-800x450-noPad.jpg?1596393097", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "27414952", "createdAt": "2020-07-30T11:59:39.000Z", "title": "Whitney thought Amber was going to kill Johnny", "description": "<p>Whitney testified about a violent incident in 2015, after which Whitney had to go live with her boss (because she had nowhere else to go?) and slept on the floor. Well, that boss has spoken up. Turns out that\u2019s not exactly what happened at all. Not the stair-pushing incident, and not the floor-sleeping part, either.</p>\n<p>According to Jennifer Howell, Whitney\u2019s former boss at the charity The Art of Elysium at the time, Whitney told her that Amber was extremely violent and almost pushed Whitney down the stairs. Howell also said: \u201cShe told me she was worried Amber \u2018was going to kill Johnny.\u201d</p>\n<p>Whitney, like her sister, seems to forget that when you give testimony involving other people, those people just might stand up and tell the truth about what really happened.</p>\n<p>I think we\u2019re going to see a lot more of this as the VA defamation trial approaches.</p>\n<p>I, for one, can\u2019t wait to see what happens with the UK trial. It\u2019s just a shame that we have to wait until September to find out.</p>", "photo": {"id": "224366860", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/0/vm/fm/FZVmfMiRrFOZjWS-800x450-noPad.jpg?1596110381", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "27406936", "createdAt": "2020-07-29T12:03:17.000Z", "title": "The Amber Heard circus show", "description": "<p>Yesterday while court was still in session, Amber Heard and her entourage got up and walked out so that she could hold a press conference on the steps of the high court. In her statement, she said that after her divorce, she just wanted to move on with her life, and that reliving her marriage\u2019s breakup was \u201cincredibly painful.\u201d</p>\n<p>I cry BS. If she just wanted to move on with her life, she wouldn\u2019t have made all those comments about being the victim of domestic violence, which we now know is completely untrue. She wouldn\u2019t have written that WaMo op-ed that got her sued in the first place.</p>\n<p>She also said that she would have preferred not to be here in court. Again, I say rubbish. She didn\u2019t have to be there all day every day. She only needed to appear to testify. That was two or three days out of three weeks, but she insisted upon showing up every day.</p>\n<p>Finally, she thanked the world for the tremendous outpouring of support she\u2019s received over the past weeks. And all while she\u2019s been booed every day.</p>\n<p>What I notice about that video is the faces of everybody standing with her, including and especially her sister Whitney, who looks like she\u2019s attending at gunpoint. The whole group looks miserable standing there, until the very end when they all smile on cue. It truly looked like all of them wished there were anywhere else.</p>\n<p>Me, I think it was highly disrespectful to the court for her to get up, walk out, hold a press conference, then walk back in.</p>\n<p>What do you think about it all?</p>\n<p>You can watch the video <a href=\"https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KyZRrvGWiC0\" rel=\"nofollow\">HERE</a></p>", "photo": {"id": "224361300", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/7/xr/wk/TSXrwKMGpbQcEdM-800x450-noPad.jpg?1596024200", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "27399739", "createdAt": "2020-07-28T13:45:48.000Z", "title": "Team Depp's closing arguments", "description": "<p>Here it is, folks, the final day of court. Amber arrived back in her school marm mode, all black from head to toe. She couldn\u2019t resist trying to sex it up a bit though, with a sky-high slit up the front of her skirt. Johnny\u2019s in a grey suit, looking in good spirits ahead of closing arguments on his behalf. Fans had flowers and artwork and chanted \u201cJustice for Johnny!\u201d in support for him. He, in turn, handed out thank you notes and bandanas to the crowd as a thank you for their support throughout this entire ordeal. What a sweetheart.</p>\n<p>David Sherborne spoke out on behalf of Johnny today, starting with a much-needed reminder not to lose focus on why we\u2019re all here. It\u2019s not this Depp v Heard drama; that will be settled in Virginia in early 2021. What we\u2019re here for is to decide whether or not the Sun tabloid libeled Johnny Depp when they called him a \u201cwife-beater\u201d on the front cover and continued to portray him as such in the article. That\u2019s it. Everything else is smoke and mirrors.</p>\n<p>The burden of proof, Sherborne said, falls to the Sun to prove that the article was true. And frankly, everything they\u2019ve tried to pull throughout the course of this trial just doesn\u2019t fly. Every accusation of violence save one depends solely upon the fact that Amber Heard says so. They didn\u2019t put forth a shred of evidence that wasn\u2019t easily debunked.</p>\n<p>The one accusation of violence is the \u201cstairs\u201d incident, at which Heard\u2019s sister Whitney was supposedly present. And Whitney is obviously biased. Whether through loyalty to her sister or fear of retaliation, Whitney supported Heard\u2019s version of events, even though that was easily debunked, too. Heard\u2019s own medical history proves that she was never injured. All those doctors and nurses aren\u2019t lying.</p>\n<p>Heard was the abuser in the relationship, Sherborne points out. And Johnny\u2019s not only got physical and medical evidence to support that, he\u2019s got a myriad of witnesses who saw her being violent toward him. And, to top it all off, he\u2019s got Heard on tape confessing to it. That\u2019s pretty cut and dried.</p>\n<p>Over and over throughout the course of the trial, Heard has gotten caught in one lie after the next. She lied about the dogs in Australia, she lied to Homeland security, and she\u2019s lied about every single incident where she claims Johnny Depp abused her. Each and every lie was categorically debunked and exposed. That completely shatters any credibility she had going in, which wasn\u2019t much to begin with.</p>\n<p>Now it goes to the judge, and there\u2019s no telling how long he\u2019ll take to reach a decision. It could be tomorrow, or it could take weeks. Given the complexity and sheer volume of testimony and evidence there is to consider, I think it\u2019ll take some time. But when the decision finally comes down, I\u2019ll be sure to post it just as fast as I can.</p>", "photo": {"id": "224356263", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/5/re/om/VYREomPtMrNIzNp-800x450-noPad.jpg?1595943950", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "27392699", "createdAt": "2020-07-27T16:16:28.000Z", "title": "Closing arguments, day 1", "description": "<p>Today began the closing arguments for NGN and the Sun tabloid. Amber Heard was front and center, wearing a skin-tight white dress that really did her no favors.</p>\n<p>Counsel for NGN basically rehashed everything that Team Amber spewed forth throughout the trial, that Johnny Depp is a monster, out of control on drink and drugs, potentially unaware of just how bad he really is. Depp really is the wife-beating monster Amber Heard made him out to be, they say. And, according to NGN, Depp is the deflector, accusing Heard of every terrible thing HE did, not the other way around.</p>\n<p>That seemed to be their biggest tactic, deflecting all of Heard\u2019s bad deeds back onto him. Aside from painting her as the poor little damsel in distress, that is. Another favorite fallback for them seems to be saying that poor little Amber was too tiny to have inflicted so much damage onto Johnny. She only weighed 115, they say. She COULDN\u2019T have done it, they say.</p>\n<p>Bullshit, I say.</p>\n<p>A tiny woman is capable of throwing a haymaker. And that particular woman is capable of a lot more than that. There\u2019s the hurling of heavy projectiles, one of which smashed off part of his guitar-playing finger. And let\u2019s not forget putting a cigarette out on his face and defecating in his bed.</p>\n<p>No, folks. Height and weight isn\u2019t necessarily a factor to how much damage a woman can do. Especially when you have a man that didn\u2019t fight back. This defense is rubbish, of course.</p>\n<p>Johnny wasn\u2019t in court today, but will be back tomorrow when his team gives their closing arguments.</p>\n<p>Amber was all smiles as she left court. Let\u2019s see what that smile looks like when the judge\u2019s decision comes down.</p>", "photo": {"id": "224351437", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/4/pq/dn/IGPqdnErwQSWBON-800x450-noPad.jpg?1595866592", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "27385040", "createdAt": "2020-07-26T15:11:51.000Z", "title": "We're all bots", "description": "<p><a href=\"https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/deppheads-wage-cyberwar-on-amber-heard-30jm582pl\" rel=\"nofollow\">The Sunday Times</a> has published a piece declaring that we\u2019re all bots. They even went so far as to have out accounts analyzed to see our troll status on .com. Problem is, they only found 13 accounts that could be bots. 13. Out of hundreds of thousands of accounts, they found 13.</p>\n<p>Another heavily slanted <a href=\"https://www.thegeekbuzz.com/the-basement/troll-bots-positively-identified-in-cyber-warfare-against-aquaman-actress-amber-heard/\" rel=\"nofollow\">article</a> started off calling us all bots, but then wandered off in the direction of bitching about Trump. Clearly, that guy just wanted to get people to read about him bitching about Trump by throwing Johnny Depp in the first line to attract readers. Whatever.</p>\n<p>I say let\u2019s test all those millions of bots Amber Heard has likely bought to bolster her lagging social media accounts. I\u2019m guessing that the tally would be a great deal higher.</p>\n<p>I hope you\u2019ve had a great weekend. We\u2019re back to it tomorrow, with closing arguments being given Monday and Tuesday. Then it goes to the judge to make a decision.</p>\n<p>We\u2019re nearing the end of the road, folks. Hang in there for what\u2019s certain to be a Johnny Depp victory by a landslide.</p>\n<p>Then, Virginia, where the same is sure to happen again.</p>", "photo": {"id": "224345755", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/4/nl/ey/hxNLeYNGuYBjxLD-800x450-noPad.jpg?1595776314", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}], "pageInfo": {"endCursor": "YXJyYXljb25uZWN0aW9uOjE0Mw==", "hasNextPage": true}}}}}, {"data": {"petition": {"id": "14451136", "slug": "dc-entertainment-remove-amber-heard-from-aquaman-2", "user": {"id": "24448735", "displayName": "Jeanne Larson", "photo": {"id": "221862322", "userSmall": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/7/xs/ly/cXXSLydpSVDqIVB-48x48-noPad.jpg?1553098061", "processing": false}}}, "organization": null, "updatesConnection": {"nodes": [{"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "27370986", "createdAt": "2020-07-24T16:02:11.000Z", "title": "Rocky and iO testify", "description": "<p>Mic Drop Testimony and Evidence</p>\n<p>Team Depp hit the ground running today. Of major interest, David Sherborne introduced evidence that proved that Whitney was lying when she testified that she did not know her sister to be violent. It\u2019s a transcript of \u00a0a recording - given to his team last night - which shows that Ms\u00a0Henriquez does have knowledge of Heard being violent. So, Boom. Whitney\u2019s testimony is tainted. <br>Earlier in the week, Amber said that she rarely (Never?) goes outside without makeup, but testimony was given today by Amber\u2019s acting coach Kristina Sexton that she rarely wore makeup in the daytime, if ever. And that when she did, it was light. Describing Heard's routine, Ms Sexton says: \"She wore very little. Just foundation, or lip or cheek tint if it was daytime... If it was an evening event, someone would do her make-up for her.\" So, again. Boom.<br>I have a feeling we\u2019re going to see a lot of those today. \u00a0<br>Sexton also shredded other of Amber\u2019s testimony. For example, testifying that she never saw Johnny be violent, but only repeats what Amber said because she has no reason to lie to her. Bitch, please. Amber\u2019s nothing BUT a lie. <br>Ms Laws says that Heard told Ms Sexton: \"Johnny will never let me go, he would rather destroy me than let me go\". Ms Laws asks Ms Sexton if she's aware that while Heard was telling her about the alleged domestic abuse, Heard was also contacting Depp and telling him he could stop the whole divorce process if he wanted. <br>Ms Sexton says she was not aware of this. <br>Ms. Sexton reported that Amber was worried about bad publicity over her split with Depp, because, sure. That\u2019s what any normal woman would be thinking. Of course not. Any survivor of such horrid domestic abuse that she said she suffered at his hands would be relieved to be out of the line of fire.</p>\n<p>Johnny arrived a half-hour late this morning, perhaps due to more meetings about an upcoming role.</p>\n<p>Continuing with Ms. Sexton, she says that on the night of Amber\u2019s 30th birthday party, she was told that Johnny was upstairs, refusing to come down, going so far as to say that Amber and Whitney said they went upstairs to try and get him to come down. Remember, that\u2019s the night that Johnny was late to the party because of a business meeting. He wasn\u2019t upstairs at all. <br>Ms. Sexton is supposed to be Heard\u2019s witness, and does support some aspects of Heard\u2019s story. But, by being honest about things like makeup-gate, she does a fine job of impugning the integrity of Heard\u2019s testimony. <br>The video discussed earlier is finally shown. In it, a woman is talking to Whitney and examining several injuries, saying: \u201cI can\u2019t believe Amber beat you up.\u201d \u00a0<br>Yep. That\u2019s BOOM. Proof that Whitney had knowledge of Amber being violent, and being a victim of that violence herself. Busted. <br>Ms. Wass complains that this evidence, which was submitted only last night, is \u201can ambush\u201d and asks for it to be excluded. But the judge allows the video. <br>Whitney is recalled to the stand. She insists that there was no physical fight between the sisters. It was just the producers trying to make the show more interesting. There are no bruises, she says. The lawyers are looking for injuries that aren\u2019t there. Even though they\u2019re clearly visible. She is so busted it hurts.</p>\n<p>After lunch, Whitney was back in the hot seat, spewing out the same story that Johnny was violent when he wasn\u2019t sober. And with that, she was done.</p>\n<p>The next witness was Raquel (Rocky) Pennington, who confirmed that she lived rent-free in one of Johnny\u2019s penthouses for roughly two years. Can you imagine? Living RENT FREE in an LA penthouse? And then turning around and betraying the guy that paid for it? I can\u2019t. <br>Rocky did confirm that she\u2019s never seen Johnny beat Amber, but insisted that she saw \u201cdeep\u201d gashes on Amber\u2019s arms after Australia and believed Ambers explanation that Johnny did it. She also said that she personally saw all those cuts on Amber\u2019s feet. Ms. Wass suggested that this was a lie, because no cuts existed, but Rocky insists that such was not the case. She says she\u2019s not lying for her friend Amber. <br>Except for insisting that she saw Amber\u2019s cut feet, Rocky\u2019s testimony seems to be toeing the line, saying that all the accounts of Johnny being violent are hearsay, what Amber told her. Not from anything that she witnessed. That actually goes to Johnny\u2019s favor. In fact, throughout her testimony, Rocky seemed a bit wishy-washy, supporting Amber, but leaving a lot of grey area for interpretation. For example, Rocky says that she was best friends with Amber in 2014-2016, but that they aren\u2019t best friends anymore. Just that they \u201cremain close.\u201d That could mean a whole lot, either way. Maybe she was trying to distance herself from Amber so it wouldn\u2019t look like she\u2019d lie for her, or maybe there\u2019s a little bit of trouble in paradise. Like I said, it\u2019s open to interpretation. <br>In the end, Rocky ended up backing Amber, confirming injuries that never happened, like the broken nose and bloody lip Amber says she had before the James Cordon show. When shown photos from the show, Rocky admits that there aren\u2019t any visible injuries, but that her \u201ceyes aren\u2019t that good.\u201d <br>Pitiful. <br>Rocky did trip Amber up a little bit, though, by testifying that Amber was so intoxicated at Coachella that she vomited. Amber earlier testified that she did not vomit at the festival. Woops.</p>\n<p>And, like Ms. Sexton, Rocky didn\u2019t know that Amber was in contact with Johnny trying to get him back. So it looks like Amber was doing some shady things behind her buddies\u2019 backs, while getting them to set the stage for her to frame up Johnny. <br>Rocky contradicted herself when Ms. Wass redirected. She backpedaled about Coachella, saying that she did not see Amber Vomit. Too little too late. The damage is done.</p>\n<p>Up next, iO Tillet-wright. We\u2019ll find out what he did or didn\u2019t know, whether he backs Heard blindly, or if he\u2019s the first to cut and run. <br>Ms Laws, lawyer for Johnny Depp, will be the first to question iO. First up, iO was asked about outing Lily-Rose Depp and using her photo in his project at the time, even though she was only 16 at the time. iO confirms that Johnny wasn\u2019t happy about it. They had a falling out over it and weren\u2019t speaking at the time. But just like everybody else, iO never saw Johnny being violent toward Amber. He only knows what Amber Heard told him. <br>Ms Laws asked about iO slapping Rocky, but the judge put a stop to that. Pity.<br>Ms. Laws ends her questioning after establishing that iO and Rocky competed for Amber\u2019s attention. iO called that an over-simplification, but didn\u2019t dispute it.</p>\n<p>Ms Wass began by asking iO about poopgate, and iO said that Amber couldn\u2019t possibly be responsible for it because she\u2019s poop-phobic and pretends that she doesn\u2019t even poop in private, let alone in somebody\u2019s bed. <br>Wait. Pretends she doesn\u2019t poop? Sure, because that\u2019s SO normal. <br>iO\u2019s account of the Phone-throwing fight is pretty useless, as he was in New York at the time and only heard what Amber wanted him to hear over the phone. All he could really testify to is that he called 911.\u00a0 It\u2019s interesting that iO said the following: \u201cA number of people who worked in the entertainment industry were afraid of speaking up and saying what they had seen as they feared they would be blacklisted.\" Because I firmly believe this to be true, except that I don\u2019t think it\u2019s Johnny they were afraid of. Amber has reportedly left a swath of damage in her path of people afraid to speak up against her for fear of blackmail or other retaliation. So I do believe iO snuck the truth in there at the end. Just not overtly.<br>That\u2019s the end of iO\u2019s testimony, and that\u2019s the end of testimony in this case. On Monday, the Sun will submit their closing statement. On Tuesday, Team Johnny will give their closing statement.</p>\n<p>Amber\u2019s team are undoubtedly claiming victory after her buddies testified, but I still think that the case is leaning heavily in Johnny\u2019s favor. I don\u2019t think anything said today really helped Amber at all. If anything, it shot her in the food. That\u2019s my humble opinion, anyway. What do you think?<br><br><a href=\"https://news.sky.com/story/johnny-depp-libel-trial-amber-heards-sister-to-finish-giving-evidence-12035106\" rel=\"nofollow\">SOURCE</a></p>", "photo": {"id": "224336053", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/8/uz/hc/vPuZHcYjtooQvge-800x450-noPad.jpg?1595606532", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "27361763", "createdAt": "2020-07-23T14:34:59.000Z", "title": "Amber's last day, sister Whitney's first", "description": "<p>Sasha Wass is opening questioning, telling Amber Heard we will be starting off with 'the painting incident' which took place in March 2013. We will also be looking at Heard's sixth witness statement, given on 6 July 2020.<br>Amber is wearing black this morning, and her hair is braided at the root, but wavy and loose around her shoulders. She is sipping from a water bottle as she flicks through a large black file of evidence, which in court is referred to as the \"trial bundle.\u201d</p>\n<p>We will be hearing about the painting incident which is alleged to have taken place at one of Depp's many homes, in\u00a0Sweetzer Avenue which is in\u00a0West\u00a0Hollywood.</p>\n<p>Heard explains to the judge that Depp owns several houses at the end of this road. <br>The painting incident was initially said to have occurred on 8 March 2013, after which there was some filming with Rolling Stone Keith Richards. However, in Heard's sixth statement, Heard wrote:\u00a0 \"I have now realized I cannot be sure that the painting incident took place on 8 March 2013.\u201d Heard tells the court she now believes the painting incident actually occurred on 22 March 2013. Heard says there were around three times there was filming with Keith Richards over that month. <br>Depp's lawyer Eleanor Laws QC interrupts at this point, saying this is a very important part of the evidence, and she requests permission from the judge to ask Heard questions about it too. <br>Depp is yet to arrive in court this morning. His lawyer has told us this is because he's in a \"film meeting,\u201d so will be a little late. We are expecting him around midday. This means it's possible he may miss Heard's last morning giving evidence. Depp has been later in court a few times this week, which was also said to be due to \"film meetings.\u201d</p>\n<p>We are now looking at a text exchange between Heard and Depp's assistant Nathan Holmes on 22 March 2013. It begins around noon with Holmes writing: \"On my way to get him.\u201d To which Heard replies: \"Trying to wake him now.\u201d <br>Holmes replies: \"OK. Thank you.\u201d <br>We then fast forward around six hours, and Heard says she has had \"success\" and has got Depp up. <br>Ms. Wass asks what was happening in those six hours. <br>Heard says he was \"snorting cocaine and drinking whisky.\u201d She says they were talking about the relationship and Depp was jealous, believing she was having affairs with several people including her ex-wife, artist Tasya van Ree. <br>Heard says Depp wouldn't leave the subject alone. Heard describes Depp as being on \"a bender\" at this stage. She says she reached out to friends and her mother at the time. <br>There is another text exchange between Mr. Holmes and Heard in which Heard asks: \"Is he alright? Still upright?\u201d <br>Mr. Holmes answers: \"Yes, OK. He's still upright.\" <br>Heard says she asked this as Depp had been taking cocaine and drinking for around 36 hours, and at that point she wasn't used to \"his patterns,\u201d so was worried about his health. She says she wanted to check he was \"still alive.\u201d</p>\n<p>We look at a text exchange between Heard and her mother Paige Parsons who died in May of this year. Heard's text to her mum says: \"Dealing with Johnny's spiral. It's terrible mom. I don't know what to do\" and goes on to say \"He's nuts mom. Violent and crazy. I am heartbroken that THIS is who I love.\u201d Her mother says she should tell her father, David. <br>But Heard texts back to say \"I can't tell Dad.\u201d Heard says she trusted her mother, but didn't know whether her \"dad would react violently.\u201d Heard clarifies she means violently towards Depp. <br>A later text to her mother says: \"My heart is broken. I'm OK physically. JD didn't hit me or anything last\u00a0night. I told him that would be it if he did and it worked last night. But I'm scared by what I see and who I see now. It's Dr Jekyll and Mr. Hyde -- on a binge. He's not violent to me\" (talking about Depp). <br>Heard tells Ms. Wass she sent this text to her mother as she had sent pictures of her of her bruises pictures to her mother, but didn't want her father to react badly. <br>Heard also sent another text in which she says there was no physical abuse, writing: \"It's OK Mom. He's not being violent with me. He's just even raging in general.\u00a0And the crazy mood swings and binges are really difficult for me to handle.\" She tells Ms. Wass she knew about that first hand as: \"My father was like this to my mother growing up.\u201d Heard sounds emotional as she explains to Ms. Wass what she meant by a text she sent to her mother saying: \"I feel like I'm on a very fast train that's about to explode but I don't want to jump off and leave my love behind . So I stay on the train, even though I know it's about to explode.\"<br>She goes on to describe what she says are two distinct parts to Depp's personality. She says when he was sober, he was: \"Generous, loving, a remarkable man when he's like that... The other side of him is a monster. I always held out hope he would get clean and sober.\u201d <br>Heard again clarifies that in texts where she told her mother Depp didn't hit her, she was simply trying to stop her father from finding out about the alleged domestic violence. <br>Heard describes her father David to the court, saying: \"He's an addict and an alcoholic, and very violent, but I loved him very much.\u201d <br>In a text to her mother, referring to Depp, Heard says: \"He makes dad look like a saint when he falls off the wagon.\u201d <br>Heard says over this period Depp had stayed at her house for weeks. She says: \"I couldn't get a moments sleep, I was either defending myself or trying to keep him happy... I don't know how it got so violent so fast.\" <br>Heard says at one point, she was so exhausted she \"accidentally on purpose\" locked the dead-bolts to keep Depp out of her house, and says she had the best night's sleep she'd had in ages. She texted her mother to say she'd done this. <br>Heard's mother replies: \"Oh my baby, has he stayed this way since then?.\u201d Her mum then asks what Depp's bodyguards are doing about it all.</p>\n<p>We are now talking about Heard's sister Whitney\u00a0Henriquez. In Whitney's first statement, she says Heard told her Depp had \"defaced\" Tasya van Ree's painting, altering the signature to make it read \"Tasya van Pee.\u201d Ms. Laws is saying this is a \"detail to add into their [Heard and Whitney's] constructed account,\u201d and that Depp's act was actually a \"lighthearted joke\" between all-three, then used as evidence in a bid to show Depp in a bad light.<br>There is now some faff in court as everyone searches for a picture. Possibly of some flamingos. No one seeMs. quite sure. <br>Okay, there is a painting of some flamingos, but it's not the one we're talking about. <br>The court is looking at a picture, which is said to include some bags and squares (unfortunately I can't see it to be more specific), and which Heard says was damaged by Depp. Heard says after it was damaged, it was put in the garage. <br>Ms. Laws says talking about this painting has reminded her that \"Mr. Depp was not asked about this painting at all.\u201d She is not very happy about this, and says this topic has come up after Depp's stint in the witness box. Earlier this week Heard said Depp had damaged many paintings during their relationship, hence this slight confusion over exactly which art-work we're talking about.<br>Ms. Wass asks: \"Are any of these paintings the one that Mr. Depp asked you to remove from your bedroom.\u201d <br>Heard answers: \"Yes, it's the one there, that's now sitting in my garage.\u201d <br>The judge is asking for clarification as to which painting she means. <br>\"It's the one with flamingos, and it's always been that one,\u201d Heard answers. <br>Ms. Wass asks \"What damage, if any, was there to the painting?\" However, before Heard can answer there is some debate between Ms. Laws and Ms. Wass over whether this question is leading the witness. <br>The judge eventually rules Heard can answer. <br>Heard says: \"This is the painting he tried to burn. He tried to burn it when I objected to taking it down.\u201d Heard says the picture is damaged on the back from this attempted burning.</p>\n<p>Now we are moving on to the \"three-day hostage situation\" which is alleged to have taken place in March 2015. First, Ms. Wass asks Heard if she knew about texts between Depp and his assistant Mr. Holmes, dubbed the \"drug texts.\u201d These got Depp into hot water ahead of the trial, when the judge found he was in breach of court for not disclosing the texts to The Sun's lawyers. <br>Heard says she had not been previously aware of these texts.<br>We are looking at texts describing the alleged damage to the house the couple were renting in Australia at the time of the alleged incident. Alleged damage includes broken glass, graffiti on mirrors and broken surfaces. <br>Ms. Wass asks Heard if she was responsible for any of the damage. <br>Heard replies: \"I broke a bottle, that is all.\u201d<br>We now hear a quote from Depp's late head of security, Jerry Judge, in which he says an artwork in the house had been defaced and a penis had been drawn on to a painting of a woman. <br>Ms. Wass reads out the extract from Mr. Judge's statement: \"There are two pictures here standing, very sexy. One in a bikini, standing with her hands on her breasts. What he did was paint a fake d*ck on her p****.\u201d <br>Ms. Laws is objecting to this questioning, not just because it is rather ripe, but because she says the witness is being asked to describe not just what she saw, but also what others saw. <br>Ms. Wass says it shows the \"global destruction\" going on and the \"derangement of Mr. Depp's mind\" at the time, which she says Heard is being made out to have fabricated. <br>Ms. Wass re-frames the question, and we continue.</p>\n<p>Heard now describes the scene she says she was met with on entering the house: \"There was mashed potato and gravy smeared on the door outside. <br>\"There was\u00a0 bird in the house. It scared me to death when entered room. It must have flown in window. There was blood everywhere. I thought it was from my feet but it wasn't. I thought it was paint, a kind of brownish color, on the walls. It was dark brown at first, then lightened out to a milky brown colour.\" She says the writing which was \"all the way down the stairs and stairwell\" was letters, and she could make out some words written in English. She says there was \"blood on the walls, on lampshades and everywhere with written messages.\u201d <br>She continues: \"He had burned though cushions and lampshades... There was a couch flipped over. It appeared he had set fire to one of the cushions because the couch was burned around it.\" <br>Upstairs in the bedroom level Heard says: \"There was a broken window... My paints were out, it appears to be he had either thrown or dropped paint on the floor and on the wall. There was both paint and blood, I could see textures. <br>\"I found raw meat, at first I didn't know what it was on the floor. I continued to find it for the next day hidden in various places. <br>\"He had taken my nightgown and wrapped it around pieces of food. It was food I had got food out the night before, but not got round to\u00a0 making it. <br>\"I could see my own bloody footprints, and what appeared to be dripping blood. \"I made it downstairs and there was death metal blasting out. There was blood and glass everywhere, and the tiles floor was still wet. There were windows broken. There was so much glass I could barely find a path to walk. The ping pong table was broken and on the ground.\"<br>Ms. Wass asks if Heard threw a bottle and damaged Depp's finger. Heard says no. She says: \"It occurred about 24-hours into his binge, his rage.\u201d She says it was after \"he held me up against the fridge and said over and over again that he wished he had never met me and I'd ruined his life. he said I made him drink and I always did this.\" She goes on: \"He held a bottle up to my face and said he'd cut me. At some point I pushed him, and tried to push his arMs. away.\" <br>Heard tells the court Depp damaged his finger when he repeatedly punched the wall with a cream Bakelite phone, which she says smashed into many pieces. She says at the time she didn't realise that was when he cut his finger, but that is when she believes it happened. Heard describes Depp as being \"out of his mind\" at the time of the alleged incident.</p>\n<p>The court took a short break.<br>Ms. Wass has been reminded by the judge that she must finish her questioning by lunch time, as Heard's sister Whitney is due to enter the witness box this afternoon.</p>\n<p>Heard is standing in the witness box waiting to resume giving evidence. She has three bottles of water next to her and is putting some sanitizing gel on her hands.</p>\n<p>We are talking about an alleged domestic violence incident, when Heard says Depp pulled her by the hair and punched her in the face in March 2015. <br>At this time Heard's sister, Whitney, was also said to be there at the time. This was referred to in court yesterday as the \"staircase incident.\u201d <br>Depp was wearing a hard plaster cast on his hand at the time, following the incident in Australia. Heard later returned to Australia with Depp the following month, and to the same house, after the March 2015 incident. <br>Ms. Heard begins to answer: \"I lived in many houses, and I was assaulted many times.\" <br>Ms. Wass asks why she returned to the house in Australia. <br>Heard answers: \"I was used to that.\u201d</p>\n<p>We now look at a text from the late Jerry Judge on 26 April 2015. <br>This was five days after Heard and Depp's return to Australia (with their dogs Pistol and Boo).<br>\"Hi boss... It's lovely to see how you and Amber are so happy. Seeing you sitting on that bench together yesterday... You two need happiness.\u201d Heard says Depp wasn't drinking or taking drugs at the time.<br>We are talking about the couple's return to Australia to complete Depp's filming of Pirates Of The Caribbean. This was the occasion when the dogs were illegally \"smuggled\" into the country, creating a bio hazard threat. <br>However, at this point it seeMs. the judge has heard enough about the dogs, and says he has already listened to plenty of evidence on this.</p>\n<p>We move on to more specific questioning about the forMs. that were filled out ahead of the dogs entering the country. At the time, Heard pleaded guilty to illegally bringing them into the country, despite saying she was not responsible for filling out the forMs. and had believed the dogs had had the correct shots to travel.</p>\n<p>We will now see a transcript of a recording, which Ms. Wass says was captured on 26 September 2015. The couple had a practice of recording arguments early on in their relationship, in an attempt to learn from them and come to a constructive conclusion. Later in the relationship covert recordings of arguments were also captured. Both types of recording are being heard as evidence in the case. The recording took place after the couple's honeymoon trip to South East Asia, which was in July 2015. In the conversation, Depp talks about their honeymoon, saying it was good apart from one argument in San Francisco. <br>He also talks about their arguments and says: \"There can be no physical violence towards each other.\u201d He says when they fall out, they need to physically separate from each other in order to cool off and avoid conflict. He goes on to say otherwise we will \"f***ing kill each other, or worse you know, f***ing break up.\u201d <br>Depp's lawyer, Ms. Laws, is again saying there is an issue here - that these questions have not been put to Depp so \"there is no evidential basis\" for the questions to Heard. The judge upholds this, and we move on.</p>\n<p>We return to the days leading up to Heard's appearance on the James Corden Late Late show on 16 December 2015. <br>Ms. Wass is reminding us Heard has been accused of making the injuries up, and also of photo shopping images. <br>Heard says she did not. She also says she put no make-up on to make injuries appear worse, adding \"I put make up on only to try to hide them [the injuries].\u201d <br>There were also images of a broken bed in penthouse 4 supplied. Heard says yes, and she did not damage the bed. <br>Images of clumps of hair were also pictured on the floor. <br>Head says she did not pull out her own hair, and nor did she ask anyone else to pull out her hair. <br>During the fight on 12 December, Heard also alleges that Depp headbutted her. <br>We are talking about a recording of an argument between Depp and Heard that was taken around July 2016, which mentions a headbutt. In it you can hear Depp saying: \"I headbutted you... in the forehead. That doesn't break a nose.\u201d <br>Ms. Wass asks Heard at what point she realised there was a recording in which Depp mentioned a headbutt, but the judge tells her to move on.</p>\n<p>We move on to a visit from\u00a0nurse,\u00a0Erin\u00a0Boerum to Heard on\u00a017 December 2015.</p>\n<p>Heard says: \"She was just dropping off meds, and she was late.\u201d</p>\n<p>We move on to Heard and Depp travelling to the Bahamas with his children in 2014. However, now again, Ms. Laws interrupts and we move on.</p>\n<p>We watch a video, showing the inside of the house in the Bahamas. The person filming the video is walking towards a beaded curtain on a doorway, and the bathroom is apparently through the curtain and to the left. <br>Heard has alleged she was abused inside the closet, and from the inside of the bathroom, inside the door. <br>The video goes on to show the closet, and a bed, and pan around the room. We can hear no more on this subject, as we are now veering towards parts of the hearing that need to be held in private. <br>Parts of Heard's evidence, relating to allegations of sexual violence, have been heard in private, with the media excluded from the proceedings.</p>\n<p>We move on to just after Heard's 30th birthday, and a photo that was taken on 23 April 2016. Heard says it was taken at the Coachella Festival. Heard names her friends in the picture left to right: Romi Serafy, herself, Whitney, Melanie Inglessis,\u00a0iO Tillet Wright, and\u00a0Savannah McMillan. <br>She nearly forgets her final friend's name, and laughs as she stumbles to find the name. <br>Ms. Wass puts it to Heard that she has been accused of \"painting on injuries\" that can be seen in photos now being shown to the court. This was alleged to be from photos taken during the last big alleged argument between Depp and Heard on 21 May 2016. The photo metadata shows it was taken at 8.23pm before the police arrived later that evening. <br>Heard says she neither put on make up to enhance nor create the appearance of injures, and says she also didn't want to talk to the police. <br>Ms. Wass says it was also suggested to Heard that her and her friends - including neighbor Rocky Pennington - trashed the penthouse and said it was Depp who had done it in order to frame him. <br>Heard says no, this is not the case.</p>\n<p>We are now watching CCTV video taken in the LA penthouse apartment block, taken on 22 May 2016. It shows Heard entering the lift, while texting on her phone. She then gets out of the lift. <br>Heard returns to the lift a few minutes later holding packages. Heard says she then went to her car. She says her first engagement that day was going to her friend Rocky's beach house.<br>We are looking at a photo taken at 13.58 on the same day. The picture shows Heard on the left of the photo, and Ms. Wass asks her if she was wearing make-up on that occasion. <br>\"Yes, I was [wearing make-up]. Absolutely.\u201d <br>Ms. Wass asks: \"Do you ever go out of the house without make-up.\u201d <br>Heard laughs, and says: \"No, I live in LA.\u201d <br>The judge asks for clarification on why this is.<br>Heard answers: \"I'm recognizable, or a celebrity or whatever you want to call it. So I never go out of the house without make up in case I'm photographed.\u201d<br>After going to the beach house, Heard says \"I went to my friend Amanda's birthday party.\u201d She clarifies that this is the British presenter Amanda de Cadenet.<br>Ms. Wass reads out a text from de Cadenet which advises Heard to \"put arnica on it.\u201d <br>Heard explains that arnica is a homeopathic remedy which is said to alleviate bruises and swelling. <br>The judge isn't keen for us to dwell on this topic, so we move on.</p>\n<p>We move on to details around 21 April and 21 May incidents (around Heard's birthday and the alleged final argument in LA, when a phone was said to have been thrown by Depp at Heard). <br>We are discussing Heard meeting with Depp near the end of their relationship.<br>Heard says the understanding was that Depp's security and others would always be \"in shouting distance\" of the couple. Heard says she didn't trust Depp's staff to step in and help her, so she always wanted others to be nearby too. <br>Ms. Wass is keen to know exactly how Heard felt about meeting with Depp, but the judge says no, this is a leading question.<br>We talk about the details of the domestic abuse becoming public knowledge.<br>Heard says \"I didn't want to talk about everything that happened in our marriage or relationship. I didn't want the world or his kids to know who he was, and what he could do.\"<br>Earlier this week Heard told Depp's lawyer: \"I was trying to save him the embarrassment and this, quite frankly.\u201d<br>Heard now clarifies, and says she was talking about the current court case when she said \"and this,\u201d adding \"I meant no offence to these proceedings.\u201d<br>Ms. Wass asks if her career has benefited from the case.<br>Heard answers: \"What women has ever benefited from being the victim of domestic violence?\"<br>Ms. Wass asks if she has benefited financially.<br>Heard says: \"No. I entered into he marriage without a\u00a0 pre or post-nuptial agreement in a no-fault state. I was entitled to 50% .\" <br>Ms. Wass's final question is: \"Have you told the truth to this court?\" <br>Heard answers: \"Absolutely.\u201d</p>\n<p>And with that, Heard has finished giving evidence. She steps down from the witness box. <br>The judge reminds her not to talk to any other witnesses during the case. <br>Heard's sister, Whitney, is due to enter the witness box this afternoon.</p>\n<p>I\u2019m not going to give a blow-by-blow accounting of Whitney\u2019s testimony like I did with Amber\u2019s. I think it\u2019s safe to say that she\u2019ll back her sister up on everything. It would be a real shocker if she didn\u2019t.</p>\n<p>I\u2019m actually going to call it here. I\u2019ll post the link to the transcript when it becomes available, but quite honestly, I can\u2019t sit here and listen to this nonsense. Whitney\u2019s lying her ass off for her sister, in even more ridiculous ways than I thought she would. Claiming that all the drugs were hers, for example.</p>\n<p>Maybe I\u2019m just in a mood today, but it triggers me that a mother would rather spend more than a month (two?) taking part in this fiasco rather than being home with her baby son.</p>\n<p>So, I\u2019m off for the day.</p>\n<p>More tomorrow.</p>", "photo": {"id": "224329221", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/8/ye/bt/OwYEBTqoipYxMhz-800x450-noPad.jpg?1595514902", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "27352842", "createdAt": "2020-07-22T15:45:02.000Z", "title": "Amber Heard on the stand, take 3", "description": "<p>Amber Heard showed up for court wearing a tan blouse and rather tattered looking black sweater jacket, with her hair still up in her Heidi braid on top of her head.</p>\n<p>Eleanor Laws QC, representing Johnny Depp, is asking Heard about what happened in Australia in March 2015 - an incident the actress has previously described as a \"three-day hostage situation.\u201d <br>Ms.. Laws is asking if Depp was trying to get away from Heard. <br>The actress disagrees. <br>The QC asks if Heard was in a rage - again, she disagrees. <br>Heard is now being asked if she threw a bottle at Depp - again, she disagrees. <br>Ms.. Laws puts it to her that she would throw things at Depp during fights, to which Heard replies. \"I only threw things to escape Johnny when he was beating me up. Sometimes that's all I had.\"<br>Ms.. Laws is saying Heard threw a bottle \"forcefully\" at Depp in Australia. <br>Heard says no, that it was Depp who was throwing bottles. <br>Heard says at one point, Depp offered her a bottle. She says she reached to take it and the actor pulled it back, that he was \"taunting me to take it.\u201d <br>She continues: \"He did it again.\"</p>\n<p>Heard says she was thinking about previous occasions when Depp had told her she had \"saved his life\" by helping him stop drinking. She says at that point she smashed the bottle on the floor. <br>She says she regrets doing this.</p>\n<p>Depp then started throwing bottles \"one after the other, right in my direction\", she says. \"I felt glass breaking behind me. I retreated more... he didn't stop. \"I was too scared to look behind me.\" <br>The judge asks her to clarify if Depp threw several bottles. The actress says he threw all the bottles there apart from one. <br>\"When he was clean and sober he would tell me I saved his life,\" Heard is telling the court. \"When he was clean and sober he was wonderful, that part of him I loved so much.\" Everyone around him wanted him \"to be well\" and for him to \"get help\", she says.</p>\n<p>Heard is being asked to look at a file now, containing a photograph. <br>The actress says: \"I would be shocked if Johnny remembers any of this hiMs..elf. \" <br>Ms.. Laws interrupts, saying she wants to know about an injury to Depp - we have heard a lot already about how he wounded his finger in Australia. <br>The question Ms.. Laws wants an answer to is that it was \"inconceivable\" that Depp injured hiMs..elf smashing a phone against a wall, the judge tells Heard. <br>The actress disagrees. <br>Depp has accused Heard of throwing a bottle at him, causing the injury. She denies this. <br>She is now being asked about a cigarette burn on Depp's cheek, shown in a photograph. \"Johnny did that,\" Heard says. \"He often did things like that.\" <br>Heard denies that it was she who was being violent. <br>Heard is now being asked if it is true that at one stage she was screaming at Depp not to leave and then calling him a \"coward.\u201d <br>She says this is not true.</p>\n<p>Ms.. Laws is now asking about Heard's evidence yesterday, moving on from the Australia incident. <br>The court is being played some audio. We can hear a woman's voice but it's pretty quiet (remember, we are in a different courtroom to where the trial is taking place, watching on screen). <br>Now a man's voice. Ms.. Laws says this is a conversation between Heard and Depp.<br>\"Sometimes I lose my cool when I get angry,\" Heard says in court, when asked by Ms.. Laws.</p>\n<p>Ms.. Laws is now moving on to a different Australia incident, when Heard and Depp infamously took their dogs, Yorkshire Terriers Pistol and Boo, into the country. <br>\"It was made quite clear to you... that you couldn't take the dogs into Australia,\" Ms.. Laws is saying to Heard. The actress says she received mixed messages. <br>The court has previously heard evidence from Kevin Murphy, who worked for Depp for almost eight years - he alleged Heard \"demanded\" he make a false statement about the animals being \"smuggled\" into the country. <br>He also claimed Ms.. Heard asked him to contact her former assistant, Kate James, and ask her to \"lie under oath\" to an Australian court about the incident. <br>Mr. Murphy said the actress was \"repeatedly\" told it would be illegal for her to take her two dogs with her to the country. <br>In October 2015, Heard faced criminal proceedings in Australia over the incident. In 2016 she and Depp recorded a now infamous video in 2016 apologizing for doing so.<br>Ms.. Laws is now reading out an email from Mr. Murphy, in which it seeMs.. he is making it clear that the dogs would not be able to travel at the time they wanted to go due to restrictions. <br>Heard says the process went on for a while and was confusing. <br>Speaking about Depp, she says she was travelling on \"his plane\" for \"his movie\" and she thought it had been \"taken care of.\u201d <br>Ms.. Laws said it was laid out in \"black and white\" and that Heard took the decision. <br>\"Johnny's the boss,\" Heard says. She says he called the shots. <br>\"You got caught,\" Ms.. Laws says. Heard says they both flew in, yet she was the one who got into trouble. She said anything against Depp would have \"compromised Pirates [of the Caribbean]\", which the actor was filming in the country. <br>Heard tells the court: \"I took the blame.\"</p>\n<p>The judge wants to ask Heard about the charge she faced. Was it for bringing a dog into Australia although she had said \"in some form or other\" that she wasn't bringing a dog into the country? <br>Heard says both she and Depp filled out forMs.. but that because filming of Pirates Of The Caribbean had already been compromised by the earlier incident in Australia (when Depp wounded his finger), she took the blame. <br>Ms.. Laws tells Heard knew she was taking the dogs in without the proper paperwork. <br>Heard says no, she thought they did have the correct paperwork. <br>Ms.. Laws is suggesting that Heard was trying to find someone to take the blame for her. <br>She says no and that she had already pleaded guilty. <br>Ms.. Laws is saying that Heard wanted her former assistant Kate James to lie in a statement about the dogs. <br>Heard says this is incorrect. The actress says she only wanted to show that they had tried to follow protocol.</p>\n<p>There is a lot of back and forth about the dogs now. Heard is taking a sip from her water bottle. <br>\"Trying to get around official rules is something you've done before,\" Ms.. Laws says. Heard says she doesn't know what the QC means. <br>She says Depp thought things were \"easy\" to take care of in \"his world.\u201d <br>She says she was not in a relationship in which she had \"a lot of choice.\u201d <br>Ms.. Laws puts it to Heard that she blames Depp for things she is accused of. She says this is not the case.</p>\n<p>We are now moving on to a different alleged incident, during the couple's honeymoon in July 2015 on a train in southeast Asia. <br>Heard is being shown a photograph in which Depp is apparently injured (we cannot see the photographs they are shown in court). <br>Ms.. Laws says Heard has turned the incident around. The actress denies this. \"He strangled me,\" she tells the court.</p>\n<p>Ms.. Laws is now directing Heard to her own account of what took place in a different alleged incident - we have moved on quickly - during which she claiMs.. Depp headbutted her at their penthouse apartment in LA. <br>The QC is reading out the actress's allegations, in which she claiMs.. he punched her and dragged her. <br>Ms.. Laws says this is a \"complete set of lies\"; Heard quietly says no. <br>The actress asks for a break \"whenever is convenient.\u201d <br>Ms.. Laws says she wants to finish her point and then we can have a break. <br>Ms.. Laws is talking about nurse Erin Boerum's account of the incident. <br>\"You didn't have any bruising at all when you saw Erin Boerum, did you?\" Ms.. Laws says. <br>Heard says she had two black eyes, a broken nose, a \"broken lip\", bruised ribs, \"bruises all over my body.\u201d <br>She says the \"really bad [bruises]\" were on her scalp. There were chunks of hair missing, she says, and it sounds like she is getting upset. <br>Ms.. Laws says this is \"nonsense.\u201d Heard disagrees. <br>The QC asks if she bit her own lip. \"Of course not,\" Heard replies.</p>\n<p>After a 10 minute break, Amber Heard gets back in the witness box. She is being directed to a new file by Eleanor Laws QC, representing Depp. <br>Heard is looking at a photo of her alleged injuries and is being asked if she \"played around\" with the images. <br>\"I don't know how to,\" Heard replies.<br>This is from December 2015; the next day the actress recorded for James Corden's show. <br>Ms.. Laws is being asked if this is what she looked like on the show - as in, did she look like she does in the photo.<br>Heard says she had her hair and make-up done at home. <br>Ms.. Laws has asked about stylist Samantha McMillen, who saw Heard on that day.<br>Heard says Ms.. McMillen saw her while her make-up was being done. <br>Ms.. McMillen is Depp's stylist, Heard says, but also worked as her stylist while they were a couple. She says it is not true that Ms.. McMillen saw her without make-up on. <br>Ms.. McMillen, who has already given evidence in court, says she saw \"no visible\" injuries the day after Heard claiMs.. Depp was violent. <br>The stylist says she spent \"much of the afternoon and early evening\" with Heard on 16 December 2015, as the star prepared to appear on James Corden's The Late Late Show, and she could \"see clearly\" that Heard had no marks, cuts or bruises. <br>Heard is being asked to look at a picture of Depp and says she can see no mark. <br>She denies injuring him, saying: \"I don't know how I could have.\" <br>Heard is now being directed to another photograph, which Ms.. Laws says is of hair Heard alleges was pulled out. <br>Ms.. Laws is suggesting this has been set up, that her hair would have come out at the root. <br>Heard is asked why she took a photo of her scalp if her hair did not break at the root. The actress says her scalp was bleeding. <br>She says this photograph shows just one of many clumps of hair that were pulled out.</p>\n<p>We are now being shown a short clip of Heard on Corden's show. <br>The actress confirMs.. it is her. <br>She has bright red lipstick on and is wearing a cream blouse and black tie. <br>\"That's what you looked like on the show,\" Ms.. Laws says, and says there is no injury. Heard says she had \"tons of injuries.\u201d <br>Ms.. Laws is now talking about a still taken from footage from the show. She says the actress does not have a split lip. <br>The actress says the reason she wore the red lipstick and make-up is to \"cover\" injuries.</p>\n<p>We are now going back to Heard's first allegation of violence against Depp, in early 2013. <br>The couple had moved in together the previous year.<br>In her witness statement, Heard says: \"We were talking about one of his tattoos, which he had had altered from Winona (his ex-partner) to say 'Wino'. I laughed at something he said but he must not have meant it as a joke and he hit me with an open hand across my cheek.\" <br>Later in her statement, she says: \"It felt like my eye popped out.\"<br>Ms.. Laws asks if Heard is making this up. Heard says she does not agree.</p>\n<p><br>Ms.. Laws has moved on again, to an alleged incident in the Bahamas in August 2014. The QC reads from Heard's statement again, in which the actress alleges that Depp grabbed her hair and slapped her. <br>\"He was in such a rage that he smashed a door so hard that it splintered,\" she says in her statement.<br>Ms.. Laws is directing Heard to a photograph, and says \"this is not a door from the Bahamas, is it?\" <br>Heard admits it is not but that it was a different door he kicked. <br>Ms.. Laws says Amber has submitted evidence in a \"cavalier\" way. Heard says it was an error. <br>We are now watching a very short clip, with no sound, of the inside of the property in the Bahamas. Heard confirMs.. that it is.</p>\n<p>Moving on again, to a trip to Tokyo in January 2015, the month before the couple got married. <br>Heard tells the court she attended a premiere there about two days after Depp was allegedly violent. She says she remembers wearing a backless dress to the event \"very well.\u201d She tells the court her injuries were \"not visible.\u201d</p>\n<p>And now to Thanksgiving, November 2015 - we're moving between allegations quite speedily now. <br>In Heard's statement, she says: \"We were in our place in LA. Johnny was using a lot of drugs at the time, especially cocaine and weed, which he was pretty much constantly smoking. \"We got into a fight on Thanksgiving, where Johnny ripped my shirt and threw me across the room. He threw a wine glass and a heavy glass decanter at me, which thankfully both missed me. Once when he pushed me, I fell over the back of a lounge chair and hit my head against the apartment\u2019s exposed brick wall. I noticed later that I had got a lump on the back of my head and a busted lip from this.\" <br>Ms.. Laws asks if this is all true. \"Yes, it is,\" Heard replies.</p>\n<p>Ms.. Laws has directed Heard to a file and the court is going to be shown a video clip. The footage is very dark; the actress says she can barely see it (neither can we) when asked to confirm where the footage was recorded. <br>She says it looks like one of Depp's penthouses in LA but \"cannot tell\" which one. <br>There are a few people in the clip, including a man flicking a scarf - Heard confirMs.. this is her father, David. Jack, Depp's son, is also there, Heard says. \u201cI believe I hear Marilyn Manson's voice,\" Heard says. <br>Ms.. Laws says everyone is \"joking around\" in the video, and it does sound like people are laughing.<br>Heard is being directed to a photograph; Ms.. Laws asks if it was taken after she received a \"split lip.\u201d <br>The actress says the alleged injury happened after the photo was taken, and that fights with Depp happened after other people had \"gone home\" or \"gone to bed.\u201d <br>Ms.. Laws asks about Heard's friend, Raquel 'Rocky' Pennington, who the actress says she cannot identify in the video (as it's so dark) but confirMs.. she was there.<br>Ms.. Laws is reading from Ms.. Pennington's account. <br>Rocky says that at one point Heard went upstairs to find Depp and they were gone for some period. Ms.. Pennington says Heard told her Depp had thrown a bottle of wine at her, the court hears.<br>Ms.. Laws puts it to Heard that this means the fight took place while others were there - contradicting what she has previously said. <br>Heard says this was just the first \"part\" of the argument.<br>The judge is saying he would find it helpful to have a plan of Depp's penthouses to get more of a sense of where alleged incidents took place - the court is hearing about penthouse five and penthouse three. <br>Erin Boerum, a nurse who treated both Ms.. Heard and Johnny Depp during their relationship, was there on the night of the alleged incident. <br>Heard says she was downstairs during \"part\" of the incident but not later on. <br>\"It got much worse later,\" Heard tells the court. <br>Ms.. Laws says this is a \"lie.\" <br>Heard replies: \"No, Ma'am.\"<br>We are waiting to see a video clip, I think it is, but it appears there are some technical difficulties. <br>Ms.. Laws says she is going to move on.</p>\n<p>This part of Heard\u2019s testimony is given in private, with the media and public briefly excluded from the proceedings.</p>\n<p>On the heels of Heard\u2019s private testimony, the court adjourns for lunch.</p>\n<p>Back in court after lunch, there has been some discussion about the trial timetable as Eleanor Laws QC, representing Depp, has not finished cross-examining Heard. <br>However, the judge has decided we will hear from Joshua Drew, via video-link from LA, first, and he is now giving his affirmation. At the moment, we can hear him but can't see him on the screen in the media room. <br>Mr. Drew is the ex-fiance of\u00a0Raquel \"Rocky\" Pennington, Heard's friend, and he is being asked about the night of 21 April 2016 - Amber Heard's 30th birthday party.</p>\n<p>Mr. Drew agrees with Ms. Laws that Depp was \"coherent\" and \"friendly.\u201d He says his perception was that Depp was \"slightly inebriated.\u201d Mr. Drew's perception was that it was a \"fun\" evening, he says. <br>Ms. Laws is asking Mr. Drew if a lot of the information he had about Depp and Heard's relationship came from Ms. Pennington. <br>Mr. Drew says this is correct and confirMs. he never saw the actor hitting Heard. He says he saw rows between them \"on rare occasions.\u201d <br>(We can see Mr. Drew on the screen now, by the way. He has a beard and glasses and is wearing a grey jacket and a blue shirt.<br>Ms. Laws asks Mr. Drew if he ever saw Heard drink to \"excess\" or taking drugs. He says yes to the drinking and that he has seen Heard take drugs, including mushrooMs., on rare occasions. <br>Ms. Laws is directing Mr. Drew to a deposition he has given.<br>Ms. Laws is now moving on to 21 May 2016, the final alleged incident of violence before Depp and Heard's break-up. <br>Ms.. Laws says Mr. Drew and Ms. Pennington got involved in supporting Heard and lying afterwards. <br>He does not agree. <br>Asked if he saw an assault, he says: \"I did not, as I have stated repeatedly.\" <br>Asked if Heard had an injury, he says she did. <br>Ms. Laws says she has no further questions.<br>Sasha Wass, representing NGN, wants to clarify on Heard's drug use. <br>Mr. Drew confirMs. he has never seen the actress take cocaine. <br>Ms. Wass is saying to Mr. Drew that it's being suggested that Heard was not injured when he saw her following the alleged incident in LA in May 2016. <br>Ms. Wass is directing him to a photograph of Heard, which he confirMs. he can see. <br>She then directs him to metadata attached to the photograph, but the judge cuts this short. <br>Asked by Ms. Wass, Mr. Drew says he was present when photos were taken and when police arrived at the property. <br>He says he was present when photographs of damage in the property was taken. <br>Mr. Drew is being asked to describe a print-out of a photograph but he says he cannot see it as it's too dark.<br>He is being directed to another, but he says this is just as dark. <br>Ms. Wass asks if photos can be shown on screen instead. This might take a second or two.</p>\n<p>This picture shows Amber Heard and Johnny Depp with staff from the Eastern Oriental, the luxury sleeper train they took in Malaysia on their honeymoon in August 2015.\u00a0<br><a href=\"https://storify.com/services/proxy/2/5G5tLYWq8v9a0FIkrEdSbw/https/media.fyre.co/vrUoqxFZS2SiKeGQ8m9e_2.54688258.jpg\" rel=\"nofollow\">https://storify.com/services/proxy/2/5G5tLYWq8v9a0FIkrEdSbw/https/media.fyre.co/vrUoqxFZS2SiKeGQ8m9e_2.54688258.jpg</a> <br>Heard said in her written statement they got into an argument on the train and Depp\u00a0pushed her up against the wall of their cabin and tore her shirt, exposing her breast as he screamed, hit her face and choked her before he let go.</p>\n<p><br>The judge is reminding the court of the time pressures and says there has been a technical difficulty so Ms. Wass is going to continue her questioning. <br>Wass asks Mr. Drew if he can remember what damage there was to the property (we are talking about Depp's LA penthouses - Mr. Drew and Ms. Pennington lived in one at the time). <br>\"In the hallway... there was a pretty substantial pool of red wine, there was a dent in the door of the penthouse that Raquel and I occupied,\" he says. This was penthouse one. <br>\u201cIn penthouse three there was broken glass\", he says. \u201cIn penthouse five there was a variety of things that had been thrown about.\u201d He says there was glass from a broken picture frame on the floor and piles of books that had been \"shoved around.\u201d <br>Ms. Wass asks if Mr. Drew took photographs and he says he believes he did. <br>Did he see how the damage was caused? <br>\u201cNo,\u201d he says. He also says he did not cause the damage. <br>Ms. Wass asks what he recalls about his interaction with the police. <br>Mr. Drew says his initial recollection is not completely clear \"after all these years\" but he says he greeted the officers and \"walked them through the damage myself.\u201d<br>The witness says he took them back to penthouse three, where Heard was, and the female officer said she wanted to speak to the actress privately. <br>The witness says he stayed outside with the male officer and asked \"what we could do.\u201d</p>\n<p>Mr. Drew has now finished giving evidence and again, there is some legal argument about the time being taken. Ms. Laws isn't happy.</p>\n<p>While we are having a short break, back to the couple's honeymoon, which was discussed earlier. <br>This picture shows Amber Heard and Johnny Depp with staff from the Eastern and Oriental Express, the luxury sleeper train they took in Malaysia on their honeymoon in August 2015.\u00a0<br>Heard said in her written statement they got into an argument on the train and Depp\u00a0pushed her up against the wall of their cabin and tore her shirt, exposing her breast as he screamed, hit her face and choked her before he let go. She might have gotten away with this testimony except that in photos, her neck is free of injuries, pale and perfect. She debunks herself. Depp, on the other hand, sports injuries that she inflicted upon him, unless she\u2019s willing to say that he does it hiMs.elf.</p>\n<p>After a very short break, Melanie Inglessis is being sworn in now via video-link.</p>\n<p>In 2015, she was a professional make-up artist, she tells the court.<br>She says she first did Heard's make-up in 2015 and continued to do so for the next few years. She says she has met Johnny Depp and seen him about \"five or six times.\u201d She says interactions with Depp were \"lovely.\u201d<br>Asked if she spoke to Heard about her relationship, she says they had \"many\" conversations \"about her relationship with Johnny.\u201d</p>\n<p>Our source has decided to cut out the xe by Ms. Laws and go straight to the redirect by Ms.. Wass. But fear not, the full transcripts will be posted later by the ever-reliable Nick Wallis. You can read the whole thing, then. I know I will.</p>\n<p><br>Ms. Inglessis is being asked by Ms. Wass about the restraining order filed by Heard after her break-up with Depp. <br>The witness says it was not out of the blue to her. <br>Ms. Wass asks about 15 December 2015, the day before Heard recorded James Corden's show. \"Can you tell us what you saw of Amber's face on that day?\" <br>Ms. Inglessis says she was supposed to go bowling with Heard and she never showed up. She says Heard sent a text later on saying she had had a fight with Depp; Ms. Inglessis says she went to their penthouse and saw broken glass on the floor and damage to the bed upstairs, as well as writing on the kitchen worktop. <br>Ms. Wass asks about Heard's condition. Ms. Inglessis says she was \"erratic\", \"upset\" and there was \"a lot of emotion.\u201d <br>The witness says Heard told her she and Depp had had a fight and that the actor had tried to suffocate her with a pillow and dragged her by her hair. <br>Ms. Inglessis tells the court she had to do Heard's make-up the following day, for Corden's show. The witness says Heard had \"discoloration\" near her eyes, that her left eye was a little more bruised than the right eye. The bridge of Heard's nose was red and swollen, she says, and Heard had a cut or scab on her lip. <br>Ms. Wass asks what they talked about while Ms. Inglessis was doing Heard's make-up. <br>She says they talked about the incident the night before, that the actress told her how her alleged injuries happened. <br>The witness says she applied a full face of make-up and that although it was not uncommon for Heard to wear full red lipstick, she remembers that the discussion that day was that she had no other choice because she needed to cover an injury on her lip. <br>Ms. Wass asks how effective concealer is; Ms. Inglessis says it is \"very effective\" on bruises and that they were no longer visible once her make-up had been applied. <br>Heard said 15 December 2015 was one of the worst\u00a0\"one of the worst and most violent nights\" of their relationship, with Depp throwing a decanter at her, slapping her and dragging her by her hair around their penthouse before headbutting her and saying he would kill her. <br>The next day she was due on The Late Show with James Corden, which Joshua Drew, the then partner of her friend Raquel \"Rocky\" Pennington, said Heard told them she could not drop out of.</p>\n<p>After a few questions from Ms. Laws, Ms. Inglessis says she is not lying about what she saw. She tells the court she did not want to give evidence in the case. <br>The judge has now thanked her and we will be moving back to Heard again shortly.</p>\n<p>Heard is now back in the witness box and Eleanor Laws QC, representing Depp, is questioning her. She wants to move on to a short point about Heard's restraining order against the actor, she says, after their break-up in 2016. <br>Ms. Laws says Heard was \"not limited\" to what she could or couldn't say. <br>Heard says no, she was told by her attorney to \"keep it brief\" and had no personal knowledge of how she should proceed. <br>There was no need for Heard to attend the courthouse for an appearance about it, Ms. Laws says. \"No, I don't think so,\" Heard says. <br>Ms. Laws says this is a lie. <br>Heard says this is not true, that her attorney told her she had to \"show up.\u201d</p>\n<p>We are now returning to Thanksgiving 2015, and a video that could not be played earlier. It is a longer clip and we can hear people laughing in it. <br>Ms. Heard confirMs. this was filmed in penthouse five and she can see her friend Raquel \"Rocky\" Pennington, herself, Depp, her father, Depp's son Jack and a woman with dark hair. Heard says this looks like a friend of Depp's named Pat. <br>\"This is a happy family event, isn't it?\" Ms. Laws says. <br>\"Yes, it is,\" Heard replies. However, she says it is \"untrue\" that there was no violence on that night. She says the two things are \"unrelated.\u201d <br>Ms. Laws says the video was timestamped after midnight. Before this, they had had a \"brief altercation\", Heard says, but \"relative to other things it was pretty minor.\u201d<br>The court is being shown once again the other video from Thanksgiving, which we have seen already. <br>Ms. Laws asks Heard about \"the other side\" of Depp, \"the monster,\" that she has described previously - is this a lie? <br>Heard says no. <br>The words \"savage\" and \"monster\" can be heard being said by Marilyn Manson in the video - the court previously heard he was there on that evening - which Heard agrees sound like a joke in the clip. <br>Asked if these words were used as a joke between them, Heard says this was \"Johnny and his friends.\u201d</p>\n<p>Ms. Laws is now moving on to an alleged incident in the Bahamas in December 2015. <br>She reads from the witness statement of Depp's estate manager, Tara Roberts, who said in her witness statement that Heard was \"repeatedly berating\" the actor \"with increasing ferocity.\u201d Ms. Roberts continued: \"She was insulting him, calling him names, and in the middle of this onslaught I heard her say specifically 'your career is over', 'no one is going to hire you', 'you\u2019re washed up', 'fat', \u201cyou will die a lonely man'.\" <br>Ms. Heard says these words were said, but actually by Depp, not her.<br>Seriously?<br>That is it for Ms. Laws's cross-examination of the actress. <br>Sasha Wass, for NGN, is going to ask Heard some questions now. <br>Ms. Wass is asking about substance abuse. Heard tells the court she has never had treatment for drug or alcohol abuse of any kind.<br>She admits she did throw a can as she was \"running away\" from the actor.</p>\n<p>Ms. Laws accused Heard of \"concocting\" her accusations of violence. \"Mr. Depp has never assaulted you, it has always been you that starts the fight and the rows.\" <br>The judge asks for those parts to be answered separately. <br>Heard says that it is \"untrue\" that Depp never assaulted her and \"untrue\" that she always instigated fights.</p>\n<p>Heard admits she has used cocaine a few times. Asked about alcohol, she says she has never had a problem but chose to stop drinking spirits and most other alcohol when she was 19 due to her background - she has previously said her parents are alcoholics. <br>She says she drinks red wine occasionally.<br>Ms. Wass is asking if Heard has taken cocaine since she was a teenager. <br>\"One time I did, many years after the divorce,\" Heard says. The judge says we can move on. <br>Heard says she never took cocaine while she was with Depp and never encouraged him to take the drug either. <br>Ms. Wass asks if Heard has ever self-harmed; the actress says she never has: \"I have never cut myself, ever.\"<br>Ms. Wass asks Heard about previous evidence she has given claiming Depp has self-harmed. <br>\"His body's full of... scars... I saw him do it to hiMs.elf,\" Heard says.<br>The court is hearing about a mark on Depp's cheek, which Heard says was inflicted by Depp.<br>Ms. Wass asks about Heard's claim that the actor put out a cigarette out on his face. <br>\"It was deliberate,\" Heard says. The actress says Depp was saying he didn't feel it as he was already in so much pain. <br>She says Depp had taken cocaine and other drugs at this point.</p>\n<p>Ms. Wass is directing Heard to look in a file now (we can see quite a lot of big files behind the actress in the witness box). <br>She wants to ask about the actress's relationship with Tasya van Ree, who she was with when she met Depp. <br>Ms. Wass is reading an email from Ms. van Ree which says that Heard was \"wrongfully accused\" of an incident in 2009, which we have heard about previously. <br>\"Was there any truth in the suggestion that you assaulted or beat Ms. van Ree ever?\" Ms. Wass asks. <br>\"Absolutely not,\" Heard says, and adds that they had a \"beautiful\" and \"peaceful\" relationship and good friendship after they broke up. <br>The judge says the answer is \"no.\u201d <br>Ms. Wass is asking about Heard's friend and former assistant Savannah McMillan. <br>The actress has previously answered questions on her from Ms. Laws, about her pay and her title. <br>Ms. Wass is asking about times when Heard travelled abroad and Ms. McMilan was with her - did she work for Heard or someone else? <br>Heard gives specific filMs. she worked on and says production companies paid Ms. McMillan. <br>The court has previously heard how Heard send a letter to Homeland Security officials in the US in 2014, about Ms. McMillan, who is British, to indicate that she was not working \"illegally\" in the US. <br>Heard tells the court the letter was composed by Ms. McMillan but she signed it. <br>Heard tells the court that when flying into the US, Ms. McMillan was detained for several hours, which is when she first learned that there might be a problem.</p>\n<p>That\u2019s it for today. There will be a full transcript up a bit later, and I\u2019ll edit this update to include it, if I can. I can\u2019t say that I look forward to reading all of this again with the omitted parts in place, but I\u2019ll do it. Johnny deserves that justice.</p>\n<p>Suffice it to say that I\u2019m blown away by Heard\u2019s allegation that Johnny did all that crap to himself in Australia. Cut his own finger off? Burned his own face with a cigarette? It boggles the mind, on top of all the other spinning, manipulation and outright lying that took place today.</p>\n<p>More tomorrow!</p>", "photo": {"id": "224322954", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/7/zj/bg/AzZJbGjYpawhUOo-800x450-noPad.jpg?1595432706", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "27343904", "createdAt": "2020-07-21T15:54:06.000Z", "title": "Amber in the hot seat, day 2", "description": "<p>Amber showed up wearing a cream colored blouse and fawn colored jacket, with her hair braided up over her head. She is again being questioned by\u00a0Eleanor Laws QC, representing Johnny Depp. <br>Johnny arrived late. <a href=\"https://storify.com/services/proxy/2/hn63AieJXM7Zwke917XeNQ/https/media.fyre.co/orwZ625MS.kyRa7CgPe4Q_2020-07-21T092751Z_1701038136_RC2LXH9J38CJ_RTRMADP_3_BRITAIN-PEOPLE-DEPP.JPG\" rel=\"nofollow\">https://storify.com/services/proxy/2/hn63AieJXM7Zwke917XeNQ/https/media.fyre.co/orwZ625MS.kyRa7CgPe4Q_2020-07-21T092751Z_1701038136_RC2LXH9J38CJ_RTRMADP_3_BRITAIN-PEOPLE-DEPP.JPG</a></p>\n<p><br>The last time he showed up late, it was because of a meeting he had about a new role, so it\u2019s possible that today\u2019s tardiness is related to that.</p>\n<p>They picked up where they left off, about Johnny on a rampage the night Amber claimed that he threw a phone at her face, destroying everything he could, from Penthouse 3 where they lived, to the penthouse where Rocky Pennington (RP) kept her beads. She called him crazed and delusional.</p>\n<p>There was a quick chat about what pronoun to use for iO Tillet Wright (iO). Amber explains that iO now prefers the female pronoun \u201cshe.\u201d\u00a0 Heard is shown CCTV footage of herself with concierge Cornelius Harrell in March 2016, and reluctantly admits that it\u2019s her. Mr. Harrell has given statements for court that Amber had no marks on her face. Amber disagrees, naturally. Ms. Laws mentions all the other people who also said she didn\u2019t have any marks on her. Were they all lying?</p>\n<p>Next, Heard is asked about a series of tweets between herself and Elon Musk (EM), but insists that she didn\u2019t have any affairs with anyone while she was with Johnny, not even EM. She wasn\u2019t even in communication with him, she claiMs., until 2016. She says an earlier witness,\u00a0Alejandro Romero, is wrong about seeing her with Musk at an earlier date.</p>\n<p>There is a little back and forth now between Ms. Laws and the judge over whether talk of jealousy is relevant. Heard says in some ways \"all jealousy is illogical.\u201d The judge is not keen to get into philosophical conversations, and moves the subject on.</p>\n<p>The court is now being shown CCTV footage which shows Heard in a lift with actor James Franco. Ms. Laws asks if it is indeed Franco, and Heard says yes. Heard says Franco was saying: \"Oh my god, what happened to you?\" when he saw her face after she went down to let him in. She says his words were \"What the f***.\u201d Ms. Laws asks if they were \"trying to hide their faces\" in the video, and Heard says no. Ms. Laws asks if it was \"secretive talking.\u201d Heard says it was \"discreet talking.\u201d</p>\n<p>We now move onto other events around May 2016. Heard says a text she sent at the time saying she was fearful of Depp was correct, telling Ms. Laws: \"That is true, I was petrified of the monster.\u201d We also hear about part of Heard's statement, in which she says she went to her friends Rocky and Josh's apartment (which was in the same apartment block) to seek refuge from Depp following a big argument on 21 May 2016. In it, she says \"I did not hear from Johnny any more.\u201d</p>\n<p>Ms. Laws reads out multiple texts sent by Heard to Depp's late head of security Jerry Judge on 24 May 2016, which seem to show her trying to get in contact with Depp. One reads, \"Please call me as soon as you get this\"; another \"I'm desperately trying to reach Johnny, can you help?\" and another \"I love you precious.\u201d Heard agrees she was trying to reach Depp. <br>Ms. Laws says this is not the truth, as she was in contact with Depp between 21 and 26 May. But Heard says she was referring to that night, and the incident, and saying she did not see Depp any more that night. Ms. Laws says this is not true.</p>\n<p>We now see a letter written by Heard's lawyer to Depp's lawyer on 24 May 2016, asking for their separation to be kept out of the public eye. Ms. Laws asks Heard: \"You didn't want publicity around this did you?\" Heard agrees. Heard says her lawyer \"told me I needed only the last couple of instances of violence, which had ironically been the last couple of times I saw Johnny.\u201d The letter says there had been three instances of domestic violence in the last six months. When asked by Ms. Laws which instances these are, Heard says \"there are honestly so many, I don't recall which ones they are.\u201d Ms. Laws says: \"Just days before this case started you remembered lots of new cases of alleged violence.\u201d Ms. Heard says this is not true.</p>\n<p>The judge explains to Heard that what Ms. Laws is getting at is that if there had been more instances of domestic violence, they would have been included in the letter. Heard says this is not so, and her lawyer said it was \"a short application.\u201d Ms. Laws counters: \"You make things up as you go along.\u201d That\u2019s the second time in two days that Ms. Laws has used that statement. And IMHO, she was right both times.</p>\n<p>On the 23 May, Heard filed for divorce. Ms. Laws says several people - Depp's artist friend Isaac Baruch and\u00a0concierge manager\u00a0Trinity Esparza\u00a0- saw Heard on this day and both say Heard had no injuries. Heard says she doesn't recall seeing Ms. Esparza, but she does vaguely\u00a0recall seeing Mr Baruch.</p>\n<p>The following day, 24 May, Ms. Laws says Amber did see housekeeper\u00a0Hilda\u00a0Vargas. She also says she disputes Ms. Vargas's claim that she wasn't wearing make-up.</p>\n<p>We also discuss stylist Samantha McMillan, who also said she saw Heard without make up, and saw no injuries. Heard disagrees and says: \"She has only seen me at photo shoots.\u201d She says she only ever saw her with make up on. Heard says she would put make up on first thing in the day, and that as she is often photographed, this was how she would always appear. <br>Ms. Laws asks if that meant Ms. McMillan always arrived late to shoots. Ms. Laws says it is \"inconceivable\" Ms. McMillan would not have seen Heard without make up at some point. <br>Heard says this is not so.</p>\n<p><br>Ms. Laws says the letter from Heard's lawyer to Depp's was a form of \"blackmail.\u201d You know, the one where she demanded everything from the apartment and his car to spousal support, right down to Johnny paying for Amber\u2019s laundry. Heard says this is not so, and that she wanted to let him know \"this could be done amicably.\u201d <br>Heard says she was not afraid to talk to Depp on the phone, but was afraid of him. Ms. Laws says this is not true, and that Heard was not afraid of Depp, she was simply wanting it to seem like she was.</p>\n<p>The court is now being shown more CCTV footage - it is black and white with no sound - and shows Heard in the lift with her sister and Rocky Pennington. They are heading out of the apartment. Ms. Laws says it shows Herd - who is on the far left - had no bruise on her cheek. In similar footage, as the three women return home that night, we can again see Heard standing by the lift doors. Heard says it was at around 10 or 11pm. Ms. Laws now moves on to a few hours later, in the early hours of the same night. Heard says \"my memory is not clear\" on events on that night. Ms. Laws says she would remember if she called her lawyer first that night. Talking again about the letter between lawyers, which mentions three alleged domestic violence incidents, Heard says: \"I was trying to protect Johnny. I wasn't ready to reveal everything I'd been trying to hide for four-and-a-half years.\u201d</p>\n<p>Heard is discussing texts she sent to Depp around the time she filed for divorce. She says: \"I wanted him to understand I loved him, and it didn't need to be any more acrimonious than it already was.\u00a0 I just wanted privacy.\u201d She goes on: \"As naive as it sounds, at the time, just a few days of privacy seemed like an enormous thing to me.\u201d One text from Heard says: \"I thought you'd filed.\u201d Heard confirMs. this meant she thought Depp had or was going to file for divorce.</p>\n<p>Another lift clip is shown to the court, this time in color and filmed on the 23 May 2016. Heard is in the lift with Rocky and interior designer Laura Divenere. Ms. Laws says they were all up close in the lift. Now a second clip of the lobby is being played, showing Heard in the lobby taking to Ms. Esparza. Again, they are talking over the desk and seem very close to one another. \"You had no injury did you?\" Ms. Laws asks. She goes on, \"And it's wrong to say you rarely communicated with the staff.\u201d <br>Heard answers: \"Ms. Laws, I lived in that flat a long time and I talked to them on occasions.\u201d She says she did not \u201coften\u201d talk with them.</p>\n<p>Ms. Laws references a clip where she says Heard and her sister Whitney \"acted out some sort of punching scene.\u201d <br>Heard says this is not true. We are not shown any clip of this.</p>\n<p>Ms. Laws asks if Heard saw Isaac Baruch after she had filed for a restraining order. She asks: \"Did you see him afterwards, and ask him out to dinner?\" <br>Heard answers: \"I did see him, but I didn't ask him out to dinner, I asked him if he wanted something I had cooked. He liked my cooking.\u201d</p>\n<p>We now move on to a telephone call between Depp and Heard. Heard says she believes this call is \"one Johnny asked me if I was recording, and I said no, and he recorded it.\" Ms. Laws says: \"Let's be clear, this is a recording you have provided yourself. So you know about this call.\u201d In this phone call, reference is made to a \"secret fight club.\u201d Ms. Laws says that when she asked Heard if she knew which transcript they were discussing, and mentioned \"secret fight club\" she denied knowledge of it. Heard denies this, and says it's because Ms. Laws \"mis-spoke.\u201d Ms. Laws says Heard has made the point \"four times\" that she didn't know which transcript Ms. Laws was talking about, and she is now moving on. Ms. Laws asks: \"Are you unhappy that you recorded this conversation?.\u201d Heard says no, she is unhappy that Depp told her he wasn't recording the conversation, and then she found out he was. She says they often recorded conversations between theMs.elves. Ms. Laws says Heard received \"bad publicity after she filed\" and Heard was \"angry about this.\u201d Heard says: \"I was angry, but mostly heartbroken. My marriage had ended, it was a really hard time.\u201d Ms. Laws says during the recorded phone conversation violence from the past is discussed. Ms. Laws reads out an extract from the transcript in which Depp says \"I had a jar of mineral spray thrown at my f***ing nose.\u201d It also mentions him losing the tip of his finger and Heard allegedly being violent towards him. Ms. Laws puts it to Heard that she had been violent to Depp, and she didn't deny it in the call. <br>Heard says: \"I wasn't in a place to deny or agree to it. I was trying to point out to him the reality of the system and how nasty, and violent this whole thing had been.\u201d She goes on: \"Johnny surrounded hiMs.elf with people who wouldn't disagree with him.\u201d She says he was \"almost never in contact with outside world.\u201d Heard says Depp \"severed his own finger.\u201d She says Depp's \"perception of our relationship was so skewed\" he didn't realise how bad things were.\u00a0Heard says: \"He was twice my size and beat me up for years.\u201d She says \"it's preposterous\" Depp says he was the victim of violence. <br>IMHO, what\u2019s preposterous is Heard saying that Johnny is twice her size. She stands nearly as tall as him, and is perfectly capable of swinging a fist.</p>\n<p>Like yesterday, Amber\u2019s making good use of her water bottle, sipping from it liberally.</p>\n<p>We are now talking about the night of Heard's 30th birthday party on 21 May 2016. Ms. Laws asks if when Depp arrived he was \"coherent, sociable, logical and you were affectionate towards one another.\u201d <br>Heard says, \"Yes, but he was also under the influence and high.\u201d Ms. Laws says Heard is the only one alleging that, and Heard says that's not true.</p>\n<p>We hear that Depp had received \"monumental news\" about his finances that evening, before arriving at the birthday meal. During Depp's evidence last week he told the court he\u00a0lost $650m when former business managers \"stole\" his money.</p>\n<p>Ms. Laws reads out texts from Depp to Heard, which seem to show Depp apologising for being late. There is a little confusion over the date of these texts, and Heard says she thinks they might be from the day before the birthday party. Confusingly, the texts are actually dated the 22nd May, which would make them the day after. <br>Heard says she thinks they are from before the party, as they mention \"fittings for the Met Gala.\u201d She has to repeat \"Met Gala\" for the judge, who doesn't seem too familiar with the event.</p>\n<p>Ms. Laws says Heard knew Depp had an important meeting with his accountant, and Heard says is aware that he had the meeting. Ms. Laws says after the party Heard \"went on and on\" at Depp over being late. Heard says she was \"upset he was late for my birthday.\u201d <br>Heard says he had scheduled his meeting just half an hour before her celebratory meal, and was still late. Ms. Laws asks whether Heard \"punched Depp in the face\" on that night. Heard replied \"Absolutely not.\u201d <br>Ms. Laws says Depp called his security guard Sean Bett to come and get him. <br>Heard says, \"Johnny didn't drive, he was driven. It was normal for him to call someone to drive him after he would beat-up on me.\u201d <br>We hear a text exchange in which Depp says Heard \"hay-makered me.\u201d This US phrase means to punch wildly. Ms. Laws says Heard did not dispute this in the texts.</p>\n<p>The following day Heard's friend Rocky came to her flat, and Ms. Laws says Heard did not tell her Depp had hit her. Heard says this is not true, and she had texted Rocky the night before to tell her there had been an incident. \"When she [Rocky] walked into the room it was covered in glass from things Johnny had thrown at me. Johnny was fond of glass bottles.\u201d Heard says Rocky saw all the damage. That day Heard, her sister and a group of friends headed out to\u00a0Coachella Valley Music and Arts Festival. <br>Heard is asked if she was excited about going to Coachella. <br>Heard answers: \"I couldn't be excited, my husband had beaten me up on my 30th birthday.\u201d <br>Ms. Laws asks: \"And then you excreted on the bed?\" <br>Heard says she did not, and \"it's absolutely disgusting.\u201d <br>Ms. Laws asks if it was one of Heard's friends who had messed on the bed, and Heard says no, it's \"unimaginable to me.\u201d <br>Heard says Yorkshire Terrier Boo had had a problem with messing herself \"since the weed.\u201d She explains that when Boo was a puppy she ate a bag of Depp's\u00a0marijuana, and had had issues since then. <br>Heard is asked if cleaner Hilda Vargas regularly cleaned up after the dogs (Pistol and Boo), and Heard says occasionally. <br>Heard says she would usually clean up excrement in the bed as she thought it was unfair for the cleaner to have to deal with it. Heard says Boo would often cuddle with Johnny, and mess herself on him or the bed. She says she heard Ms. Vargas giving evidence last week. In that, we heard that Ms. Vargas believed the excrement to be human rather than animal. \"I cannot imagine what kind of human being would do that for a prank or joke\" Heard tells the court. She says she was not there though, and had headed to Coachella by this time. Heard says she does not recall if she took the dogs with her or not.</p>\n<p>We are now moving on to what Ms. Laws calls the \"bathroom incident.\u201d Heard says there were many incidents involving the bathroom, and involving doors, so asks for more clarity on which incident this was. The court is about to be played some audio, which we are told is undated. We can hear Depp talking in this, but his voice is very muted. He seeMs. to be apologising for closing the door into Heard's toes. He says: \"I didn't mean to do that.\u201d We can now hear Heard, who is saying she did not mean to push the door into Depp, but reacted to the door hitting her toes. She says \"It was not my intention.\u201d We can hear Heard saying \"I'm so sorry. I can remember hitting you as a response. And I'm really sorry about hitting you in the head with the door.\u201d She goes on, \"I just reacted and I'm sorry, it's below me.\" <br>Ms. Laws asks: \"You admitted punching him in the face there?\" <br>Heard says: \"No.\u201d <br>Ms. Laws says: \"And it was not in self-defence was it?\" <br>Heard answers: \"That's exactly what it was.\u201d She says at the time Depp was \"falling against the door and screaming out incoherently.\u201d <br>She says she had previously kept an eye on him to check he wasn't choking on his own vomit. She says she \"pushed the door as an instinct. to get it off of me as it was putting pressure on my body.\u201d Heard says: \"I knew better than to fight with him about the details of the fight, and what he perceived as injuries to him. My job was to say sorry, and get him on track, and move on to bigger things.\u201d She says doing so would have \"made him more mad, enraged, and he would have got more violent with me.\u201d <br>Ms. Laws says every time there is evidence showing Ms. Heard admitting to violence, she \"turns it round\" and alleges self-defence. \"It's what you do isn't it?\" Ms. Laws adds.</p>\n<p>We are now about to be played audio of another conversation between Depp and Heard. Again, this audio is hard to hear. We hear Heard saying: \"You're trying to justify how you do or don't come to the door.\u201d <br>Depp says: \"You seem to think there's this cowardice in me, running away from me.\u201d He says \"the only time I did things to you was when you threw the can at me in Australia.\u201d <br>We hear Heard saying she \"threw pots and pans.\u201d <br>Ms. Laws asks if Heard said in the audio that was in self-defence? <br>Heard answers \"that was not the point of the conversation.\u201d<br>Ms. Laws says in this case Heard \"does not want to ever admit to using violence against Mr Depp. You don't want to admit the truth - that you were violent do you?\" <br>Heard says this is not true.</p>\n<p>We now hear about what Ms. Laws calls the stair incident, which Ms. Laws says was \"very violent.\u201d <br>Ms. Heard says she was only ever violent \"in defence of myself and my sister.\u201d <br>Ms. Laws says Heard spat at Depp. <br>Heard answers: \"I never spit at anyone\" <br>Ms. Laws says Heard threw a can of Red Bull at Depp's back. <br>Heard answers: \"I don't even drink Red Bull, no.\u201d <br>Ms. Laws says Heard punched Depp in the face. <br>Heard agrees: \"I did strike Johnny that day, in defence of my sister.\u201d <br>Heard says the reason for this is: \"I heard the rumour he pushed an ex-girlfriend down the stairs - I think it was Kate Moss - and that was fresh in my mind. So I reacted quickly.\" Heard goes on: \"I have been Johnny's punching bag for years. And I remember this as it was the first incident when I ever struck him back. Ms. Laws puts it to Heard that this is the first time she has ever mentioned Kate Moss in relation to this incident. <br>For a second (third) time Ms. Laws tells Heard: \"You are making this up as you go along.\u201d <br>Ms. Laws says there has been no mention of Moss in Heard's deposition, and she has never before said this was the reason she \"punched Depp\" during the stair incident. The court is now being played Heard's deposition, which was also shown in court yesterday. In the deposition Heard is asked \"have you ever hit Johnny Depp?\" <br>Heard is told by her lawyers, \"You don't have to answer.\u201d<br>She says she was protecting \"my baby sister\" and she jumped up to \"act defensively to protect her life.\u201d She says \"I would have done anything to prevent her from being pushed down the stairs. She says any sibling or parent would do the same. <br>Ms. Laws asks why she didn't mention Moss in the deposition. <br>Heard says: \"I didn't have a chance.\u201d <br>Ms. Laws asks if Heard has mentioned Moss in any statement, deposition or evidence so far. <br>Heard agrees she has not. Heard says \"She had anything but the freedom to speak\" and was \"surrounded by 14 lawyers\" on the recorded deposition shown to the court. <br><a href=\"https://storify.com/services/proxy/2/LMT5MrirBwU7b3aoqCnRWg/https/media.fyre.co/RU3QItsVTziZ05gQGGlH_GettyImages-75480804.jpg\" rel=\"nofollow\">https://storify.com/services/proxy/2/LMT5MrirBwU7b3aoqCnRWg/https/media.fyre.co/RU3QItsVTziZ05gQGGlH_GettyImages-75480804.jpg</a> <br>For a third (fourth) time Ms. Laws says: \"You are making this up as you go along sometimes. You add information you have thought of on your feet to try to make your account more detailed.\u201d <br>Heard refutes this.</p>\n<p>We have now moved on to an alleged attack on Heard by Depp on 23\u00a0March 2015, when he is said to have pulled her by the hair and hit her.</p>\n<p>Heard tells the court: \"He hit me with the hard plaster cast, and my sister Whitney. It was particularly unpleasant.\u201d <br>At the time Depp had his finger in a cast due to an injury sustained in Australia. He chose one of the children's designs for the cast, with a picture of a baby dinosaur on in. <br>Ms. Laws asks why she did not mention the cast in her statement. Heard says she cannot mention every accessory or detail of every incident.</p>\n<p>After the lunch break, the court is shown a photo of Heard with Rolling Stone Keith Richards, along with her sister. Heard confirMs. she is second left in the picture. <br>Ms. Laws asks Heard if it's correct there is no bruise on her cheek. <br>Heard says she cannot tell.<br><a href=\"https://storify.com/services/proxy/2/rRkWYKCWHX99xoLSA3I_xg/https/media.fyre.co/8pCmJR7gRWjNEXyPkoHs_Keith%20Richards%20photo.jpg\" rel=\"nofollow\">https://storify.com/services/proxy/2/rRkWYKCWHX99xoLSA3I_xg/https/media.fyre.co/8pCmJR7gRWjNEXyPkoHs_Keith%20Richards%20photo.jpg</a> <br>Heard says this photo was taken \"right before\" the painting incident. She says her previous reference to \"disco bloodbath\" was actually in relation to another fight, not the argument over a painting by her ex-partner Tasya Van Ree. Heard has alleged Depp hit her because the picture was hung up in her bedroom, and that Depp tried to set fire to art work.</p>\n<p>Ms. Laws now asks detailed questions about the \"disco bloodbath\" fight. She asks: \"How did he hit you in such a way that blood spattered on the wall?\" <br>Heard says: \"Back then it was just slaps or backhands, and at the time it was a shock. I felt his rings hit my mouth, my teeth.\" <br>Ms. Laws asks: \"How close were you?\" <br>Heard answers: \"We were at his downtown place in the Eastern Columbia building. All the details of these incidents remain true. I remember them perfectly. There has been a mistake with dates. That particular incident which we called disco bloodbath happened on the 8th, downtown. \" <br>Ms. Laws now tries to interrupt, but the judge cuts in saying: \"It's easier if I can hear one person at a time.\u201d He says Hurd is answering the question, and he wants to hear it. <br>Heard goes on: \"All I can tell you is Johnny wore these rings. He backhanded me. We got into an argument because he said I'd had affairs with two people I never had an affair with.\u201d Heard says the blow \"popped my teeth.\u201d She says she was standing next to the living room, and she recalls \"the next day there was blood next to the Smeg fridge. The next day Johnny made a joke about it.\u201d Heard says the wall was around two or three feet away from her at the time. <br>Ms. Laws is keen to know the angle and exact proximity. <br>Ms. Laws is now asking: \"What did the blood spatter look like?\" <br>Heard says she cannot recall, going on: \"We made light of it. It's hard to believe, but I was so quick to think it would never happen again.\" <br>\"How many drops of blood?,\u201d Ms. Laws asks. <br>The judge interrupts again and says he doesn't think knowing the exact amount of blood is helpful.<br>Ms. Laws is putting it to Heard that she changed her account of the date of the alleged painting incident as there was the Keith Richards photo showing her with a clear face the day after the alleged fight. <br>Ms. Laws says Heard shifted the painting fight to 22 March 2013, and said the disco bloodbath fight happened on the 8 March. <br>Heard says no, she had no need to change the dates, and that she has always said the disco bloodbath was on 8 March. <br>The judge asks for clarification of what \"disco bloodbath\" means. <br>Heard says: \"He hit me, and split my lip, a blood went on the wall and on my shirt.\u201d She says the phrase was used by Depp later, and is the title of a book. She says she asked him if that was in reference to the alleged fight on Friday. <br>Ms. Laws tells Heard she has \"missed an important detail\" in her statement, and that's why she changed the date. <br>Heard says that is not the case, but says there were \"so many incidents in March\" that she got mixed up as to what happened at each one.</p>\n<p>We are now looking at the Keith Richards photo again, and Amber says she can't be sure there isn't damage to her face. She says: \"My bottom lip looks swollen to me.\u201d <br>Sasha Wass, the lawyer for The Sun, has now interjected. <br>The judge is getting a little cross over lawyers in court talking over each other, and says for a second time he can only listen to one person at a time.</p>\n<p>Heard is now being asked to look at screen shots taken on 7 April 2013. <br>Ms. Laws says we will also be discussing flight details relating to a man called Ian Patrick McLagan, who has played the guitar for the Rolling Stones.<br>Ms. Laws asks, \"You have seen these documents before haven't you?\" <br>Heard says she has seen so many documents she can't tell, and then adds \"I don't think I have seen this.\u201d <br>Ms. Laws says it's these flight details that have caused Heard to change her dates in her earlier statement. <br>Heard refutes this.<br>The documents include an email chain about flights and travel to set. Depp's lawyer\u00a0Stephen Deuters\u00a0is cc'd in.</p>\n<p>Ms. Heard says she \"vaguely\u00a0recognizes\" the second photo with\u00a0Ian Patrick McLagan.</p>\n<p>Ms. Laws says Heard hasn't just changed the dates, she has also \"shifted the more lurid and graphic\" accounts to earlier in the timeline (specifically 8 March), to explain her clear face in the dated photos.<br>Ms. Laws says Heard is \"treading a fine line\" as her sister Whitney has already said in her statement that Heard had a split lip after the painting incident. <br>Heard says no, the truth is that Depp \"hit me a lot in March.\" <br>We now look at Heard's sister's statement - Whitney\u00a0Henriquez - talking about arriving at Heard's apartment after the painting incident. Whitney says when she came home on the day Depp should have been filming a documentary with Keith Richards, she came home \"and the place was a mess.\u201d She says the painting had been taken off the wall, and she noticed the signature of the painting had been altered. <br>Whitney also says \"it was apparent she [Heard] had been crying, her face was swollen. I noticed that one side of her face was super-red and she had a split lip.\" <br>Ms. Laws tells Heard: \"Your sister has made the made mistake as you, saying you had a red face and swollen lip on the day you went to the filming of the Keith Richard's documentary.\" <br>Ms. Laws says this is a description of an \"obvious and clear injury, which we can't see in any of the photographs.\" <br>Ms. Laws goes on: \"You have quite a difficult path to tread because of all the lies you've woven. You've woven a web of lies which you've had to shift and change because of evidence that's come to light around this Keith Richards documentary.\" <br>Heard disagrees.<br>We are now looking at a photo of the painting, which shows the altered signature, changed from \"Taysa van Ree\" to \"Taysa van Pee\u2019 <br>We hear a text message exchange between Depp and Whitney, in which Whitney seeMs. to be cheering him on for defacing the image. <br>One reads: \"She' s the worst,\u201d apparently referring to van Ree. <br>The judge asks if Heard has \"tried to construct an incident around these documents\u2019 <br>Heard says no, \"It's a totally different painting, and I don't think Johnny realised that\u2019 <br>Heard says Depp defaced multiple paintings, and \"the one he tried to light on fire was a canvas\u2019 \u00a0<br>Ms. Laws says \"multiple paintings\" is now \"another detail added\u2019 <br>Heard says the number of paintings he destroyed was \"countless\u2019 <br>For the fourth (fifth) time, Ms. Laws tells Heard she is \"making it up as she goes along\u2019 <br>Heard says in the text exchange, which seeMs. to say she also found the image tampering \"funny,\u201d it is because on that occasion \"you could wipe the mark off the glass\u2019 She says Ms. Laws is mixing up two different painting incidents, one in 2012 and one in 2014. <br>Heard says: \"I didn't shift anything\u2019</p>\n<p>After a 10minute break, they went into the three day \"hostage situation\" Heard says she suffered at the hands of Depp in early March 2015. <br>Ms. Laws says Heard has alleged \"extreme acts of physical, emotional and psychological violence\" in her earlier violence. <br>Ms. Laws says she wants to find out exactly what physical violence took place.<br>A sentence in Heard's statement says: \"I fell like a rag doll.\u00a0 I got back up and he said something like \u201cYou want to go? You want to fight, tough guy?\u201d and he slapped me in the face.\" <br>Another says: \"\u00a0He grabbed me by the neck and shoved me against the fridge\u2019 It goes on: \"Over the course of the day, he kept attacking me \u2013 he hit me, pushed me, choked me and spat in my face.\" <br>Ms. Laws goes on to another extract which reads: \"I tried to run past him to get away and he grabbed me by the hair, hurled me around. I fell onto the ping pong table and it collapsed under me. He ended up on top of me.\" <br>In Another part of the statement about the same incident, Heard says Depp \"ripped off my gown\" and later smashed her phone so hard \"It broke into pieces\u2019 <br>Ms. Laws now moves on to an alleged incident on day two of the \"three day incident\u2019 <br>In her statement Heard says: \"\u00a0Glass was broken everywhere \u2013 on the floor and the counter-top. At some point he pulled me around by my neck and pushed me down against the bar, I was against the bar, naked, bent over backwards, my back against the marble. He was pressing so hard on my neck I couldn\u2019t breathe. <br>A visibly and audibly upset Heard now tells the court: \"I was naked and my feet were bare, so I couldn't get a purchase on my feet... I was trying to push away from the counter top so I could breathe. I thought he had lost control of what he had done, I was slipping on the counter tops and slipping on the glass\u2019 <br>Heard is crying a little as she says this. <br>In her statement Heard says she still has scars from the glass on her feet and arMs..</p>\n<p>As the cross-examination moves to a photo taken of the injuries Heard alleges occurred on the trip, she wipes her nose with a tissue. <br>Heard says she took these photos herself in the bathroom. <br>Talking about the photos, Ms. Laws says: \"These are not scars sustained writhing around on the floor trying to get away from Mr Depp. They are straight.\" <br>Heard says: \"I do not agree, I know they are\u2019 <br>Ms. Laws suggests they are \"self-harm scars, inflicted by you\u2019<br>Heard answers: \"I have had them since that night... I have never self-harmed. Johnny's a self-harmer, I'm not a self-harmer.\" <br>Ms. Laws is now questioning Heard's comparison of the situation with being \"a hostage\u2019 She says, \"You could have left at any time couldn't you?\u2019 She goes on, \"And you had a cell phone didn't you - you could have called anyone at any point\u2019 <br>Heard accepts she did have a phone, and could have called someone. <br>However Heard says she has not mis-characterised the situation, saying: \"Absolutely not. This was my marriage. I lived in it.\u201d<br>Ms. Laws says the three days are a \"graphic depiction of the three day hostage situation,\u201d and questions why Heard didn't record any of this at the time. <br>Heard says that Depp had \"taken eight to ten MDMA on the first night, maybe even more. There was no valuable conversation between us that would have been worth recording.\"<br>Ms. Laws is asking about a phone call from Heard to her sister shortly after the Australia incident. <br>Ms. Laws asks why she did not tell her sister about what had happened. <br>Heard says: \"I can't remember what I said to her, but I certainly wouldn't have recalled everything that had happened to me.\u201d<br>We are now talking about an audio recording, which appears to have been taken on Heard's phone but which she says Depp recorded. The audio is said to last \"seven or eight hours.\u201d <br>Heard says \"years later\" she realised Depp had recorded it, and she only understood this once it \"came up in my divorce proceedings.\u201d <br>Ms. Laws asks why this is not mentioned in her statements. <br>Ms. Heard says she can't mention everything. <br>Ms. Laws asks Heard when she discovered her phone after the recording had been taken. <br>Heard says it was the next day, as she \"had been given some drugs, and slept.\u201d <br>Ms. Laws asked how Heard managed to call her sister if the phone was recording, and Heard says maybe on her iPad or through Facetime, but she \"has no recollection of that call.\u201d <br>Ms. Laws asks Heard: \"You use your phone a lot and don't like to be away from your phone?\" <br>Heard answers: \"I wouldn't characterize myself that way.\"<br>Ms. Laws is asking Heard if she ever listened to the long audio file on her phone. <br>Heard says: \"At some point, but maybe I just read transcripts, I can't remember.\u201d <br>There is also apparently a second recording, taken several hours later. <br>The judge asks if Heard knows if it was her phone that recorded both. Heard says she doesn't know, \"But that was my suspicion.\u201d <br>He then asks if she called her sister on her phone. <br>Heard says: \"I can't remember making that call.\u201d <br>Heard asks the judge if she can ask a question. <br>The judge says: \"This is a one-way process , so it's not for you to ask questions to Ms. Laws.\u201d He asks Ms. Laws to continue in her questioning.</p>\n<p>Ms. Laws is asking where Heard spoke to her sister, and whether it was upstairs. <br>Again, Heard says she can't remember, but she says she did go upstairs at some point. <br>Ms. Laws is pushing the point that she wants to know why the phone has recorded a conversation with her sister, close by the phone, but she was not using the phone itself. <br>Heard says Jerry Judge (Depp's late head of security) was downstairs. <br>Ms. Laws asks why heard was not looking for her phone. <br>Heard answers: \"After everything I'd been through, strangled, hit, sexually assaulted, the last thing I was thinking about was where my cell phone was.\u201d<br>Ms. Laws is asking Heard why she returned to a bedroom she claiMs. she had been assaulted in, to which the actress replies: \"It was not the room that was the problem.\" \u00a0</p>\n<p>Talk then returns to an allegation made yesterday in court by Heard, that Depp took her vintage Ford Mustang from her. <br>We move on to documentation over an MOT. However, at this point, the judge suggests it's a good place to end for the day.</p>\n<p>Don\u2019t even get me started on how ludicrous this testimony is or this update will be twice as long. Suffice it to say I\u2019m outraged over the bullsh*t that got dropped by Amber Heard today.</p>\n<p>More as I find it, folks.</p>", "photo": {"id": "224316765", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/6/ji/qt/cCJIqTIqGdJenNr-800x450-noPad.jpg?1595346847", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "27335583", "createdAt": "2020-07-20T15:43:03.000Z", "title": "Amber Heard on the stand", "description": "<p>This is a long one, folks.</p>\n<p>We began the day with a van outside the court with a large display featuring Amber Heard with the caption: Ditch the Witch, and a lot of supporters for Johnny Depp.</p>\n<p>Inside the court, things started off with few legal arguments back and forth about the allowance and review of some written submissions that were apparently put in at the last minute, doesn\u2019t say what they are. The judge gave both parties until 1pm tomorrow to review and respond to them.</p>\n<p>The defense also complained about Adam Waldman tweeting his \u201cIn memoriam\u201d tweet from court and asked that AW be forced to desist from tweeting. DS called this a stunt, but the judge agreed that the phrase \u201cIn memoriam\u201d is unwelcome because it might be misconstrued as a threat and left it there. AW wasn\u2019t instructed not to tweet, as I understand it.</p>\n<p>Amber Heard takes the stand wearing a short-sleeved light colored v-neck blouse with her hair braided over one shoulder. She confirms that her witness statement is true and correctly signed. Now that she\u2019s been sworn in, her witness statement will be released to the public and we\u2019ll be able to see what nonsense she\u2019s come up with, including whatever she testifies to in private.</p>\n<p>Out of the gate, Amber\u2019s witness statement starts off painting her as the poor little victim to Johnny Depp\u2019s \u201cmonster\u201d getting brutalized, and woe is her, the poor little thing.</p>\n<p>Right.</p>\n<p>She also insisted that he tried to control her professional life, reviewing her scripts and berating any romantic scenes she was in and insinuating that he told her what parts she could or couldn\u2019t take based on whether or not there were nudity or romantic scenes. And she said that he began to say that she dressed like a whore and began to tell her what she could and couldn\u2019t wear. She certainly did her homework about what real victims go through. Pity, though, that this is the first we\u2019re hearing about all this, four years later. She even said that Johnny said that he hoped she\u2019d get raped by \u201cSlimy Mexicans\u201d or a big gang of black MF-ers because of the sexy or revealing clothes she wore, accusing him not only of verbal abuse, but also of using racial slurs to do it with.</p>\n<p>Mind you, this is all in her witness statement. She hasn\u2019t begun to testify yet.</p>\n<p>Out of the gate, Amber shows what a liar she is. Throughout her relationship with Johnny, she kept her house on Orange Ave, which means that she was never in danger of being homeless, like she claimed when trying to keep Johnny\u2019s penthouse.</p>\n<p>Also from the beginning, the female barrister isn\u2019t having any of Amber\u2019s showboating (which I almost misspelled as sow-boating, which would have been just as appropriate). Whenever Amber tried to add or embellish, FB yanked the chain and got the subject succinctly back on track.</p>\n<p>FB\u2019s first questions to Amber were about her family and friends that came to live in the Eastern Columbia building penthouses rent free.</p>\n<p>Next, Amber admitted that she didn\u2019t sign a prenup, nor was she asked to. But FB produced an email from David Kipper (a doctor) saying that Johnny and Amber had been fighting non-stop because he wanted a prenup. So she didn\u2019t get five minutes in without contradicting herself with a lie. It also bears mention that Amber is so animated and agitated that the judge asked her to slow down with her answers.</p>\n<p>They went back and forth about the prenup that never got signed, with Amber managing to get in that JD beat her up over it, of course. It\u2019s rather hard to keep up with AH because she seemingly contradicts herself with every breath. There was no prenup, then there was. First Johnny wanted it, then it was his sister Cristy who wanted it, as well as a litany of his friends. But in the end, there WAS a prenup that simply never got signed.</p>\n<p>She said at least twice that Johnny insisted that the only way out of the marriage was death. Implying, I supposed that he\u2019d kill her before he\u2019d let her go. Painting him as that monster again. Joke\u2019s on her, innit? Because he did let her go.</p>\n<p>Once again, the judge stops Amber from giving such lengthy answers that stray from the question. FB made this easier by asking a series of yes or no questions. Love her!</p>\n<p>ML is FB asked about Amber\u2019s statement that she didn\u2019t take cocaine after the age of 18. Amber insisted that it was true, and that she didn\u2019t take coke in front of Johnny, ever.</p>\n<p>I swear, it\u2019s almost impossible to keep up with Amber\u2019s answers because she either contradicts herself so much, or she picks a fringe point to answer without addressing the direct question. Asked if she had coke issues, she says she never had anxiety eating disorders, which was mentioned, but wasn\u2019t the point at all.</p>\n<p>Amber insists that she never had anxiety eating disorder, is not bipolar, and never had a substance abuse problem. Dr Kipper, who wrote notes about all of the above, is either lying, got it wrong, or made a mistake. He\u2019s the one, she says, that put her on such a range of meds that she\u2019s lost track of them all.</p>\n<p>ML nailed AH on taking drugs at Coachella, where Amber\u2019s memory seems spotty about who she took MDMA and mushrooms with. First Amber said that she took them, but doesn\u2019t remember who she took them with, then changed her story to say that she didn\u2019t take them, and still doesn\u2019t remember who she didn\u2019t take them with. ML reminds her that it\u2019s a high profile male she\u2019s talking about, but Amber still feigns amnesia about it.</p>\n<p>Amber then denies taking MDMA or mushrooms in Australia. She insists that she\u2019s only done shrooms or MDMA (ecstasy) a handful of times, including Coachella and her bachelorette party. So Coachella\u2019s back on the map. ML: So lots of medical professionals are either lying or misrepresenting Heard\u2019s drug use? Amber blames it on Johnny, saying that HE misrepresented her drug use to all these people.</p>\n<p>Amber denies being the one who puked in the parking lot at Coachella, insisting that she\u2019s never barfed in a parking lot in her life. Instead, she blames the vomiting incident on her (then) pregnant sister. But a note/email to a friend says that Amber admitted to puking in the parking lot and being high for 24 hours. Amber tried to turn it around on Johnny, saying that he\u2019s the one that did drugs, but ML (love her!) asked Amber to try to answer the question without making negative comments about her ex-husband. Amber had to agree to just answer the questions.</p>\n<p>It bears noting that at every step of Amber\u2019s testimony, netizens in the Twitterverse were posting screen grabs that directly contradict her. And a picture is worth a thousand words. If you haven\u2019t followed Nick Wallis on Twitter, it\u2019s worth looking him up, reading his spot-on live tweeting, and having a look at the comments. They tell the real story, unlike Amber.</p>\n<p>Next, ML asked about Amber\u2019s allegation that Johnny took her mustang away from her for 3.5 years, or longer, Amber added. She says he took the car and had his drivers take her everywhere so that he could keep tabs on where he was going. Maybe it\u2019s just me, but I wouldn\u2019t care if he knew where I was if I wasn\u2019t doing something shady. There was some discussion at length about Johnny fixing the car up on the tv show Overhaulin in order to get out of paying for it and how Amber alleges that the car didn\u2019t work right after the show \u2013 despite the plethora of photos she\u2019s taken of herself driving \u201cCherry Thunder\u201d as she\u2019s dubbed it. How this has anything to do with the Sun calling Johnny a wife-beater is beyond me, but hey. What do I know?</p>\n<p>They moved on to a matter of whether or not Samantha McMillen worked for, and was paid by, Amber Heard. Amber insists that SM never worked for her during a certain period, that she was only along as a \u201cfriend\u201d or unpaid intern, but EL refers to a document where Amber admits to paying SM $1,300, complete with a photocopy of a check. To be honest, I don\u2019t know what this has to do with the Sun, either, but it certainly does discredit Amber\u2019s integrity as a witness, insisting that SM wasn\u2019t her assistant, despite SM getting paid.</p>\n<p>Amber was asked about her temper, and admitted that she had outbursts of rage during arguments with JD, but evidence was presented that Amber just has a bad temper in general, and has outbursts with more people than just Johnny Depp. Proven.</p>\n<p>They played the tape where Amber admits to punching/hitting him, and admits to starting the fight. But Amber still insists that she was only reacting to Johnny\u2019s violence towards her. Regarding the bathroom door incident, she says that she only pushed the door to keep Johnny from falling down, because, she says, he had a tendency to pass out drunk and vomit all over himself. Everyone who says she was the violent one, she says, is lying for Johnny. She only acted in self-defense.</p>\n<p>After lunch, they stuck to the topic of Amber\u2019s temper, which she said only got out of hand with Johnny, and only in response to his violence toward her. EL puts forth that that\u2019s not true, and addresses Amber\u2019s arrest for domestic violence against Tasya Van Ree in Washington in 2009. Amber insists that her relationship with Van Ree is the most peaceful relationship that she\u2019s ever heard of, despite evidence of screaming matches and that arrest which Amber downplays as a non-event.</p>\n<p>Moving on, EL talked about the day Amber went to court and the fact that there was so much press. EL asked if Amber tipped off the press. She said no and blamed the press being there on Johnny\u2019s lawyers and TMZ \u2013 despite the fact that the TMZ article came out well before that. So, no dice there. She says that IF there was a leak of information, it didn\u2019t come from her. It came from somebody else, either on behalf without her knowing, or that it was Johnny\u2019s team. Anybody but her.</p>\n<p>EL then questioned Amber as to why she wanted to meet with Johnny when the restraining order was in effect if she was so petrified of him. Amber gave some half-arsed statement about how she wasn\u2019t afraid of Johnny, she was afraid of the monster.</p>\n<p>Amber was then asked about the night of the fight where Amber says Johnny threw a phone at her face. Amber admits that Rocky Pennington, iO Tillet-Wright and Josh Drew were in the adjoining apartment. Not their own penthouses, as has been previously declared. She also admits that she called her lawyer and her publicist, as well as iO calling the police.</p>\n<p>Every time She was caught lying by somebody else\u2019s testimony and evidence, Amber was asked, \u201cSo are they lying?\u201d She said she didn\u2019t want to call anyone a liar, but then proceeded to call them a liar. She must have said that half a dozen times. Most of what they talked about has been said before, all about the night of that fateful fight and the aftermath. This accounting is long and rambling enough, so I\u2019m not going to repeat it all. Suffice it to say that She says Johnny beat her up, hit her with a phone, and wrecked PH5 where she kept all her personal stuff, including her wardrobe. So, EL asked if the police officers were lying when they said they saw no damage to the property. Amber avoided giving a yes or no answer by saying things like \u201cThey must have seen it,\u201d or \u201cI don\u2019t know how they could have missed it.\u201d</p>\n<p>At one point, EL said: \u201cYou\u2019re making this up as you go along.\u201d AH denied it, of course, but I LOVE EL for saying it.\u201d</p>\n<p>I also love that EL is showing pictures of the magical moving disappearing bruises and asking her to explain them, as well as whey they weren\u2019t there the next day, and why people have testified that she had no marks on her at all. The answers are that the pictures were taken a different day, or she was wearing concealer, and everyone is lying.</p>\n<p>And that was it for the day. And, unless somebody else steps up to live-tweet, that\u2019s pretty much it for my timely updates. I\u2019ve relied upon Nick Wallis\u2019 brilliant live-tweeting for my updates, and he sadly won\u2019t be able to do it anymore. So let\u2019s all say thank you to Nick, and look forward to whatever updates might come our way.</p>", "photo": {"id": "224310705", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/4/da/yv/GgDAYVbkVMexeDi-800x450-noPad.jpg?1595259787", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "27322204", "createdAt": "2020-07-18T17:15:40.000Z", "title": "Day 9", "description": "<p>First up today was Isaac Baruch, an artist and friend of Johnny Depp\u2019s since they were teens. Mr. Baruch resided in the Eastern Columbia building at the time of all these goings on. Right out of the gate, QC tries to twist his words and put words in his mouth that he didn\u2019t say. When IB testified that he saw no marks or bruises on the night of the fight, QC began testifying to the opposite. IB asked if there was a question in there somewhere. Likewise, the judge stepped in to put a stop to it, too, to keep the proceedings on track and timely. The QC questions were pretty general, bantering back and forth about how IB has known JD so long, lives rent-free at Johnny\u2019s residence, and might therefore lie out of loyalty. The same old song and dance. Until the Question of Elon musk arose, relating to when EM visited, which dates and what time of day. Usually late at night until morning, and always when Johnny was away. But just as fast as that came up, it was glossed over. So the make takeaway from IB is that on the night that Amber said Johnny threw a phone at her face, she bore no marks at all. None.</p>\n<p>Alejandro Romero is a concierge at the ECB. He was also questioned about EM visiting, from around March of 2016. QC called him a liar about the dates because they don\u2019t match up with her narrative, but AR stood his ground. And that was about it for him. Honestly, I\u2019m not sure what this accomplished in relation to a case of Libel against the Sun for calling Johnny a wife-beater, but maybe it\u2019ll get tied up later.</p>\n<p>Travis McGivern works (worked?) as a security guard for Johnny Depp. QC made short work of browbeating him when he disagreed with her timetable of when he entered Johnny\u2019s penthouse on the night of the that Amber Heard alleges that she only hit Johnny Depp in defense of her sister, Whitney Heard, and with whom. QC asserted that TM entered the apartment with Amber\u2019s nurse, Debbie Lloyd when Amber was already in the apartment, with the fight already underway. TM says that he met Amber in the lobby and left DL there with her and went up to the penthouse alone. Amber came up after and got into it with Johnny. TM is adamant that Amber is the only one that was physically violent, punching Johnny in the head. \u00a0QC started testifying again, but TM kept in line asking for a question and refusing to speculate when she asked him to. The takeaway from this line of questioning is that somebody in the room can testify to the fact that only Amber Heard was violent that night.</p>\n<p>Amanda De Cadanet, founder of the #MeToo movement and former Amber Heard supporter, will not be questioned. She has publicly withdrawn her support for Amber Heard, so this comes as no great surprise. The last thing the defense wants is another explosive testimony supporting Johnny Depp.</p>\n<p>After lunch, there was some debate about metadata and how easily it can be forged, in reference to the May 16, 2016 pictures that Amber Heard had taken. The times in all of those photos, according to metadata, is 00:00, which is impossible if metadata is correct. The bickering started to interfere with the timetable of the proceedings, so it will be decided by Monday morning.</p>\n<p>Laura Devinere is an interior decorator and on again/off again friend of Amber Heard\u2019s. She was sworn in and confirms her witness statement. The basic gist of her testimony is that she was terrified into signing a statement in support of Johnny Depp due to coercion on the part of Adam Waldman. She says she\u2019s terrified of what Johnny\u2019s lawyers were insinuating they would do to her. She says she didn\u2019t want to get involved and was very uncomfortable giving a statement.</p>\n<p>An interesting note is that the court played a recording of a conversation between LD and Amber that was recorded without LD\u2019s knowledge or consent, which is illegal in the state of California. How many laws does Amber have to break, FFS? In the conversation that was taped, Amber drilled LD about what AW was saying to her, and honestly, it sounds like LD is terrified of Amber Heard, not Adam Waldman.</p>\n<p>The main takeaway from LD seems to be that she was uncomfortable making that statement that she never saw any injuries on Amber Heard because of pressure she was under from Johnny\u2019s team, but nowhere does she say that the statement is untrue in any way. So, while she may still be terrified of Amber, LD stands by her statement.</p>\n<p>Due to previous commitments, that\u2019s all I caught. Apologies. But I hope you found this information useful.</p>\n<p>I'm having internet issues, so if I don't get updates put up in a timely manner, kindly forgive.</p>", "photo": {"id": "224300958", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/9/gd/ej/faGdeJsmEgHXgJN-800x450-noPad.jpg?1595092541", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "27304713", "createdAt": "2020-07-16T17:06:37.000Z", "title": "Day 8", "description": "<p>The biggest takeaway from today is that Neither Vanessa Paradis nor Winona Ryder will be called to testify. They say it\u2019s because there\u2019s no need, as the allegations are that Johnny Depp hit Amber Heard, not them, so they won\u2019t be called at all.</p>\n<p>I\u2019m not gonna lie. I was looking forward to seeing Vanessa take Queen\u2019s Counsel (QC) apart stitch by stitch.</p>\n<p>Sean Bett, a former LA county sheriff, worked for Johnny Depp in the 90\u2019s as a security guard and as his driver. He\u2019s the security guard that took pictures of Johnny Depp\u2019s face after Amber Heard\u2019s 30th birthday party, when she admittedly punched him in the face. He also helped search for Johnny Depp\u2019s phone after Amber Heard threw it out of the apartment. QC tried to minimalize SB\u2019s interaction with Johnny Depp and his family, so that it would somehow matter less when SB testified that he never saw injuries on Amber Heard. She flat out called SB a liar, but SB said that she could call him a liar a hundred times. It doesn\u2019t change the facts. SB had no problem whatsoever asserting the facts, despite repeatedly having his statements challenged. QC said that they would have to agree to disagree.</p>\n<p>I disagree. We\u2019re not dealing with matters of opinion, here. It doesn\u2019t matter what QC thinks, it matters what she can prove.</p>\n<p>The judge stepping in when QC tried to insinuate that Johnny Depp, as well as SB, were involved in a nightclub incident where a woman says she was roughed up and handcuffed by Johnny Depp\u2019s security, who tried to pass themselves off as police officers. Judge told QC to stop testifying and ask a question. Thank goodness! QC has a tendency to testify rather than posing a question.</p>\n<p>While Winona Ryder and Vanessa Paradis will not be called on to testify, their witness statements were released and available to read online.</p>\n<p>They\u2019re running behind, so Amber Heard will not take the stand tomorrow. She\u2019ll have the whole weekend to best figure out how to spin some damage control, if she doesn\u2019t spend the time clubbing or shopping.</p>\n<p>There isn\u2019t a schedule yet as to who will appear next, or when, but here\u2019s a suggested list of who might take the stand tomorrow. Isaac Baruch, artist and friend of Johnny Depp. Travis McGivern, Building manager at the Eastern Columbia Building. And Katherine Kendall, an actor and #metoo advocate.</p>\n<p>On a personal note, it\u2019s been suggested that I take these updates too personally. Yes, I do, especially when a woman\u2019s survival of rape is stolen and twisted by a narcissistic sociopath to read like it\u2019s her own story, I do take it very personally. As a survivor, a woman, and as a human being. And I will NOT apologize for that.</p>\n<p>More as it happens, folks.</p>", "photo": {"id": "224289131", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/6/sx/ar/iySxAREgNJkOTFB-800x450-noPad.jpg?1594919199", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "27298052", "createdAt": "2020-07-15T23:07:14.000Z", "title": "Amber Heard's new Low", "description": "<p>I have to admit that I was a little late to the game today. I did finally catch up and read all the tremendous live tweets from Nick Wallis. And I started to write a blow-by-blow series of events like I did yesterday, but there was one thing that happened today that I just can\u2019t get past.</p>\n<p>Kate James (KJ) was Amber Heard\u2019s personal assistant. As such, Amber heard about a horrific incident that had happened in Kate\u2019s life. When she was 26, Kate was raped at machete point for hours and barely escaped with her life.</p>\n<p>And now, we find out that Amber Heard has taken <a href=\"https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Ec--4AqWoAEHkqm?format=jpg&amp;name=medium\" rel=\"nofollow\">that story</a> and twisted it around as if it\u2019s her own story.</p>\n<p>I could go on and on about how this is textbook behavior for a narcissistic sociopath, but frankly, I\u2019m too disgusted to look up the references. They\u2019re out there if you want to look \u2018em up yourself.</p>\n<p>This perverted, despicable action is reportedly described in Amber Heard\u2019s witness statement, to which we can\u2019t be privy until after she\u2019s been sworn in. So we\u2019ll have to wait and see how similar Amber\u2019s story is to Kates.</p>\n<p>On a personal note, I can\u2019t begin to describe how vile it is for Amber to take the single worst moment of a person\u2019s life and use it for her own personal gain. What gain? I can only speculate that she\u2019s going to accuse Johnny of being the one that raped her. I knew she was going to pull something for sympathy when she hit the stand, but I didn\u2019t know that it would be this repugnant. Not only to potentially lie about Johnny raping her, but also to steal someone\u2019s real life story to do it. As a survivor myself, I am deeply appalled and offended on every level.</p>\n<p>Amber Heard is supposed to take the stand on Friday, if everything stays remotely on schedule. We\u2019ll see then how low Amber has sunk in her crusade to vilify Johnny Depp. And how severely she\u2019ll test my gag reflex.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/amber-heard-assistant-testifies-johnny-depp-sun-libel-trial-1303318\" rel=\"nofollow\">SOURCE</a></p>", "photo": {"id": "224284352", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/5/ay/nj/nKAYnJMOQGRTbIE-800x450-noPad.jpg?1594854770", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "27285707", "createdAt": "2020-07-14T17:09:04.000Z", "title": "Poopgate Pictures", "description": "<p>Malcolm Connolly was a security person for Johnny Depp and Amber Heard. He was asked about several instances including the time on the honeymoon train, citing journal entries that accuse Johnny of beating her up, and never mind the fact that, yet again, she doesn\u2019t have a mark on her. He, on the other hand, is sporting <a href=\"https://buckwriter.files.wordpress.com/2016/04/12974294_539598889547092_1989485723801669839_n.jpg\" rel=\"nofollow\">a huge shiner</a>. Oh his honeymoom.</p>\n<p>Moving on to the topic of Australia, QC tried to insinuate that, because of all the different stories that came out, that Amber didn\u2019t chop off Johnny\u2019s finger at all. Maybe Johnny did it himself on that accordion door, which Malcolm insisted is impossible because the door has a safety feature.</p>\n<p>Queen\u2019s Counsel, (QC) also insinuated that Johnny injured Amber despite the fact that she was searing a slip when Malcolm arrived first, and she didn\u2019t have a mark on her. Scratches on her arms didn\u2019t appear until after Jerry Judge, Johnny\u2019s long-time head of security, showed up. In other words, those scratches were more likely than not self-inflicted.</p>\n<p>When QC\u2019s insinuations didn\u2019t sway Malcolm to change his answers, she made it seem that Johnny was on drugs, as usual.</p>\n<p>Redirect clarified that Malcolm simply never saw any injuries on Amber Heard. He, Malcolm, wouldn\u2019t tolerate any man hitting a woman. Not Johnny Depp. Not even the Pope. On the other hand, Malcolm recounts being asked to intervene because Amber heard kept hitting Johnny repeatedly. Malcolm also assures the court that he has not been pressured in any way into testifying on Johnny Depp\u2019s behalf.</p>\n<p>Tara Roberts, (TR) is Johnny Depp\u2019s Bahamian estate manager. QC started by insinuating that TR relies upon JD for her home and income, so she\u2019d lie for him. TR insists that she\u2019s got other family income. She\u2019d be sad if she lost the job because of all the friends she\u2019s made, but that she wouldn\u2019t be financially devastated. She\u2019s got no reason to lie to keep her job, and wouldn\u2019t anyway.</p>\n<p>QC tried to debunk TR\u2019s statement that Johnny has never been violent toward people by showing that TMZ video. TR wouldn\u2019t change her statement that Johnny isn\u2019t violent or that Amber had no injuries on the island. So, unable to make any headway with her, QC let her off the hook.</p>\n<p>Redirect cleared up that TR never saw Johnny hit or abuse Amber Heard or any other person. And that Amber never showed any injuries. But she did see Amber Heard being violent toward Johnny Depp, causing injuries including a gash across the bridge of his nose.</p>\n<p>No further questions.</p>\n<p>Samantha MCmillen (SM) is Johnny Depp\u2019s stylist since 2002, for 18 years now. She also worked as a stylist for Amber Heard while she and Johnny were together. SM confirmed what she\u2019s been saying the whole time that when Amber Heard appeared on <a href=\"https://static.independent.co.uk/s3fs-public/thumbnails/image/2020/07/14/17/depp-court.jpg\" rel=\"nofollow\">the James Cordon show</a>, she displayed no injuries despite insisting that she had two black eyes.</p>\n<p>Hilda Vargas (HV) has been Johnny Depp\u2019s housekeeper for 30 years. She\u2019s the one that found poop in Johnny Depp\u2019s bed. QC tried to blame it on the dogs by saying that Depp\u2019s dog Boo has a history of having accidents. HV clarified that the dogs have accidents \u201cOn the floor.\u201d Both Pistol and Boo are too small to jump on the bed, and have never had an accident in the bed. She\u2019s cleaned up after Boo many times, so she can say with authority that the poops were too big to have come from him. QC tried to suggest that Amber Heard was already gone for a full day at Coachella before the poop happened, but HV stuck to her story that Johnny was gone, and the poop was fresh. QC says that HV was angry, and HV admits that she felt disrespected to be left a mess like that because this sort of thing hasn\u2019t happened 30 years of Working for Johnny Depp.</p>\n<p>Redirect clarified HV\u2019s statements, and included that HV also saw Amber in May of 2016 without any injuries on her.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://pagesix.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2020/07/johnny-depp-trial-poop-39.jpg?quality=90&amp;strip=all&amp;w=840\" rel=\"nofollow\">The Photo of the poop</a> has been released to the media.</p>", "photo": {"id": "224275451", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/7/rn/vc/ARrnvcomQqLMbuC-800x450-noPad.jpg?1594746548", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "27259929", "createdAt": "2020-07-11T11:52:04.000Z", "title": "Amber Turd Trending", "description": "<p>Today's update is going to be short and sweet. Amber Turd is trending in the UK after mention of that nickname was made in court. So much so that the Star has picked it up for the front page.\u00a0</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/12092973/johnny-depp-amber-heard-aquaman-petition/\" rel=\"nofollow\">The Sun</a>, who Depp is currently suing for libel, has picked up on it, too. Seems their support for Amber Tu...er, Heard has soured. They're also talking about our little petition, here. We're in the news, folks.</p>\n<p>See the whole photo of the Star's front page <a href=\"https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Eco1oX6XgAAhe4S?format=jpg&amp;name=900x900\" rel=\"nofollow\">HERE</a>.</p>", "photo": {"id": "224255917", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/0/hl/vv/EehLVVATacVhuid-800x450-noPad.jpg?1594468326", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "27254148", "createdAt": "2020-07-10T18:04:46.000Z", "title": "Johnny Depp in Court: Day 4", "description": "<p>Johnny seemed very confident today even though QC badgered him and called him a liar with every other breath and brought his dying mother into it. Really low blow.</p>\n<p>QC tried to paint Johnny as a drug-addicted monster that walks around in a rage all the time. She failed miserably, because quite simply, that isn\u2019t true.</p>\n<p>QC went into that final night, the one where Amber insists that Johnny threw a cell phone at her face.</p>\n<p>I\u2019d like to interject here that if you haven\u2019t seen Brian\u2019s videos, be sure to check him out. He debunks her version of events with clear and concise logic that\u2019s infallible. You can find him <a href=\"https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCg0C-N_MPYYOXyF4T3jMxNQ/videos\" rel=\"nofollow\">HERE</a>.</p>\n<p>They brought up our little petition in court today. It had been suggested that he had something to do with creating the petition back when Amber Heard was in AM1. Johnny said that the petition came \u201cyears later.\u201d So take heart in knowing that he\u2019s aware of us, my friends.</p>\n<p>After a 5 (or so) session where testimony was given in chambers, David Sherborne (DS) redirected Johnny for an hour before the lunch break and an hour afterward.</p>\n<p>DS asked about the people Johnny surrounds himself with. QC had painted them as yes men who wouldn\u2019t interfere while He was slapping his wife around. DS gave Johnny a chance to testify that such is not true. His entourage wouldn\u2019t stand idly by while such a thing happened, which was never a problem because it never happened.</p>\n<p>The main difference between QC\u2019s cross examination and DS\u2019s redirect is that DS asked questions in a brief and concise manner. And he allowed Johnny to complete his answers instead of cutting him off, which QC did almost constantly. It was a very efficient way of conducting business. In two hours, DS debunked the accusations about Johnny\u2019s violent nature that QC spent 3.5 days trying to construct.</p>\n<p>Also debunked were the accusations that Johnny acquired massive amounts of drugs for only himself. Amber Heard\u2019s medical records of the time showed that she had, indeed, ingested or otherwise used (abused?) drugs, including some that Johnny doesn\u2019t even use.</p>\n<p>After Johnny was let out of the hot seat, officer Melissa Saenz testified via video uplink. This is one of the officers that responded the night of that last, final fight of the marriage, the one where Amber insisted that Johnny threw a phone at her face and otherwise roughed her up.</p>\n<p>QC tried to insist that OMS didn\u2019t get a very good look at Amber\u2019s face, and that there were injuries to Amber\u2019s face that OMS missed, or didn\u2019t see, or whatever. But OMS remained completely certain that she did get a very good look at Amber, and that there were no marks. There were no signs of violence whatsoever, on Amber or at the scene.</p>\n<p>Like she did with Johnny, QC pulled the tactic of calling OMS a liar and interjecting her own scenario. But OMS weathered it brilliantly and refused to change her account of the evening.</p>\n<p>I\u2019m not sure what QC thought she was going to get away with, trying to call OMS a liar. OMS is a trained professional, an expert in domestic violence. But all she succeeded in doing was making herself look foolish.</p>\n<p>That\u2019s about all I caught from today. More as I hear about it.</p>\n<p>On a personal note, I simply don\u2019t see how Johnny can\u2019t come out on top. Where the defense had nothing but \u201csuggestions\u201d and self-imposed testimony, the offense \u2013 Johnny\u2019s team \u2013 has receipts for everything. Medical records and whatever else they need to prove their side of the case. I think it\u2019s a slam dunk.</p>\n<p>Next up: Probably updates about how Amber Heard is out until late/early every morning partying it up, seeming to take none of this seriously. And never mind Covid 19 in the crowds.</p>\n<p>Photo of the court by <a href=\"https://twitter.com/nickwallis\" rel=\"nofollow\">Nick Wallis</a></p>", "photo": {"id": "224251704", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/8/fm/oy/SAFmoypoRnqSmNX-800x450-noPad.jpg?1594404291", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "27243789", "createdAt": "2020-07-09T17:14:10.000Z", "title": "Johnny Depp in court: Day Three", "description": "<p>Day three saw more of the same badgering from the Sun\u2019s counsel, who I\u2019ll refer to as QC. Today, she addressed two incidents of what she called violence against Amber Heard at the hands of Johnny Depp.</p>\n<p>First, QC talked about what happened in Australia when Johnny lost the tip of his finger. QC badgered Johnny with Amber\u2019s ever-changing version of events. Now, Amber\u2019s saying that she slept through the night and morning when Johnny chopped off his own finger and trashed the house \u2013 though she did make a statement in documents that she\u2019s the one that broke the TV, belying her story that she woke up in the morning to find all this horror.</p>\n<p>Johnny held his own, though, giving answers that were at times humorous and I daresay sassy. It was refreshing to see that he adamantly refuses to let Amber\u2019s team get away with her fictional version of events.</p>\n<p>It was rather horrifying, though, to see Johnny describe how the bone was sticking out of his devastated finger, and being so ruined himself that he did indeed write on the walls and mirrors in his own blood.</p>\n<p>The judge and Johnny\u2019s counsel were heard from a lot more today, objecting when QC stepped out of line, giving Johnny more of a chance to answer questions without being interrupted. Not that there were many questions. It was more like QC giving testimony and interrupting Johnny when he tried to answer to the fictional charges she was laying out.</p>\n<p>QC also described the incident in the penthouse where Amber Heard said she hit Johnny for the first (and only?) time, in defense of her sister Whitney. Amber insists that Johnny was pushing Whitney around to try to get at Amber to abuse her. Johnny patently denied that version of events the same way he denies her version of all of these events.</p>\n<p>As court wrapped up, it became known that Johnny\u2019s lawyer will have an hour to redirect \u2013 to question Johnny again about certain points that QC addressed during her cross examination. I think that\u2019s good. After being raked over the coals for three days, Johnny will get a chance to set the record straight.</p>\n<p>On another amusing note, it seems that our little petition has been mentioned in court documents. See <a href=\"https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EcerdEtWoAECbP0?format=jpg&amp;name=900x900\" rel=\"nofollow\">the picture</a>. It seems that Amber Heard is bugged by our efforts. And to that, I say: GOOD. She needs to know that actions have consequences, and it\u2019s not always consequences you can control. She seems to be the type that likes to be in control, but she can\u2019t control the petition, and she will never control me.</p>\n<p>That\u2019s about it for today. I\u2019ll update as fast as I find out.</p>", "photo": {"id": "224244106", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/6/ge/ke/ISgekeKrppUcXrq-800x450-noPad.jpg?1594314854", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}], "pageInfo": {"endCursor": "YXJyYXljb25uZWN0aW9uOjE1NQ==", "hasNextPage": true}}}}}, {"data": {"petition": {"id": "14451136", "slug": "dc-entertainment-remove-amber-heard-from-aquaman-2", "user": {"id": "24448735", "displayName": "Jeanne Larson", "photo": {"id": "221862322", "userSmall": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/7/xs/ly/cXXSLydpSVDqIVB-48x48-noPad.jpg?1553098061", "processing": false}}}, "organization": null, "updatesConnection": {"nodes": [{"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "27232100", "createdAt": "2020-07-08T15:56:15.000Z", "title": "Johnny Depp in court, day two:", "description": "<p>Day two was really more of the same as yesterday, with the Sun's counsel badgering Johnny Depp about his drug and alcohol use, trying to guilt-bomb Johnny into admitting that taking any drugs and drinking alcohol turns him into a wife-beating monster.</p>\n<p>But Johnny's having none of it. He won't admit to it because he never did it. He's never been violent with women and he's never been violent with Amber Heard.</p>\n<p>The sun's counsel is leaning heavily on a fight on a plane wherein Amber Heard says that Johnny Kicked her, trying to get Johnny to say that if a man would kick a woman, doesn't that make him a wife-beater. Johnny's staying on top of it though, insisting that it didn't happen. And I guess Amber forgets that they weren't alone on the plane. There was a pilot, a stewardess, and two assistants. If any such kick took place, I'm sure it would have been in the headlines at the time.</p>\n<p>Basically, the Sun's outta gas.</p>\n<p>By the end of the day, the Sun was asking for more time to put Johnny on the stand, because, as she says, Johnny took too long answering questions and put her behind. It's a sneaky way of keeping Johnny in the hot seat and creating less time for the Sun and/or Amber Heard to have to explain themselves. I hope the judge sees right through it.\u00a0</p>\n<p>Both parties have tomorrow to bicker about it, then the judge will make a ruling on how much extra time, if any, Johnny is on the stand again on Friday.</p>\n<p>I don't know what the Sun's going to pull moving forward, but I'll do my best to keep you updated.</p>\n<p>Special thanks to <a href=\"https://twitter.com/nickwallis\" rel=\"nofollow\">Nick Wallis</a> on Twitter who's done a legendary job of live-tweeting the proceedings.</p>", "photo": {"id": "224236019", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/3/kv/oi/QzkVoIeSpTOYSOn-800x450-noPad.jpg?1594223964", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "27220053", "createdAt": "2020-07-07T13:27:19.000Z", "title": "And so it begins", "description": "<p>Both Johnny Depp and Amber Heard have arrived at court in London. Johnny arrived looking dapper in a suit and tie, and wearing a black face mask. Amber showed up wearing the same black dress she wore when she went to court with fake bruises to get a TRO.\u00a0</p>\n<p>Johnny has taken the stand for his testimony.</p>\n<p>The Sleazeball defense lawyers have spent the entire day digging up every incident in the history of Johnny's life where they can try and make him out to be a violent monster, from when he allegedly trashed a hotel room when he was with Kate Moss to a time when he chased papz with a board when they were swarming his heavily pregnant partner, Vanessa Paradis.\u00a0</p>\n<p>All they've managed to convey is that they don't have any current FACTS to hit him with, so they're throwing 20 and 30 year old articles at him.</p>\n<p>Johnny's weathered it well, even getting a couple of snappy comebacks in here and there. I won't try to give you every detail because I'd fail miserably. Just know that our boy is holding up well, and is in good spirits.\u00a0</p>\n<p>More as I discover it.\u00a0</p>", "photo": {"id": "224227289", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/9/mv/xr/yDmvXRRkdkXsWAT-800x450-noPad.jpg?1594128440", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "27213545", "createdAt": "2020-07-06T19:04:33.000Z", "title": "T- minus tomorrow", "description": "<p>Johnny Depp's libel case against the Sun tabloid starts tomorrow.</p>\n<p>Hang onto your seats, gang. It's going to be a bumpy ride.</p>\n<p>I'll update you as fast as I hear about what's going on.</p>\n<p>In the meantime, let's all send Johnny Depp happy vibes. This might well be the first time he's been in the same room with Amber Heard in a long time. May he have the strength to tough it out.</p>", "photo": {"id": "224222849", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/7/ln/kl/mDlNkLbaDVJyNgG-800x450-noPad.jpg?1594062275", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "27201212", "createdAt": "2020-07-05T00:41:47.000Z", "title": "Heard will be present when Johnny Depp testifies", "description": "<p>Court has ruled that Amber Heard, Johnny Depp\u2019s ex-wife, can be present in the courtroom when Johnny testifies. Johnny\u2019s legal team tried to have her banned until or unless such a time as she might be called on to testify herself, but that bid was lost. That means that she can and likely will sit there watching Johnny Depp testify about why he\u2019s not a wife-beater, and the Sun tabloid is guilty of libel by calling him such.</p>\n<p>The case is planned to be heard in a UK court on Tuesday. NGN\u2019s legal team failed to get the case thrown out of court earlier this week.</p>\n<p>In UK criminal cases, witnesses cannot be present in court while others testify. However, they can be present in civil cases. Depp hoped to ban Heard by claiming her testimony would be influenced if she was present while he was cross-examined.</p>\n<p>In a court order published today, Justice Nicol rejected that argument.</p>\n<p>This is a classic abuser\u2019s intimidation tactic, to stare down the victim as they testify, hoping to frighten or otherwise affect Johnny\u2019s testimony. Maybe she thinks that he\u2019ll see her baby greens and melt.</p>\n<p>Me, I hope the judge sees this attempt at manipulation for what it is and calls her on it if she so much as blinks wrong at Johnny. It won\u2019t make a difference in the Sun libel case, but any shenanigans she pulls can be carried directly to Depp\u2019s defamation case in January, 2021.</p>\n<p>Depp\u2019s libel suit against the Sun is set to begin next week, on Tuesday, July 7th, and could last up to three weeks, before the judge alone hands down his verdict.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8489659/Johnny-Depp-fails-ex-Amber-Heard-banned-court-gives-evidence.html\" rel=\"nofollow\">SOURCE</a></p>", "photo": {"id": "224214653", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/0/ug/or/QmuGoRfZKuJSJtC-800x450-noPad.jpg?1593909710", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "27180137", "createdAt": "2020-07-02T18:31:42.000Z", "title": "Depp's libel suit against the Sun will proceed", "description": "<p>In a hail Mary bid to get the suit dismissed, the Sun (et al) filed a motion to dismiss over texts they say Depp didn't submit to the court.\u00a0</p>\n<p>It didn't work.</p>\n<p>The judge has decided that Johnny Depp's litigation against\u00a0The Sun\u00a0owner News Group Newspapers over a 2018 article in the tabloid that cast him as a \"wife beater\" can go ahead.</p>\n<p>The trial is set to start next Tuesday, July 7th.</p>\n<p>What do you think Johnny's chances are?</p>", "photo": {"id": "224199374", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/3/pd/bd/lsPDbdHisntkKwH-800x450-noPad.jpg?1593714705", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "27161535", "createdAt": "2020-07-01T00:42:25.000Z", "title": "You have GOT to read this...", "description": "<p>Some froot loop managed to get <a href=\"https://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/circuit/sites/circuit/files/assets/documents/pdf/high-profile/depp%20v%20heard/cl-2019-2911-brief-ashley-ruth-moye-amicus-curiae-supp-plaintiff-brief-6-29-2020.pdf\" rel=\"nofollow\">this declaration</a> filed in Johnny Depp's defamation case against Amber Heard in VA. In it, the author claims to be an undercover Federal agent who wrote a script for Johnny to star in, so Johnny owes her $25 million dollars.</p>\n<p>She says that she personally witnessed Amber abusing Johnny (but we're only just now hearing from her), and that Amber wanted to have a 3-way with her and Johnny.</p>\n<p>And she, the author of this lunatic filing, has a romantic history with Johnny Depp, because, of course she does.</p>\n<p>Amber wanted this person's jacket, but she told Amber to fuck off.\u00a0</p>\n<p>And she was able to boss Amber around when Johnny could not, forcing Amber to leave while she had a conversation with Johnny. In this conversation, Johnny disclosed to her that Amber blackmailed him into marrying him by threatening to blow her, the undercover Federal agent's, cover. If that happened, both she and johnny would be murdered.</p>\n<p>So poor Johnny was FORCED to marry Amber to protect his friend with benefits, at peril of death.<br>\u00a0<br>You know, I've read some tall tales, but none made me laugh quite this hard. I don't know what amuses me more, the content, the fact that it actually got filed, or that there's some whack job out there crazy enough to do it.</p>\n<p>Read it for yourselves, folks. This one takes the crazy cake.<br>\u00a0<br>\u00a0</p>", "photo": {"id": "224186144", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/7/fa/qn/PMFAqNQPCcfQqfy-800x450-noPad.jpg?1593564147", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "27144199", "createdAt": "2020-06-29T13:13:19.000Z", "title": "Judge rules against Johnny Depp, but all is not lost", "description": "<p>In a hail Mary attempt to get the court thrown out, the Sun (et al) asked the court to throw out Johnny Depp\u2019s libel suit by alleging that Depp failed to turn over texts about trying to obtain drugs. Justice Nichol has determined today that Johnny Depp did breached the order but did NOT dismiss the suit. Instead, the court has given Depp the opportunity to rescue the situation by applying for \u201crelief against sanctions.\u201d A hearing about the sanctions was set for later today.</p>\n<p>I\u2019ll post updates as fast as I get them.</p>\n<p>Personally, I don\u2019t see what those texts have to do with the Sun calling Johnny a wife beater, but the court says that the timing of those texts is significant because of the timing. They were said to occur during a 3 day period in Australia when Heard insists that she was abused. Which is rubbish, of course, but that\u2019s what court is for. To sort out the mess.</p>\n<p>The sun libel trial is set to commence on July 7th, if everything stays the course.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://www.theguardian.com/film/2020/jun/29/uk-judge-rules-against-johnny-depp-over-drugs-texts-in-libel-case\" rel=\"nofollow\">SOURCE</a></p>", "photo": {"id": "224173592", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/4/ll/yg/NBllYGqmichSNrl-800x450-noPad.jpg?1593436401", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "27135402", "createdAt": "2020-06-28T15:20:01.000Z", "title": "The petition at 451,000", "description": "<p>Our little petition has passed a milestone. First we hit the 450,000 mark, then eased over into 451. It makes me happy to see so many people willing to step up and take a stand for justice for Johnny Depp, a male survivor of domestic abuse. It\u2019s important for people to recognize that men are victims, too.</p>\n<p>I don\u2019t expect Amber Heard to get fired because of this petition, though it would be nice to know we made such a difference. But what this petition really does is raise awareness.</p>\n<p>Every time we make the news, there\u2019s a chance that somebody new might read the petition and realize what Johnny Depp really went through at the hands of Amber Heard. It\u2019s important for him to be vindicated, but it\u2019s also important in the broader sense that men can be the victims of not only abuse, but the unsubstantiated accusations of some spiteful abuser that wants to ruin him. Any man can fall victim to it. Anybody can.</p>\n<p>Most recently, a guy called <a href=\"https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=1&amp;v=rYTVB52-Pok&amp;feature=emb_title\" rel=\"nofollow\">ENTERTAINMENT HACKER</a> made a video about us, and he explains beautifully how the petition can help raise awareness. It\u2019s worth a look.</p>\n<p>So, you see, it\u2019s a cycle. The petition raises awareness, and the press reports on us, raising awareness about us so we can raise even more awareness about the issue.</p>\n<p>Thank you to everybody who shares this petition, whether it\u2019s through the media, or one person sharing the link. Each and every one of you is helping bring justice for Johnny, and raise awareness of a very important issue whose time has come.</p>\n<p>You guys rock.</p>", "photo": {"id": "224166930", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/2/lw/zy/bTlWzyCQCMtTGIe-800x450-noPad.jpg?1593357646", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "27107946", "createdAt": "2020-06-25T20:20:41.000Z", "title": "Amanda De Cadenet jumps ship", "description": "<p>#MeToo activist Amanda De Cadenet has withdrawn her support for \u201cclose\u201d personal friend Amber Heard. Amanda says that she feels \u201cused\u201d and \u201cmisled\u201d by Amber Heard after hearing heard abuse ex Johnny Depp in audio tapes.</p>\n<p>Amber Heard was expecting the long-time women\u2019s rights activist to testify on her behalf Johnny Depp\u2019s upcoming libel suit against the UK tabloid the Sun, which starts in just 12 days, and in Depp\u2019s looming defamation suit against Amber Heard herself. Now, that\u2019s not going to happen.</p>\n<p>It remains unclear whether or not De Cadenet will testify on behalf of Johnny Depp.</p>\n<p>If you recall, Amanda De Cadenet (center) was pictured with a smiling and bruise-free Amber Heard just hours after she (Heard) claimed that she was brutally attacked. But said nothing.</p>\n<p>And those tapes were released in January 2020, six months ago, but De Cadenet said nothing. Still, the fact that one of Heard\u2019s staunchest supporters and a leader in the #MeToo movement has withdrawn support for Heard is a HUGE development. The closer the court dates get, the more rats jump off of Heard\u2019s sinking ship.</p>\n<p>Who do you think will jump off next? iO? Rocky? Rocketman? Who else has she got left?</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8456747/Prominent-MeToo-activist-Amanda-Cadenet-drops-support-Amber-Heard.html\" rel=\"nofollow\">SOURCE</a></p>", "photo": {"id": "224146513", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/3/bx/ca/GRBXcASihXkIaVf-800x450-noPad.jpg?1593116444", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "27089232", "createdAt": "2020-06-24T03:19:19.000Z", "title": "Amber Heard refuses Hipaa", "description": "<p>Amber Heard continues to refuse to sign HIPAA releases for her medical records and instead wants Johnny Depp to trust that she has the records she believes to be relevant.</p>\n<p>Trust? Seriously?\u00a0</p>\n<p>Sorry, honey, that's not the way court works. Court compels you to provide certain documents and you provide them. Unless you're Amber Heard. She has filed a motion to not sign the Hipaa papers, and show up only with the records that SHE thinks are relevant.\u00a0</p>\n<p>I have no doubt that her request will be denied, and that she'll be legally compelled to sign over her medical records. All of them.\u00a0</p>\n<p>And besides, isn't this kind of nonsense what she accused Johnny of in the media? Refusing to turn over his medical records? She really does accuse him of the shenanigans she pulls, doesn't she?\u00a0</p>\n<p>I can't wait for the outcome of the Virginia defamation case, even more than the outcome of the UK libel case. I'm sure that Johnny will prevail in both. Not because I'm a fan, but because he showed up with all the evidence. More than we've seen, I'm sure.</p>\n<p>Is it July 10th yet?</p>", "photo": {"id": "224133495", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/6/un/zd/IIuNzDMTNgcMflX-800x450-noPad.jpg?1592968761", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "27074363", "createdAt": "2020-06-22T19:21:27.000Z", "title": "Johnny Depp is in London", "description": "<p>It's happening, folks. Johnny Depp is in London under mandatory 2-week quarantine to prepare for the start of his libel case against the UK tabloid The Sun.\u00a0 The case is set to start on July 7th and could take up to three weeks to cover everything.\u00a0</p>\n<p>No doubt the result of this case will directly impact upon Depp's 50m defamation case against ex-wife Amber Heard, and her future in Hollywood - which already appears to be in shambles as it is.</p>\n<p>How do you think it's going to go down?</p>", "photo": {"id": "224123000", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/4/ah/zf/zfaHZfMTeaIBGkN-800x450-noPad.jpg?1592853689", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "27025403", "createdAt": "2020-06-18T02:25:43.000Z", "title": "Cara Delevingne had a 3-way with Heard and Musk, testimony", "description": "<p>Just when you didn\u2019t think the Depp-Heard scandal could get any messier, along come claims that supermodel Cara Delevingne had a three-way hookup with Amber Heard and Elon Musk.</p>\n<p>Josh Drew is the ex-husband of Amber Heard\u2019s BFF Raquel Pennington. He and the (ex) Mrs. lived in one of the penthouses the Johnny Depp owned, free of charge, so he was privy to many of the goings-on in Heard\u2019s nasty affairs.</p>\n<p>In an interview with Depp\u2019s attorney Benjamin Chew, Josh Drew admits that Rocky (Raquel, his then wife) told him that Amber Heard was having a three-way affair with both Cara Delevingne and Elon Musk.</p>\n<p>There had been previous rumors that Heard and Delevingne were having an affair before and during the time of Depp and Heard\u2019s divorce, but this is the first mention of a three-way with Heard, the supermodel and the billionaire.</p>\n<p>Now, Cara Delevingne might find herself in the company of James Franco and Elon Musk, who have both been subpoenaed to testify in Heard and Depp\u2019s legal struggles.</p>\n<p>I\u2019m betting that a casual affair with a couple of friends wasn\u2019t worth the trouble of having to testify in court in front of a jury and the whole world wasn\u2019t worth the public humiliation Delevingne stands to suffer.</p>\n<p>This is relevant to the case because both of these people have seen her up close and can testify as to whether or not she had any injuries that she claimed were inflicted upon her.\u00a0</p>\n<p>What do you think of this whole sordid mess?</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://perezhilton.com/amber-heard-cara-delevingne-elon-musk-cheating-threesome-johnny-depp/\" rel=\"nofollow\">SOURCE</a></p>", "photo": {"id": "224086043", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/4/fa/yx/JZfAYXXORUjRXCY-800x450-noPad.jpg?1592447145", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}], "pageInfo": {"endCursor": "YXJyYXljb25uZWN0aW9uOjE2Nw==", "hasNextPage": true}}}}}, {"data": {"petition": {"id": "14451136", "slug": "dc-entertainment-remove-amber-heard-from-aquaman-2", "user": {"id": "24448735", "displayName": "Jeanne Larson", "photo": {"id": "221862322", "userSmall": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/7/xs/ly/cXXSLydpSVDqIVB-48x48-noPad.jpg?1553098061", "processing": false}}}, "organization": null, "updatesConnection": {"nodes": [{"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "26982265", "createdAt": "2020-06-14T14:01:29.000Z", "title": "Kaplan jumps ship", "description": "<p>Roberta Kaplan and her legal team have withdrawn from representing Amber heard. See the picture from the county's court website to see who Amber has left. It's getting pretty slim.</p>\n<p>Think about this. The lawyer that represented Harvey Weinstein and Jussie Smollet doesn't want to represent Amber Heard anymore.\u00a0</p>\n<p>This action comes after Heard's last motion to dismiss was denied, and mere days after Melanie Inglessis's motion not to testify was quashed. Inglessis will have to testify.</p>\n<p>Johnny Depp's attorney, Adam Waldman has been relentless is pointing out Kaplan's ties to such shady clients in the past. Looks like his tactics have paid off. Well done, sir.</p>\n<p>I'm not sure what this will mean for Amber Heard's case, but it is nautical fact that rats jump off a ship as it's sinking.</p>", "photo": {"id": "224050981", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/2/by/qz/aKbyQzIURvMPDbV-800x450-noPad.jpg?1592143290", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "26962557", "createdAt": "2020-06-12T18:14:33.000Z", "title": "Melanie Inglessis will testify", "description": "<p>Amber Heard's former makeup artist Melanie Inglessis filed a motion asking not to have to testify via live feed in johnny Depp's upcoming libel case against the Sun Newspaper.</p>\n<p>The motion was denied. She will have to testify.</p>\n<p>If you remember, Melanie said in a declaration that she saw bruises around Amber Heard's eye(s) when she made the actress up for an appearance on the James Cordon late night show just a day or two after Heard claimed that her (then) husband Johnny Depp beat her up.\u00a0</p>\n<p>However, other people, including Heard's stylist, have said that they saw no marks on Heard's face the very same day.</p>\n<p>Now Melanie's in the hot seat. We all know that Johnny never beat Amber up, so there could not possibly have been bruises anywhere on her face from him hitting her. Melanie's stuck between a rock and a hard place. Does she tell the truth and admit that she was lying before? Or does she stick with the lie and risk perjuring herself?</p>\n<p>The Sun trial starts on 10 July, just one month away.\u00a0</p>\n<p>How do you think it'll turn out?</p>", "photo": {"id": "224036808", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/7/bo/zh/GLBoZhJAsjjxhLX-800x450-noPad.jpg?1591985674", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "26873103", "createdAt": "2020-06-06T20:29:29.000Z", "title": "Where did the money go?", "description": "<p>Johnny Depp\u2019s legal team has issued subpoenas for any communication Amber Heard has had with the ACLU and Children\u2019s hospital regarding the donations she\u2019s supposed to have made to those charities.</p>\n<p>Depp's team is asking for \u201ccommunications\u201d including, \u201cany written or verbal exchanges between any person or persons or entities, including but not limited to verbal conversations, telephone calls, letters, e-mails, memoranda, reports, telegraphs, faxes, exhibits, drawings, text messages, and any other documents which confirm or related to the written or verbal exchange.\"</p>\n<p>Specifically, the subpoenas are asking for \"All documents that refer, reflect or relate to any donations made to YOU or for YOUR benefit by Ms. Heard, from January 1, 2016, through and including the present.\"</p>\n<p>According to Depp and Heard\u2019s divorce settlement,\u00a0that the actress would get $7 million from the actor as an equalization payment.\u00a0As a caveat to the payment, it was agreed upon that the money would be donated to charity.</p>\n<p>Heard had cited those two charities, the ACLU and Children\u2019s hospital as the charities to which she would donate, and Johnny offered to send the money straight to those organizations. Heard, however, declined, saying that to do so would change and violate the terms of their divorce.</p>\n<p>So now, Johnny wants to know where the money went.</p>\n<p>Questions to Amber\u2019s PR team about the subpoenas have gone unanswered.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://theblast.com/c/johnny-depp-amber-heard-legal-war-subpoena-aclu-childrens-hospital-questions-donations\" rel=\"nofollow\">SOURCE</a></p>", "photo": {"id": "223974807", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/0/ho/un/EehOUNWfbcSDIsR-800x450-noPad.jpg?1591475373", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "26800697", "createdAt": "2020-06-02T20:07:43.000Z", "title": "Amber Heard\u2019s makeup artist is fighting it", "description": "<p>M\u00e9lanie Inglessis, Amber Heard\u2019s former makeup artist is trying <a href=\"https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-esq/amber-heards-makeup-artist-fighting-live-testimony-johnny-depps-uk-libel-trial-1296661\" rel=\"nofollow\">to quash the judge\u2019s order</a> for her to testify remotely during Johnny Depp\u2019s libel case against the Sun magazine for labeling him a wife beater on its cover.</p>\n<p>Inglessis said in a 2019 declaration that she saw bruises on Amber Heard\u2019s face and covered them up with makeup for an appearance on the Late Show with James Cordon. The day before that, Heard had claimed the Depp gave her a black eye.</p>\n<p>In the same declaration, she said that Amber told her \u201cmany times\u201d that Depp had abused his then wife. Now, Inglessis doesn\u2019t want to testify to that fact. In fact, she doesn\u2019t want to testify at all.</p>\n<p>On May 16, Inglessis filed a motion in California federal court asking\u00a0Magistrate Judge Patrick J. Walsh to quash his order compelling her give live testimony via a video feed. She also informed the court that she's received \"death threats and faced online harassment.\u201d Inglessis also says her career as a celebrity makeup artist will suffer if she's forced to testify.</p>\n<p>A hearing is set for June 10 to decide the matter.</p>\n<p>It\u2019s no wonder that Inglessis doesn\u2019t want to testify, given that so many other people have testified that at the same time, they saw Heard without any bruises or marks on her face at all. Let\u2019s not forget that Heard\u2019s stylist, <a href=\"https://perezhilton.com/amber-heard-johnny-depp-black-eye-stylist/\" rel=\"nofollow\">Samantha McMillen</a>, styled Amber Heard for that same James Cordon show and swore that there wasn\u2019t a mark on her. Not one.</p>\n<p>There\u2019s the picture from the show. What do you think?</p>", "photo": {"id": "223906169", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/7/on/xp/spOnXPrFkUMvOkm-800x450-noPad.jpg?1591128466", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "26778177", "createdAt": "2020-05-31T18:33:32.000Z", "title": "$5,258,088", "description": "<p>More than five and a quarter million dollars. That's how much money Warner Bros stands to lose on Aquaman 2 if Amber Heard is in it.\u00a0</p>\n<p>I reached that figure by multiplying the number of signatures on this petition by 12 - the average I'm using for movie tickets.\u00a0</p>\n<p>And that doesn't count the people that plan to boycott the film that haven't signed this petition. The amount could top 6 or 7 million.\u00a0That may not seem like a whole lot when you put it next to a billion, but there's no denying that it's a substantial chunk of change nonetheless.\u00a0\u00a0</p>\n<p>Amber Heard is already out of AM2 by all reports, but I still hope that Warner Bros is paying attention, just in case they reconsider. And I hope all the other studios are looking, too. Their public is speaking, and we don't want Amber Heard. We don't want her in movies and we don't want her plastered all over L'Oreal ads. We just don't want her at all.\u00a0</p>\n<p>Keep up the good work signing and sharing this petition, as well as the one to boot her from L'Oreal. We the people are the ones with the real power when it comes to where the money goes. Let's make 'em listen.</p>", "photo": {"id": "223880928", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/3/ae/fr/OhaeFrLkgXxiynA-800x450-noPad.jpg?1590950014", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "26723491", "createdAt": "2020-05-25T16:48:55.000Z", "title": "L'Oreal condones domestic violence", "description": "<p>Even though more evidence against comes to light almost daily about what a monster Amber Heard is, L\u2019Or\u00e9al continues to employ her as a spokesmodel. But Heard\u2019s fate has yet to be officially confirmed in a court of law.</p>\n<p>For L\u2019Or\u00e9al, though, Heard\u2019s innocence or guilt shouldn't really be the issue. The suspicion should have been enough. After all, if a man were accused of half the things Amber Heard has done, he would have been sacked on the spot. The fact that Amber Heard continues to be a spokesperson for L\u2019Or\u00e9al can only mean that the brand condones domestic violence and abusers. They are firmly in their corner.</p>\n<p>A responsible company that cares about the rights of abused people would have immediately distanced themselves from Heard. At the least, they would have withdrawn her images from public circulation whilst they awaited the outcome of the trial.</p>\n<p>Instead, L\u2019Or\u00e9al has done exactly the opposite, posting images of Amber Heard over the weekend, praising her for her inner strength and beauty. To add insult to injury, the very next image they posted was a pair of pink boxing gloves, further teasing at their support of violent behavior.</p>\n<p>The outrage on Twitter was immediate and definite. It\u2019s a slap in the face to all domestic violence survivors, and quite a few people didn\u2019t hesitate to say so.</p>\n<p>A LOT of people have sworn to boycott L\u2019Or\u00e9al and the companies it owns - including Maybelline, Garnier, and Lanc\u00f4me. I\u2019m one of those people. I won\u2019t touch anything those companies make, from hair care to lipstick. \u00a0I\u2019ll buy the 99 cent knockoffs at the dollar store first.</p>\n<p>If L\u2019Or\u00e9al continues to endorse a known abuser, they will find themselves on the wrong side of history. There\u2019s no telling what damage they stand to suffer. For a beauty company, it certainly won\u2019t be pretty. And they will have only themselves to blame.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://medium.com/thecre8tive/lor%C3%A9al-s-association-with-amber-heard-condones-domestic-violence-3f35d294ad5a\" rel=\"nofollow\">SOURCE</a></p>", "photo": {"id": "223831227", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/3/po/he/JOpOhEMDNhTRdXV-800x450-noPad.jpg?1590425339", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "26712424", "createdAt": "2020-05-23T23:33:04.000Z", "title": "Amber Heard as Batwoman?", "description": "<p>There\u2019s a <a href=\"https://twitter.com/DiscussingMovie/status/1262870353837203458\" rel=\"nofollow\">parody site</a> that\u2019s saying that Ambere Heard is in talks to replace Ruby Rose as Batwoman.</p>\n<p>It\u2019s a PARODY site, folks, meaning that it\u2019s not real. But that\u2019s not stopping Amber Stans from clamoring over it. Her fans have exploded all over the Twitter-verse with excitement over the</p>\n<p>Batwoman has been renewed for another season. Rose\u2019s reason for leaving has not been disclosed. Initially, there was much speculation whether she had exited the show due to her surgeries for two herniated discs last year. A source told Variety that this wasn't the case and Rose's decision was nothing to do with her.</p>\n<p>But one thing you can count on is that Amber Heard is not going to step into those shiny black boots.</p>\n<p>And level-headed fans rejoice.</p>\n<p>\"Thank god, I almost had a heart attack,\" one fan wrote, while another tweeted, \"That amber heard as batwoman tweet.. you tricksters almost had me...\"</p>\n<p>\"Thank you, I so needed that laugh today,\" another tweeted.</p>\n<p>\"I really hope not,\" another fan wrote.</p>\n<p>Amber has a part in the upcoming Stephen King miniseries \u201cThe Stand\u201d as Nadine Cross, a selfish, dark-spirited woman who, in a single act of conscience, beheads herself to thwart the spawn of darkness. As for me, I\u2019ll gladly watch THAT part.</p>\n<p>Aside from that, though, Amber\u2019s prospects look pretty bleak when it comes to getting roles. Word has it that she\u2019s unbondable. Uninsurable. And nobody will hire an actress that can\u2019t be bonded. So we may not be seeing her in anything else anytime soon.</p>\n<p>What are your thoughts?</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://meaww.com/batwoman-ruby-rose-exit-amber-heard-replaced-fans-says-no-fake-news-parody\" rel=\"nofollow\">SOURCE</a></p>", "photo": {"id": "223821965", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/4/oh/jf/AmohJFTqxLVPKAp-800x450-noPad.jpg?1590276786", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "26676296", "createdAt": "2020-05-19T16:11:32.000Z", "title": "That chat with Laura Divenere", "description": "<p>Amidst all of the legal wrangling back and forth between Amber Heard\u2019s legal team and Johnny Depp\u2019s, a conversation took place between Laura Divenere and Amber Heard. The chat itself isn\u2019t much to write home about, just the two of them trash-talking Adam Waldman, Johnny\u2019s lawyer, and crapping themselves about having to give depositions whether they like it or not.</p>\n<p>What\u2019s really interesting about this conversation, though, is that Amber Heard recorded it without Laura\u2019s knowledge or consent (see photo). Normally that wouldn\u2019t be a problem because so many states are one-party states, meaning that only one party in the conversation needs to give consent in order to record it. But <a href=\"https://www.dmlp.org/legal-guide/california-recording-law\" rel=\"nofollow\">California</a> is not a one-party state. That means that if both (or all) parties don\u2019t give consent, it\u2019s illegal to record the conversation. It constitutes wiretapping, which carries a $250,000 fine and/or up to 1 year in jail.</p>\n<p>You can read a transcript of the conversation between Amber and Laura\u00a0<a href=\"https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/6811708-Laura.html\" rel=\"nofollow\">HERE</a>. Make of it what you will.</p>\n<p>The question I have to as is this: How many laws does Amber have to break before she\u2019s held accountable?</p>", "photo": {"id": "223795521", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/3/sf/or/TwsfoRhWSTmqOcV-800x450-noPad.jpg?1589904693", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "26667583", "createdAt": "2020-05-18T15:15:58.000Z", "title": "Vanessa, Winona, Kate James will testify", "description": "<p>The Judge has ruled that Amber Heard's drinking and claims that she doctored vaccination certificates to smuggle her dogs into Australia WILL be used against her in ex-Johnny Depp's libel case against The Sun. That\u2019s pretty huge, as it shows Ms. Heard\u2019s disregard for the law.</p>\n<p>Court has also ruled that Heard\u2019s former PA can testify. Mr. Justice Nicol declared that some, limited testimony from Kate James, a former personal assistant to Heard, will be included in the forthcoming trial. Specifically, Kate never saw any bodily injuries on Amber Heard\u2019s body or face.</p>\n<p>Likewise, Mr. Justice Nicol will admit testimony from Vanessa Paradis, Johnny Depp\u2019s partner of 14 years and the mother of his two children. Vanessa has written letters of support for Johnny and has been vocal about the fact that Johnny is kind and gentle, and has never been abusive toward her</p>\n<p>Winona Ryder\u2019s, Johnny\u2019s past girlfriend, will also testify that Johnny was never abusive towards her in any way. In her statement, Ryder said: \u201cI cannot wrap my head around [Heard\u2019s] accusations. He was never, never violent towards me. He [Depp] was never, never abusive at all towards me.\u201d</p>\n<p>Heard was not happy about the ruling. A spokeswoman for Heard said: \u201cAs the judgment today shows, Mr. Depp\u2019s team has been attempting to introduce irrelevant evidence. This is one of the defining characteristics of their strategy \u2013 to adduce irrelevant evidence designed to smear Ms. Heard and distract from the facts so that people do not focus on Mr. Depp\u2019s behaviour.\u201d</p>\n<p>In other words, she\u2019s all butthurt that his past girlfriends get to say what a nice guy he is.</p>\n<p>Unfortunately, testimony from David Killackey, Johnny Depp\u2019s mechanic, was ruled irrelevant and will not be admitted. If you remember, Killackey was witness to threats from both Amber Heard and her father, as well as being sexually harassed by Heard herself.</p>\n<p>We need to keep in mind that this is ONLY Johnny\u2019s libel case against the Sun. ONLY about whether Johnny was abusive toward Amber Heard, not about her being abusive to him. Evidence that may be irrelevant to the libel case in the UK will probably be admissible in Johnny\u2019s Defamation case in VA. We\u2019ll most likely heard from Mr. Killackey then.</p>\n<p>I for one can't wait to see how this plays out. What do you think?</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://www.theguardian.com/film/2020/may/18/johnny-depp-libel-claim-can-use-amber-heard-pa-evidence-the-sun-says-high-court\" rel=\"nofollow\">SOURCE</a><br><a href=\"https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8330805/Judge-rules-Amber-Heards-drinking-red-wine-used-against-Johnny-Depps-libel-case.html\" rel=\"nofollow\">SOURCE</a></p>", "photo": {"id": "223789046", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/9/bu/er/aRbUERuvPPqKprd-800x450-noPad.jpg?1589814959", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "26642351", "createdAt": "2020-05-15T10:31:24.000Z", "title": "It wasn't just Johnny she abused", "description": "<p>In the midst of the sh*tstorm of accusations flying back and forth between Johnny Depp and Amber heard, it\u2019s important to remember that when someone is abusive, they generally have a history of abusing other people.</p>\n<p>Lately, Amber Heard\u2019s team has been accusing Johnny of abusing his past girlfriends, trying desperately to establish a pattern of abuse by Johnny.</p>\n<p>That\u2019s blown up in her face repeatedly, because those past girlfriends have shown up every time\u00a0<a href=\"https://www.thedailybeast.com/winona-ryder-and-vanessa-paradis-defend-johnny-depp-he-was-never-never-violent\" rel=\"nofollow\">to defend him</a>, saying that he\u2019s a kind and gentle and was never violent with them.</p>\n<p>Amber heard, on the other hand, has a long and storied history of showing violent tendencies with multiple people. She was arrested in 2009 and 9 for\u00a0<a href=\"https://www.usatoday.com/story/life/movies/2016/06/07/amber-heard-arrested-2009-charge-hitting-girlfriend/85563338/\" rel=\"nofollow\">assaulting her wife</a>\u00a0Tasya Van Ree. Stories are still coming out about other women stepping forward to say that she also abused them.</p>\n<p>Fast forward to the present and Amber\u2019s current trials and tribulations. The stories about injuries she reportedly inflicted upon Johnny Depp \u2013 in her own words caught on tape \u2013 have been pretty well documented. I\u2019m not here to recount all of them. I\u2019d be here all day. Suffice it to say that she tortured him and nearly killed him on several occasions.</p>\n<p>It does bear mentioning that it's not just Johnny that was affected by Heard's actions. His children were often in the house during these incidents and witnessed the immediate aftermath.</p>\n<p>And there have been other victims of Amber\u2019s wrath. Kate James, Heard\u2019s former personal assistant, has come forward with horrifying and heartbreaking stories <a href=\"https://theblast.com/c/johnny-depp-amber-heard-abuse-assistant-kate-james-lawsuit-drugs-mental-verbal-trial\" rel=\"nofollow\">of\u00a0the way she was treated</a>\u00a0at Amber Heard\u2019s hands.</p>\n<p>\u201dAmber was regularly verbally and mentally abusive and would often scream at me in that way, over the smallest things. She would fly into blind rages where no-one could reason with her, and even if I was trying to offer an explanation, I didn\u2019t think that she could hear me as she was so angry. It was like she thought regular things that can go wrong in any person\u2019s life on any given day didn\u2019t apply to her. Everything that went wrong was always my fault. I remember one occasion where she missed a connection on a flight on or around Christmas Day in 2012. My aunt was visiting from Australia at that time. She was screaming abuse at me for literally hours as though I had made it snow and caused the disruptions to the flight.\u201d</p>\n<p>One time, Amber Heard took James\u2019\u00a0<a href=\"https://twitter.com/winonasrider/status/1237872412080795649?lang=en\" rel=\"nofollow\">4 year old son</a>\u00a0to use as a human prop in a photo shoot. If I recall correctly, Heard drove with the tiny toddler in the front seat without any restraint. Jame\u2019s was horrified and couldn\u2019t get her son away from Heard fast enough.</p>\n<p>Then there\u2019s <a href=\"https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7743993/Amber-Heards-father-threatened-SHOOT-Johnny-Depp-witness-testifies-actors-defamation-suit.html\" rel=\"nofollow\">David Killackey</a>, who was reportedly threatened and sexually harassed by Amber Heard. David, who worked on both Heard and Depp's classic cars, claimed that Heard was\u00a0abusive toward him\u00a0and that her father, David Heard, made 'death threats' toward Depp in a phone call. Killackey said the abuse began after he told Heard that all work on the cars would have to be paid directly, rather than through Depp's management.\u00a0\u201cThe reply I received was to verbally abuse me with expletives, threats and a continued rant over what she claimed was an unfortunate financial downturn of her personal finances caused by Mr. Depp. At one point she said \"you motherf***er, you're screwing me!\"</p>\n<p>Another time, Heard asked Killackey to show her something in her car. Then, when they were both inside, Heard said suggestively that they were alone down there and that \u201canything could happen.\u201d Killackey immediately exited the vehicle, spurning her advances, and that she became unpleasant after that.</p>\n<p>Killackey said that he stopped communicating with Heard directly after a 'very unpleasant' call, and soon began to hear from her father instead.\u00a0During one phone call about the repairs, David Heard allegedly told Killackey: 'That f***ing piece of s*** is f***ing me too because I'm supposed to get 10 percent of the money and without it I can't produce the movie I was gunna make!\u201d David Heard went on to say: 'When I get to him I'm going to beat the s*** out of him' and 'I'm from Texas, and men from Texas carry 45's and Johnny is going to meet the f***ing end of mine!' Killackey claimed.\u00a0\u00a0</p>\n<p>Killackey reported the threats to the police.</p>\n<p>Apparently, that apple didn\u2019t fall far from the tree.</p>\n<p>The point, here, is that it\u2019s Amber Heard is the one that has a history of abusive behavior, not Johnny Depp. No matter how much smoke and mirrors she throws up to make it look like Johnny is the one who was violent, there is simply no getting away from the history of her own actions. And, soon enough, she\u2019ll end up paying for them. He tacky little web is falling apart around her, and she\u2019s got nowhere left to hide.</p>\n<p>I, for one, can\u2019t wait to see her finally meet her Karma. I only wish I could have a front row seat.</p>", "photo": {"id": "223770448", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/1/aj/sp/khaJsPnDNHPfNpr-800x450-noPad.jpg?1589538998", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "26603653", "createdAt": "2020-05-10T23:53:54.000Z", "title": "\"Official\" confirmation. Will we get it?", "description": "<p>We would all love to see official confirmation that Amber Heard has been fired. But when it comes to the entertainment industry, it\u2019s not always that cut and dried.</p>\n<p>Everybody in Hollywood might know for a fact that she won\u2019t be returning as Mera in Aquaman 2. She might already know it herself. So could we. We could know that she\u2019s already been dealt out of the movie and blacklisted from the DC universe, and blackballed in Hollywood, but might be waiting for \u201cofficial\u201d confirmation before we let ourselves believe it.</p>\n<p>But that\u2019s not always the way it goes in Hollywood. We might never get \u201cofficial\u201d confirmation. It\u2019s entirely possible that the only confirmation we actually get is when they film and release the film without her in it.</p>\n<p>I hear some Amber Stan in the back screaming: \u201cBut she has a contract! You\u2019re stupid!\u201d And that maybe true, on both counts. But consider this. Actors can be bought out of their contracts the same way athletes can, and for a variety of reasons. Remember when Robert Downey Junior couldn\u2019t be insured because of his drug use? Didn\u2019t the same thing happen to Linsey Lohan? That could be why. Or there could be a heinous breach of the contract\u2019s morals clause. Could be she was just a nightmare to work with and they were looking for a reason to dump her.</p>\n<p>It could be anything.</p>\n<p>RDJ was able to regroup and make the world's best comeback, thanks to the friends he has in the industry, and I'm glad.</p>\n<p>Whatever the reason, there\u2019s every reason to believe that Amber Heard won\u2019t be back in Aquaman 2. I don\u2019t know if they\u2019ll replace her as Mera, or if they\u2019ll just write the character out and get Momoa a new love interest. Either way, the movie will be better for it. I, personally, look forward to enjoying it without her in it.</p>\n<p>The moral of the story is a lot of fans already believe that Amber Heard is out. You may not, and that\u2019s fine. But don\u2019t hold your breath for \u201cofficial\u201d confirmation. It may not come. But when AM2 comes out without her, we\u2019ll all be celebrating just the same.</p>\n<p>I\u2019m bringing the marshmallows to toast over the flames of her ruined career. Feel free to join me.</p>", "photo": {"id": "223742506", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/2/uu/ej/JlUUejuQrrtsWoC-800x450-noPad.jpg?1589154838", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "26595397", "createdAt": "2020-05-09T19:20:43.000Z", "title": "That reporter from the Times", "description": "<p>A few days ago, I was contacted by a journalist from the NYTimes, asking me about the petition. I was dumb and na\u00efve, and I responded to her questions.</p>\n<p>The reporter\u2019s name is Rachel Abrams. In addition to the Times, she\u2019s written pieces for Variety and other publications that favor Amber and Elon Musk, as well as others. I didn\u2019t know that when I talked to her. I thought I was helping to get the petition some attention with a piece in the New York Times. I\u2019m sure she was counting on that. And, sadly, she got it.</p>\n<p>She asked me about why I started the petition. I told her that I started the petition because I was sick of the inequality in Hollywood. If a man were accused of half the things that Amber reportedly did, he would have been sacked on the spot. And, in fact, he was. Johnny got canned because of Amber\u2019s WaPo op-ed.</p>\n<p>She asked me if any famous names have signed. I said that I saw the name Nic Cage scroll by, but that there\u2019s no way of knowing if that was the real Nicolas Cage showing support for his friend or if somebody was just using that name. No way to tell.</p>\n<p>She asked for a list of people who have signed this petition, but don\u2019t worry, kids. She did not get it. Under no circumstances would I serve you guys up that way. You\u2019re safe with me.</p>\n<p>She asked if I've talked to Adam Waldman. I told her that I have not.</p>\n<p>She asked where I got my information for my updates, and I named several sources, like the Blast. I\u2019m sorry to say that I also named Brian McPherson, <a href=\"https://twitter.com/ThatBrianFella\" rel=\"nofollow\">ThatBrianFella</a> on Twitter and <a href=\"https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCg0C-N_MPYYOXyF4T3jMxNQ\" rel=\"nofollow\">Incredibly Average</a> on Youtube. He truly is the best source for information, the way he scours every source available and reports on it objectively. I stressed that several times, his objectivity. It\u2019s easy to lean in Johnny Depp\u2019s favor when all the shady stuff is on Amber\u2019s side, but Brian sticks to objectivity. That\u2019s what makes him such a reliable source.</p>\n<p>I was an idiot. I chatted away, thinking everything was on the up and up. And I hope they were. But there\u2019s the very real possibility that I was just fodder for a hit piece she and her team are working on to make Johnny Depp and his fans look stupid, and I walked right into it.</p>\n<p>Watch for her piece, folks. Only time will tell what spin she had in mind when she got me on the phone.</p>\n<p>If she was legitimately interested in the petition, as she seemed, I hope she writes a piece that brings some attention to the inequality of cause and effect within Hollywood.</p>\n<p>If, on the other hand, her intentions were duplicitous and I was played for a fool, I can only hope that I am kindly forgiven by the wonderful folks within the Depp community for being so naive. I intended only good.</p>\n<p>We\u2019ll have to wait and see.</p>", "photo": {"id": "223736257", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/8/py/co/mwPYCOpVTuashGM-800x450-noPad.jpg?1589052045", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}], "pageInfo": {"endCursor": "YXJyYXljb25uZWN0aW9uOjE3OQ==", "hasNextPage": true}}}}}, {"data": {"petition": {"id": "14451136", "slug": "dc-entertainment-remove-amber-heard-from-aquaman-2", "user": {"id": "24448735", "displayName": "Jeanne Larson", "photo": {"id": "221862322", "userSmall": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/7/xs/ly/cXXSLydpSVDqIVB-48x48-noPad.jpg?1553098061", "processing": false}}}, "organization": null, "updatesConnection": {"nodes": [{"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "26587280", "createdAt": "2020-05-08T19:14:49.000Z", "title": "Amber Heard has been fired from Aquaman 2", "description": "<p>Some inside sources have unofficially confirmed that Amber Heard has been sacked from AM2. Apparently they don't want to start filming and then get left in the lurch if she gets hauled off to jail for falsifying evidence, a very real possibility.</p>\n<p>It's not official confirmation, but it's the next best thing. It's likely that the official announcement will come after Johnny Depp wins one or both of his cases they have pending.\u00a0</p>\n<p>What a sh*t show that's going to be, with everybody from James Franco to Elon Musk already subpoenaed to appear. People think that those two are being called because they allegedly cheated with Amber in Johnny's penthouse, but I think they're going to be asked to testify that they didn't see any marks on her in the days following her claim that she was beaten.</p>\n<p>It's pretty obvious what was going on, but the meat of the matter is that she faked those bruises, and those two can testify to that - or risk perjuring themselves.</p>\n<p>So, it may be a little while before we get OFFICIAL confirmation, but we can unofficially start the party.</p>", "photo": {"id": "223730504", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/1/ez/kj/mfEzKJrYXWmNZBJ-800x450-noPad.jpg?1588965291", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "26568574", "createdAt": "2020-05-06T19:30:09.000Z", "title": "Elon Musk melts down on Twitter.", "description": "<p>Following the birth of his latest son - I'd provide his name, but frankly, I can't understand it - Elon musk jumped on twitter to criticize UK coronavirus advisor Neil Ferguson, who\u00a0just stepped down from his government post\u00a0after getting caught breaking quarantine rules for a tryst with a married woman.</p>\n<p>\"What a tool,\" Musk wrote while retweeting an article about Ferguson's public indiscretion.</p>\n<p>Depp fans were quick to point out Musk's indiscretions with Amber Heard just one month after she married Johnny Depp.\u00a0</p>\n<p>Musk adamantly denies he was involved in any love triangle, and reaffirmed his stance on Tuesday.</p>\n<p>Of the images released of video footage showing Musk in the elevator going up to Depp's penthouse with Heard, Musk said: \"This is false. JD\u2019s team put out 'video evidence', but conveniently excluded the date stamp, as it was well after JD &amp; AH had separated.\"</p>\n<p>A die-hard Johnny Depp fan continued to lay into Musk and did not let him off the hook for the denial.</p>\n<p>\"The building staff testified under oath they let you in the building while Johnny was filming in Australia. Amber asked them to get you a fob so you had freedom to come and go. Security saw you multiple times while they were married,\" the person wrote to Musk.</p>\n<p>Musk once again claimed that whoever gave a deposition was not telling the truth, and wrote:</p>\n<p>\"This person is wrong. Why does JD want to believe he got cucked so bad anyway!?\"</p>\n<p>\u201cCuck\u201d is a concept borne out of insecurity: a fear that one is inadequate, sexually or otherwise, and that inadequacy will lead to the loss of the things that are important to him. ... Those who call others a cuck do so in the desperate hope that shreds of their own masculine and racial prominence can be protected.</p>\n<p>So Elon Musk is taking pot shots at Johnny's masculinity, saying Johnny wasn't enough of a man for Amber, and that he himself was. The use of that word speaks volumes about Musk's own insecurities, though, rather than his intended insult toward Depp.</p>\n<p>Johnny Depp isn't \"Cucked.\" He's more than adequate as a man and as a human being. Otherwise, he wouldn't be such a target for a toxic narcissist who tried to take advantage of him, ruin him, and possibly even kill him.\u00a0</p>\n<p>Seems to me that Musk should have better things to do with his time these days, like basking in the glory of being a new father.</p>\n<p>But that's just me.</p>\n<p>Drop your thoughts below.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://theblast.com/129256/elon-musk-defends-amber-heard-takes-on-johnny-depp-fans-after-so\" rel=\"nofollow\">SOURCE</a></p>", "photo": {"id": "223717186", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/1/nf/hg/iVNfhgiwGsXmevD-800x450-noPad.jpg?1588793411", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "26549433", "createdAt": "2020-05-04T17:42:06.000Z", "title": "Amber Heard's mother has died", "description": "<p>Paige Heard, Amber Heard's mother, has died. Out of respect for the departed, there won't be any updates on this page for a few days.</p>\n<p>Thanks for understanding.</p>", "photo": {"id": "223703257", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/8/qp/nl/SiQpnlVZVOVjFBh-800x450-noPad.jpg?1588614128", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "26541807", "createdAt": "2020-05-03T18:37:41.000Z", "title": "Amber Heard faked a bloody nose with nail polish", "description": "<p>Longtime friend of Depp\u2019s, Josh Richman, revealed the shocking allegations in a declaration entered into the ongoing Virginia defamation case.</p>\n<p>\"I have known and considered Johnny Depp a friend for approximately 33 years. I attended Johnny's wedding ceremony with Amber Heard in the Bahamas on February 7, 2015.</p>\n<p>He continues, \u201cWe, and certainly I knew from Johnny that prior to the wedding that on a night they had an argument, Johnny recounted to me, Amber went into the bathroom, and came out with a Kleenex with red on it, saying he had given her a bloody nose. But after the incident, he retrieved the Kleenex, which he says he still has to this day.\"</p>\n<p>Thank goodness Johnny's friends are willing to step up and testify to what they've seen and heard.</p>\n<p>And thank goodness Johnny got that tissue and kept it. I'm sure we'll see it in evidence as part of Depp's 50m defamation suit against Heard, who continues to allege that she was the victim of Johnny Depp's domestic abuse - despite overwhelming evidence proving that she was the aggressor.\u00a0</p>\n<p>Honestly, what was she thinking?</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://theblast.com/c/johnny-depp-amber-heard-lawsuit-bloody-nose-red-nail-polish-kleenex-evidence-faked-injury\" rel=\"nofollow\">SOURCE</a></p>", "photo": {"id": "223697459", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/2/jy/kv/IEjyKvwsHtyVznZ-800x450-noPad.jpg?1588531063", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "26526705", "createdAt": "2020-05-01T22:30:44.000Z", "title": "Amber Heard & friends: Contradictions", "description": "<p>That Brian Fella's at it again. He's put together a comprehensive <a href=\"https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=phtD_zWn8e4\" rel=\"nofollow\">video</a> detailing the contradictions surrounding the most recent 911 phone call that was recently unearthed.</p>\n<p>I could ramble at length, but the best thing you can do is watch the <a href=\"https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=phtD_zWn8e4\" rel=\"nofollow\">video</a>. It tells you more than I can. Give it a listen and let us know what you think below.</p>\n<p>All credit to Brian, who calls himself <a href=\"https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCg0C-N_MPYYOXyF4T3jMxNQ\" rel=\"nofollow\">Incredibly Average on YouTube</a>.</p>", "photo": null, "video": {"photo": {"id": "223685946", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/5/ht/df/JGHTDfGkJvdWbYH-800x450-noPad.jpg?1588372246", "processing": false}}}, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "26495047", "createdAt": "2020-04-29T00:13:20.000Z", "title": "Newfound 911 call from that fateful night - both sides claim victory", "description": "<p>'I need to report an assault.' Listen to 911 call made the night Johnny Depp and Amber Heard had blowout fight that ended their toxic 18-month marriage - but both claim tape backs up their version of events.</p>\n<p>'Hi, I need to report an assault right now happening at 849 Broadway at the Eastern building,' the caller says, referring to the couple's home in LA.\u00a0The recording was buried in legal files for nearly four years and it raises tantalizing new questions about the former couple's infamous clash around the time.\u00a0Timestamped 8:27pm on May 21, 2016, the call appears to have been made when Heard claims Depp hurled a cell phone at her face and tore out her hair.</p>\n<p>Refusing to give a name, the caller explains that a friend named Amber is being attacked by a man described merely as a 'boyfriend', saying:\u00a0'I happen to know that it's happening and I just need to remain anonymous. Physically assaulting her, yeah,' replies the caller, becoming agitated. 'Send somebody up there please,' the caller adds, reiterating the location of the couple's lavish penthouse before the recording abruptly ends.\u00a0</p>\n<p>Heard's attorney says phone records and police department logs vindicate Heard\u2019s account of the final shocking episode of domestic violence she endured before filing for divorce.</p>\n<p>Depp\u2019s legal team say this recording does the precise opposite, however, by raising discrepancies in the various accounts Heard and her allies have given of the notorious dust up.\u00a0\u00a0</p>\n<p>His attorney is also questioning the identity of the caller, pointing out the female voice on the clip does not belong to iO Tillett Wright. They suggest the 8:27pm 911 call was instead placed by Heard's buddy Raquel Pennington.</p>\n<p>iO Tillett Wright's famous call was not registered on the 911 system until 10:09pm, around an hour and a half after the alleged attack. Johnny's team insists that the timing discrepancies support his version of events that night.</p>\n<p>You can hear the audio of the \"anonymous\" call <a href=\"https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8246393/Listen-911-call-night-Johnny-Depp-Amber-Heard-blowout-fight.html?ito=social-twitter_dailymailceleb\" rel=\"nofollow\">HERE</a>.</p>", "photo": {"id": "223663994", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/0/kg/fy/zlKgFYliHkGnwTH-800x450-noPad.jpg?1588119201", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "26474199", "createdAt": "2020-04-26T20:04:56.000Z", "title": "Johnny's painting of his dog", "description": "<p>While visiting with Kirk Hammett (of Metallica) at his home, Johnny posed with a famous guitar that came over to visit, a '59 Les Paul once played by Peter Green of Fleetwood Mac.</p>\n<p>Of the painting on the wall behind him, Johnny said: \"The painting on the wall is one I made of an old friend... My old dog, Mooh, who sadly passed away back when i was away on-location filming, \"Public Enemies\". He was a very gentle boy and i still miss him greatly!!!!\"</p>\n<p>I'm not crying. You're crying.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://theblast.com/c/johnny-depp-amber-heard-instagram-photo-dead-dog-mooh-painting-studio-guitar-metallica\" rel=\"nofollow\">SOURCE</a></p>", "photo": {"id": "223648788", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/0/sk/bv/pvskBvCkeKvwSwQ-800x450-noPad.jpg?1587931498", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "26458784", "createdAt": "2020-04-24T22:29:15.000Z", "title": "WB gets roasted for wishing Amber Heard a happy birthday", "description": "<p>Warner Bros wished Amber Heard happy birthday. The backlash was immediate and severe, with fans of justice lambasting the studio for still supporting \"abuser\" Heard.</p>\n<p>One fan posted this petition as a response, and it has about 3.7k likes, almost half as many likes as the <a href=\"https://twitter.com/aquamanmovie/status/1253005577208434692\" rel=\"nofollow\">birthday wish</a> itself got.\u00a0</p>\n<p>It's nice to know that there are still so many fans of JUSTICE still willing to speak up.<br><br><a href=\"https://www.comicbookmovie.com/aquaman/rip-aquaman-twitter-accounts-mentions-as-it-wishes-mera-actress-amber-heard-a-happy-birthday-a174780\" rel=\"nofollow\">SOURCE</a></p>", "photo": {"id": "223637650", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/1/nl/pg/NSnlPguYQUKgNph-800x450-noPad.jpg?1587767357", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "26438494", "createdAt": "2020-04-22T22:37:03.000Z", "title": "The Bloody Aftermath - Audio", "description": "<p>There's a new <a href=\"https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VDP9NVQmiXw\" rel=\"nofollow\">video</a> by That Brian Fella, who calls himself Absolutely Average on Youtube (he's anything but). It contains audio taped in the immediate aftermath of the incident in Australia where Johnny Depp's finger was shattered and cut off.</p>\n<p>It's hard to listen to, but it's an accurate retelling of exactly what happened, including Amber Heard apologizing for it and begging him not to leave her.</p>\n<p>It's kind of a long one, but it's well worth the listen.\u00a0</p>\n<p>My opinion, after listening to this, is that any one of them should have picked up the phone on the spot and turned her in to the police. I don't know why they didn't, considering the horrible nature of his injury.\u00a0</p>\n<p>Let us know what you think.<br><a href=\"https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VDP9NVQmiXw\" rel=\"nofollow\">THE VIDEO</a></p>", "photo": {"id": "223623632", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/4/fd/ny/zffdnYoyceQNhIM-800x450-noPad.jpg?1587595024", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "26389076", "createdAt": "2020-04-17T23:51:18.000Z", "title": "Johnny Depp on Instagram", "description": "<p>Johnny Depp has officially joined <a href=\"https://www.instagram.com/johnnydepp/\" rel=\"nofollow\">Instagram</a>.</p>\n<p>Just thought you'd like to know.</p>", "photo": {"id": "223588620", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/2/in/cq/YqINCqGuFHaJnvo-800x450-noPad.jpg?1587167481", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "26361392", "createdAt": "2020-04-15T17:38:46.000Z", "title": "Amber Heard to testify in private", "description": "<p>Amber Heard will be allowed to give evidence about alleged sexual violence at the hands of her ex-husband\u00a0Johnny Depp\u00a0behind closed doors. Her lawyers successfully argued she should not be forced to testify about such sensitive subjects in front of the media.</p>\n<p>Johnny's lawyers argued that she's done nothing but talk about her claims in public forums like #Metoo and United Nations platforms since she first accused him in the first place.</p>\n<p>But ultimately, Mr Justice Nicol ruled that she could testify behind closed doors.</p>\n<p>That does not mean, however, that her testimony will be kept secret. Her statements will likely be as accessible to the public as all other testimony so far. I'm sure we'll hear all about it, either from the court's website, or from whoever decides to \"leak\" it.</p>\n<p>Me, I'm glad she's going to testify about Johnny being sexually violent towards her. It's more false evidence for which she can be held accountable later. She's just digging herself in deeper.\u00a0</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://www.theguardian.com/film/2020/apr/08/amber-heard-to-testify-in-johnny-depp-case-behind-closed-doors\" rel=\"nofollow\">SOURCE</a></p>", "photo": {"id": "223570462", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/4/hm/sm/tvhMsMDUqMaWVfz-800x450-noPad.jpg?1586972328", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "26342323", "createdAt": "2020-04-13T20:31:10.000Z", "title": "Glitch", "description": "<p>I have tried several times to post an update about Amber Heard giving testimony about being the victim of sexual violence in private, but for some reason, it will not post. I'll keep trying, or I'll give up and try another topic. Either way, fear not. I'm still with you, still cheering for justice for Johnny Depp, and hoping that the rumors about Amber Heard getting fired from Aquaman 2 are true.\u00a0</p>\n<p>Hang in there.</p>", "photo": {"id": "223556633", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/9/yt/aj/TUYtAJzJzMEqNuu-800x450-noPad.jpg?1586809872", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}], "pageInfo": {"endCursor": "YXJyYXljb25uZWN0aW9uOjE5MQ==", "hasNextPage": true}}}}}, {"data": {"petition": {"id": "14451136", "slug": "dc-entertainment-remove-amber-heard-from-aquaman-2", "user": {"id": "24448735", "displayName": "Jeanne Larson", "photo": {"id": "221862322", "userSmall": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/7/xs/ly/cXXSLydpSVDqIVB-48x48-noPad.jpg?1553098061", "processing": false}}}, "organization": null, "updatesConnection": {"nodes": [{"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "26305342", "createdAt": "2020-04-09T16:53:15.000Z", "title": "Medics search for Johnny Depp's fingertip as Amber Heard sobs - listen", "description": "<p>\"I can't find the finger!\" Listen as Johnny Depp's doctor shouts as he combs through trash.</p>\n<p>Amber Heard can be overheard violently sobbing in the background as the actor's private doctor David Kipper frantically searches for the missing digit so it can be reattached.</p>\n<p>\"I can't find the fingertip, I can't find the finger,\" Kipper repeats in the astonishing recording made immediately after Amber Heard flung a vodka bottle that severed Johnny Depp's finger.</p>\n<p>\"Look at all this awful blood. Holy f**k. Wow, wow, wow,\" gasps Debbie Lloyd, a nurse and colleague, as she surveys the estimated $75,000 worth of damage to the rented home where it took place.</p>\n<p>Be prepared. Not only is there shocking audio, but there are also graphic photos of the injury.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8196065/Medics-search-Johnny-Depps-severed-fingertip-Amber-Heard-sobs-background.html\" rel=\"nofollow\">SOURCE</a></p>", "photo": {"id": "223528377", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/6/mn/db/zJmnDBtPxHwwoZN-800x450-noPad.jpg?1586451197", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "26274852", "createdAt": "2020-04-06T18:17:22.000Z", "title": "Amber Heard could face 3 years in jail for faking evidence", "description": "<p>Amber Heard could be charged with submitting falsified evidence in her abuse case against Johnny Depp. She claims that Johnny beat her up, but Johnny says that he can prove those black eyes were fake.</p>\n<p>We already suspected as much because with such traumatic injuries comes swelling, and she had none. Not to mention the fact that her bruises moved from one day to the next, whenever it was necessary to paint them on for show.</p>\n<p>In 2019 Amber Heard\u2019s personal stylist, Samantha McMillen, went\u00a0on record\u00a0stating that she believes that her black eyes were fake, saying that:\u00a0\u201cOn December 16, 2015, I spent much of the day and evening with Amber Heard, preparing her to appear on the James Corden show. I saw her throughout the day of December 16, 2015, in good light, at close range, wearing no makeup. Throughout the day of December 16, 2015, I could see clearly that Amber Heard did not have any visible marks, bruises, cuts, or injuries to her face or any other part of her body. She appeared as a guest on the James Corden show that day.\u201d</p>\n<p>There you have it.</p>\n<p>In the state of California, a person who is found to have falsified evidence\u00a0 can be convicted of a felony under California Penal Code sections 132 or 134 for a maximum sentence of 3 years.\u00a0</p>\n<p>The question is whether or not she'd do any time at all, even if convicted. So far, she's gotten away with a boatload of offences, including beating her husband, without seeing the inside of a jail cell.\u00a0</p>\n<p>This isn't the first time she has submitted falsified documents or has been faced with jail time. In 2016 Heard plead guilty for supplying\u00a0falsified documents\u00a0when she smuggled her two dogs into Australia. And she got out of any real punishment for that.\u00a0</p>\n<p>What do you think? Should Amber Heard go to jail for falsifying evidence and submitting false reports?</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://www.sausageroll.com.au/lifestyle/celebrities/amber-heard-could-face-up-to-3-years-in-prison-for-fake-evidence/\" rel=\"nofollow\">SOURCE</a></p>", "photo": {"id": "223506922", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/4/tt/bi/LDTtbIMreeDWVAK-800x450-noPad.jpg?1586197045", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "26239699", "createdAt": "2020-04-03T15:12:36.000Z", "title": "Amber Heard reportedly fired from Aquaman 2", "description": "<p>Amber Heard is facing removal from the Aquaman Franchise, as well as being banned from WB productions and several other screen projects, according to a multitude of articles over the last few days.\u00a0<br><br><a href=\"https://www.koimoi.com/hollywood-2/amber-heards-exit-from-jason-momoas-aquaman-franchise-is-totally-possible-heres-how/\" rel=\"nofollow\">Koimoi.com</a> explains that not only will Mera go the way of the dodo, but that Jason Momoa's Arthur Curry could be replaced as Aquaman. He'll still serve as king, but the role of Aquaman could be handed over to Aqualad.\u00a0<br><br><a href=\"https://boundingintocomics.com/2020/04/02/new-rumors-detail-amber-heard-could-be-removed-from-aquaman-2/\" rel=\"nofollow\">Bounding Into Comics</a> says that Warner Bros. might be feeling the heat from Aquaman star Amber Heard\u2019s bad press.\u00a0Reports\u00a0are saying Heard might be removed from Aquaman 2 or see her role reduced greatly. We would obviously prefer the former. Though this humble petitioner would pay double to see Mera get killed off in some gruesome fashion in the first ten minutes.<br><br><a href=\"https://www.small-screen.co.uk/amber-heard-fired-from-aquaman-2-dc-comics-dceu-mera/\" rel=\"nofollow\">Small Screen</a> reports that Amber Heard has been fired as Mera from\u00a0Aquaman 2\u00a0after the new evidence which has come out of her legal battle with Johnny Depp. There have been rumors for months now that Warner Bros. Pictures and DC Comics might be forced to fire Amber Heard.<br><br><a href=\"https://www.sausageroll.com.au/entertainment/movies/amber-heard-to-be-fired-from-aquaman-2-and-other-hollywood-movies/\" rel=\"nofollow\">Sausage Roll</a> says that Reports are flowing in from Hollywood alleging that Amber Heard has been removed from the upcoming Aquaman sequel and subsequently expelled from any future Warner Brothers production indefinitely.<br><br><a href=\"https://www.thenews.com.pk/latest/637815-amber-heard-sacked-from-aquaman-post-legal-battle-with-johnny-depp\" rel=\"nofollow\">The International News</a> says that Certain media outlets have claimed that the makers of the Aquaman are contemplating over removing Amber from the cast of the film. However, an official statement is still awaited in this regard. We hope it's just a matter of time.\u00a0</p>\n<p>There are a lot more articles out there, and they all say the same thing. It's no guarantee, of course. And it would be wise to wait for official confirmation before celebrating. But we remain hopeful.</p>\n<p>When we first started this petition, it was heartfelt, but didn't really stand much of a chance of making any difference. Since then, though, we've garnered over 400,000 signatures, and reports indicate that Heard being removed from Aquaman is a real possibility.</p>\n<p>Here's hoping.</p>", "photo": {"id": "223481651", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/2/sf/zd/xpsFZDRmurlfrmi-800x450-noPad.jpg?1585926757", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "MilestonePetitionUpdate", "id": "26228217", "createdAt": "2020-04-02T18:18:06.000Z", "signatureCount": 400000}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "26216961", "createdAt": "2020-04-01T21:38:11.000Z", "title": "Amber Heard's PI digs up dirt on her, not Johnny", "description": "<p>Former porn star turned Hollywood \"fixer\" Paul Barresi was hired by Amber Heard's legal team last summer to find people who had been verbally or physically abused by Johnny Depp.\u00a0</p>\n<p>Barresi said he was hired to look into Depp's 'follies and vices' in the hopes those who spoke out against Depp would testify in\u00a0the upcoming defamation cases. He spoke to 100 people across the US and Europe who worked with Depp on films dating back 30 years.\u00a0</p>\n<p>Problem is, he couldn't find a single person who had a bad word to say about Depp. \"In fact, they couldn't say enough about his ever flowing outpouring of generosity and tender heart\" Barresi said.</p>\n<p>Rather, some had unkind things to say about Heard instead.\u00a0</p>\n<p>See, that's the problem. When a shrew goes after a genuinely nice guy. The dirt that gets dug up is going to land on her, not him.</p>", "photo": {"id": "223465118", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/0/ke/ks/PxKeksGXTxtSfIM-800x450-noPad.jpg?1585777329", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "26151746", "createdAt": "2020-03-28T01:24:41.000Z", "title": "Amber Heard loses bid to have $50m Defamation suit dismissed", "description": "<p>Amber Heard tried to have Johnny Depp's $50m defamation suit dismissed, citing that her op-ed in the Washington Post never named Depp.</p>\n<p>But Chief Judge Bruce D. White rejected her motion to dismiss on the grounds that three of the four sentences the Pirates of the Caribbean star complained about could 'convey the alleged defamatory meaning that Mr Depp abused Ms Heard.'</p>\n<p>The article did not mention Depp by name, but he filed for defamation in March of last year, saying that the op-ed implied that he was the abuser and caused him to lose the role of Captain Jack Sparrow. $50m would have been his paycheck, hence the amount of damages sought.\u00a0</p>\n<p>Heard had requested a dismissal on the basis of the statute of limitations because the events referenced occurred back in 2016. But the judge rejected her claim because the defamation suit was filed within four months of the op-ed's publication, well within the statute.\u00a0</p>\n<p>The Defamation case is due to be heard in August.\u00a0</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8161683/Amber-Heard-loses-bid-50-million-defamation-suit-ex-Johnny-Depp-thrown-he.html\" rel=\"nofollow\">SOURCE</a></p>", "photo": {"id": "223418547", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/9/sb/rr/OFsBrRcymdYAWqb-800x450-noPad.jpg?1585358683", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "26132119", "createdAt": "2020-03-26T20:04:21.000Z", "title": "Amber Heard cuddles with Elon Musk in penthouse elevator in security video", "description": "<p>Amber Heard is seen cuddling up to\u00a0Elon Musk\u00a0in the private elevator to\u00a0Johnny Depp's penthouse in exclusive new images that will drag the Tesla mogul deeper into the couple's explosive legal battle.</p>\n<p>Musk has insisted that Heard and Depp were already split by the time he started seeing Heard, and that the relationship didn't become intimate until some time later. These images seem to negate that statement. The Space X inventor, 48, can been seen in one image draping his arms around Heard, who appears to be wearing just a swimsuit and a towel.</p>\n<p>Depp's legal team has issued subpoena to Musk for any texts, emails, letters or communications he exchanged with Heard during their marriage or anything mentioning alleged incidents of domestic violence.</p>\n<p>They specifically want to know what she told the tech tycoon about the May 21, 2016 fight that resulted in Heard seeking a restraining order, accusing Depp of hurling a phone at her and beating her.</p>\n<p>So Musk is drawn even deeper into Depp's 50 million defamation suit. Gotta wonder if she was worth all the trouble.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8152935/Swimsuit-clad-Amber-Heard-seen-cuddling-Elon-Musk-Johnny-Depps-private-elevator.html\" rel=\"nofollow\">SOURCE</a></p>", "photo": {"id": "223404985", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/6/st/nx/jnstNxRZRCoZnFH-800x450-noPad.jpg?1585253062", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "26110937", "createdAt": "2020-03-25T14:25:32.000Z", "title": "Amber Heard and cancer-ridden girlfriend go shopping at Home Depot despite Covid 19 warnings", "description": "<p>Amber Heard and love interest Bianca Butti stepped out together on Monday afternoon (March 23) ins Los Angeles. They went to the Home Depot to stock up on plants and firewood. Neither wore masks or gloves.</p>\n<p>For Heard, it's probably no big deal. She's young and healthy. But Bianca Butti is batting breast cancer, and is therefore immuno-compromised. It's seriously not a good idea for her to be out and about while the world is in the grips of a pandemic that could easily kill her, much less with no protection on board.\u00a0</p>\n<p>Heard, supposedly being a loving partner, should have insisted that her lady love stay home. Surely Heard is capable of buying firewood on her own. Or, at the very least, should have demanded that Butti wear a mask and gloves.\u00a0</p>\n<p>Your thoughts?</p>\n<p><a href=\"http://www.justjared.com/2020/03/24/amber-heard-girlfriend-bianca-butti-stock-up-on-flowers-firewood-while-social-distancing-together/\" rel=\"nofollow\">SOURCE</a></p>", "photo": {"id": "223389917", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/8/uu/oa/eMUuOAWCiEfTiAU-800x450-noPad.jpg?1585146334", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "26096153", "createdAt": "2020-03-24T19:15:03.000Z", "title": "Javier Bardem defends Johnny Depp", "description": "<p>Pirates Of The Caribbean\u201d co-star,\u00a0Javier Bardem has stepped forward to defend Johnny Depp against \"the lies and manipulations of toxic beings.\" Namely Amber Heard.\u00a0</p>\n<p>Bardem went on the record in Depp\u2019s defamation case against his ex-wife and stated he does not believe Depp to be a violent person, adding that Depp has a \u201crespectful attitude\u201d towards those around him.</p>\n<p>Bardem goes on to say: \u201dI love Johnny. He has always been a true gentleman and an extremely generous and caring friend to my family and myself,\u201d Bardem began his statement.</p>\n<p>\"On top of that, I\u2019ve had the gift of working with him twice and have experienced his respectful attitude towards every single member of the crew alongside his unique and hilarious sense of humor. I stand by Johnny because I have always seen and felt a true caring and loving man in him ... an extraordinary and unique artist who has listened to anyone who needed his help.\" Bardem says.</p>\n<p>Bardem says that he's willing to testify in Depp's defense in upcoming litigation.<br><a href=\"https://theblast.com/c/johnny-depp-amber-heard-javier-bardem-lawsuit-declaration-pirates-abuse-winona-ryder-statement\" rel=\"nofollow\">SOURCE</a></p>", "photo": {"id": "223380906", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/9/uf/ry/ncufrYKLWZUFOZt-800x450-noPad.jpg?1585077306", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "26024959", "createdAt": "2020-03-20T18:05:35.000Z", "title": "Depp's Sun libel case postponed", "description": "<p>Johnny Depp\u2019s libel case against the Sun has been adjourned to a later date. A two-week trial was due to begin in London on Monday, at which Depp, Heard and a number of Hollywood figures were expected to give evidence.</p>\n<p>Two of Depp\u2019s legal representatives have already had to self-isolate. And, according to Mr Justice Nicol, \u201cNo one can predict whether others involved in the case, and I do not exclude myself, will either become infected or need to self-isolate.\"</p>\n<p>Travel restrictions between the UK and France, where Depp is currently, and the US, where Heard lives, were a further factor in the decision.</p>\n<p>Now, yet again, it's a waiting game.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://www.theguardian.com/film/2020/mar/20/johnny-depps-libel-case-against-the-sun-in-high-court-adjourned\" rel=\"nofollow\">SOURCE</a></p>", "photo": {"id": "223326206", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/3/bm/eq/XABmEQktFencvSE-800x450-noPad.jpg?1584727539", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "26007275", "createdAt": "2020-03-19T17:56:37.000Z", "title": "Depp grabbed Heard by the collarbone?", "description": "<p>In proceedings in Johnny Depp's libel case against the Sun, Adam Wolanski, QC, (representing The Sun) told the court of the fight between Depp and Heard on March 4, 2015, presumably from Amber Heard's perspective;</p>\n<p>\u201cThat night the complainant shoved Ms Heard into a ping-pong table, threw bottles through window panels of a glass door, then grabbed Ms Heard and tore off her nightgown. The complainant grabbed Ms Heard by her neck and choked her against the refrigerator. The complainant mocked her, while touching and grabbing her by her breasts and repeatedly shoved her up against the refrigerator. The complainant (Depp) then <strong>grabbed Ms Heard by the neck and collarbone, slammed her against the counter-top and strangled her</strong>.\u201d</p>\n<p>I'm going to keep it short and sweet, here. I just want someone to explain to me how a guy can grab a girl by the collarbone. Feel free to attach diagrams if necessary, because I just can't figure that one out.\u00a0</p>\n<p>And, while we're at it, I'd like for someone to explain to me how Depp displayed injuries in the days and weeks following the \"fight\" while Amber heard displayed none. Seems to me that someone thrown through at table and glass door would at least have a scratch. A bruise. Anything.</p>\n<p>Meanwhile, the judge will let us know if the trial is going to proceed Monday as scheduled, or if there will be a delay because of the Covid 19 pandemic.\u00a0<br><a href=\"https://pagesix.com/2020/03/18/amber-heard-didnt-slice-johnny-depps-finger-court-hears/\" rel=\"nofollow\">SOURCE</a></p>", "photo": {"id": "223313353", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/8/cm/lx/UICmlxFkvljTvKU-800x450-noPad.jpg?1584640598", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "25945905", "createdAt": "2020-03-15T23:43:43.000Z", "title": "People Magazine reporting on Johnny Depp", "description": "<p>For the longest time, the mainstream media refused to report on Johnny Depp and his legal endeavors, even after those tapes that proved that Amber Heard was the aggressor in their relationship surfaced.</p>\n<p>Finally, though, parts of the mainstream media are reporting that celebrities are coming forward yet again to maintain that Johnny is a good guy who's never hurt anybody. That he's a kind and generous soul. Like <a href=\"https://people.com/movies/penelope-cruz-winona-ryder-defend-johnny-depp-defamation-lawsuit-amber-heard/\" rel=\"nofollow\">THIS</a> article about Penelope Cruz and Winona Ryder stepping forward to support Depp.</p>\n<p>Not that they have much choice. With Amber Heard going on record insisting the Depp abused his former partners, she's all but DEMANDING that these former paramours and/or friends go on record saying that he never did any such thing.\u00a0</p>\n<p>I know I already reported that Cruz and Ryder are supporting Depp. The focus of this update is that the mainstream media are FINALLY starting to report on it. I think we're on the upswing.</p>", "photo": {"id": "223261239", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/0/th/ra/cytHRATZvJjtPpo-800x450-noPad.jpg?1584315827", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}], "pageInfo": {"endCursor": "YXJyYXljb25uZWN0aW9uOjIwMw==", "hasNextPage": true}}}}}, {"data": {"petition": {"id": "14451136", "slug": "dc-entertainment-remove-amber-heard-from-aquaman-2", "user": {"id": "24448735", "displayName": "Jeanne Larson", "photo": {"id": "221862322", "userSmall": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/7/xs/ly/cXXSLydpSVDqIVB-48x48-noPad.jpg?1553098061", "processing": false}}}, "organization": null, "updatesConnection": {"nodes": [{"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "25927813", "createdAt": "2020-03-14T17:32:59.000Z", "title": "New wave of support for Johnny Depp", "description": "<p>If you recall, just about ALL of Johnny Depp's exes stepped forward to say that he's a kind and wonderful person when Heard first alleged domestic abuse.</p>\n<p>Now, by insisting that Depp abused his exes, Amber Heard is prompting some of them, and his friends, to step forward again to say that he wasn't.\u00a0<br><a href=\"https://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/films/news/winona-ryder-johnny-depp-amber-heard-domestic-violence-lawsuit-a9399691.html\" rel=\"nofollow\">Wynona Ryder</a> has jumped forward again to defend Johnny, insisting that her once-fiancee was never violent toward her, and that Amber Heard's allegations are impossible to believe.<br><a href=\"http://www.justjared.com/2020/03/14/penelope-cruz-defends-johnny-depp-writes-declaration-for-his-case-against-amber-heard/\" rel=\"nofollow\">Penelope Cruz</a> has also stepped forward again as well, saying that she first met Johnny Depp since she was 19 years old, and that \"He is always kind to everyone around. He is one of the most generous people I know.\u201d</p>\n<p>I have a feeling that with the Sun trial due to start in about a week, we're going to be hearing a LOT more support for Johnny Depp.</p>", "photo": {"id": "223247954", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/4/ce/xd/VNCexdIpHpCGHWG-800x450-noPad.jpg?1584207183", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "25902675", "createdAt": "2020-03-12T20:01:43.000Z", "title": "Amber Head NOT confirmed for Aquaman 2", "description": "<p>The internet is losing it's mind because WB DC officially announced a release date for AM2. They're outraged that WB and DC are completely ignoring the fact that Amber Heard has been PROVEN to be a serial abuser, and ignoring the petitions signed by hundreds of thousands of paying fans to remove Amber Heard from AM2. How dare they confirm her for a return to the role of Mera.\u00a0</p>\n<p>But did they?\u00a0</p>\n<p>Everything I've read, including those statements confirming the official dates for the movie's release. And ALL\u00a0 of them use language like \"The cast is EXPECTED to return.\" or \"Amber heard is SET to return.\"</p>\n<p>Expected. Set. Prepared. Ready.</p>\n<p>Nowhere does it say that Amber Heard is CONFIRMED to return.\u00a0</p>\n<p>I'm sure she wants to. She's certainly going to need the money to pay of Johnny Depp when he wins his 50 million dollar defamation suit against her. And she seems the type to NEED the fame that comes with stardom.</p>\n<p>But let's not get ahead of ourselves. There are two law suits standing between Amber Heard and that role. Johnny's libel suit against the sun and his defamation case against Heard herself. If she's found in the wrong in either one of them, then she's got a lot to lose.\u00a0</p>\n<p>There's a morals clause in every contract in Hollywood these days. And if Heard loses in either one of those cases, the studio can, and probably will, fire her due to that morals clause.\u00a0</p>\n<p>Let's not forget that the filming and release date for AM2 was pushed back when these suits were filed, probably for exactly that reason.</p>\n<p>WB DC aren't ignoring us. They're covering their collective asses. If they fire her just because of a petition, they open themselves up for a HUGE wrongful termination suit from Heard.\u00a0</p>\n<p>By waiting for the outcome of these cases, WB DC are giving themselves a valid reason to fire her. If she's fired for a morals clause violation, she can't sue them for wrongful termination.\u00a0</p>\n<p>Stay calm, folks. It's not over until it's over. Filming hasn't even started. Let's wait and see what happens with these law suits before we throw our outrage around. We know she's going to lose. THEN we can turn our watchful eye to the studio to see what they're going to do about it.\u00a0</p>", "photo": {"id": "223231880", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/6/eq/mp/YWeqmPOjOxsgtGh-800x450-noPad.jpg?1584043305", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "25885635", "createdAt": "2020-03-11T14:33:08.000Z", "title": "Johnny Depp's kids saw", "description": "<p>Tara Roberts, Johnny Depp's island estate manager, confirms that Amber Heard abused Johnny Depp when his children were with him on his private island, Little Hall's Pond Cay.\u00a0\u00a0</p>\n<p>Heard\u00a0body-shamed\u00a0her then-husband. She was reportedly yelling at him that he was \u201cwashed ups\u201d and \u201cfat.\u201d They were standing in the parking lot of their house on the island when she physically and verbally attacked Depp.</p>\n<p>\u201cI saw Amber lunge at Johnny, clawing, tugging and aggressively pulling him. He continued to stand there yelling at her to stop and leave him alone. When he stepped back to leave, her onslaught would start again. During this entire incident, I never saw Johnny hit Amber, or push her back, nor did he physically react to the attacks,\u201d Roberts said.</p>\n<p>That night is when\u00a0Amber Heard threw a can of paint thinner at Johnny's face, leaving a bloody gash across his nose. The next morning, Roberts witnessed that the kids saw the bloody gash on their father's face.</p>\n<p>It's unclear whether or not the kids ever saw Heard abusing their father as it happened, but there is no doubt whatsoever that they saw the aftermath as it took its toll on Johnny Depp.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://www.ibtimes.com/amber-heard-assaulted-johnny-depp-while-his-children-were-them-estate-manager-says-2937719\" rel=\"nofollow\">SOURCE</a></p>", "photo": {"id": "223221000", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/1/nr/ul/KtnrulXnGRvaAmu-800x450-noPad.jpg?1583937189", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "25878111", "createdAt": "2020-03-10T19:09:25.000Z", "title": "Heard: \"I love you and I'm sorry.\"", "description": "<p>Just weeks after the fight that ended the relationship between Johnny Depp and Amber Heard's marriage, Heard tried to get a massage to Johnny through Johnny's CAA talent agent, Christian Carino. She wanted Carino to tell Johnny that she loved him, and that she was sorry. This And never mind that there's a restraining order in place.</p>\n<p>Carino advised Heard to \u201cleave it alone for a while,\u201d but she was persistent and really wanted to know what\u00a0Depp was thinking at the time.</p>\n<p>Months later, after her breakup with billionaire Elon Musk, Heard chatted Carino up again, to lament that yet another man had left her to deal with a public breakup all on her own.</p>\n<p>Instead of consoling his client/friend, Carino reminded Heard that \"You weren't in love with him and you told me a thousand times you were just filling space.\u201d\u00a0</p>\n<p>Ouch. Elon's going to read that, if he hasn't already. Knowing that he was just space filler for Heard, and that he's now being called to testify in Depp's defamation case against her, I'll be Elon's REALLY glad he got involved with that piece of tail. Hardly seems worth it.\u00a0</p>\n<p>Heard asked if Carino could pass a note from her to Depp.</p>\n<p>Yep. Even with that TRO still in effect, she's trying to contact Johnny, violating the TRO herself, and enticing him to violate it, too.\u00a0</p>\n<p>Depp was having none of it, preferring instead to let the case play out in court. Wisely so.</p>\n<p>The short count is on for the libel case against the Sun. By the end of this month, that case will be full steam ahead.\u00a0</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://theblast.com/c/amber-heard-johnny-depp-text-messages-I-love-him-sorry-apology-trial-court-agent-lady-gaga\" rel=\"nofollow\">SOURCE</a></p>", "photo": {"id": "223216001", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/2/xd/bu/qEXDBUlOxxIXIxC-800x450-noPad.jpg?1583867368", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "25869919", "createdAt": "2020-03-09T18:37:49.000Z", "title": "Amber Heard Set Johnny Depp up for violation", "description": "<p>Not long after Amber Heard painted on some bruises and filed for a TRO against Johnny Depp, she and Johnny mutually agreed to sit down at a mutually agreed-to meeting in 2016.</p>\n<p>After the meeting didn't go her way, Amber Heard allegedly turned johnny Depp in for violating the restraining order.</p>\n<p>Remember, this is a meeting that she had mutually arranged, but she tried to put him in jail for it, just because she didn't get what she wanted (translated: she didn't get everything she was asking for- his money, house, belongings and cars- did I forget anything?).\u00a0</p>\n<p>Johnny, of course, was furious, texting to a friend: \"...send me to county for breaking the restraining order...some of which, as you can guess, that she was more than complicit with!!! I couldn't give a f***in' fat rat's ass!! as she wants her name cleared, which can no longer happen in terms of the public's opinion and more than likely the people who run her profession.\"</p>\n<p>Depp further accused Heard of deliberately making him violate the TRO by meeting him in San Francisco\u00a0just so that she could redeem her public reputation. The worse she could make him look, she apparently thought that it was the better she could make herself look.\u00a0</p>\n<p>Didn't work. Not then, and not now.\u00a0</p>\n<p>With Johnny Depp's libel trial against the Sun due to start in just over a week, Heard's reputation will tank even farther than it did after those taped confessions of her beating Johnny Dee surfaced.\u00a0</p>\n<p>The whole truth will be out then, and there won't be any coming back for her. The only job she'll likely be able to get will be in either the fast food or adult entertainment industries.</p>\n<p>Karma, baby.</p>", "photo": {"id": "223210442", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/0/kw/wp/hBkwWpcVRCyKKxu-800x450-noPad.jpg?1583779072", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "25864160", "createdAt": "2020-03-08T19:11:30.000Z", "title": "Bianca/Depp double take", "description": "<p>Amber Heard\u00a0held hands with 38-year-old paramour Bianca Butti as they made their way through LAX Airport on Saturday afternoon (March 7) in Los Angeles.</p>\n<p>At first glance, it would be an honest mistake to think that it was an old photo of Heard traveling with her ex, Johnny Depp. With her <a href=\"http://cdn01.cdn.justjared.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/bianca-lax/amber-heard-girlfriend-bianca-butti-still-going-strong-04.jpg\" rel=\"nofollow\">brimmed hat and blue shades</a>, Butti looked every bit the quirky Pirates of the Caribbean star.\u00a0<br><a href=\"http://cdn01.cdn.justjared.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/bianca-lax/amber-heard-girlfriend-bianca-butti-still-going-strong-03.jpg\" rel=\"nofollow\">PHOTO</a><br><a href=\"http://cdn01.cdn.justjared.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/bianca-lax/amber-heard-girlfriend-bianca-butti-still-going-strong-04.jpg\" rel=\"nofollow\">PHOTO</a><br><a href=\"http://cdn03.cdn.justjared.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/bianca-lax/amber-heard-girlfriend-bianca-butti-still-going-strong-06.jpg\" rel=\"nofollow\">PHOTO</a></p>\n<p>Many in the Twitterverse (including me) are left wondering if this was just a coincidental styling choice made by Butti all by herself, or if Heard had a hand in dressing her lady love up like her ex husband.\u00a0</p>\n<p>The question would be: WHY? Is Heard trying to send the message that she can still lead Johnny around on a leash? Or is she doing it simply to mock him. With the libel trial against the sun coming up, it's entirely possible that Heard is simply trying to grab headlines the only was she can. The only was she ever could, really. By associating herself with Depp, a REAL star.</p>\n<p>What are your thoughts? Coincidence or scheme?</p>", "photo": {"id": "223206211", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/0/wm/mo/jhwmMOrQKiasERN-800x450-noPad.jpg?1583694692", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "25860738", "createdAt": "2020-03-07T23:50:32.000Z", "title": "Tapes in, texts out", "description": "<p>After a hearing in London <a href=\"https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2020/mar/06/johnny-depp-disclose-audio-recordings-before-libel-trial\" rel=\"nofollow\">last week</a>, the judge ordered that the audiotapes where Amber Heard confesses to serially abusing Johnny Depp will be allowed in Depp's libel action against the Sun newspaper. David Sherborne, representing Depp, said the evidence \u201cdemonstrates in her own voice that she was not a victim of domestic abuse, but rather that she was the aggressor\u201d.</p>\n<p>He added that, in the recordings, Heard is apparently heard to say that no one would believe Depp if he claimed to be a victim of domestic violence.</p>\n<p>However, the texts between Johnny Depp and (friend and actor) Paul Bettany are out.\u00a0</p>\n<p>Also, it is revealed that actress Amanda de Cadenet, a friend of Heard, will give evidence over a video link. It is unclear at this point as to what testimony she will give, whether it will benefit Heard or Depp.\u00a0</p>\n<p>As has already been reported, Amber Heard plans to appear to testify. Remember, this is the case against the Sun, not Johnny's defamation case against her. She doesn't have to show up for this, but she plans to appear anyway. We have yet to see what she plans to bring to the table and what she expects to gain.</p>\n<p>We'll find out in just a couple of weeks, when the suit against the Sun proceeds.</p>", "photo": {"id": "223203486", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/0/us/xm/pvusxmIQcpMmTKn-800x450-noPad.jpg?1583625521", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "25849621", "createdAt": "2020-03-05T21:01:11.000Z", "title": "photos suggest that Amber Heard also abused Elon Musk", "description": "<p><a href=\"https://www.sausageroll.com.au/entertainment/movies/elon-musk-appears-to-have-a-black-eye-in-these-amber-heard-pictures/\" rel=\"nofollow\">Photographs</a> from when Amber and Elon were dating show Musk sporting a <a href=\"https://www.sausageroll.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/3F8B424300000578-4438656-Flawless_The_star_showed_off_her_natural_beauty_going_makeup_fre-m-81_1493000643013.jpg\" rel=\"nofollow\">black eye</a> and other <a href=\"https://www.sausageroll.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/3F8B417500000578-4438656-image-a-95_1493001061387.jpg\" rel=\"nofollow\">facial damage</a>.</p>\n<p>This has many people wondering if Amber Heard also abused Elon during the time they were together.</p>\n<p>Elon Musk has already been subpoenaed to testify in Johnny Depp's defamation case against Amber Heard. I have to wonder if he's also going to be questioned as to whether or not he was abuse by Amber Heard.</p>\n<p>I can't wait to see where all of this leads</p>", "photo": {"id": "223194886", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/3/nh/hd/fynHHDkbZnwFGZV-800x450-noPad.jpg?1583442073", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "25845405", "createdAt": "2020-03-05T03:22:36.000Z", "title": "Amber Heard's glaring perjury", "description": "<p>In her declaration against Johnny Depp, under the date marked, \"March 2015, Australia\", Heard talks about an incident where Depp \"pushed me, slapped me, and shoved me to the ground before I retreated to a locked bedroom.\"</p>\n<p>The next day, she alleged that he began throwing pans and bottles at her. A fight ensued and he allegedly got physical with her, hitting her, shoving her to the ground, choking her and spitting on her face.</p>\n<p>\"I wanted Johnny to go to sleep, in the hopes that he would sober up. Instead, he began to fight with me about our upcoming marriage.\"</p>\n<p>But here there is a problem: Depp and Heard got married in February 2015, a month BEFORE she claimed the abuse in that instance happened.</p>\n<p>According to the\u00a0U.S. Penal Code, any discrepancy in one's court declaration that does not align with the truth in any way could be grounds for perjury.\u00a0</p>\n<p>\"Whoever under oath (or in any declaration, certificate, verification, or statement under penalty of perjury as permitted under section 1746 of title 28, United States Code) in any proceeding before or ancillary to any court or grand jury of the United States knowingly makes any false material declaration or makes or uses any other information, including any book, paper, document, record, recording, or other material, knowing the same to contain any false material declaration, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both,\" the code says.</p>\n<p>Fined, imprisoned, or both.</p>\n<p>Amber Heard has a lot more to worry about than losing $50 million to her ex. She very seriously needs to think about how many different ways she's looking at losing her freedom because of her actions.</p>", "photo": {"id": "223191468", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/1/xb/vu/SXxbvUJunQAJzTp-800x450-noPad.jpg?1583378631", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "25837178", "createdAt": "2020-03-03T18:47:52.000Z", "title": "Amber Heard to testify in London next month", "description": "<p>Amber Heard is all set to fly to London next month and testify in Johnny's libel suit against the Sun newspaper. The question I have is WHY? As I understand it, she doesn't have to. Has she been subpoenaed?\u00a0</p>\n<p>There are only two reasons I can think of that she would show up uninvited and pitch her two cents into the ring.\u00a0</p>\n<p>First, a toxic narcissist will to anything to try to save face. and they're masters of playing the victim. Amber Heard would likely jump at any chance to vilify Johnny and paint herself as the poor, terrorized victim of his unbearable abuse.</p>\n<p>Primarily, I think she's going to talk about those texts that Johnny wrote to Paul Bettany. You know, the ones where Johnny talked about burning and drowning Amber, then fucking her dead corpse to make sure she's dead. Anybody with half a brain knows that abuse victims often fantasize that their abuser would die so that the abuse could stop. Johnny was venting to his friend about his abuser. He would never do such a thing. He said so in the very same text.</p>\n<p>But Amber's likely won't play it that way. I'm willing to bet real money that she's going to show up and use that text to portray herself as a victim who was afraid for her very life. \"He was planning to KILL me!\" She'll probably testify, dabbing at the corner of her eye with a tissue.\u00a0</p>\n<p>Her testimony will have no bearing on the Sun case, because nothing can change the fact that Amber is the one who abused Johnny. No. What she's doing is setting up her testimony so that it will be a matter of record, so that she can use it in Johnny's defamation suit against her.</p>\n<p>She plays the long game, let's not forget. She took \"damning\" photos and set herself up as the victim for probably the entirety of their relationship, knowing what she was ultimately going to do. I wouldn't doubt that the same thing is going on here.</p>\n<p>The other reason the I can think of for her to show up and testify is to try to rattle Johnny, who will most likely be there. It's possible that she wants him to see her and fall to pieces, lose his resolve, or make a mistake and say something stupid.</p>\n<p>Think about how crazy stupid in love with her he was. Is that really gone from within him? Or does he still have a soft spot for his \"made up\" ex wife? Could he see her, go all mushy and drop the defamation case?</p>\n<p>I don't think so.</p>\n<p>Four years is a long time, and a lot of things can happen. One of those things is that Johnny has recovered himself. He's gotten back who he is, and he's steeled his resolve to defend himself against allegations that just aren't true. Seeing her isn't going to make him lose that. If anything, seeing her will strengthen his resolve.</p>\n<p>I'd love to know what you guys think about why Amber Heard plans to show up in London next month to testify in the Sun case. Drop and comment and let me know what you think.</p>", "photo": {"id": "223184695", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/5/wh/fb/orwhfBVgKPWkWfT-800x450-noPad.jpg?1583261273", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "25831906", "createdAt": "2020-03-02T20:19:11.000Z", "title": "Steven Spielberg's daughter jailed for domestic abuse.", "description": "<p>Mikaela Spielberg, Steven <a href=\"https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/mikaela-spielberg-tearful-mug-shot-domestic-violence-arrest-192238648.html\" rel=\"nofollow\">Spielberg's daughter has been jailed</a> for domestic assault with bodily injury after a physical fight with her fiance.</p>\n<p>The two were out drinking, and a heated argument developed. Mikaela began pelting fiance Chuck Pankow with various objects. One struck him in the hand, leaving a visible injury.\u00a0</p>\n<p>Mikaela's bail has been paid, and she's expected back in court on March 9th.\u00a0</p>\n<p>This is another example of a woman committing domestic abuse. It's not as uncommon as people might think. I'm just glad that the mainstream media has started reporting about cases like this.</p>\n<p>Hopefully, with such a high profile case as Johnny Depp's making the news, more men will come forward, and be believed and treated with as much empathy as female survivors.</p>", "photo": {"id": "223180151", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/6/yo/gp/YkYOgpAoyrNbxpH-800x450-noPad.jpg?1583180353", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "25826726", "createdAt": "2020-03-01T19:51:24.000Z", "title": "Amber stans attacking petitioners", "description": "<p>Angry and scheming Amber Heard stans have begun attacking comments made by petitioners on updates. They've started jumping on people who make comments on updates, attacking and insulting them in the most horrible ways.</p>\n<p>Fear not. I do not allow fans to be maligned on my petition. If a comment is made attacking anybody that comments on an update on this petition, it will be removed with the utmost haste.\u00a0</p>\n<p>I'm not like Amber, trying to scrub the comments here to benefit myself. Say what you want about me. But I simply won't allow my people to be attacked.\u00a0</p>\n<p>The truth may be ugly, but that's what we try to stick to here. Scheming hate need not apply.</p>\n<p>Carry on.</p>", "photo": {"id": "223175669", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/5/vb/ya/fSVBYawiNrTYeuT-800x450-noPad.jpg?1583092286", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}], "pageInfo": {"endCursor": "YXJyYXljb25uZWN0aW9uOjIxNQ==", "hasNextPage": true}}}}}, {"data": {"petition": {"id": "14451136", "slug": "dc-entertainment-remove-amber-heard-from-aquaman-2", "user": {"id": "24448735", "displayName": "Jeanne Larson", "photo": {"id": "221862322", "userSmall": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/7/xs/ly/cXXSLydpSVDqIVB-48x48-noPad.jpg?1553098061", "processing": false}}}, "organization": null, "updatesConnection": {"nodes": [{"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "25818131", "createdAt": "2020-02-28T18:39:54.000Z", "title": "Burn v Burn", "description": "<p>It was reported in the High Court that Johnny Depp wrote of<a href=\"https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/johnny-depp-wrote-of-drowning-and-burning-his-girlfriend-b2csw85lh\" rel=\"nofollow\"> drowning and burning</a> his ex wife Amber Heard in text messages to his fellow actor Paul Bettany. The mainstream media immediately ran with it, screaming that Depp \"<a href=\"https://metro.co.uk/2020/02/27/johnny-depp-threatened-burn-drown-amber-heard-shocking-messages-12313416/\" rel=\"nofollow\">threatened</a>\" Heard with doing those things.\u00a0</p>\n<p>First, those texts were private messages. Depp was frustrated with his abuser. Heard was never intended to read those, therefore, they are not a threat to her.\u00a0</p>\n<p>Second, to state the obvious, Depp never burned or drowned Heard. In fact, in the same text, he confesses that he could never spray his rage at the woman he loves. Not only were those words never a threat in the first place, but he also asserts that he could never do such a thing.\u00a0</p>\n<p>And finally, let's not forget that Amber Heard DID burn Johnny Depp. She put a cigarette out on his face. That's a fact.\u00a0</p>\n<p>Let's stop focusing on something that never happened and start paying attention to what actually DID happen.\u00a0</p>\n<p>The fact that the mainstream media refuses to report on Amber Heard's clear admissions of guilt, but jump all over Johnny Depp's frustrated texts to his friend about something that never happened display the ongoing bias against a male survivor of domestic abuse.</p>\n<p>Right now, with the current social environment, there are victims of abuse that continue to suffer because they've got nowhere to turn.</p>\n<p>This double standard needs to be addressed, and it needs to be rectified. That way, male survivors of domestic might feel more comfortable coming forward and seeking help.</p>\n<p>\u00a0</p>", "photo": {"id": "223168184", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/9/cj/qm/dccJqMakZzWfEHw-800x450-noPad.jpg?1582915195", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "25813558", "createdAt": "2020-02-27T21:16:38.000Z", "title": "Johnny Depp goes to court in London", "description": "<p>Johnny Depp appeared in England's <a href=\"https://www.yahoo.com/news/johnny-depp-appears-uk-court-libel-case-151911193.html\" rel=\"nofollow\">High Court</a> on Wednesday for a pre-trial hearing in his libel case against the Sun. Depp is is suing the tabloid and its executive editor Dan Wootton over a 2018 article which directly referred to him as a wife-beater.\u00a0</p>\n<p>This comes ahead of his defamation case against ex-wife Amber Heard. The two cases are directly related because both involve Amber Heard accusing Depp of committing domestic violence against her, and Depp insisting that Heard was the abuser in their relationship.\u00a0</p>\n<p>It's safe to say that the outcome of the libel suit will foreshadow and effect how the defamation trial will play out. And the results of both may very well affect whether or not Amber Heard returns as Mera in Aquaman 2. This is very likely the reason that filming was pushed back a year, to allow for the outcome of both.</p>\n<p>Depp's case against Heard is set to proceed in August of this year.</p>", "photo": {"id": "223164325", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/6/iq/wy/bDiQwyGgzobkPzy-800x450-noPad.jpg?1582838200", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "25797524", "createdAt": "2020-02-24T19:34:51.000Z", "title": "IO: Whatta Guy", "description": "<p>iO Tillet-Wright's infamy extends farther than making the 911 phone call on May 21, 2016 that began the end of Johnny Depp and Amber Heard.\u00a0</p>\n<p>Before any of that happened, \"Uncle iO\" outed sweet little Lily Rose Depp. Lily Rose had confided in iO about her personal proclivities, and iO took it upon himself to out her before she decided to out herself. iO wrote \"I'm so proud of my baby girl @lilyrose_depp. She decided hse wanted to be in @selfevidentproject because she falls somewhere on the vast spectrum, and I couldn't be happier to welcome her to the family. She's a tiny gem of a good human. #Prouduncle #weareyou</p>\n<p>Lily Rose handled it with grace and dignity, but I can only imagine the pain of betrayal at the hands of somebody who her family had taken in as one of their own.\u00a0</p>\n<p>Then came iO's complicity in buddy Amber Heard's scheme to ruin Johnny depp - which failed miserably and backfired squarely in her face.\u00a0</p>\n<p>Next, iO claimed that Johnny Depp was fired from Pirates because he missed a month of filming. That would be the month that Johnny was recuperating from Amber cutting off part of his finger, and poor Johnny contracting MRSA three times, nearly dying.\u00a0</p>\n<p>Fact is that Johnny was dumped from Pirates one week after Heard's WaMo op-ed in which she obviously refers to being a victim of Johnny Depp's (nonexistent) abuse.</p>\n<p>Over and over again, iO chooses to stab Johnny and his family squarely in the back, even though Johnny took iO into his home when he (iO) had nowhere else to go.</p>\n<p>I have to wonder what life will be like for iO when his complicity in Heard's scams blow up in his face, stripping away from him any credibility he might have amassed as an author and artist. I can't imagine his future will be too bright. Once Amber Heard no longer needs him to try and bolster her losing case, iO will be dumped like everybody else that no longer serves her purpose. Then he'll not only be exposed, but he'll wear the clothes of a fool, duped and dumped.\u00a0</p>\n<p>I'd call him another of Amber's many victims, but he jumped in with both feet and has nobody but himself to blame.</p>", "photo": {"id": "223151425", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/7/wy/af/cXWyAFDoonljZNZ-800x450-noPad.jpg?1582572893", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "25773426", "createdAt": "2020-02-19T18:42:36.000Z", "title": "Amber Heard back on Instagram", "description": "<p>After a brief respite, Amber Heard is posting on Instagram again. It's a simple photo of the back of her head, with an enigmatic caption about being young. Lyrics from Running against the wind.</p>\n<p>She's got comments turned off, probably due to the backlash she got following the release of audio tapes which reveal that she abused Johnny Depp, not the other way around. Fans flooded to her social media platforms to let her know exactly what they think of her. She tried to scrub her feed by deleting the comments she didn't like, but there were so many of them that now she's got comments disabled.\u00a0</p>\n<p>She does, however, seem to have amassed more than a hundred thousand likes in just a few hours. The Twitterverse is speculating that the bulk of those likes comes from bots.\u00a0</p>\n<p>In the meantime, we're waiting to see what the next play will be in the defamation case brought by Johnny Depp after Amber referred to him as her abuser in an op ed. She's subpoenaed everybody this side of the Pacific, but has yet to present any real evidence that she was ever abused.</p>\n<p>The clock is ticking relentlessly toward August 3rd. Then the truth will come out. All of it.</p>", "photo": {"id": "223131394", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/0/su/dm/wosUdmJVTWLSAXU-800x450-noPad.jpg?1582137758", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "25769383", "createdAt": "2020-02-18T23:54:49.000Z", "title": "Depp's attorney hits back against fishing expedition", "description": "<p>Johnny Depp\u2019s lawyer claims\u00a0Amber Heard\u2018s attorney is the one with ties to\u00a0Harvey Weinstein, not Depp, after Heard filed a subpoena seeking to get the Weinstein Company to turn over details of Depp\u2019s dealings with the disgraced Weinstein.</p>\n<p>\"Weinstein\u2019s real association is with Roberta Kaplan herself,\u201d Waldman said. Roberta Kaplan was formerly Harvey Weinstein's lawyer, and now represents Amber Heard.\u00a0</p>\n<p>Kaplan and Tina Tchen, the founders of the Time\u2019s Up Legal Defense Fund, have a client list of accused abusers and hoaxers that includes\u00a0Jussie Smollett, Harvey Weinstein and Amber Heard.</p>\n<p>\u201cReal abuse victims deserve better self-appointed leaders than these buck-chasers,\u201d Waldman said.</p>\n<p>Kaplan and Tchen did not immediately respond to requests for comment on Waldman\u2019s claims.</p>\n<p>Depp has set forth a motion to quash Heard's request for information from the Weinstein company, stating that it's overly broad and isn't within the scope of the case.</p>\n<p>For all appearances, Heard's request is a hail Mary attempt to smear Johnny Deep by association to Weinstein and distract attention away from the case at hand. The Defamation case against Heard for calling Depp a wife-beater when she herself is the one with a history of committing domestic violence against Depp and prior lovers.</p>\n<p>Heard's spokesperson insists that Johnny Depp continues to try his case in the court of public opinion, while Heard looks forward to winning the case in court.</p>\n<p>As of now, that's slated to get started on August 3rd, 2020. We'll have to see how that comes out.</p>", "photo": {"id": "223127912", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/4/ir/tz/HRIrTZCGVXHrIcX-800x450-noPad.jpg?1582070091", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "25763381", "createdAt": "2020-02-17T18:54:52.000Z", "title": "Amber Heard desperate to tie Depp to Harvey Weinstein", "description": "<p>Amber Heard has filed a request for the Weinstein company to turn over all correspondence between Johnny Depp and Harvey Weinstein.\u00a0</p>\n<p>Just when we think that there are no more straws for Amber Heard to grasp at, she pulls another sliver out of thin air.</p>\n<p>This latest fishing trip is Heard's most desperate attempt yet to smear Johnny Depp by associating him with Weinstein, Hollywood's biggest pariah. If she can smear enough mud on Johnny, she thinks, I guess, that she can get a pass for abusing him.</p>\n<p>There is a link between Johnny Depp and Harvey Weinstein, of course. The 2004 movie, 'The Libertine.' The film was promoted by the Weinstein Company. As such, there's no guarantee that the owner of the post-production promotion company ever passed words with Johnny Depp, and there's certainly no proof whatsoever that Johnny had any knowledge whatsoever of Weinstein's misdeeds.\u00a0</p>\n<p>Perhaps we should look at Amber Heard's ties to Weinstein herself. Heard's lawyer, Roberta Kaplan used to be Harvey Weinstein's lawyer. That alone speaks volumes.</p>\n<p>But let's not forget the largely forgettable Film 'All the Boys Love Mandy Lane' with Heard in the titular role (a hilarious comparison with Heard's real life). Harvey Weinstein's company was supposed to distribute the film, but he dropped it. That gives Heard Just as much of a chance to have had conversations with Weinstein as Johnny did, by the post-production-company field of logic.</p>\n<p>Take a good look at that photo, folks. That's Amber Heard sitting in a booth with the aforementioned Weinstein. Why don't we find out what SHE said to him?\u00a0</p>", "photo": {"id": "223122600", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/9/py/iv/jgPYIVoxThmInXU-800x450-noPad.jpg?1581965694", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "25755800", "createdAt": "2020-02-15T22:48:20.000Z", "title": "Amber Heard abusive toward her assistant", "description": "<p>Laura Divinere, an interior decorator who used to work for the couple, has gone on the record about who was abusive in the marriage and who wasn't.\u00a0</p>\n<p>According to a deposition given by\u00a0Divenere, she \"worked for Johnny Depp and Amber Heard as their interior decorator in downtown LA in the Eastern Columbia Building from July 2014 to sometime in 2016. Thereafter, I worked for Amber and still do to this day. I\u00a0have been and continue to\u00a0consider myself a friend of Amber's. I remain in regular contact with Amber.\"</p>\n<p>\"I was with Amber and interacted with her frequently on the several days immediately following her abuse allegation...including at least on May 23, 24, 25. On those days,\u00a0I worked with Amber,\u00a0retrieved packages for her, rode elevators with her,\u00a0and saw her up close and in person. <strong>On none of those days immediately following the abuse claims did I observe any signs of physical abuse or injury, including redness, swelling, cuts, bruising, or damage of any kind.</strong>\"</p>\n<p>\"In all of my many interactions with Amber over a period of years,\u00a0she did not ever mention any allegation of violence or other abuse to me.<strong>\u00a0I do not recall any allegation of violence or other abuse to me in the days following May 21</strong>.\u00a0I knew and interacted with Amber's close friends Rocky Pennington, io Tillett Wright, and her sister Whitney Heard. <strong>None of them ever mentioned any accusation of violence or other abuse against Amber by Mr. Depp</strong>,\"</p>\n<p>\"<strong>I witnessed\u00a0Amber being verbally abusive towards her former assistant Kate</strong>, screaming at her on the phone.\u00a0Her then-assistant <strong>Kate called me several times in tears, very upset, regarding the treatment she received from Amber.</strong>\"</p>\n<p>Apparently, Amber Heard is an equal opportunity abuser.\u00a0</p>", "photo": {"id": "223114644", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/1/ww/ip/FGwwiPOrlWqdnHy-800x450-noPad.jpg?1581806903", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "25747299", "createdAt": "2020-02-13T20:03:08.000Z", "title": "Petition to remove Amber Heard from L'oreal", "description": "<p>There's a petition to have Amber Heard removed from being a spokesperson for L'oreal. Since the tapes came out with Amber Heard admitting that she hit Johnny Depp and body shamed him calling him fat, there's been an <a href=\"https://meaww.com/amp/petitions-demand-amber-heard-removal-as-l-oreal-spokesperson-after-leaks-she-abused-johnny-depp?__twitter_impression=true\" rel=\"nofollow\">outcry</a> for L'oreal to remove Amber Heard as one of the faces of L'oreal. Scores of consumers have vowed not to use any L'oreal products as long as they employ a proven and confessed serial abuser. I'm one of them.</p>\n<p>If this is something that you feel strongly about, consider signing <a href=\"https://www.change.org/p/l-or%C3%A9al-remove-amber-heard-as-l-or%C3%A9al-spokeperson/u/25746467?cs_tk=Ao8q-dWA3w51AbZ3SV4AAXicyyvNyQEABF8BvMjL8HaYd4Tv72mmZxA-z1c%3D&amp;utm_campaign=393cf1f96cbd4dbab0ad169e777b71bf&amp;utm_content=control_v0_0_1&amp;utm_medium=email&amp;utm_source=petition_update&amp;utm_term=cs\" rel=\"nofollow\">the petition</a> to have Amber Heard removed from L'oreal.</p>", "photo": {"id": "223107914", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/3/hk/qe/zyhKqeWpXCokYHH-800x450-noPad.jpg?1581624191", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "MilestonePetitionUpdate", "id": "25744008", "createdAt": "2020-02-13T04:53:05.000Z", "signatureCount": 300000}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "25742853", "createdAt": "2020-02-12T23:05:05.000Z", "title": "Tara Roberts witnessed the abuse.", "description": "<p>That Brian Fella came through for us again. In a recent tweet, he describes how Tara Roberts, Johnny's Estate Manager on his island in the Bahamas since 2008, witnessed Amber Heard physically and verbally abuse Johnny Depp on his island.\u00a0</p>\n<p>According to Roberts' deposition, \"Amber repeatedly berated him with increasing ferocity. She was insulting him, calling him names, and in the middle of this onslaught, I heard her specifically say 'Your career is over.' 'No one is going to hire you.' 'You are washed up.' 'Fat.' 'You will die a lonely man.' and also screaming things that were incomprehensible.\"</p>\n<p>\"[Johnny] was responding to [Amber's] verbal attacks by saying 'Go away' and 'Just leave me alone.' Amber's screaming and berating rose to a fever pitch and Johnny kept saying 'Go away' and 'Leave me alone.'\"</p>\n<p>\"I saw Amber lunge at Johnny, clawing, tugging, and aggressively pulling him. He continued to stand there telling her to stop and leave him alone.\"</p>\n<p>That was the incident where Heard threw a can of lacquer thinner at Johnny Depp's face, leaving an open gash on the bridge of Depp's nose.</p>\n<p>Johnny never raised his voice or pushed her back. Roberts never saw Johnny being aggressive with Heard.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://twitter.com/ThatBrianFella/status/1155919674699341824?s=20\" rel=\"nofollow\">HERE</a> is Brian's twitter post. And <a href=\"https://only-johnny-depp.tumblr.com/post/186640430727\" rel=\"nofollow\">HERE</a> is more of Tara's deposition.</p>\n<p>So there you have it. One more witness who saw Amber Heard savaging Johnny Depp, not the other way around. I'm sure she won't be the last.</p>", "photo": {"id": "223104481", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/8/cl/cp/LRClcPoWnFzWahC-800x450-noPad.jpg?1581548866", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "25737217", "createdAt": "2020-02-11T21:48:58.000Z", "title": "Perez Hilton Apologizes to Johnny Depp", "description": "<p>When Amber Heard made domestic abuse claims against Johnny Depp, many were quick to believe her and vilify him. Among those was Perez Hilton, who was quite vocal in his support for Team Heard.</p>\n<p>Now, Perez Hilton is apologizing to Johnny Depp for believing Amber Heard. After listening to the leaked audio where Heard admitted to hitting Johnny Depp and mocking him for being a victim, Hilton says \u201cI really questioned her credibility, I questioned her motives, I questioned everything.\"</p>\n<p>\u201cI feel like I owe Johnny Depp another apology,\u201d Perez goes on to say, \u201cI want to apologize to Johnny Depp for not believing all of the other women in his life.\u201d</p>\n<p>You can read more about Hilton's apology, and watch his apology video <a href=\"https://www.ibtimes.com/perez-hilton-apologizes-johnny-depp-believing-amber-heard-watch-2918588\" rel=\"nofollow\">HERE</a>.</p>", "photo": {"id": "223099958", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/8/zp/ei/nDzpeItgUnXipcn-800x450-noPad.jpg?1581457740", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "25732087", "createdAt": "2020-02-10T21:16:38.000Z", "title": "MeToo lawyer accused of sexual misconduct", "description": "<p>Michelle Ugenti-Rita became the face of the #MeToo movement when she accused former State Rep. Don Shooter of sexual harassment.</p>\n<p>Now, there's a lobbyist who says the state senator and her now husband, Brian Townsend, sexually harassed her while the politician was still in the Arizona House of Representatives. Ugenti-Rita was a state representative between 2013 and 2015, meaning the alleged allegations happened before the politician made her accusations against Shooter.</p>\n<p>The lobbyist alleges that Ugenti-Rita showed her photos of herself on her phone, and that Ugenti-Rita's husband, Townsend, sent explicit photos hif himself and his wife to the lobbyist.\u00a0</p>\n<p>The lobbyist also alleges that she was later invited up to Ugenti-Rita's hotel room, where Ugenti-Rita behaved provocatively and urged the lobbyist stay until Townsend could join them.\u00a0</p>\n<p>Arizona\u2019s Senate Democratic Leader David Bradly said that the \u201callegations contained in the deposition appear to be a clear violation of our sexual harassment policy that warrants further investigation.\"</p>\n<p>This clearly illustrates that Amber Heard is likely not the first woman to use the #MeToo movement to hide her own criminal behavior by purporting to represent women's issues.\u00a0</p>\n<p>This outlines a fundamental problem with the #MeToo movement. While claiming to be representatives of abused women, the MeToo platform has created an environment where men can be persecuted with no proof whatsoever aside of a woman accusing him, the way Amber Heard accused her ex-husband Johnny Depp of abusing her.\u00a0</p>\n<p>Heard presented falsified photos as proof, and she became the darling of #MeToo, furthering her own career and public reputation at the cost of a man who did none of the things she accused him of.</p>\n<p>Heard's photos were quickly debunked as fakes by other public photos the day before, the day after, and even later the same day showing her with no bruises or busted lip at all.</p>\n<p>Ultimately, women like this don't represent women who really have been brutalized. In fact, there's almost irreperable damage.\u00a0Until this flawed system is fixed, the real victims are the women who are forced to suffer in silence for fear that they won't be believed if they come forward to tell their stories and seek help.</p>", "photo": {"id": "223095647", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/6/kg/ui/aEKGuiyRzYecRPQ-800x450-noPad.jpg?1581369402", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}], "pageInfo": {"endCursor": "YXJyYXljb25uZWN0aW9uOjIyNw==", "hasNextPage": true}}}}}, {"data": {"petition": {"id": "14451136", "slug": "dc-entertainment-remove-amber-heard-from-aquaman-2", "user": {"id": "24448735", "displayName": "Jeanne Larson", "photo": {"id": "221862322", "userSmall": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/7/xs/ly/cXXSLydpSVDqIVB-48x48-noPad.jpg?1553098061", "processing": false}}}, "organization": null, "updatesConnection": {"nodes": [{"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "25727571", "createdAt": "2020-02-09T22:52:46.000Z", "title": "Heard still stepping out.", "description": "<p>Amber Heard is still acting like she's an A-list star, stepping out at at a pre-Oscar party with her latest gal pal, and yesterday to the Spirit Awards (solo). I'm hoping that her gal-pal had other obligations for the day, and not that she stayed home to hide any facial injuries she might have recently acquired.\u00a0</p>\n<p>These outings have a lot of people wondering why Heard is still being invited to high-profile events after she was heard on audio tape admitting to beating her (then) husband Johnny Depp.</p>\n<p>I speculate that she was invited to these events before that tape became public listening, and that she should enjoy them. I doubt that she'll get any more such invites. I think it's the end of the road for her.</p>\n<p>The star of the picture, though, is the lady in black who's covering her face like the sight of Amber Heard makes her as sick as it makes me. You, madam facepalmer, are my new hero.</p>", "photo": {"id": "223092089", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/1/ly/hn/zmlyHNayVOVnjHP-800x450-noPad.jpg?1581288767", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "25719959", "createdAt": "2020-02-08T00:33:54.000Z", "title": "That Brian Fella", "description": "<p>There's a guy named @ThatBrianFella on twitter who also has a YouTube\u00a0channel called <a href=\"https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ED547mVW4AIv4O8.jpg\" rel=\"nofollow\">Incredibly Average</a>.\u00a0He takes a great deal of time and puts forth a whole lot of effort putting together videos that explain in detail what's going on in the Amber Heard/Johnny Depp saga.\u00a0</p>\n<p>Johnny himself has seen and praised Brian's efforts. That's about the highest accolade you can get.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aca0KWoHtqQ&amp;t=10s\" rel=\"nofollow\">HERE</a> is his video about the tape that came out about a week ago where Amber Heard admits to beating Johnny Depp, insulting and gaslighting him.\u00a0</p>\n<p>And <a href=\"https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cg9SvQSMnoE\" rel=\"nofollow\">HERE</a> is Brian's take on the newly released audio clip, in which she dares Johnny to come out as a victim, saying that nobody will believe him because he's a\u00a0 man that's bigger than her teeny tiny little 115 lb self is. She even outlines her plan to take pictures of made up bruises during the entirety of their marriage so that she can set him up.</p>\n<p>BTW, if she weighs 115, I'll eat my hat, with my head in it. Just saying.</p>\n<p>Brian has a whole string of videos he's made as the feud has unfolded. They're well worth the watch if you want to know the whole story. Give him a look at his YouTube channel <a href=\"https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCg0C-N_MPYYOXyF4T3jMxNQ\" rel=\"nofollow\">HERE</a>.<br><br>He and they are anything but Incredibly Average. They are superb.</p>", "photo": {"id": "223085632", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/1/ly/qg/JWlyqgSshyjHBlO-800x450-noPad.jpg?1581122035", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "25714425", "createdAt": "2020-02-06T23:06:25.000Z", "title": "\"No one will believe you\" Amber Heard taunts Johnny Depp", "description": "<p>In a newly released audio recording, Amber Heard brags that no one will believe that he's the victim of abuse because he's a big, strong man and she's a tiny little female. She says that she couldn't possibly have abused him because she's never been able to overpower him or knock him down. The judge and jury will never believe him, she asserts.\u00a0</p>\n<p>In the same conversation, Heard lays out her dastardly plan, taunting him about having her hair and makeup done to take pictures of her alleged abuse over time, so that the time stamps would match up with her allegations. It's obvious that she's been planning his demise for a very long time. Unfortunately for her, she can't keep her mouth shut and her own words give her away.\u00a0</p>\n<p>Johnny Depp replies\u00a0</p>\n<p>You can read a very telling transcript HERE.</p>\n<p>Johnny finally seems to understand what's been going on for the entirety of their marriage, that he's being set up to take a fall. He tells her, sadly, \"I've loved you for so many f**king years but you know what? You didn't exist. You don't exist. You're not there. You're a f**king made up thing in my head. And I can't believe you're doing this to me.\"\u00a0</p>\n<p>Incredibly, Heard's lawyers hold up this latest audio recording as proof the Johnny was the abuser, despite Heard's admissions.\u00a0</p>\n<p>Johnny's lawyers say simply that this is a conversation any abuse victim will recognize. Her saying \"No one will believe you, so you better do what I want.\"\u00a0</p>\n<p>What do you think? Does Amber Heard dig herself deeper into a hole with her own words? Or does she vindicate herself as being the victim of abuse?</p>", "photo": {"id": "223081209", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/2/go/yt/gEGOYTGdfqmRFEE-800x450-noPad.jpg?1581030388", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "MilestonePetitionUpdate", "id": "25713220", "createdAt": "2020-02-06T18:51:16.000Z", "signatureCount": 200000}, {"__typename": "MilestonePetitionUpdate", "id": "25703295", "createdAt": "2020-02-05T01:59:38.000Z", "signatureCount": 150000}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "25702684", "createdAt": "2020-02-05T00:02:26.000Z", "title": "Amber Heard's laughable response to recorded evidence that she abused Johnny Depp", "description": "<p>Here's Amber Heard's reaction to the audio of her admitting that she repeatedly abused Johnny Depp. Through her lawyer, she says:</p>\n<p>\"The fact that a woman fights or talks back does not mean that she has not been the subject of repeated domestic violence or abuse. It's a myth to say, as Mr. Depp apparently is implying that, if Ms. Heard slapped him, then she can't also be a victim. That is just not true.\"</p>\n<p>The argument that he was violent too might fly, except that the whole crux of her argument on the recording, the reason for the fight de jour, is that he always leaves (\"splits\") whenever she starts a physical altercation with him.\u00a0</p>\n<p>Can't have it both ways, hon. You can't accuse him of abuse, but get caught on tape calling him a baby and a coward for leaving whenever you get physically violent with him.\u00a0<br><br>This reaction doesn't fly any more than the rest of her flimsy accusations. Time's up for Amber, and she's apparent'y the only one that doesn't know it, still trying desperately to seem socially relevant.\u00a0</p>\n<p>What are your thoughts about this?</p>", "photo": {"id": "223072017", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/3/zl/ch/rEzlchieWugdNbU-800x450-noPad.jpg?1580860948", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "25696318", "createdAt": "2020-02-03T19:14:34.000Z", "title": "Recording: \"I wasn't punching you, I was hitting you.\"", "description": "<p>Straight from the horse's mouth, Amber Heard admits that she abused Johnny Depp repeatedly. And she blames HIM for it.</p>\n<p>From <a href=\"https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7947733/amp/Amber-Heard-admits-hitting-ex-husband-Johnny-Depp-pelting-pots-pans-tape.html?__twitter_impression=true\" rel=\"nofollow\">Daily Mail</a>: \"I can't promise I won't get physical again, I get so mad I lose it.\" Listen as Amber Heard admits to 'hitting' ex-husband Johnny Depp and throwing pots, pans and vases at Johnny Depp in explosive audio confession.</p>\n<p>You can hear the entire recorded conversation <a href=\"https://youtu.be/aca0KWoHtqQ\" rel=\"nofollow\">HERE</a>, thanks to thanks to Brian McPherson (@ThatBrianFella).\u00a0</p>\n<p>Heard, a self-proclaimed ambassador for women's rights and outspoken domestic violence advocate, taunts Depp for fleeing the late night physical abuse rained down on him by her, telling him: \"You are such a baby and coward. Grow the f**k up Johnny.\"</p>\n<p>And many more admissions of abuse she inflicted upon Depp, including the comment: \"I can't promise I won't get physical again.\"</p>\n<p>Depp's attorney Adam Waldman says that there are a dozen more recordings just like it. It's only a matter of time before we hear them all.\u00a0</p>\n<p>Most studio contracts contain morals clause. That's how Disney ousted Johnny Depp from Pirates. I find it impossible to imagine that Heard's contract as Mera doesn't contain a Moral's clause. Certainly, committing violent domestic abuse violates such a clause.</p>\n<p>Amber Heard used the #metoo movement to glorify herself and frame Johnny Depp. But it looks like time's up for her.</p>", "photo": {"id": "223066757", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/2/hg/dx/QohGdxkKSkoygcr-800x450-noPad.jpg?1580757276", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "MilestonePetitionUpdate", "id": "25695287", "createdAt": "2020-02-03T16:10:35.000Z", "signatureCount": 100000}, {"__typename": "MilestonePetitionUpdate", "id": "25691982", "createdAt": "2020-02-02T21:12:24.000Z", "signatureCount": 75000}, {"__typename": "MilestonePetitionUpdate", "id": "25688499", "createdAt": "2020-02-02T01:31:35.000Z", "signatureCount": 50000}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "25583981", "createdAt": "2020-01-10T22:22:53.000Z", "title": "Heard exploits boot with no explanation. We have one.", "description": "<p>As of yet, Amber Heard has provided no explanation for the many photos that have shown her wearing a <a href=\"https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2020/01/06/20/23070936-7857879-image-a-21_1578341166855.jpg\" rel=\"nofollow\">medical boot</a>.<br>In <a href=\"https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2020/01/08/08/23139876-7864125-image-a-1_1578473805971.jpg\" rel=\"nofollow\">One picture</a>, she's hamming it up on the black sands of a Hawiian beach in a flowing white dress, with the boot on full display, of course. In <a href=\"https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2020/01/08/17/23139932-7864125-Glamorous_Adding_some_glamorous_touches_the_star_accessorised_he-a-7_1578505316271.jpg\" rel=\"nofollow\">another photo</a>, she makes sure to flash a lot of leg, for good measure.</p>\n<p>I have a couple of questions about this before I provide you with what I believe is the only possible motive for the spiffy new footwear.<br>First, who <a href=\"https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2020/01/08/09/23139878-7864125-image-m-20_1578477350287.jpg\" rel=\"nofollow\">wears heels</a> with a medical boot?<br><br>Second, who repeatedly puts their full weight on an injured foot if the injury is so severe that it requires a boot? There are repeated pictures of her doing exactly that\u00a0<a href=\"https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2020/01/08/09/23139942-7864125-image-m-29_1578477460482.jpg\" rel=\"nofollow\">HERE</a>, <a href=\"https://s.yimg.com/ny/api/res/1.2/fcnj7U5EJYg0ZxZlmb5Lmg--~A/YXBwaWQ9aGlnaGxhbmRlcjtzbT0xO3c9ODAw/https://media.zenfs.com/en-US/theblast_73/c4b275de8085d1cf9ca2c19c05301a29\" rel=\"nofollow\">HERE</a>, and <a href=\"https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2020/01/08/17/23139948-7864125-Ouch_It_is_not_known_how_Amber_hurt_herself-a-5_1578505316128.jpg\" rel=\"nofollow\">HERE</a>.</p>\n<p>Nah. I don't buy it. In this humble petitioner's opinion, there's only one reason Amber Heard is posing for all these photo ops with that great big clunky boot on her foot: To divert attention away from texts from her parents that PROVE that she lied about Johnny Depp abusing her so that she could kick him out of his own condo and keep it for herself. <a href=\"https://theblast.com/c/johnny-depp-amber-heard-domestic-violence-text-messages-parents-statement\" rel=\"nofollow\">Read the texts for yourself</a>.</p>\n<p>I'd bet real money on this whole boot show being a diversionary tactic.</p>", "photo": {"id": "222964500", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/0/ca/dx/aICAdxckrFfdkrP-800x450-noPad.jpg?1578694975", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "25429235", "createdAt": "2019-12-01T22:40:36.000Z", "title": "Amber Heard's father threatens to shoot Johnny Depp, reports", "description": "<p>According to <a href=\"https://theblast.com/c/johnny-depp-amber-heard-dad-father-threatened-shoot-kill-court-death-threat\" rel=\"nofollow\">David Killackey</a>, who worked on both\u00a0Amber\u00a0and\u00a0Johnny\u2018s classic cars, Amber Heard became abusive towards him and her father made \"death threats\" towards Johnny Depp in a phone call to him.</p>\n<p>Killackey says he told Amber Heard that she was going to have to pay for any work done on her car after her split with Johnny Depp.\u00a0</p>\n<p>According to Killackey, \"The reply I received what can only be described as an extremely hostile response from Amber. I did my best to convey to her that I did not wish to get in the middle of the dispute between her and Mr. Depp. She did not receive this information very well. Her first reaction was to verbally abuse me with expletives, threats and a continued rant over what she claimed was an unfortunate financial downturn of her personal finances caused by Mr. Depp. At one point she said 'you motherf---er,' you're screwing me!\"</p>\n<p>Killackey claims he then had a conversation with Amber Heard's father that turned threatening. \"During the attempt to facilitate the repairs, modifications, and additions to the Mustang. I received many text messages and phone calls from Amber's father, Mr. David Heard. After the separation of Amber and Mr. Depp, Mr. Heard became very bitter towards Mr. Depp,\" he claimed.</p>\n<p>In one phone call, Amber's dad stated \"That f---ing piece of s--t is f---ing me too because I'm supposed to get 10% of the money and without it I can't produce the movie I was gunna make!\" and \"He is ruining my baby girl's career and blackballing her in Hollywood.\"</p>\n<p>Further, Mr. Heard said: \"and when I get to him I'm going to beat the s--t out of him\" and \"I'm from Texas, and men from Texas carry 45's and Johnny is going to meet the f---ing end of mine!\"</p>\n<p>Mr. Killackey\u2019s chilling first-hand experience with Amber Heard and her family exposes the motive behind Amber Heard\u2019s abuse hoax - money.</p>\n<p>Mr. Heard's threats have been reported and are being taken very seriously.</p>", "photo": {"id": "222825377", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/7/fk/tz/LGFKTzwedfCKVHG-800x450-noPad.jpg?1575240038", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}], "pageInfo": {"endCursor": "YXJyYXljb25uZWN0aW9uOjIzOQ==", "hasNextPage": true}}}}}, {"data": {"petition": {"id": "14451136", "slug": "dc-entertainment-remove-amber-heard-from-aquaman-2", "user": {"id": "24448735", "displayName": "Jeanne Larson", "photo": {"id": "221862322", "userSmall": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/7/xs/ly/cXXSLydpSVDqIVB-48x48-noPad.jpg?1553098061", "processing": false}}}, "organization": null, "updatesConnection": {"nodes": [{"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "25413300", "createdAt": "2019-11-28T01:53:54.000Z", "title": "Depp/Heard court date delayed until August", "description": "<p>Originally slated for February 2020, the court date for Johnny Depp's defamation case against Amber Heard has been continued until August of 2020. Not surprising, considering all of Heard's delay tactics. But fear not, seekers of justice. The case will be heard in court, and Johnny Depp will prevail. The only question at that point will be why Australia hasn't sought charges for assault leading to serious bodily harm.</p>", "photo": {"id": "222808377", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/8/rs/sh/pVRSSHzoXIqIPCB-800x450-noPad.jpg?1574906036", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "MilestonePetitionUpdate", "id": "25363893", "createdAt": "2019-11-17T06:44:53.000Z", "signatureCount": 40000}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "25362850", "createdAt": "2019-11-16T22:38:30.000Z", "title": "Heard: IME DENIED", "description": "<p>Amber heard's petition to force Johnny Depp to endure an 8 hour mental evaluation was DENIED. The court deemed the 8 hour IME to be inappropriate and not helpful.\u00a0<br><br>Thanks to Federica P on her L'oreal petition, you can read a transcript of the hearing in which AH's request for an 8 hour mental eval of JD <a href=\"https://www.dropbox.com/s/ii9hzxzbgqc6wnh/IME%20Hearing.pdf?dl=0\" rel=\"nofollow\">HERE.</a></p>\n<p>That's one more score in Johnny Depp's favor. More to come, I have no doubt.</p>\n<p>Thanks to that Brian Fella for the screen grab.</p>", "photo": {"id": "222749827", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/6/hc/nw/awHCnwjqmBToGNl-800x450-noPad.jpg?1573943912", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "25355080", "createdAt": "2019-11-15T02:30:31.000Z", "title": "Amber Heard in Doubt for Aquaman 2", "description": "<p>The future of Amber Heard as Mera in\u00a0Aquaman\u00a02 and continued DC movies may be in doubt following Johnny Depp's 50m defamation suit, says <a href=\"https://cosmicbook.news/amber-heard-aquaman-2-doubt-johnny-depp-lawsuit\" rel=\"nofollow\">Cosmicbook</a> news. Likewise, netizens around the world are signing a petition to remove Amber Heard from Aquaman 2. Every day brings more coverage in favor of Johnny depp, with some fans reversing their position following evidence presented to the court. In the face of logic, the truth is coming to light. With the court date coming up in February, justice looms near for Johnny Depp and his growing number of supporters.</p>", "photo": {"id": "222739018", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/9/zl/kz/aHzlkZfHgcjtLKJ-800x450-noPad.jpg?1573785032", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "MilestonePetitionUpdate", "id": "25335892", "createdAt": "2019-11-11T11:43:20.000Z", "signatureCount": 35000}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "25329815", "createdAt": "2019-11-09T18:17:54.000Z", "title": "They're taking notice", "description": "<p>Since the petition to remove Amber Heard from Aquaman 2 passed the 30,000 signature mark, there's been a scattering of articles sparking renewed interest, including a tweet from the DCEU asking what people think. I think it's great that so many people are taking notice. Let's hope Warner Bros, DC and James Wan take notice and respond accordingly.</p>\n<p>One thing that can't be argued: People are taking notice of our little petition, and over 33,000 people agree with it.</p>\n<p>Are you listening Warner Bros, DC, and #jamesWan?</p>", "photo": {"id": "222717744", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/8/ka/yi/cEkAYImHwuXpvHT-800x450-noPad.jpg?1573323477", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "25314814", "createdAt": "2019-11-06T14:54:41.000Z", "title": "Heard demands 8 hour mental evaluation", "description": "<p>In her latest bid to smear ex husband Johnny Depp, Amber heard is now requesting that Depp undergo extensive mental health evaluation. She wants him observed while under the influence of drugs and booze she says he used when she says that he abused her. The result, I guess she thinks that'll prove that he was capable of doing all the horrible things she accused him of doing to her.</p>\n<p>You know. All the things she did to HIM then accused him of doing to her.</p>\n<p>Depp's fans are up in arms all over Twitter, insisting (rightfully so) that it's just a smear tactic and that she's not only bullying him, but also placing a stigma on all persons who have sought medical attention as being perpetrators of violent crimes.</p>\n<p>Me, I'm glad she's still flying those bullying colors. All she's proving is that she continues to try to manipulate control, and damage him. In short, shes proving his case for him.</p>\n<p>I can't wait until February. He might FINALLY shut her up.</p>", "photo": {"id": "222705725", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/8/fu/pd/DnfupdJCgHsmRkD-800x450-noPad.jpg?1573052084", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "25289628", "createdAt": "2019-10-31T19:21:18.000Z", "title": "Amber heard scrambles for support", "description": "<p>Johnny Depp just scored <a href=\"https://deadline.com/2019/10/johnny-depp-malpractice-suit-settled-amber-heard-abuse-battle-1202772693/\" rel=\"nofollow\">a win</a> (and an 8 figure settlement from) his former management company. Now, Amber Heard's team seems to think that the loss will inspire his former managers to jump on board to defend her. I guess she thinks hat one desperate, bitter ex can benefit from the definitive loss of another, his ex managers.\u00a0<br><br>In a <a href=\"https://pmcdeadline2.files.wordpress.com/2019/10/2019_10_29_heard_petition_to_enforce_subpoena1-wm.pdf\" rel=\"nofollow\">memorandum</a> to support a request for a subpoena, Amber Heard's lawyers are asking for TMG (the ex managers) to reveal that they had knowledge that Depp violently abused Heard.</p>\n<p>So, not only is she not denying that she (falsely) alleged violence by Depp, she keeps right on saying it. She might think she's drumming up support, but all she keeps doing is repeating the same offense. She just keeps right on defaming him.\u00a0</p>\n<p>I can't wait until he wins and FINALLY shuts her up.</p>", "photo": {"id": "222685802", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/7/wn/vc/fKWnVcDXIPhSfAQ-800x450-noPad.jpg?1572549680", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "MilestonePetitionUpdate", "id": "25289003", "createdAt": "2019-10-31T17:26:20.000Z", "signatureCount": 30000}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "25178969", "createdAt": "2019-10-10T17:14:35.000Z", "title": "Elon Musk officially subpoenaed in Johnny v Amber", "description": "<p>Elon Musk\u00a0has officially been subpoenaed in by\u00a0Johnny Depp\u00a0is his legal battle with\u00a0Amber Heard.\u00a0Musk is being asked to turn over all communications, including text messages, with the actress on or about the time of her alleged domestic violence incident with the actor.</p>\n<p>According to new legal documents, obtained by The Blast, Depp filed a subpoena to Musk to produce and protect all items that are associated with Amber Heard.</p>\n<p>I'll bet Musk is SO glad he got involved with such a shrew. His name is being dragged through the mud, and will be for years. Not that I have much sympathy for any guy that sleeps with another man's wife a month after the wedding, in the groom's bed, no less.\u00a0</p>\n<p>Those two deserve each other. Johnny never deserved any of this.</p>\n<p>\u00a0</p>\n<p>\u00a0</p>\n<p>\u00a0</p>", "photo": {"id": "222602539", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/8/ea/cv/RjeaCvriWRduYCC-800x450-noPad.jpg?1570727678", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "25043744", "createdAt": "2019-09-07T21:52:06.000Z", "title": "Amber Heard tries to silence Johnny Depp", "description": "<p>For a woman who refuses to be silenced. Amber Heard is trying awfully hard to get Johnny Depp's defamation suit thrown out. She has now hired attorney\u00a0Roberta Kaplan, who has filed a new motion to dismiss, arguing, as have many before him, that Johnny Depp\u2019s name was never even mentioned in the op/ed in which Amber Heard describes herself as a survivor of domestic abuse.\u00a0<br>\u201cIn Mr. Depp\u2019s view\u2026 Ms. Heard can never speak about the backlash she endured after reporting him, or about the death threats against her, without impliedly re-accusing him of abuse,\u201d Kaplan writes.\u00a0<br>Well, duh.\u00a0<br>1) When Amber Heard describes herself as a survivor of domestic violence at the hands of Johnny Depp, she's committing defamation. So no. She CAN'T say it.\u00a0<br>2) Amber Heard and Johnny Depp both signed a divorce agreement that forbids them both from speaking negatively about each other. So, no. She CAN'T keep spewing her slanderous rhetoric.\u00a0<br>I'm pretty sure that Kaplan is smart enough to understand that premise, but she's a lawyer. She'll argue whatever she's paid to argue, especially in such a high-profile case.<br><br>Aside from which, is it just me, or does Amber Heard look pretty rough, lately? She looks bloated and pasty in recent photos, including this one. I wonder what's up with her.\u00a0</p>", "photo": {"id": "222498619", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/5/fv/yr/kvFvYRlLLioULNt-800x450-noPad.jpg?1567893127", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "25009074", "createdAt": "2019-08-29T19:02:27.000Z", "title": "Amber Heard put out a cigarette on Johnny Depp's face", "description": "<p>Photos reveal that Amber Heard put out a cigarette on Johnny Depp's face during the fight in which she chopped off his finger with a vodka bottle.</p>\n<p>Johnny contracted MRSA three times, nearly losing his life.</p>\n<p>Don't let that monster Amber Heard get away with it. Please sign and share the petition to remove Amber Heard from Aquaman 2.</p>\n<p>#JamesWan</p>", "photo": {"id": "222471693", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/8/mg/ss/cmMgsSYZzDElwNl-800x450-noPad.jpg?1567105349", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}], "pageInfo": {"endCursor": "YXJyYXljb25uZWN0aW9uOjI1MQ==", "hasNextPage": true}}}}}, {"data": {"petition": {"id": "14451136", "slug": "dc-entertainment-remove-amber-heard-from-aquaman-2", "user": {"id": "24448735", "displayName": "Jeanne Larson", "photo": {"id": "221862322", "userSmall": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/7/xs/ly/cXXSLydpSVDqIVB-48x48-noPad.jpg?1553098061", "processing": false}}}, "organization": null, "updatesConnection": {"nodes": [{"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "24707532", "createdAt": "2019-06-15T21:28:43.000Z", "title": "Amber Heard: Sauce for the Goose", "description": "<p>Amber heard is complaining because the public no longer hates her ex-husband Johnny Depp. Right after their split, amid allegations of spousal abuse, Johnny's reputation took a serious hit.\u00a0</p>\n<p>Now that Depp has been able to prove that he's the one that's been abused the whole time, his reputation is on the mend, while hers has taken a serious nose dive.</p>\n<p>Heard's legal<a href=\"https://wegotthiscovered.com/movies/amber-heard-accuses-johnny-depp-lying-defamation-case/\" rel=\"nofollow\"> team is screaming</a> \"Perjury!\" about Johnny Depp, saying that he clearly lied about when or how many 911 calls were made that fateful night, saying:</p>\n<p>\"\u201cThese signal an intention by Mr. Depp to litigate in the court of public opinion.\u201d</p>\n<p>She didn't mind the court of public opinion when it was swinging in her favor, did she? Well, too bad, babycakes. Sauce for the goose is good for the gander. If she'd been around Hollywood's A-list for more than ten minutes, she'd know that public opinion is a fickle, fickle thing. One minute, you're the darling of the media. The next, the whole world knows that you're a monster and nobody minds calling you out on it.</p>\n<p>She'll have to get used to that. When Johnny wins his defamation case, she's not going to have anywhere to hide, no matter how many times she shows off her nipples. Little boys will oggle the view, but grownups will shun her for the monster she is. Hopefully, her only employment options will be the fabulous world of fast food, or porn. nothing in mainstream entertainment.</p>\n<p>She'll also have to get used to being about 50 million dollars lighter. According to Celebrity Net Worth, Amber's 'only' worth about 9 million. If/when the verdict for that case swings in Johnny's favor, she'd going to have to start asking all her friends for loans to cover it. And I think she'll find herself in a very lonely place.\u00a0</p>\n<p>Little girl's got a big lesson to learn. Here's hoping it happens sooner than later.\u00a0</p>", "photo": {"id": "222216506", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/2/po/to/xpPOTOiWNDjuefT-800x450-noPad.jpg?1560634126", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "24654169", "createdAt": "2019-06-04T14:59:42.000Z", "title": "Amber Heard fires back, calls Johnny Depp a liar", "description": "<p>Amber Heard is <a href=\"https://www.thesun.co.uk/tvandshowbiz/9207926/amber-heard-hits-back-johnny-depp-lies/amp/?__twitter_impression=true\" rel=\"nofollow\">calling Johnny Depp a liar</a> when his legal team claims that the 911 call wasn't made when Heard's camp says it was. She has produced what she's calling evidence of TWO 911 calls made that night, at 8:30 pm and 11pm.\u00a0</p>\n<p>But Johnny's legal team has recovered cctv footage of Johnny leaving at 8:30. So even if the earlier call WAS made when Amber says it was, it couldn't have been made in the middle of her fictional fight with Johnny, like she claims. He wasn't in the building anymore.\u00a0</p>\n<p>Either way, she's the liar. And she just keeps right on proving it.</p>", "photo": {"id": "222171713", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/0/vo/ll/OyvOllJTGEFEvXM-800x450-noPad.jpg?1559660386", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "24635737", "createdAt": "2019-05-30T21:37:21.000Z", "title": "Amber Heard sucking up to the Trans crowd", "description": "<p>Amber Heard recently invited trans woman Corey Ray to attend the Cannes Film Festival, calling her L'oreal's \"woman of worth.\"</p>\n<p>I am angered beyond words that Amber still represents L'oreal. And the fact that she's using trans women to try and use transwomen to reinvent herself as some kind of hero representing trans persons infuriates me.\u00a0</p>\n<p>It's not the first time Amber's used a Ray to help herself seem socially relevant. She also took Ray to the Golden Globes with her.\u00a0</p>\n<p>Seems there's no demographic Heard's not willing to hide behind.\u00a0</p>", "photo": {"id": "222156998", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/5/dt/uu/wjdtuuyRqbUdozf-800x450-noPad.jpg?1559252244", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "24625826", "createdAt": "2019-05-28T21:57:23.000Z", "title": "Who's The Liar Now?", "description": "<p>There's an interesting <a href=\"Raquel%20Pennington's deposition (Amber Heard 's best friend and witness) who has never seen Johnny Depp yelling,  grabbing or hitting someone or smashing things..Staff testimony of her %22bruises%22 seen weeks after 21st may 2016 (Johnny Depp was NOT even in the Country) when she was with Elon Musk... Officer M. Saenz testifies she has never seen broken things or smashed bottles in the apartment.... And much more.. \" rel=\"nofollow\">update</a> over on <a href=\"https://www.change.org/p/l-or%C3%A9al-remove-amber-heard-as-l-or%C3%A9al-spokeperson\" rel=\"nofollow\">the petition to remove Amber Heard as a L'oreal spokesperson</a>. According to their update,\u00a0</p>\n<p>\"Raquel Pennington's deposition (Amber Heard 's best friend and witness) who has\u00a0never seen Johnny Depp yelling,\u00a0 grabbing or hitting someone or smashing things..Staff testimony of her \"bruises\" seen weeks after 21st may\u00a02016 (Johnny Depp was NOT even in the Country) when she was with Elon Musk... Officer M. Saenz testifies she has\u00a0never seen broken things or smashed bottles in the apartment.... And much more.. \"</p>\n<p>It's definitely worth a read. <a href=\"Raquel%20Pennington's deposition (Amber Heard 's best friend and witness) who has never seen Johnny Depp yelling,  grabbing or hitting someone or smashing things..Staff testimony of her %22bruises%22 seen weeks after 21st may 2016 (Johnny Depp was NOT even in the Country) when she was with Elon Musk... Officer M. Saenz testifies she has never seen broken things or smashed bottles in the apartment.... And much more.. \" rel=\"nofollow\">Have a look</a>, and sign <a href=\"https://www.change.org/p/l-or%C3%A9al-remove-amber-heard-as-l-or%C3%A9al-spokeperson\" rel=\"nofollow\">that petition</a> as well while you're there. Amber Heard doesn't deserve to be in Aquaman 2, and no serial abuser deserves to be a spokesperson for a company geared toward serving women.\u00a0<br>#JamesWan<br>#Loreal<br>#Aquaman<br>#Aquaman2</p>", "photo": {"id": "222148860", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/9/oi/os/XyOIOsQQbmBfmqW-800x450-noPad.jpg?1559080645", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "MilestonePetitionUpdate", "id": "24614101", "createdAt": "2019-05-26T08:58:59.000Z", "signatureCount": 25000}, {"__typename": "MilestonePetitionUpdate", "id": "24608409", "createdAt": "2019-05-24T18:25:31.000Z", "signatureCount": 20000}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "24598821", "createdAt": "2019-05-22T22:39:05.000Z", "title": "Amber Heard admits to abusing Johnny Depp", "description": "<p>Amber Heard admits that she threw a can of paint thinner at Johnny Depp's head in front of witnesses on the island.\u00a0</p>\n<p>What more proof do we need that she's guilty of domestic abuse? What more does Warner Bros DC need to fire her?\u00a0</p>\n<p>If it was a male actor that admitted to abusing his wife, he would have been canned and panned long since. And yet, Amber Heard still hasn't been dumped for Aquaman 2. It's a sexist double standard that must not be tolerated.\u00a0</p>\n<p>Make some noise, people. Let WB DC know that domestic abuse will not be tolerated!</p>", "photo": {"id": "222124221", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/1/wx/co/ZeWxCotIYNkbvOS-800x450-noPad.jpg?1558564748", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "24530632", "createdAt": "2019-05-09T03:11:38.000Z", "title": "Amber Heard begs for support", "description": "<p>Amber heard threw another <a href=\"https://www.refinery29.com/amp/en-us/2019/05/231832/amber-heard-why-women-could-get-political-social-media?utm_source=twitter&amp;__twitter_impression=true\" rel=\"nofollow\">pity-party</a> recently, trying to make herself the victim again by saying that the media is to blame for her recent fall from grace. If women are political, she insists, they'll lose followers.</p>\n<p>Then she says that we should give \"all men a 9 p.m. curfew to rein them in.\" Because, sure. That'll happen.\u00a0</p>\n<p>What, I wonder, would the public's opinion be if men called for a curfew to \"rein\" women in? There would be one hell of an uproar about sexism.\u00a0</p>\n<p>That's what gets me about Amber Heard. She commits all sorts of offenses that seem to slide under the radar because she's a woman, and she's pretty. If any man did the things she pulls, they'd have their chan yanked back faster than you can blink.\u00a0</p>\n<p>After that little sexist display, she begged the audience to back her up, telling them to \"\u201cSo lose the followers [who disagree], you\u2019ll get a lot more!\u201d</p>\n<p>I guess she's promising that if people disassociate themselves with anybody that dares to have an opinion that opposes hers, they'll be rewarded by acceptance by what I guess she sees as her own personal army of butt-kissers.</p>\n<p>Sorry, but it doesn't work that way. If somebody's deserving of support, they don't have to beg for it. And, if they have all these \"a lot more!\" supporters, again, they wouldn't need to beg for them.</p>\n<p>No. It sounds like she's desperate, attending as many events as possible trying to stay relevant, and begging for support because hers is waning. The more evidence Johnny Depp releases, the worse she looks. The more evidence she \"leaks\" the more she shoots herself in the foot.\u00a0</p>", "photo": null, "video": {"photo": {"id": "222060931", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/2/cn/wg/fPCNWGgvlXtACJH-800x450-noPad.jpg?1557371500", "processing": false}}}, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "24507764", "createdAt": "2019-05-03T23:50:49.000Z", "title": "Samantha McMillen's testimony against Amber Heard", "description": "<p>\u201cOn December 16, 2015, I spent much of the day and evening with Amber Heard, preparing her to appear on the James Corden show. I saw her throughout the day of December 16, 2015, in good light, at close range, wearing no makeup. Throughout the day of December 16, 2015, I could see clearly that Amber Heard did not have any visible marks, bruises, cuts, or injuries to her face or any other part of her body. She appeared as a guest on the James Corden show that day.\u00a0After the show, Ms. Heard said to me \u2018can you believe I just did that show with two black eyes?\u2019 Ms. Heard did not have any black eyes, and had been visibly uninjured throughout the day and at that moment. I later learned that Ms. Heard had accused Johnny Depp, in court filings and the media, of violently abusing her the previous night, December 15, 2015.\u201d<br><br>Heard lied about that beating and every other incident. She was clearly framing Johnny the whole time they were together. I'm willing to bet that she only hung in there long enough to get him to put a ring on it so she could divorce him and get half his fortune.</p>", "photo": {"id": "222040637", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/2/jn/uq/dzjnUqfOjQhtAMl-800x450-noPad.jpg?1556927451", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "24503562", "createdAt": "2019-05-03T01:31:45.000Z", "title": "Johnny Depp reads letters from Hunter S. Thompson", "description": "<p>If you're a good guy, you deserve good friends. And Johnny's one of the best. Enjoy listening to Johnny read letters from his good friend Hunter S. Thompson, <a href=\"https://faroutmagazine.co.uk/johnny-depp-reading-letters-from-his-close-friend-hunter-s-thompson/\" rel=\"nofollow\">HERE</a>.</p>", "photo": {"id": "222037125", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/9/vd/hh/hUVDhHGcBIKTxfP-800x450-noPad.jpg?1556847107", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "24497193", "createdAt": "2019-05-01T19:46:39.000Z", "title": "Johnny Depp is expected to return as Gellert Grindelwald", "description": "<p>There's a ton of speculation that Johnny Depp will not return to the Fantastic Beasts franchise. But the fact is that he's already contracted, and is fully expected to return. So all those headlines are just to get hits and sell papers, as it were.\u00a0</p>\n<p>Amber Heard, on the other hand, only has 2 projects on her dance card, and one of those is Aquaman 2. Let's keep letting WB know that we, the ticket-buying public, do not want a known abuser in the role. They can do so much better.</p>", "photo": {"id": "222032327", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/3/nm/ny/tMNMNYIPaFrJzwn-800x450-noPad.jpg?1556740001", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "24485225", "createdAt": "2019-04-29T03:04:59.000Z", "title": "Johnny Depp won't back down", "description": "<p>With Amber Heard's stylist testifying that Amber Heard didn't have two black eyes she accued Johnny Depp of giving her, Depp is more determined than ever to debunk the rest of Heard's hoaxes. Depp is determined <a href=\"https://hollywoodlife.com/2019/04/28/johnny-depp-not-backing-down-legal-battle-amber-heard/\" rel=\"nofollow\">not to back down</a> until his name is cleared of her accusations.\u00a0</p>\n<p>Heard's accusations about the night of May 21, 2016, the night she said that Johnny gave her those fake bruises has already been proven to be a hoax, by 2 police officers, dozens of witnesses, and more than 80 hours of video surveillance. It never happened.\u00a0</p>\n<p>Now, Depp is debunking the rest of them, too, one by one. New subpoenas have been issued, and the entire matter is headed straight to court. It'll be a long battle, with months and months passing between each motion, each step, and every filing, but the outcome is clear.\u00a0</p>\n<p>Amber Heard lied.\u00a0</p>", "photo": {"id": "222021797", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/3/vz/fl/CLVZFLQhEFtsxHo-800x450-noPad.jpg?1556507102", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}], "pageInfo": {"endCursor": "YXJyYXljb25uZWN0aW9uOjI2Mw==", "hasNextPage": true}}}}}, {"data": {"petition": {"id": "14451136", "slug": "dc-entertainment-remove-amber-heard-from-aquaman-2", "user": {"id": "24448735", "displayName": "Jeanne Larson", "photo": {"id": "221862322", "userSmall": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/7/xs/ly/cXXSLydpSVDqIVB-48x48-noPad.jpg?1553098061", "processing": false}}}, "organization": null, "updatesConnection": {"nodes": [{"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "24469211", "createdAt": "2019-04-25T03:06:37.000Z", "title": "Stylist: \"Amber Heard had NO injuries\" after multiple allegations of abuse.", "description": "<p>Star stylist Samantha McMillen testified that she has never seen any injuries on Amber Heard, accordint to\u00a0<a href=\"https://theblast.com/amber-heard-stylist-testimony-dispute-facial-injuries-johnny-depp/amp/?__twitter_impression=true\" rel=\"nofollow\">THE BLAST.</a></p>\n<p>Joynny Depp\u2019s legal team obtained testimony of celebrity stylist,\u00a0Samantha McMillen. McMillen has helped style Heard for \u201cmajor events\u201d since 2014.</p>\n<p>Specifically, she describes styling the star for an appearance on \u201cThe Late Late Show with James Corden\u201d on December 16, 2015, after the actress alleged Depp had given her two black eyes during an argument that occurred the previous night.</p>\n<p>\u201cThroughout the day of December 16, 2015, I could see clearly that Amber Heard did not have any visible marks, bruises, cuts, or injuries to her face or any other part of her body,\u201d McMillen testified.</p>\n<p>When describing those facial injuries, McMillen said, \u201cMs. Heard did not have any black eyes, and had been visibly uninjured throughout the day and at that moment.\u201d</p>\n<p>The stylist also gave testimony about working with Heard on May 24, 2016 \u2026 the day allegedly brutal fight that Heard\u00a0recounted during her emotional deposition.</p>\n<p>McMillen said she showed up to the house around noon and \u201cshe came to me at the bottom of the staircase in Mr. Depp\u2019s house and gave me a hug, sobbing.\u201d</p>\n<p>The stylist was adamant Heard had no marks on her face during their meeting on May 24, but admitted, \u201cThree days after my encounter with Ms. Heard, on May 27, 2016, I saw in the media that Ms. Heard had gone to Court with prominent injuries visible on her face. I knew that she did not have those marks on her face May 24, 2016 when I was with her.\u201d<br><br>Funny how that works.</p>", "photo": {"id": "222007251", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/2/dh/ps/PpdHpSvXqYFWiZg-800x450-noPad.jpg?1556161600", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "24448901", "createdAt": "2019-04-20T00:54:54.000Z", "title": "Amber Heard - The pot calling the kettle back", "description": "<p>Amber Heard is firing back at Johnny Depp, accusing him of <a href=\"https://www.thecut.com/2019/04/johnny-depp-allegedly-tried-to-get-amber-heard-blacklisted.html\" rel=\"nofollow\">getting her blacklisted</a> in Hollywood following their split. The allegations come by way of Depp's former lawyers, who are also being sued by Depp for mismanaging his affairs and bilking him out of tens of millions of dollars.\u00a0</p>\n<p>So, Depp's ex-wife, who falsely accuses him of domestic abuse against her, is running around screaming that Depp tried to ruin her in Hollywood, despite the fact that she's been running her mouth about HIM ever since their divorce almost 3 years ago. <br><br>To back her up are accusations from Depp's ex-lawyers, who are trying just as hard as Amber Heard is to smear Depp because he's suing them to get back the money they wrung out of him.</p>\n<p>Sounds legit.</p>", "photo": {"id": "221987377", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/3/do/us/qxdOuSevbRNzgaA-800x450-noPad.jpg?1555721696", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "24445300", "createdAt": "2019-04-19T02:29:39.000Z", "title": "New Amber Heard Victims step forward.", "description": "<p>\"We are now interviewing OTHER WOMEN WHO HAVE COME FORWARD CLAIMING THEY ARE VICTIMS OF HORRIFIC ACTS OF VIOLENCE and other abuse AT THE HANDS OF AMBER HEARD...\"</p>\n<p>She accuses him of domestic violence and his previous partners say what a nice guy he is.\u00a0<br><br>He sets the record straight and says that she abused him, and her previous partners <a href=\"https://www.rollingstone.com/movies/movie-news/amber-heard-johnny-depp-alleged-abuse-defamation-lawsuit-filing-821487/?fbclid=IwAR2RkVpb3kJxtYxNJRuNjGYT5QP8Edeqze59x2gdheluCzTY8LoKhVwUOjY\" rel=\"nofollow\">step forward to say that she abused them, too</a>.<br><br>Funny how that works</p>", "photo": {"id": "221984324", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/2/oi/ai/CKoIAiEHdljSZpO-800x450-noPad.jpg?1555641190", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "24439700", "createdAt": "2019-04-17T19:30:26.000Z", "title": "Surveillance proof - see the video", "description": "<p>Johnny Depp has amassed a wealth of evidene against Amber Heard, proving that she didn't have any marks on her face following what she described as a violent attack, including witnesses and video surveillance from the building they lived in at the time.\u00a0</p>\n<p>You can see video footage from the building <a href=\"https://theblast.com/johnny-depp-amber-heard-elevator-surveillance-footage-defamation/\" rel=\"nofollow\">HERE</a></p>\n<p>You can see Amber Heard and her co-conspirators, her sister and her BFF Raquel Pennington getting on and off the elevator at the condo building. And Amber doesn't have a mark on her.</p>\n<p>What will she come up with next?</p>", "photo": {"id": "221979890", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/2/hh/ib/AkhhIBJVJSEnZME-800x450-noPad.jpg?1555529427", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "24425069", "createdAt": "2019-04-14T06:05:43.000Z", "title": "Elon Musk to testify", "description": "<p>In an interesting turn of events, Tesla billionaire Elon Musk has been <a href=\"https://www.thisisinsider.com/johnny-depp-lawyer-subpoenas-elon-musk-in-amber-heard-legal-fight-2019-4\" rel=\"nofollow\">subpoenaed to testify</a> against his former girlfriend Amber Heard, ex wife of Johnny Depp. In his $50 million dollar defamation suit, Johnny Depp stated that Must began visiting Heard in Depp's condo late at night while he (Depp) was away filming, just one month after his (Depp's) marriage to Heard. And now, Elon is going to have to answer to that, in front of a judge, under oath, risking penalty of perjory. Keeping in mind that Johnny's condo has security cameras all OVER the place, and can tell the real story of when Musk came and went. Pun fully intended.</p>\n<p>No doubt Amber was a tasty piece of tail, but I just have to wonder if it was worth the public relations nightmare she drags to every life she touches.</p>\n<p>And, not for nothing, but doesn't it look like Musk is sporting a shiner in that photo? What do you think the odds are that she gave it to him?</p>", "photo": {"id": "221967995", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/0/rf/ht/yERFhTiWKlHtMme-800x450-noPad.jpg?1555221944", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "24421664", "createdAt": "2019-04-13T06:11:34.000Z", "title": "Amber Heard continues to insist that she was the victim", "description": "<p>And so, <a href=\"https://pagesix.com/2019/04/11/amber-heard-claims-johnny-depp-became-a-monster-when-he-drank/\" rel=\"nofollow\">according to Heard</a>, were her friends and family.</p>\n<p>She got physical with (ex husband) Johnny Depp to defend herself. And to defend her\"Baby sister\" - who she says Johnny was about to push down the stairs, getting physical only after Johnny \"laid his hands on her, to prevent what could have been a FATAL injury!\" The best answer she gave is \"I don't know what I did.\"</p>\n<p>In video testimoney, Heard is asked a yes or no question: Have you ever hit Johnny Depp with a closed hand or fist? In response, Heard launches into yet another horryfying episode of graphic abuse at the hands of her \"monster\" ex husband.\u00a0</p>\n<p>And Heard is visibly upset when the person that asked the question reminded her that it's a yes or no question, jutting our her jaw in that angry, defiant way she has when she's not happy. Which is a lot.</p>\n<p>\"Have you ever punched your husband?\" She tried to waffle with her answer and refused to use either the words \"yes\" or \"no\" - instead insisting that \"whatever\" she did was in defense of herself or another.\u00a0</p>\n<p>We're never going to get the truth out of this spoiled, selfish piece of work. The best we can hope for is that the judge sees through her nonsense and rules in Johnny's favor.\u00a0</p>\n<p>And, as ever, we can hope that Warner Bros DC removes Amber Heard from Aquaman 2.\u00a0</p>", "photo": {"id": "221965005", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/5/jh/rb/ZAjhRBzmDveDJwd-800x450-noPad.jpg?1555135897", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "MilestonePetitionUpdate", "id": "24408196", "createdAt": "2019-04-10T11:43:36.000Z", "signatureCount": 17500}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "24388600", "createdAt": "2019-04-05T19:43:20.000Z", "title": "Johnny Depp staying busy", "description": "<p>The wheels of justice grind steadily forward. Johnny Depp is quietly gearing up to present his case against ex wife Amber Heard, having <a href=\"https://read.ilovehalloween.net/johnny-depp-amber-heard-attack-domestic-abuse-people-worldwide-petition-aquaman-2-pirates-caribbean\" rel=\"nofollow\">submitted 87 videos</a> suppoerting his accusation that Heard abused him.</p>\n<p>The suit itself is for defamation, but make no mistake, there's a lot more at stake. as a reult of this case, the world will get the verdict on who, eactly, was the abuser in the case, and who was the victim.</p>\n<p>The ramifications for the #MeToo movement are far-reaching, too. By making herself the darling of #MeToo and domestic abuse victims, Heard has now made it even more difficult for real victims to come forward. If she lied, there's nothing stopping the media from saying that they did, too. She has single-handedly set domestic abuse victims back a hundred years.\u00a0</p>\n<p>In the meantime, Johnny is steadily filming the next Fantastic Beasts movie and working with his band, The Hollywood Vampires. Amber is steadily dating.\u00a0</p>\n<p>And, hopefully, Warner Bros DC are busy looking for the actress they'll replace Heard with for Aquaman 2.\u00a0</p>\n<p>Keep signing the petition, folks. Let them know that we, the ticket-buying public, don't want a serial abuser in the DC universe.</p>", "photo": {"id": "221931797", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/2/gb/ml/oogBmloCKUWAUYm-800x450-noPad.jpg?1554493403", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "24366907", "createdAt": "2019-04-01T05:17:12.000Z", "title": "Four years until Aquaman 2", "description": "<p>According to <a href=\"https://www.forbes.com/sites/scottmendelson/2019/02/27/aquaman-2-james-wan-dc-films-james-cameron-avatar-star-wars-jason-momoa-amber-heard-shazam/#303b92cc2ea2\" rel=\"nofollow\">Forbes</a>, Aquaman 2 will likely have a release date of December 16, 2022, four years after the first Aquaman splashed onto the big screen.Why the wait? Simply put: the competition. From the looks of it, December 2022 is the first Christmas season between now and then that won't have a big-ticket studio release. Specifically: Avatar.</p>\n<p>Besides that, James Wan is a busy guy, slated to work first on his \"Trench\" horror flick - which Jason Momoa and Amber Heard are both reportedly attached to.\u00a0</p>\n<p>As horrific as the thought of Amber Heard alongside Jason Momoa in yet another film, the way for Aquaman 2 is good news. It gives plenty of time for Johnny Depp's defamation suit to hit the courts. When, not if, it's proven in a court of law that Amber Heard violently abused her ex husband - same as she did her ex wife - it should be pretty clear to those in charge of the DCU why she should be left out of it.\u00a0</p>\n<p>Fingers crossed!\u00a0</p>", "photo": {"id": "221911721", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/0/lm/hq/QELMHQrrFCPSIhP-800x450-noPad.jpg?1554095834", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "24360231", "createdAt": "2019-03-30T05:02:58.000Z", "title": "Amber Turd", "description": "<p>In court papers filed recently, Johnny Depp accused Amber Heard and her pals of deliberately soiling the sheets of his bed the night of Amber Heard's 30th birthday because she was angry that he arrived home late.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://www.mirror.co.uk/3am/celebrity-news/johnny-depp-accuses-amber-heard-13087239\" rel=\"nofollow\">Heard says that her tiny teacup Yorkie made the mess</a>.</p>\n<p>The housekeeper that found the pile of poop testified that the \"evidence\" was too big to have come from such a small animal.</p>\n<p>A source close to Depp claims that there might be \u201cstrong, photographic evidence that connected Amber to the feces\u201d that might turn up in the course of the upcoming proceedings.</p>\n<p>The hostilities between Heard and Depp keep getting messier by the minute, literally and figuratively. And, the longer it goes on, the worse Amber looks.\u00a0</p>\n<p>And, from the sound of it, she didn't smell too fresh, either.</p>", "photo": {"id": "221905796", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/2/hq/dh/RFhqDhejUmagSYE-800x450-noPad.jpg?1553922179", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "MilestonePetitionUpdate", "id": "24354463", "createdAt": "2019-03-28T18:15:55.000Z", "signatureCount": 15000}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "24350942", "createdAt": "2019-03-27T22:57:58.000Z", "title": "The True Face of Amber Heard", "description": "<p>Watch <a href=\"https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kbu5Ozqb2oU\" rel=\"nofollow\">this segment from the tv show Overhaulin</a>' - when they redid Amber Heard's vintage Mustang. Begining at :30 seconds in, Heard is pissy, petulant, abrasive and insulting. Watch her body language and gestures to everybody around her, flipping them off and being aggressive. Until she learns that she's on television, and then it's all smiles and mugging it up.\u00a0</p>\n<p>Then watch at 1:15 when she physically assaullts both her father and Johnny Depp, like it's cute or okay because she's a pretty girl.</p>\n<p>Just look at how she looks at Johnny, like she's saying \"You'd better not say the wrong thing, mister.\"</p>\n<p>That, my friends, is the real Amber Heard, on display for the whole world to see. That's what Johnny lived with. I'm just shocked that he took it as long as he did.</p>", "photo": {"id": "221897625", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/6/ch/ii/qgcHIiJteTwrHAc-800x450-noPad.jpg?1553727480", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}], "pageInfo": {"endCursor": "YXJyYXljb25uZWN0aW9uOjI3NQ==", "hasNextPage": true}}}}}, {"data": {"petition": {"id": "14451136", "slug": "dc-entertainment-remove-amber-heard-from-aquaman-2", "user": {"id": "24448735", "displayName": "Jeanne Larson", "photo": {"id": "221862322", "userSmall": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/7/xs/ly/cXXSLydpSVDqIVB-48x48-noPad.jpg?1553098061", "processing": false}}}, "organization": null, "updatesConnection": {"nodes": [{"__typename": "MilestonePetitionUpdate", "id": "24342720", "createdAt": "2019-03-26T10:29:56.000Z", "signatureCount": 12500}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "24340081", "createdAt": "2019-03-25T19:22:58.000Z", "title": "How an almost severed finger made the world fall in love with Johnny Depp again", "description": "<p><a href=\"https://meaww.com/johnny-depp-amber-heard-defamation-lawsuit-fan-support\" rel=\"nofollow\">Meaww.com</a> has published an article about how Johnny Depp's nearly severed finger has turned the public's opinion of him back into a favorable one.</p>\n<p>Thanks to Amber Heard's manipulation of the #MeToo movement and accusations that Johnny Depp was a domestic abuser, a lot of people 'canceled' him. They were quick to believe Heard amid the #MeToo media storm that was felling giants around us.\u00a0</p>\n<p>But then Depp produced photos of himself with a bruised face and a nearly severed finger, accusing Amber Heard of being the \"perpetrator of domestic abuse, not the victim.\"\u00a0</p>\n<p>Fans the world over have flocked back to Johnny Depp's side, eating their words and seeking atonement for being so quick to believe the accusations against him.\u00a0</p>\n<p>By making herself the darling of the #MeToo movement, Heard made it even harder for real victims of abuse to come forward. If one woman can lie about being abused, all claims of domestic abuse can now be viewed with doubt. Heard has not supported victims of domestic abuse, she has done them a huge disservice.</p>\n<p>Heard's \"evidence\" against Depp was wan and dubious, while his proof seems insurmountable. The verdict isn't in yet, but the tide of public opinion is just about unanimous, in favor of Depp.</p>\n<p>There are over 11,000 signatures on the petition to remove Amber Heard from Aquaman 2, so it looks like a lot of people agree.</p>", "photo": {"id": "221888247", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/8/jg/ql/USjGqLbtXBqmneA-800x450-noPad.jpg?1553541780", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "MilestonePetitionUpdate", "id": "24336379", "createdAt": "2019-03-24T23:10:13.000Z", "signatureCount": 10000}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "24336092", "createdAt": "2019-03-24T21:32:49.000Z", "title": "Amber Heard peitition on Reddit", "description": "<p>There's a heated discussion going on on Reddit about the petition to remove Amber Heard from Aquaman 2. Have a look to see what folks are saying. Maybe add your own opinion.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/b4ck1x/petition_to_remove_accused_dv_perpetrator_amber/\" rel=\"nofollow\">Petition to Remove Amber Heard on Reddit</a></p>", "photo": {"id": "221880604", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/6/kl/sc/nVklsclCzJxreiW-800x450-noPad.jpg?1553463173", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "MilestonePetitionUpdate", "id": "24334549", "createdAt": "2019-03-24T14:06:11.000Z", "signatureCount": 9000}, {"__typename": "MilestonePetitionUpdate", "id": "24333325", "createdAt": "2019-03-24T04:47:01.000Z", "signatureCount": 8000}, {"__typename": "MilestonePetitionUpdate", "id": "24332879", "createdAt": "2019-03-24T00:55:24.000Z", "signatureCount": 7500}, {"__typename": "MilestonePetitionUpdate", "id": "24332875", "createdAt": "2019-03-24T00:53:16.000Z", "signatureCount": 7500}, {"__typename": "MilestonePetitionUpdate", "id": "24332549", "createdAt": "2019-03-23T22:28:55.000Z", "signatureCount": 7000}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "24331738", "createdAt": "2019-03-23T17:17:36.000Z", "title": "Petition to remove Amber Heard from L'Oreal Paris", "description": "<p>Frederica P started <a href=\"https://www.change.org/p/l-or%C3%A9al-remove-amber-heard-as-l-or%C3%A9al-spokeperson?signed=true\" rel=\"nofollow\">a petition</a> to remove Amber Heard as a spokesperson for L'Oreal Paris. Hers is the face of an abuser. It should not be the face of an international beauty company that celebrates women. Let L'Oreal know that real victims of domestic abuse matter, and they shouldn't glorify a fake one.<br>Sign and Share.<br><a href=\"https://www.change.org/p/l-or%C3%A9al-remove-amber-heard-as-l-or%C3%A9al-spokeperson?signed=true\" rel=\"nofollow\">Petition: Remove Amber Heard from L'Oreal Paris</a></p>", "photo": {"id": "221875499", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/9/vk/xj/MRVKxjcHkEdfUdO-800x450-noPad.jpg?1553361460", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "MilestonePetitionUpdate", "id": "24331691", "createdAt": "2019-03-23T16:57:56.000Z", "signatureCount": 6000}, {"__typename": "MilestonePetitionUpdate", "id": "24331689", "createdAt": "2019-03-23T16:57:25.000Z", "signatureCount": 6000}], "pageInfo": {"endCursor": "YXJyYXljb25uZWN0aW9uOjI4Nw==", "hasNextPage": true}}}}}, {"data": {"petition": {"id": "14451136", "slug": "dc-entertainment-remove-amber-heard-from-aquaman-2", "user": {"id": "24448735", "displayName": "Jeanne Larson", "photo": {"id": "221862322", "userSmall": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/7/xs/ly/cXXSLydpSVDqIVB-48x48-noPad.jpg?1553098061", "processing": false}}}, "organization": null, "updatesConnection": {"nodes": [{"__typename": "MilestonePetitionUpdate", "id": "24330868", "createdAt": "2019-03-23T12:00:05.000Z", "signatureCount": 5000}, {"__typename": "MilestonePetitionUpdate", "id": "24330005", "createdAt": "2019-03-23T04:32:56.000Z", "signatureCount": 4000}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "24328795", "createdAt": "2019-03-22T20:36:15.000Z", "title": "They hear us!", "description": "<p><a href=\"https://boundingintocomics.com/2019/03/21/petition-created-to-remove-amber-heard-from-aquaman-2-after-johnny-depps-lawsuit/\" rel=\"nofollow\">BoundingIntoComics.com</a> has written an article about the petition to remove Amber Heard from Aquaman 2. With thousands of visits to that site daily, our petition is gaining visibility - and signatures. We're well over 4,000 voices strong. Hopefully, someone at Warner Bros DC will listen.</p>", "photo": {"id": "221872532", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/2/zs/wu/DTzSWuTWQvoBWng-800x450-noPad.jpg?1553286977", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "MilestonePetitionUpdate", "id": "24327941", "createdAt": "2019-03-22T16:38:12.000Z", "signatureCount": 3000}, {"__typename": "MilestonePetitionUpdate", "id": "24326949", "createdAt": "2019-03-22T12:07:07.000Z", "signatureCount": 2500}, {"__typename": "MilestonePetitionUpdate", "id": "24325719", "createdAt": "2019-03-22T04:42:37.000Z", "signatureCount": 2000}, {"__typename": "MilestonePetitionUpdate", "id": "24325091", "createdAt": "2019-03-22T00:50:23.000Z", "signatureCount": 1500}, {"__typename": "MilestonePetitionUpdate", "id": "24324342", "createdAt": "2019-03-21T21:19:21.000Z", "signatureCount": 1000}, {"__typename": "StarterPetitionUpdate", "id": "24323825", "createdAt": "2019-03-21T19:24:01.000Z", "title": "Great work so far!", "description": "<p>With every milestone reached, the Petition to remove Amber Heard from Aquaman 2 is sent to execs at Warner Bros. Let's keep sharing the petition and let Warner Bros know that we, the ticket-buying public, do not want a sereal domestic abuser in a position of a role model to young girls.\u00a0 Make them send Amber Heard packing. Thanks!</p>", "photo": {"id": "221869136", "petitionMedium": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/0/um/tb/GYumTbFbkystAUH-800x450-noPad.jpg?1553225727", "processing": false}}, "video": null, "embeddedMedia": null}, {"__typename": "MilestonePetitionUpdate", "id": "24323770", "createdAt": "2019-03-21T19:10:30.000Z", "signatureCount": 750}, {"__typename": "MilestonePetitionUpdate", "id": "24321026", "createdAt": "2019-03-21T05:23:51.000Z", "signatureCount": 500}, {"__typename": "MilestonePetitionUpdate", "id": "24318625", "createdAt": "2019-03-20T17:41:29.000Z", "signatureCount": 250}], "pageInfo": {"endCursor": "YXJyYXljb25uZWN0aW9uOjI5OQ==", "hasNextPage": true}}}}}, {"data": {"petition": {"id": "14451136", "slug": "dc-entertainment-remove-amber-heard-from-aquaman-2", "user": {"id": "24448735", "displayName": "Jeanne Larson", "photo": {"id": "221862322", "userSmall": {"url": "//assets.change.org/photos/7/xs/ly/cXXSLydpSVDqIVB-48x48-noPad.jpg?1553098061", "processing": false}}}, "organization": null, "updatesConnection": {"nodes": [{"__typename": "MilestonePetitionUpdate", "id": "24318292", "createdAt": "2019-03-20T16:13:01.000Z", "signatureCount": 200}, {"__typename": "MilestonePetitionUpdate", "id": "24317632", "createdAt": "2019-03-20T13:29:22.000Z", "signatureCount": 100}, {"__typename": "MilestonePetitionUpdate", "id": "24317155", "createdAt": "2019-03-20T11:12:40.000Z", "signatureCount": 50}, {"__typename": "MilestonePetitionUpdate", "id": "24316808", "createdAt": "2019-03-20T08:49:06.000Z", "signatureCount": 25}, {"__typename": "MilestonePetitionUpdate", "id": "24316460", "createdAt": "2019-03-20T06:18:51.000Z", "signatureCount": 10}, {"__typename": "MilestonePetitionUpdate", "id": "24316273", "createdAt": "2019-03-20T04:55:31.000Z", "signatureCount": 5}], "pageInfo": {"endCursor": "YXJyYXljb25uZWN0aW9uOjMwNQ==", "hasNextPage": false}}}}}], "count": 26, "cursors": ["", "YXJyYXljb25uZWN0aW9uOjEx", "YXJyYXljb25uZWN0aW9uOjIz", "YXJyYXljb25uZWN0aW9uOjM1", "YXJyYXljb25uZWN0aW9uOjQ3", "YXJyYXljb25uZWN0aW9uOjU5", "YXJyYXljb25uZWN0aW9uOjcx", "YXJyYXljb25uZWN0aW9uOjgz", "YXJyYXljb25uZWN0aW9uOjk1", "YXJyYXljb25uZWN0aW9uOjEwNw==", "YXJyYXljb25uZWN0aW9uOjExOQ==", "YXJyYXljb25uZWN0aW9uOjEzMQ==", "YXJyYXljb25uZWN0aW9uOjE0Mw==", "YXJyYXljb25uZWN0aW9uOjE1NQ==", "YXJyYXljb25uZWN0aW9uOjE2Nw==", "YXJyYXljb25uZWN0aW9uOjE3OQ==", "YXJyYXljb25uZWN0aW9uOjE5MQ==", "YXJyYXljb25uZWN0aW9uOjIwMw==", "YXJyYXljb25uZWN0aW9uOjIxNQ==", "YXJyYXljb25uZWN0aW9uOjIyNw==", "YXJyYXljb25uZWN0aW9uOjIzOQ==", "YXJyYXljb25uZWN0aW9uOjI1MQ==", "YXJyYXljb25uZWN0aW9uOjI2Mw==", "YXJyYXljb25uZWN0aW9uOjI3NQ==", "YXJyYXljb25uZWN0aW9uOjI4Nw==", "YXJyYXljb25uZWN0aW9uOjI5OQ=="]}