Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Support for ROS2? #160

Open
eugval opened this issue May 3, 2021 · 4 comments
Open

Support for ROS2? #160

eugval opened this issue May 3, 2021 · 4 comments

Comments

@eugval
Copy link

eugval commented May 3, 2021

Hello,

First of all, thank you for all the tools that are provided, these are really helpful!

We would like to migrate our lab's ROS installation to ROS2, and I would appreciate any info on the following:

  1. Is there currently support of ROS2 for the intera packages?
  2. If not, are you planning to migrate the intera_sdk and sawyer_robot repos to ROS2?
  3. What about Noetic, would the intera packages be compatible?
  4. I assume that migrating intera_sdk and sawyer_robot packages to ROS2 is not just a matter of a few simple steps, but if it is could you please give some guidance (or perhaps for migrating to Noetic instead)?

I really appreciate any info you could give me on these.

Many Thanks!

@UtQ67
Copy link
Contributor

UtQ67 commented May 17, 2021

Is there currently support of ROS2 for the intera packages?

No the SDK currently does not support ROS2

What about Noetic, would the intera packages be compatible?

The current master branch is compatible with Noetic, we migrated it recently.

@davidau8195
Copy link

I am curious if there is any roadmap for ROS2 support any time soon.

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Jun 28, 2023

Hi @davidau8195 ,

This will unfortunately take some time. Do not expect any results soon.

Regards,
Matthias

@pac48
Copy link

pac48 commented Sep 29, 2023

One option is to use the ros1_bridge to work around the issue. You may find this Dockerfile to be a useful reference.

# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants