Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Larger Multiline Input Elements #765

Open
samad-yar-khan opened this issue Jul 10, 2022 · 0 comments · May be fixed by #766
Open

Larger Multiline Input Elements #765

samad-yar-khan opened this issue Jul 10, 2022 · 0 comments · May be fixed by #766

Comments

@samad-yar-khan
Copy link

Problem

  • Rocket.Chat Apps developers run into use cases where the need larger input boxes inside a modal.
  • Example : In GitHub Rocket.Chat App we want to fetch code and display it inside a MultilineInput Component, but the input box is to small to read code snippets. Please Go through this Discussion -> (Updating the Multi-Line InputBlock #744)

Available Component

  • The Fuselage UI Kit offers Rocket.Chat App Developers a MultilineInput Element to take user input inside a multiline input box.
  • This component works well with small user inputs but it becomes inconvenient for larger user input cases. Example : 1) Adding a code snippet as input as seen below. 2) Taking Journal Entries as input in a potential RC Journal App
2022-07-11.04-58-13.mp4

Describe the behavior of New Component

  • Adding a new MediumMultilineInput Component and a LargeMultilineInput Component.
  • The Existing MultilineInput Component will be used as a SmallMultilineInputComponent

Insert an image

  • Medium Multiline Input Component

    • Modal
      image

    • Banner
      image

  • Medium Multiline Input Component

    • Modal
      image

    • Banner
      image

@samad-yar-khan samad-yar-khan changed the title New Input Components Larger Multiline Input Elements Jul 10, 2022
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant