You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The model documentation automatically labels scale in the table of parameters as “scale or volume fraction.” This is correct for all shapes. However it makes no sense for shape-independent models where it may have other meaning, most notably I(0), proportional to Mw, for Guinier (IF on absolute scale).
But every model will be different and how to interpret scale should be left to documentation.
SUGGESTIONS:
when creating the documentation scrape for model category and edit the entry based on that: If a shape, behave as now, if model independent leave to the author edited documentation to interpret the meaning of scale and do not add "or volume fraction."
Alternatively just remove vol fraction and make that something that each model needs to state separately.
NOTE: Identified during use in the NIST CNR summer school
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
ifinfo.categoryandnotinfo.category.startswith("shape:"):
info.parameters["scale"].description="Scale factor"# Note: this updates both info.base and info.parameters since they share the same underlying# object (up until core.reparameterize() makes a modified copy in info.parameters).
You could instead make a generic string that applies to all models by changing this line:
The model documentation automatically labels scale in the table of parameters as “scale or volume fraction.” This is correct for all shapes. However it makes no sense for shape-independent models where it may have other meaning, most notably I(0), proportional to Mw, for Guinier (IF on absolute scale).
But every model will be different and how to interpret scale should be left to documentation.
SUGGESTIONS:
NOTE: Identified during use in the NIST CNR summer school
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: