starts with condition bug

[ghost]

Description

the more ors you have in starts with condition, the smaller chance for the condition to return true, even if the condition is definitely met

Steps to Reproduce

command /teststarts:
	trigger:
		if "1" starts with "1" or "2" or "3" or "4" or "5" or "6" or "7" or "8" or "9":
			send "true"
		else:
			send "false"

Expected Behavior

expected to always be true

Errors / Screenshots

None

Server Information

• Server version/platform: 1.12.2 Paper
• Skript version: 2.5beta2

Additional Context

[ShaneBeee]

According to the docs, this doesn't even support or

as You can see, it says "text" not "texts"

[jaylawl]

command /teststarts:
	trigger:
                if ("1", "2", "3", "4", "5", "6", "7", "8", "9") contains "1":
			send "true"
		else:
			send "false"

[Moderocky]

What’s happening is - because the contains check only accepts a single text - it is first resolving the (A or B or C) part, so there is only a 1/n chance that it is the matching “1” - perhaps it would be better to put this as a feature request?

Something like if %thing% contains (all|any) of %strings%

(This might need to be adapted, since contains can be for list contains, string contains, etc.)

[FranKusmiruk]

What’s happening is - because the contains check only accepts a single text - it is first resolving the (A or B or C) part, so there is only a 1/n chance that it is the matching “1” - perhaps it would be better to put this as a feature request?

Something like if %thing% contains (all|any) of %strings%

(This might need to be adapted, since contains can be for list contains, string contains, etc.)

The contains condition already supports this for strings, there's the (any|all|none) of %texts% contains %texts% pattern. Anyways, marking this one as a bug since the starts with condition should ideally support or lists properly or in general, we may as well add a warning when a user tries to use an or list on a condition that doesn't support them such as this case.