Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Allow for alternative paradigm layouts/sizes, e.g. "Algonquian" #854

Open
aarppe opened this issue Jun 11, 2021 · 1 comment
Open

Allow for alternative paradigm layouts/sizes, e.g. "Algonquian" #854

aarppe opened this issue Jun 11, 2021 · 1 comment
Labels
aew-request Request from Arok E. Wolvengrey feature Improvement Expansion or improvement of a current functionality that does already work and meets previous specs

Comments

@aarppe
Copy link
Contributor

aarppe commented Jun 11, 2021

For certain user groups, an alternative paradigm layout/size might be desirable, which cannot be reduced to the regular layouts/sizes due to row/column/cell ordering. An example of this is the Algonquianist tradition, where all ni- forms are shown together, as is the case for ki- or 0/o- forms, as well a grouping direct vs. inverse forms together in verb paradigms.

@aarppe aarppe added the feature label Jun 11, 2021
@aarppe aarppe added the Improvement Expansion or improvement of a current functionality that does already work and meets previous specs label Jun 11, 2021
@eddieantonio
Copy link
Member

See #567. I think they want paradigms ordered in the Algonquinist tradition.

Blocked by #822

@nienna73 nienna73 changed the title Allow for alternative paradigm layouts/sizes, e.g. "linguistic" Allow for alternative paradigm layouts/sizes, e.g. "Algonquian" May 11, 2022
@aarppe aarppe added the aew-request Request from Arok E. Wolvengrey label May 20, 2024
@fbanados fbanados moved this to To do in Third release Aug 2, 2024
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
aew-request Request from Arok E. Wolvengrey feature Improvement Expansion or improvement of a current functionality that does already work and meets previous specs
Projects
Status: To do
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants