Sharing Glossaries
#11728
Replies: 1 comment
-
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
# for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
# to comment
-
I am lucky to be administering several related projects, and one thing I love is to share glossaries between the projects.
In the Internet Privacy space we have generated a lot of new terminology, some by the Tor Project, some external.
So as I administer other projects like OnionShare, I can share our glossaries between projects.
This is great!
Proposal 1: Do not show external glossary terms if there is an entry on the project
One challenge we face, tho, is that we have a lot of duplicated definitions. I am interested on how OnionShare defines their own terminology, but if I already have an entry for, lets say, 'tor relays', on our glossary.... I don't need to know what they say on theirs.
It would be better if external entries are only shown when they are not present on the local glossary.
Proposal 2: Allow to share glossaries without requiring admin access
I would like more projects to use our glossary, but I dont want to give admin permissions to random people on the Internet.
Is there another way to allow the use of our glossary?
I want to have the glossary of F-droid in Tor Project, in case we mention apps they distribute. But I dont date to ask admin access just for that.
Proposal 3: Discourage the translation of the Glossary explanation, or maybe do not show the English explanation if there is text on the language.
When translators translate the explanation of a term, the glossary interface gets cluttered with the versions in english/local language of all the strings. i dont need to see both, is ok with only my language.
I can easily see the English if I really need to.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions