You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We can use the same approach we're currently using for deriving Gibbs samplers to instead identify and use proximal envelopes for many non-standard and discrete prior and observed distributions (see here for an overview of the idea).
We can start by deriving the basic proximal gradient routine for models (see here) and expand to other approaches and distributions later (e.g. splitting approaches, divide and concur, proximal Langevin for posterior sampling, etc.)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
We can use the same approach we're currently using for deriving Gibbs samplers to instead identify and use proximal envelopes for many non-standard and discrete prior and observed distributions (see here for an overview of the idea).
We can start by deriving the basic proximal gradient routine for models (see here) and expand to other approaches and distributions later (e.g. splitting approaches, divide and concur, proximal Langevin for posterior sampling, etc.)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: