Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? # to your account

Update pytest-sugar to 0.8.0 #10

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 28, 2016

Conversation

pyup-bot
Copy link
Contributor

There's a new version of pytest-sugar available.
You are currently using 0.7.1. I have updated it to 0.8.0

These links might come in handy: PyPI | Changelog | Homepage

Changelog

0.8.0

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

  • Release as an universal wheel
  • Pytest3 compatibility
  • Treat setup/teardown failures as errors
  • Fix path issue in --new-summary
  • Disable sugar output when not in terminal, should help with testing other pytest plugins
  • Add double colons when in verbose mode
  • Make --new-summary default, replaced flag with --old-summary

Got merge conflicts? Close this PR and delete the branch. I'll create a new PR for you.

Happy merging! 🤖

@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Dec 28, 2016

Current coverage is 93.33% (diff: 100%)

Merging #10 into master will not change coverage

@@             master        #10   diff @@
==========================================
  Files             3          3          
  Lines           225        225          
  Methods           0          0          
  Messages          0          0          
  Branches         31         31          
==========================================
  Hits            210        210          
  Misses            8          8          
  Partials          7          7          

Powered by Codecov. Last update 5e693ee...d6c493c

@jettify jettify merged commit eb701d3 into master Dec 28, 2016
@jettify jettify deleted the pyup-update-pytest-sugar-0.7.1-to-0.8.0 branch December 28, 2016 22:09
# for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? # to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants