You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Dear shriveling_world team and friends,
I find the time-space compression maps really intriguing, but one thing I always asked myself is: why are all cone-tops (i.e. 'entry points' to the discontinuous transport system) at the same height? Aren't some points/cities more important than others? If a peak in the "spiky world" stands for highest accessibility, wouldn't it be possible (and desirable) to combine the shriveling-world layout with, say, a gravitational accessibility model, in the sense that the 'mass' of a region (e.g. population) also determines the height of a cone?
Best regards,
Fabian Wenner
Dear shriveling_world team and friends,
I find the time-space compression maps really intriguing, but one thing I always asked myself is: why are all cone-tops (i.e. 'entry points' to the discontinuous transport system) at the same height? Aren't some points/cities more important than others? If a peak in the "spiky world" stands for highest accessibility, wouldn't it be possible (and desirable) to combine the shriveling-world layout with, say, a gravitational accessibility model, in the sense that the 'mass' of a region (e.g. population) also determines the height of a cone?
Best regards,
Fabian Wenner
Originally posted by @fwenner in #152 (comment)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: