You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I wanted to be able to discover if a slave was available on the bus by using a ping. Basically a ping will only send the address, and then the stop condition. The missed_ack signal is used to determine the presence of the slave.
I made the following addition to i2c_master.v to add a s_axis_cmd_ping input signal that can cause STATE_ADDRESS_2 to transition to STATE_STOP, rather than read or write a byte.
I would like to upstream the change. Should I make a pull request? Is this a "fitting" way to add ping support to this module? Should the pull add support for ping in i2c_master_axil.v i2c_master_wbs_16.v i2c_master_wbs_8.v?
I wanted to be able to discover if a slave was available on the bus by using a ping. Basically a ping will only send the address, and then the stop condition. The missed_ack signal is used to determine the presence of the slave.
I made the following addition to i2c_master.v to add a
s_axis_cmd_ping
input signal that can cause STATE_ADDRESS_2 to transition to STATE_STOP, rather than read or write a byte.I would like to upstream the change. Should I make a pull request? Is this a "fitting" way to add ping support to this module? Should the pull add support for ping in
i2c_master_axil.v i2c_master_wbs_16.v i2c_master_wbs_8.v
?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: